Hear Buzz Aldrin tell the story of the first Moon landing 

agree.

That and the fact that nobody left LEO in almost half a century. Next step after the Moon was supposed to be Mars. Seems seeing the Mars landing is what keeps Buzz Aldrin alive. He's one of the main advocate of it. I really wish he'll be around when it eventually happens.

@@Eselfar Hopefully, he is gonna be 100 in under a decade

All he says are lies...prove me wrong

@@Fargosportsmassage prove he’s not

You know , he's an ex-fighter pilot , he's in really good shape

To look more younger you need to go to the moon

@@stefanpetca5265 Which he did

Old enough to lie.

Adrenochrome

Sorry to burst your bubble Anthony, we never sent men to the moon! It was all stage here on Earth in a studio! Ask Stanley Kubrick!

@@Powerful1776​​⁠ Prove it. You still have yet to present a single shred of actual evidence to substantiate your “fake Moon landings” claim. Repeating a lie over and over doesn’t make it true. It makes you look pathetic. 😊 Do better, learn.

​​@@Powerful1776 toidi (read it backwards)

Even if they did go to the moon which I highly doubt what exactly would this have done for mankind? Absolutely f all other than squandering taxpayers money.

@@michaelwalsh9145 Many technologies in the private sector were developed by Apollo. Also, what’s wrong with exploration for the sake of exploration? At some point, humans will have to be a multi-planetary species. Gotta start somewhere. Lastly, NASA landed humans on the Moon. Fallacious logic isn’t evidence. Try again? Do better, learn.;

That's weird because we never been to the moon and neither did buzz

the only time in my life i was ever “starstruck” was meeting Mike Collins in a small country store in a fishing town at 5am. I was 14 and he was wearing his flight jacket with his name on it. We were in line and all i could say was Youre Mike Collins, he laughed and said yeah i am. I was speechless i think he thought it was amusing.

Yep Hard Line.

They never could explain that , never will they try

I think (with my really meager brain) that technology was so much more advanced in the 60's then today or ever. Yet, a noted scientist said that THAT technology is now obsolete, so I guess that means we're going backwards. Oh, hey, does that mean we don't have a lander on Mars? It's a nice thought, but I guess we're out of ideas on how to make things happen. I challenge them to give us the coordinates of where those landers are located on the Moon, we'd be looking at a lot of nothing.

@@AmericanPatriot-1776 , I can only assume that you're joking, since the coordinates are readily available and the descent stages have been photographed by unmanned lunar spacecraft several times. You should note that some of this was done by the Russians and Chinese, who would have everything to gain if they could say nothing was there. It takes a special kind of mental deficiency to believe Apollo didn't happen, your parents should have kept you away from those lead paint chips...

@@AmericanPatriot-1776 All the coordinates for the landing sites are listed on the internet. Not even hard to find. Don't be so stupid.

Did he tell you why there is no video of a Geiger counter in space.

his wife Lois passed away a few years ago, and Buzz has .. remarried on his 93rd birthday xD

@@maciejguzek3442 Yes, I am very aware of the current status of his life today and the passing of his ex-wife.

What an honor for you!

Did he tell you it was bullshit and everyone ate it up ?

What? Starring in Kubrick's movie?

@@saturndirect8085 Incorrect. But for the sake of entertainment, why don’t you present your history-changing, substantial evidence supported by sound logic and/or reputable sources that both refuted the mountains of evidence we have to prove we landed men on the Moon as well as every single credible scientist and expert in every field related to space travel in the entire world. Do better, learn.

@@DemonDrummer Mountains of evidence? LOL even 5 year old see that all footage is studio recorded. Buzz Aldrin didn't mention; They weren't there? It is on tape -''We didn't go there"" he said.

@@saturndirect8085 1) It’s always telling when you cultists can’t produce your own evidence to support your claims and instead commit a desperate burden of proof fallacy to try and weasel your way out of it. 2) Gaslighting while _still_ not providing a single shred of evidence only makes you look pathetic and desperate. 3) Isn’t it funny how you cultists both believe what Aldrin says and don’t believe what Aldrin said depending on if it fits your narrative (lies)? What was his next few sentences? Go ahead, I’ll wait. 4) I’ll happily leave some evidence that proves NASA landed men on the Moon in a spectate comment for you to, likely, not address with evidence of your own. Do better, learn.

@@saturndirect8085 Proof we landed men on the Moon: 1. There are over 8,000 photos available to the public of the moon landing missions. 2. There are thousands of hours of video too. 3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material that has been studied and verified by astronomers and geologists all over the world and showed chemical signs of being on the moon. 4. The LRRR data laser retroreflector arrays left by Apollo 11, and other subsequent Apollo missions, can still be interacted with today by using powerful enough lasers here on Earth. 5. The SELENE photos which show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions. 6. The Chang'e 2 photos, which show the lander base and the flags. 7. Chandrayaan-2, which managed to photograph another Apollo lander base. 8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits. 9. Pic du Midi Observatory, which watched Apollo missions all the way to the moon. 10. The Lick Observatory observations during the return coast to Earth produced live television pictures broadcast to United States west coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco 11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messages FROM the lunar vehicles and not to them, cause the earth was between him and Huston. Also, backyard amateurs all around the world were able to tune in on the Apollo audio (not the video, that would have taken bigger hardware, but, the audio was easy) by pointing their Yagi and/or dishes at the moon. Hundreds (or maybe thousands?) of people in many countries did exactly that. 12. The Soviet Union, who monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, who's leader Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered", describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing. 13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to be kept silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud. 14. In October-November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon surface by all Apollo landing missions excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and the transmitter power outputs (20 W were in agreement with the NASA reports). 15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as the German Aerospace Center, Berlin, are not located in the US, and are not funded by the US government. 16. After the images shown here were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher resolution camera work. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at higher resolution. Comparison of the original 16 mm 17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site show an almost exact match of the rover tracks. 18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts on all Apollo landing sites. The exception is that of Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being blown over by the lander's rocket exhaust on leaving the Moon. 19. Spain and Australia were 2/3rds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the moon. 20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world (including from enemies) used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. You can find more info about this on MIT's site. The tracking was accurate to within 1 mile. 21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time, and used it to photograph the SIVB fuel dumps around the moon (which spanned out for miles, thus were visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (same dynamic). 22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit. 23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent clear down to the lunar surface by monitoring the doppler shift in its telemetry signal. Do better, learn.

Don’t flatter yourself.

Imagine actually having evidence to substantiate your claim that it was a hoax.

Imagine some species on another planet, a bit more evolved than we are, looking at us and having a good laugh - to them, that would be a daily commute.

this is a fake holographic fake reality realm we is in its not a planet firmament dome our beautiful Heavenly Father Almighty The Most High put over us fake moon fake sun now to deceive the humans!!!

Let him prove he went to the moon. I went to the moon. On my wedding day. It's made out of honey not cheese as they say. Honeymoon. 😂🤣

Buzz Aldrin buzzzzz 🐝 off. Go write your books that no one will read. You really survived the harshness of space. The radiation and exposure of the van Allen belts. The shearing radiation of the sun. And unprotected atmosphere of the suns radiation. And the xtremse coldness of space on the darkness of space to freeze your life supports back pack. My grandmother made me green jello jelotin that looks like an alien.🤢😱👽

Randy Grenier That's because he never left Earth...

So far, we're the only intelligent, sensing life in the known, vast universe. Here in 2023, it is interesting to hear the cosmologists offering that perhaps we are alone, that the universe is infinite, and there was no Big Bang - just forever. If there was a Big Bang, why? How did we go from nothing to something instantaneously? At inception the entire mass of the universe was supposedly packed into space the size of an atom. Pretty impressive, if true.

@G.Gorrell wooshed

But those people don't matter. They and their opinions have no value to our species and our future. They will fade out and be forgotten

Actually the fake Apollo 8 was riskier than the fake Apollo 11 in many ways. That was the time they claimed to take 3 men in untested craft through the VAB and back, and spending time with their newly irradiated craft and crew to orbit the moon - un-credible LOL.

I believe it’s fake

@@_Gnome. 😂😂👌👌

We can with Artemis! ❤

They create new scams every year

The good old days when there were more patriots than America haters! I watched the landing I think it was over about three or four A.M. than I went to work. I am thankful to this day that I stayed up and watched it.

@@gar9429 Thank you thank you. The motivation behind denying the Moon landing is indeed hatred, for America

I remember them. There deaths were completely unnecessary. Grissom should have bailed from NASA when Scott Carpenter did.

Of course i remember Grissom , Chaffee and White ,their death was tragic but finally it made the landing possible- after the investigation some misconstructions were found and changes were made . This tragic fire changed everything

I remember them.

Gus Grissom was murdered. The other 2 Astronauts were just collateral damage. The CIA assassinated JFK as well

Ed White was one of Buzz's good friends and is actually the one who encouraged Buzz to join NASA. when Buzz went back to Space after theat horrific accident, he carried a medallion to commemorate Ed's role in Space and in his life.

Only half right

🧡💛💚💙 To anyone watching and wondering why there's a huge amount of Dislikes on this video --> It's widely known and accepted in society that NASA Astronauts are frauds and told to lie to the public about UFO sightings and all air craft in space. They are part of the deep black budget SAP from the industrial military complex. Buzz Aldrin's status will remain that of a cockroach unless he tells the public about the truth that he knows

@@sommi888 see guys, this is a symptom of a smooth brain

@@calebgangte1228 yup...YOU are gullible for believing this bs

@@PhantomOfThePsy-Opera you should know that they were competing with Russia, and they would do anything to prove it wrong. There were 400,000 people working at Nasa at the time. You would need to convince even the janitor/s to put up with the "lie". There are over 13 space organizations in the world with many people working there in each organization. If you still can't believe these, study the math. Try to prove how it's impossible.

space is fake bro, dont let the elties decieve you, you cant land on moon, its made of plasma

​@@elsa9026Yawn. Another grade school dropout heard from.

@@marksprague1280 space is fake , that dude is buzz aldrin is a freemason

@@marksprague1280 in leavve the world behind it says obey nasa on someones shirt, wake up, i wont obey nasa

⁠@@elsa9026 *_Please_* tell me this is some kind of weird bit… 😅

Both never happened

Pretty sure those dudes landed at the same time. Neil was the first to set foot (or boot) on the moon. Buzz took communion.

@@TexMex421 controlled opp

He was not the first man to land on the moon.His camera guy was.He had to set up the camera to show the moon landing of the first man touching the moons surface,,Yeh I reallly believe the moon landing..not

@@elainebenis2230 Exactly! no video camera works unless a person is holding it. The camera feels lonely. Every selfie stick actually has a little human at the end. If you have a back-up camera in your car, there is a guy living in the trunk. It's unpossible without a guy!

Buzz drank heavily after the reported "moon landing." He knew firsthand it all was one big Giant Lie.

3 billion times and it's just as much of a lie today as it was in 1969.

Yes, it’s a lie. They have a bunch of propulsion jets on the sides of the LEM for maneuvering. You need air or media for those jets to push through, and there’s none on the moon.

@@whitestratman3158 Hey fellow flat earther

@@whitestratman3158 do you actually think anyone can put that much emotion and come across as genuine as that when telling a fake story? You really think he could come up with all those very specific details? Look at his body language, just the enthusiasm with which he describes the experience... that at 90 years old... seems like you are so heavily invested in denying this that you can't use your brain anymore.

Did your family members have astronomy classes at school?!

That is hilarious - you make that up or read that somewhere?

@@dj3114 sounds like he heard it from Michael Collins 🤷

@@BlurryZurry Just doesn't seem like something someone as straight forward as Micheal Collins would have actually said. If he did - incredible. My point is whether he did an interview where he actually said that.

@@dj3114 ooooooh ok I see.

And you believe he really said that

Hmm

Yeaaaaah hmmmmm grazy lies

X

Never happened, enclosed and stationary earth

@@federalinvestigation9962 tapped.

@анна орлова yes there are lol are you alright?

I believe they are up there

In other words, were being played all the time. Fake.

Logic

@Bret 1959 Logic has never satisfied a fools.

A 😀great actor.

Newsflash people, we did not land on the moon. First think of the radiation up there. The 200% temperature variation a 24 hour period. Chief NASA wing ding Werner Von Braun said it would be impossible to send anyone to the moon because of the sheer size of the craft needed to do the trip. Also consider the recent announcement from NASA that it would take scientists 15 years from now to design and build a craft to to back to the moon. Why, when we have supposedly been there six times before. Yet the dumb down masses still believe we went. People will believe anything if you tell it to them over and over and over again.

@@waynejohanson1083 Did you ever consider a visit to Cleveland? I hear they have a great mental illness center there to take care of your problem. Good luck.

He is used to punching people in public I gather

Autograph from an actor

I had a small part to play in that momentous event way back in 1969. I was 24 at the time and part of a team of contract electricians at the Honeysuckle Relay station and the nearby deep space tracking station at Tidbinbilla. near Canberra in Australia (ACT), when the first signals came through. The Parkes Radio Dish in NSW was also involved in the relaying work. Even though I was not one of the NASA personnel who were there as radio technicians, I was still part of the event. Our job was to make sure the electrical gird was secure. It was a most memorial day. Yes, I was one of the 400.000 people world wide who were involved,directly and indirectly in the mission to send man out to the Moon and to walk on the Lunar surface. and to get them back safely. We all had our part to play, even though my job was not quite the prestigious work the NASA personnel had. In a very small way, I was part of that history.

Why haven't we been back to the moon in 50 years?

@@MRkriegs Go read up on that subject in an honest way. Do an honest search on the internet for the answer to your question. Type in say, *Why did NASA cancelled the Apollo's 18 19 and 20* A whole lot of information will be at your disposal. Get educated. Try to do better.

@@apolloskyfacer5842 try and do better? I cant ask that question on RU-vid? Is that out or bounds? I'm confused asking honest questions I dont know.

@@MRkriegs Once again. Go read up on that subject in an honest way. Do an honest search on the internet for the answer to your question. Type in say, *Why did NASA cancelled the Apollo's 18 19 and 20* A whole lot of information will be at your disposal. Get educated. Try to do better than coming here asking the tiresome repetitive question that many have asked and has been answered on these forums ad nauseam.

Indeed!!.. What a humble human being......

@@NotoriousGotGame Do you get paid to make such ignorant comments, Batsy, or do you just do it for sh*ts and giggles? Collins was assigned to fly the command module, while Armstrong and Aldrin were assigned to take the lunar module down to the surface.

@@charlied5953 Haha. Seems you made Batsy Productions throw in the towel :)

How come I've only just learnt about this now? History did not treat this man right.

Did you hear his last words before his death? Makes you wonder

Nope. That was a camera mounted on one of the legs of the Lunar Lander. Neil Armstrong activated it before he descended the latter. Best you read up on the topic and get knowledgeable about it.

The film they supposedly used (Kodak Ektachrome 160 film) with a *extra thin estar base* (to get more exposures on a roll) would have NEVER made it to the moon and back with all the radiation and heat (250 degrees Fahrenheit on the moon). It would turn completely black and into toast. Quote from an article in the American Cinematographer: *"All films used were fabricated on Kodak’s Estar thin base, which has a 2½-mil film thickness, as compared to the standard 5-to-7 mil thickness.This reduced thickness allows up to 33 percent more film to be carried on weight and bulk-critical to space missions."* There is absolutely no evidence or picture of a protective housing used with the Hasselblad 6x6 camera. Even Gunnar the Swedish technician who built it for Apollo 11 said during an interview that he never made one, never seen one and never heard that the astronots used one. :) and the great picture of Buzz Aldrin holding the camera unprotected on the moon proves it. The picture of Buzz holding the unprotected camera is too perfect. The light is coming three quarters back from the right and he is filled from the front with a soft source, probably a bounce board. Since there is no additional light from a blue sky and atmosphere the shadow side can not be that bright with an aperture setting of F-8.0 to F-16. Also the ground gets darker towards the horizon which is completely unnatural in bright sunlight and it seems that it was done intentionally for better contrast. Plus the horizon is way too close to camera (point of view), no more then 300 feet instead of 1.5 miles how it should be.

@@oratkotsi6794 .

@@oratkotsi6794 Wow Mr Kotsi. You've put a whole lot of time and effort to put all this nonsensical diatribe together. I don't know if I should be impress or amused. Or maybe both. Sadly for you, Modern History is what it is. NOT what you think or wish it to be. And the SIX Apollo Moon Landing Missions are a series of astonishing events in that history. Best you get used to the Reality of it all instead of typing out a whole lot of pretentious nincompoopery of pseudo-knowledge

@@apolloskyfacer5842 says the senile troll. LOL

Bot

Bringing the USA together would be a great start.

@@ArKritz84 Yes, Despite the Vietnam war, America was respected and citizens had a quality of life during Apollo. It's true that while America is falling apart with other nations pointing nuclear weapons at it, how could they think about sending astronauts to the moon, especially spending the money for it when Americans are homeless in droves the economy is so bad and basic needs financially inaccessible.

The only thing abandoned was the studios where the hoax was filmed when Kubrick shouted ‘that’s a wrap’

@@atmakali9599 You're a maroon

Not really abandon more like problems to continue the project

Actually you are the fool!

@@OGKenG why they be red

They didn't go then, or Bush's 1989, or 2005-9 and they are not going in 2024 either. The VAB is still the *radiation* barrier it always was. Study Project Orion's EFT-1 to see how a real team probes the VAB (clue it's not like Apollo 8 just merrily going through with 3 people and a few laps round the moon).

@@skyfacer9626 jesus christ dude you killed him

I think the remaining moon landers would collectively say "Congratulations Space X, you duplicated what we did in '69 - '74 with 2020 money and technology". Its seems like we're just repeating something with newer equipment, for a younger generation for the sake of doing it. Maybe we'll even have a new Shuttle in about 20 -30 years too. Has anyone else noticed the lack of legacy Astronaut presence in regards to anything Space X / (NASA?) is doing, instead we have all fresh faces talking about Space X , and representing the US Space Program, as if its a college capstone project needed to graduate. I found the recent manned launch fascinating from a generational viewpoint more than anything. There's just something missing in the current laid back Space X version of the US Space Program; maturity, authenticity and decorum would be three places to start..

@Poklando Totally true....at least we made the Moon on time..... thanks Apollo

They can't go to the moon. The sophisticated technology that existed in the 60s is no longer available.

You didn’t watch that you Chinese bot I bet you think his hair is real

What a time to be alive. Its a shame I didnt get to experience it too. My dad was born almost exactly 1 year after the landing. But thanks to mr. Musk and SpaceX, Im sure there are lots of interesting events coming.

@@Scientists_dont_lie you mean the Moon landing? Its really a shame that some ppl have to keep repeating that one of mankinds greatest achievements is fake

@@michal_king478 Because it is and anyone with half a brain would know that by now.

Sunny Stephen Wrong! The evidence is overwhelming that they landed on the moon. So did the Soviets, but not with men on board.

@@nikiwiki2006 Right and it happens only every 50 years and they taped over all the original footage and they destroyed the technology and it is a painful process to build it back up again according to Don Petit from NASA. Use your brain or stay insane. Your choice.

Buzz on the Moon is bling on your finger?

@@4orsesheron997 lying to the world that the Earth is a pretty cartoon ball pays a lot of money

Those are cult/masonic rings that he has to wear.

Dang respect

@Will Mason so does your brain. And your wife.

Ya kuddos to the makers of moon landing

Yeah...in a studio lol

@@johnsmith-lb4mo what else ? earth is flat and vaccines have chips ? 🤡

@@johnsmith-lb4mo Yes, but they found out that it was to difficult to make in a studio, so they filmed it on location. Much easier.

I might not say anything. We still haven't figured out how to keep from aging and dying. When we can do that and travel at the speed of light, I'll probably change my mind on that lol.

Ikr 🤣

True.

Welcome to the fray. 😂

On the bright side, it provides a target rich environment for those who love to ridicule fools. 😁

I simply say: it must be fascinating to be mentally ill. I'd try to be a little more compassionate, but they're infuriating.

It's funny because people don't seem to realise that every single stage of this mission was practised over and over again and it was their _job_ to record every tiny detail, there'd be no point spending vast amounts of money to send someone to the Moon and then when they return their entire report was 'It was ok' like some evasive teenager....

It doesn’t sound like someone who actually went to the moon! Where are the stars? You could look at their faces and see something wasn’t right. They were quiet because they didn’t go to the moon.

@@susanc886 EXACTLY!

@@susanc886 They were on the Moon during the day on the Moon. How many stars do _you_ see during the day? Also, assume much?

@@DeadEyeJedi Without an atmosphere? Just look away from the sun and you’ll see them

Yes. Stanley Kubrick the producer of the film 2001 Odyssey, insisted that all SIX Apollo Moon Landings be filmed on location. out there on the Lunar surface. He was aiming for realism. I'm often wondered why those films looked so realistic.

@@apolloskyfacer5842 That's because your sense of reality has been warped by many years of being lied to. Did you know that ALL of the original footage was lost by NASA? Mankind's greatest achievement and they lost the film of it. No wonder they still don't have the technology to 'go back'. Nothing to see, here. Literally nothing, as they also lost the blueprints. Yeah... sure ya did! 🙄

@@apolloskyfacer5842 If Kubrick had really filmed them, then they would have been much better.

Not sure which was better. Instead of faking something to the world, you get to see real action for fake reasons the government tells you. No disrespect to you though.

@@politicalfoolishness7491 What?

@@DemonDrummer I'm sorry but this is above your education grade. I was speaking with Keith since you missed that.

@@politicalfoolishness7491 So asking a clarifying question leads you to believe my education level is insufficient? I’m sure the fact you responded with fallacious gaslighting isn’t indicative of your character. How about you simply expand on your assertion, or is that above _your_ education level? Also, this is a public forum, little one. I can respond to whomever I want. Do better, learn.

@@DemonDrummer OK then - since you barged in on a conversation initiation that wasn't directed at you and you seem oblivious to that - your education seems to not be adequate for that sensitivity. Are you just a paid troll looking to engage random people and get 50 cents per response? Assuming for a moment that you aren't, if you'd watch some evidence that has been shown over the last few decades and be honest with yourself, you wouldn't be so cocky. But I'm not interested in lining your pockets with a back and forth of stuff both of us have seen but you won't explain.

Yeah and I saw Jurassic Park on TV to doesn't mean that dinosaurs exist

Bullshit

I think a lot of people will ask why didn't the astronauts throw a rock at a 45-degree angle to see how far it would have travelled?

@@michaellyne8773, maybe they should have done that! But there was no minute of time for some games!

@@Billpeterson4785 , I don´t understand your words!

@@rockwellrhodes7703, ok he will do

30,000 Up Votes 😎Big Fat Zero Down votes. 😎

@@apolloskyfacer5842 We will never know some things but this is a factually fictional.

@@Barneyjo If you say so Mr CJ

Here ya go, this will help. 😊 *False Equivalence Fallacy:* a logical fallacy that occurs when someone incorrectly asserts that two or more things are equivalent, simply because they share some characteristics, despite the fact that there are also notable between them. For example, a false equivalence is saying that cats and dogs are the same animal, since they’re both mammals and have a tail. Do better, learn.

You are obviously clueless about radio propagation. Go find a ham radio operator, and he'll explain to you why your cell phone has trouble in the mountains and signals from a satellite (or the moon) usually don't.

Why is it that these people are able to harness the power of the internet solely to share their own staggering ignorance and stupidity?

Tell the truth. It never dies. Like the Sun. I guess they will say they visited there too😂

@@St63420 You: *_”Tell the truth.”_* When are you going to start doing that? Do better, learn.

and a big sincerely LIAR MAN.

He's a total fraud 🤣🤣🤣🤣

@@ddeanw.3237 cringe

He did indeed.

He lived faking history

It was guys like him that make America exceptional.

You need a reality check. He may have worked on the guidance. Does not mean he went to the moon. We saw it go up that was it. The rest lies fabrication Hollywood affects. It was a military secret. The evidance in front of your nose.

@Michael N and tens of thousands of people have kept the secret for over 50 years, right.🤣😅

So would NASA. Too bad they can't lol

@@yoitsdarththey went back 5 times and are planning a manned mission right now

@@brown22sugar25 if you say so

He didn’t go the supposed 1st time 😂

⁠we’ve since put satellites in space. “Plans” to go back soon have been claimed for 50+ years now

*historic

⁠ ‘We accidentally recorded over the original videos and photos, and we destroyed all the technology, so that’s why we haven’t been back to the moon’ - NASA The ‘moon rocks’ given to Netherlands by Neil Armstrong himself, were investigated and turned out to be petrified wood Not only that, they went 6 times, played golf and drove the buggy around and done flips. But erm… we don’t know how to go back 80 years later with much improved tech etc. If you believe that 🤣, then 3:02 you have Stockholm syndrome. 😂🤣🤣🤣😂😅😂🤣😅😂🤣

@@altingashi3927 "The ‘moon rocks’ given to Netherlands by Neil Armstrong himself, were investigated and turned out to be petrified wood " False. That "rock" was not given by Armstrong, nor any astronaut. "Not only that, they went 6 times, played golf and drove the buggy around and done flips." Nobody did flips, and as for "playing golf," Alan Shepard used an improvised iron to hit 2 whole shots at the end of that EVA. It wasn't part of the mission, just something he did. If you think that's a big deal, you have incredibly low standards. "But erm… we don’t know how to go back 80 years later with much improved tech etc." Yet again, deniers can't do simple math. The last mission was in December 1972 - that's less than 52 years ago. 80 years ago the only thing heading toward space were V2 rockets. And the only people claiming that we don't know how to go back are you deniers - that's not coming from NASA.

​@@altingashi3927 Emoji galore. Clown.

@@skyfacer9626 And why don't you rather boldly keep facing the sky; your everyday free meal (eagle dung, perhaps?) might escape you if you don't ...

@@skyfacer9626 I wouldn't know, ask your husband, he knows you better, and hopefully he's right there with, khm, in you. Silly me, you'd have to have brain to produce a brain fart, so probably psychiatric nurse that cares for you (J. D. Schultz, Sr.) produced it.

@@skyfacer9626 Now, now, don't be too harsh on yourself, especially in front of your mirror -- if it breaks, it takes 7 years from your dirty little life. Silly me, just go ahead and scream to all your mirrors ...

@@skyfacer9626 If you're unable to hold an argumented discussion, could you please just shut up. And just FYI, a great many people in Russia, including space scientists and engineeres, are now positive that we we deceived by US and USSR governments concerning the "Moon landings".

what a beautiful memory too

What a time to be deceived by a lie.

@@ExtraEcclesiamNullaSalus I was a systems designer for 30 years and we had a term for you. ID10t

@@jaberwoky_ idiots are the people who believe in whatever NASA and the U.S. military says like it's a religion.

You were to buzzed out boy. The military has secrets they wont tell the public. Worlds biggest scam of the century. You watch to much star trek.

Yes it was just a game played on the TV! It was all a staged production on TV! We never went to the moon!

@@Powerful1776Buzz Aldrin would like your bank account number.

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 A fantasy great story

@@davidGPS95 Except you can’t prove that, can you? Remember, when asked to do so in the other thread, you ran away like a scared child. 🙃 But I’ll give you another chance. 🤗 Feel free to present your history-changing, substantial evidence supported by sound logic and/or reputable sources that refutes the mountains of evidence we have to prove NASA landed men on the Moon. Go ahead, I’ll wait. I’m willing to bet you’ll either cowardly disappear, desperately deflect, or fallaciously argue. Lets see… Do better, learn.

Goosebumps for what a made believe story no human can leave earth why do you think they dont do anymore they know we'll catch dem liying to us

@@eduardosoto7650 1) Learn how to use punctuation. 2) Feel free to present your history-changing, substantial evidence supported by sound logic and/or reputable sources that refutes the mountains of evidence we have to prove NASA landed men on the Moon. Go ahead, I’ll wait. I’m willing to bet you’ll either cowardly disappear, desperately deflect, or fallaciously argue. Lets see… Do better, learn.

Hmmm, and if he didn’t?

He "thinks" he landed on the moon.

@@kirbyjustine1 Intense Psy-op here on Earth and Possibly Dementia

ITS A BIG LIE.

LIES

No. Nor would it matter if he had, or did. Because personal testimony isn’t actually a reliable form of evidence.

Now these conspiracy theorists aren't even showing one bit of "proof", just straight up saying "uhh to me he looks like he's lying so it's fake"

Where’s your proof that he’s telling the truth.

Proof? Please explain why space x starship would require several trips made to create a refueling depot to be able to make it to Moon and back, yet they accomplished this on an amount of fuel that is literally impossible. Oh, run some calculations on the particle density of the van Allen radiation belts. Don't use NASA info. When you run the calculations properly the radiation dose received by a human body in 5 hours total time,2.5 through and 2.5 back, on this trip is around 6000 times a lethal dose. No way. Only way to even fathom protecting a human body through that is to launch a ship made out of several inch lead lined walls, but then your launch weight to fuel ratio goes away.

​@@skidmark7845Photographs of the Apollo landing site taken by lunar probes from 4 different countries. Lunar soil and core samples that have been analyzed by scientists from around the globe who have verified that those samples are non-meteoric and extraterrestrial. Now, where's YOUR proof?

CLOWN

You saw a staged production on TV! We never went to the moon!

@@Powerful1776 ''We'' ? He man YOU certainly never went to the moon but WE the 12 brave apollo mission astronauts went to the moon 1969 to 1972 ns the entire world exactly KNOW this ! Don't mess with NASA ! Don't mess with the last living legend our famous Apoollo 11 astronaut Dr Buzz Aldrin ! Period ! Copy that !

​@@holidayturnpike Don't be such a sore loser. We understand your envy because you never stepped foot on the moon, but don't drag others down with you.

​@@Powerful1776 The only thing staged here is your high school graduation. Take a hike, nitwit.

Neil is the one with the biggest balls

@@GannicusMisteriosdeHonduras The biggest lair

@R Sinclair Thanks for the insight coward

A family friend was an engineer on Apollo at North American. Great stories.

@@carlton7015 say that to Buzzs face and get socked in the snotbox like your fat friend did

❤️

Anyone that would believe that the astronots went in a rocket over 500K miles to the moon and back, pooped and peed for a week in their suits and landed with a curtain rod/space blanket contraption held together by duck tape (lunar lander) on the moon and ascended back to the command module without any incidents is either mentally deranged or in serious need of something to "believe" in. It doesn't surprise me that NASA (DOD) would try to convince anyone but children that this is "real", but what surprises me is that anyone but children would actually fall for this lie.

@@anthonyrichardson8770 Today's spam from mister multiple-sock-puppet-account-liking-his-own-posts troll.

@@anthonyrichardson8770 Sorry Carl Smart, Jonathan Jackson, Richard Niklas, Roger Samuelson, Anthony Richardson, Justin King, Moishe Shekelbag, Geoff Birchall, Giorgio Missoni, Aaron Friedmann, Orat Kotsi, Robert Mudrow, Jeremy Smiles, Oliver, Feeyuck Yewetoobe, Henry Evans, Angelo Litrico, Vince Courts, Sam Mencia, Samual Shultz, Mario Marin, but your desperate, pitiful game to get validation and thus purpose in your life, which clearly has none, is obvious and pathetic. We can tell you’re all the same person with *way* too many YT accounts. Get help. Proof we landed men on the Moon: 1. There are over 8,000 photos available to the public of the moon landing missions. 2. There are thousands of hours of video too. 3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material that has been studied and verified by astronomers and geologists all over the world and showed chemical signs of being on the moon. 4. The LRRR data laser retroreflector arrays left by Apollo 11, and other subsequent Apollo missions, can still be interacted with today by using powerful enough lasers here on Earth. 5. The SELENE photos which show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions. 6. The Chang'e 2 photos, which show the lander base and the flags. 7. Chandrayaan-2, which managed to photograph another Apollo lander base. 8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits. 9. Pic du Midi Observatory, which watched Apollo missions all the way to the moon. 10. The Lick Observatory observations during the return coast to Earth produced live television pictures broadcast to United States west coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco 11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messages FROM the lunar vehicles and not to them, cause the earth was between him and Huston. Also, backyard amateurs all around the world were able to tune in on the Apollo audio (not the video, that would have taken bigger hardware, but, the audio was easy) by pointing their Yagi and/or dishes at the moon. Hundreds (or maybe thousands?) of people in many countries did exactly that. 12. The Soviet Union, who monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, who's leader Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered", describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing. 13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to be kept silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud. 14. In October-November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon surface by all Apollo landing missions excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and the transmitter power outputs (20 W were in agreement with the NASA reports. 15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as the German Aerospace Center, Berlin, are not located in the US, and are not funded by the US government. 16. After the images shown here were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher resolution camera work. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at higher resolution. Comparison of the original 16 mm 17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site show an almost exact match of the rover tracks. 18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts on all Apollo landing sites. The exception is that of Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being blown over by the lander's rocket exhaust on leaving the Moon. 19. Spain and Australia were 2/3rds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the moon. 20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world (including from enemies) used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. You can find more info about this on MIT's site. The tracking was accurate to within 1 mile. 21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time, and used it to photograph the SIVB fuel dumps around the moon (which spanned out for miles, thus were visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (same dynamic). 22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit. Do better, learn.

Sadly, the freaks will label it all "fake" and continue to languish in their personal never never land.

Those men risked their lives to do this. Now we have millions of Americans who pretend it didn't happen, including Candace Owens. I'll never listen to her again.

Yes. I’ve read that somewhere before.

Neil called "SHOTGUN" first.

what

@@tirumaljanu25 Neil Armstrong unfortunately died in 2012

@@coasterlife8935 and now we lost Michael Collins.

@Stephen Docherty you're*

Edward Gross I wonder how it feels when you have been to the moon and flat earthers and their ilk say the whole thing is a fake and you are a liar and part of the lying establishment! Cannot say I blame Aldrin for punching the fellow. Further I understand fully when manned flights to the moon were suspended. It is still way too costly and risky, in particular when unmanned probes are far cheaper, and even if they crash it is no big deal.

@Stephen Docherty Just stick to your music videos and leave the STEM to the adults here.

@Stephen Docherty who you calling an Idiot?

@Stephen Docherty I dunno whose brain died if you typed shit like "Your a fukn idiot". About the word capacity I'd expect from someone like you...

Armstrong said in an interview that circumstances related to the design of the cabin is what led to him being first on the moon. Not because he was Commander of the mission.

Cameraman stepped out first onto the Hollywood set.

@@aleciawimer8506There wasn’t a cameraman.

@@SolarChronicle Who recorded it? Answer: a camera man. He was the first one to set foot on the Hollywood set. They didn’t travel 290,000 miles to the moon, which can get -300 degrees Fahrenheit. A big lie.

@@aleciawimer8506 There was no cameraman.

Those two Venn Diagrams are basically a circle.

​@@DemonDrummerA very small circle, but sadly not small enough.

@@marksprague1280 Agreed.

Two flavors of the same brand of stupidity.

Moon landing is and will be bullshit

I believe that's the Apollo 10 command module behind him

He doesn't tell the story of the moon landing. *Listen* to when he talks about. _Listen to the subject matter and what he remembers_ At no point does he really describe what it would have been like to stand in 1/6g on a slippery surface, freezing cold and baking heat, the view of the stars and planets. At no point does he comment on the temperature in the LM. The hatch was in shadow and would have been covered in frost from their breath - if you've ever spent time in a campervan you'll know he was never there.

@@Tom-fp9yp They reused the CM's in the various fakes - that's why NASA regularly mixes them up and can't even seem to devote a single webpage to each one.

@@G-ra-ha-m Explain to me what the point of faking the moon landing would be. Why would NASA go through all this trouble and effort just to fake it. They would have to fake every single document, every single video of the landing, every single Apollo 11 spaceship part etcetera.

@@surr3al756 he's just here to troll. Don't feed them.

Anyone that would believe that the astronots went in a rocket over 500K miles to the moon and back, pooped and peed for a week in their suits and landed with a curtain rod/space blanket contraption held together by duck tape (lunar lander) on the moon and ascended back to the command module without any incidents is either mentally deranged or in serious need of something to "believe" in. It doesn't surprise me that NASA (DOD) would try to convince anyone but children that this is "real", but what surprises me is that anyone but children would actually fall for this lie.

I don't think hunter biden was born yet, lol

What?

@@DemonDrummer I would sooner try a landing than to abort and really didnt know what was going to happen on the abort.

Well said! ❤

Many of the advancements made is to enslave mankind and for depopulation.

We stand on the shoulders of giants

They had good lightning in the "studio".

Did Kubrick get an oscar for this one?

@J Calhoun i'll tell you which camera they used. They used Hasselblads. They were fixed, FIXED, to the astronauts suit, near their chests.

I know right? I ended up watching this cause I was staring out my window at the moon. It’s just so beautiful but no matter how hard I try, I can never capture it 🤷‍♀️

@D D And what have you added to any of these conversations? Nothing. Anyone can make statements and claims. Anyone can ask questions. But you think these questions are honest ones? They aren't. And, they've been answered 100000s of times. And those zeroes are not an exaggeration.

it never happened

@@TheJohnCooperShow Proven it, little John. Feel free to present your history-changing, substantial evidence supported by sound logic and/or reputable sources that refutes the mountains of evidence we have to prove NASA landed men on the Moon. Go ahead, I’ll wait. I’m willing to bet you’ll either cowardly disappear, desperately deflect, or fallaciously argue. Lets see… Do better, learn.

Buzzard on the way through the Van Allen Radiation Belt going to the moon&land safely walk around,jump,scoop up moon rocks&dust&load up &fly away.NASA claims that all the LUNAR /Apolo missions went through the VARB,thou the a few astronauts on the International Space Station he said the farthest astronauts if long have been aboard the space shuttle and said they still have to find a way to pass through the VARB safely,I'm back up all the APOLO Moon missions passed right through the VARB ( Van Allen radiation belt)we no issies except 13when a call came down Houston we got a problem.

They named buzz light year after buzz

@@kevinroark4346 The government claims there are deadly invisible radiation belts surrounding the Earth and you believe them? Based on what evidence? You are a government shill. Also, NASA says they went around the VAB.

@@kevinroark4346 The Van Allen Radiation Belt starts at 3000km from Earth. The ISS is at low Earth orbit, some 400km, so it's not affected by the belt. Apollo crews passed through and came back, no problem. You just can't live within the belt for long periods of time without proper shielding.

Buzz spacefaker

@True Believer You're saying he's a liar?

@True Believer I'm sorry, but this just sounds like all of you want to be right, and refuse to believe that we could've ever done something.

@Eaglette Er, what are you saying?

Oh, he's a very good story teller, indeed. Hahaha! You're a sheep!

Really lies

Dope

Met him at a book signing. What history these men belong to! What history!

Marc. You're lucky he didn't punch you in the face...

@@defiverr4697 Lying history...

@Redblade please forgive him. It's his age. He forgot to mention that he performed a communion after they landed. They had about 2 mins to themselves between engine cutoff procedure and next steps and he had a patch of wine and crackers in his arm pocket, and remembered God, as Neil watched. In the name of God they landed on the moon, in the name of God, returned back to safely.

NO!!!

@@gar9429☮

❓I sincerely doubt you're a holder of any qualification. Go troll elsewhere.

Claims to hold a PhD in Physics but thinks there is wind on the Moon… 😅 Sure buddy, sure… 😂 Do better, learn.

​@@DemonDrummerHe's sarcastic

@@ansonpui5855 That’s not how sarcasm works.

Glory days. And then what happened.

They never did it 😂

With help from an ex nazi von braun

@@BananaJuicce We're not going to 'autonospace' you say? Sure, you're right no one is going there, ha ha. But as for the moon, they'll be going back pretty soon and all you conspiracy whackjobs and scientific fact deniers will have to find something else to obsess about.

You so STUPID

Yeah, So what's your point troll ?

A golf cart would be better.😁👌

@@apolloskyfacer5842 by the way if your delusional that you thing those morons went to the moon no wonder you are seeing trolls. You cant tell one human being from a fictional troll. What's wrong hit by to many moon rocks on your head.🤪dahhhh! By the way what kind of name is skyjerker. ?

@@stratisapostolou6284 Is there a name for that fantasy world you live in troll ? If not, then I'll give it a name. Dream Cuckoo La La Land. It's fairly obvious you're happy existing there. Whatever 'floats ya boat' of self delusion I guess. 😂

@@stratisapostolou6284 The claim that the Van Allen radiation belts were deadly is false, a gross exaggeration and simply not supported by the data. Radiation was indeed a definite concern for NASA before the first space flights, but they invested a great deal of time, money, and research into it and determined the hazard was minimal in the scope of the mission. It took an Apollo spacecraft a little less than an hour total, to pass through the least severe parts of the radiation belts twice - once on the outbound trip and once again on the return trip. Read that again. The combined time passing through the edges of the belts, once going outbound, and once coming back, was about one hour (each way). The total radiation dose received by the astronauts was about one rem. A person will experience radiation sickness with a dose of 100-200 rem, and death with a dose of 300+ rem. Clearly, the doses received fall well below anything that could be considered a significant risk. Despite claims that "lead shielding meters thick would have been needed", NASA scientists found it unnecessary to provide any special radiation shielding. The Command Module structure was two layers of stainless steel, plus one layer of polymer honeycomb, plus three more layers of aircraft aluminum with phenolic resins in between each layer, along with several layers of mylar and kapton insulation and heat shielding. This does not count the resins used in the ablative heat shield on the bottom of the spacecraft. The walls of the Command Module were roughly three to four inches thick, as they differed in thickness in places. The total thickness of the walls of the Command Module is actually irrelevant, since lead or any of the heavier metals do not protect against the type of radiation of which the Van Allen belts consist. An aluminium alloy was used due to the very fact that the lower the atomic number, the less Bremsstrahlung (electromagnetic radiation normally in the form of X-rays produced by the acceleration, or especially the deceleration, of a charged particle after passing through the electric and magnetic fields of a nucleus). The aircraft aluminum-phenolic resins (which were specially designed to shield from the particular type of radiation found in the Van Allen belt) and the polymer honeycomb of the shell of the spacecraft were more than enough to adequately shield against the minimal radiation through which the spacecraft passed. Let me say that again, so the hoaxers will be sure to see it. The amounts of radiation the spacecraft passed through were minimal, primarily because they passed through the thinnest edges, and because the types of radiations found in the belts were shielded against. Why? Because those belts are donut-shaped, or toroidal. That means they're shaped like a giant Cheerio surrounding the earth. They also thin out significantly in terms of the density and flux of the radiation levels as they reach their outer edges. Hoaxers also make the ignorant and uninformed mistake of limiting themselves to two-dimensional thinking. Given that the belts are toroidal (imagine that giant Cheerio around the equator) and that they extend to an angular path of 26-28 degrees from a line drawn through the center of the planet to the equator, the trajectory of the spacecraft through the belts would not have taken the astronauts through the thickest part of the belt in the first place. The Van Allen belts are not like a shell surrounding the planet, they are a fairly narrow band. They begin about 600 miles above the surface, and extend out to around 3700 miles from the surface. Here's the important part: Since the belts are almost non-existent on an angular measurement exceeding 28 degrees above the equator, and the translunar trajectory of all of the Apollo spacecraft were inclined a little above 30 degrees, (in addition to the tilt of the earth on its rotational axis of 23.5 degrees) then the spacecraft missed the belt almost entirely. They only passed through the very edges of the belts in the first place. That's right, they missed almost all of the region of radiation entirely. Hoaxers never think of this. To monitor radiation exposure during the flights, Apollo crews carried dosimeters on board their spacecraft and on their persons. And these readings confirmed NASA had made a good choice. At the end of the program, the agency determined that its astronauts had avoided the large radiation doses many feared would ground flights to the Moon. In no case did any astronaut experience any debilitating medical or biological effects. Do better, learn.

It’s never good either. When they on rare occasion appear to be even halfway literate, it’s because they’ve copied something from somewhere, which invariably has been debunked over and over.

The junk we left on the surface can be seen from an Observatory or satellites. The Russian and Chinese governments have never made the "fake" claim. The Ignorance takes one's breath away

Yes, weird that anyone has even a little bit of healthy skepticism left. Google photos of the lunar module. It looks like a school project, made with cardboard, curtain rods and gold foil. I suspect it actually was. That anyone can believe someone actually could land on the moon in that pos is quite frankly, comical.

@@asor8037 isn't it weird that someone doesn't just look at -the- some pictures, but actually tries to educate themselves? I know that willful ignorance is a badge of honor these days, but could you please at least *try* to do better?

@@ArKritz84 cardboard and curtain roads.

Yet we still at war with eachother . 😂no wonder we were told to get the fk off the moon and don't come bk

@@seanoxborough5830 …what?

❤

ALL lies by the evil US government. 'We the people' are debt slaves and have NO rights only privileges. Fake Apollo landings was financed from hard working, taxpayers money. Don't believe ANYTHING they tell or show you, the government with their corrupt politicians and BAR attorneys are shameless liars and NOT on your side. Conspiracy FACT!

@@samuelshulz2739 Since the sad sack with the many, _many_ sock puppet accounts is back and spewing their nonsense everywhere again, quick PSA. The follow accounts are the same ignorant Moon landing denying cultist: • Oliver • Jo Weiss • Sammy Gravano • Carl Smart • Jonathan Jackson • Richard Niklas • Roger Samuelson • Anthony Richardson • Justin King • Moishe Shekelbag • Geoff Birchall • Giorgio Missoni • Aaron Friedmann • Orat Kotsi • Robert Mudrow • Jeremy Smiles • Feeyuck Yewetoobe • Henry Evans • Angelo Litrico • Vince Courts • Sam Mencia • Samual Shultz • Mario Marin • Albrecht Jungmann

exactly, that's the point

*If you said this you honestly don't like any of your grandpas. Anybody who agrees to your comment is honestly bad unforgiven grandchild.*

@@zagur333 Not everyone was fortunate enough to ever have grandparents growing up.

@@zagur333 ok furry

Sound like a gotdamn liar to me

Only USA had that kind of money in hollywood at the time. Now everyone does. Get with the times.

@@Xander081987 Capitalism baby, you get with times. The communist soviets had all the money after ww2 but corruption is the main side-effect of (communist/ socialism). but if you think it was just about money then you are wrong

​@@fhaddad3 Actually, the US was the only major power to come out of WWII with its industrial infrastructure intact. As a result, our GNP during the 60s was equal to the total of the 12 other richest nations.

If you look up the cost of the space program for the soviet union vs the USA in the 60s you'll find a very close number. Nevertheless it was an actual race and no expenses was spared (from both sides)

@@fhaddad3 The numbers may have been the same but the percentages of the budgets was radically different. It was about 4% of the US budget, but a far higher percentage of the Soviet budget -- enough to be a real liabiliry.

Skyfacer Wow, you’re ignorant and very intolerant. How do you know that ‘True Believer’ has anything to do with religion? And if it does, who friggin cares? Does their faith affect you in any way?

كذاب

I get chills watching the same footage knowing its all fake.

@@kimjongun2946 nope

The people who saw it first in Australia did too.

Deke Slayton was the person responsible for Apollo crew assignments.

Given the context of the Vietnam War I agree "on behalf of a grateful Nation" as it was no mean thing to carry on after on or about 1973-1975. But here is Buzz Aldrin...still alive as with the others. Some of those who have done this we may have never known. It is interesting to speculate that the *Aliens* we might find on Mars or on the Far Side of the Moon might be ... well, a bunch of us Humans already there! Anyhow everyone always wants to be the "next first" and I think that remains a driver for why this happens in the first place.

@Sam Lewis Your Tin foil hat is cutting off the blood supply to your brain.

Buzz Aldrin was regarded as an especially competitive man even by his colleagues, - people not noted for self-effacement. He lobbied hard to be the first man to exit the lunar module. Fellow Apollo 11 astronaut, Michael Collins later wrote of Aldrin that he 'resents not being the first man on the Moon more than he appreciates being the second".

lol check out this smooth brain 👉@Sam Lewis

Wow, that sure was nice and specific, and totally relevant too. 👎

Someone doesn’t understand how NASA’s budget is determined.

can't do what? can't fake a moon landing?

we are going back, are you living under a rock

I'd also add that I don't think you understand what a "million" is - nor is there really any way to articulate the advancement in "knowledge" or "technology" in the way you've attempted to articulate it. Define what "a million times more knowledge" even means....... The fundamental premise of your claim is also demonstrably wrong. I know you don't know what that means. Have your little sister explain it to you...

gift

@Rad J please tell me this is satire

Wait you have no subs...

That shadow of that flag is mad

@Quadir Lovell that's an actual sub??

You get so high that your on another planet ?

They forced him to lie and go along with the hoax. If he had refused, they would have killed him like they killed the crew of Apollo 1. Gus Grissom, Ed White, and Roger B. Chaffee were murdered because they did not agree to the lie. No one ever set foot on the moon. No astronaut ever went further than low earth orbit.

@@jflaplaylistchannelunoffic3951 Is there a name for that fantasy world you exist in ?

@@jflaplaylistchannelunoffic3951 ohhh, I see.. Any proof?

Everything you’ve ever been taught is a LIE

@@heathererickson6216 Well. aren't you the paranoid one.

🥱 1/10

❓

Is it another Apollo 11 denier?

@@Lexi2019AURORA If it's a person, it's an attention-seeker. Never writes anything with substance.

shame he refused to swear on the bible that he REALLY did go to the moon 😕 just saying

ahhh, youre so adorable! Now take your pill and be done, and also ask them to lock your door, we're celebrating! Idiot..

Check the press conference after the “Moonlanding” and you will find how Buzz tells the events. Then decide if these three guys were happy and eager to talk about the voyage. If you are objective your opinion will change.

@you tube And what would swearing on a Bible accomplish? Bart clearly stated many times that if any of them swore on a Bible it’d show just how far they were willing to lie. Oh, and when the one apollo astronaut said he’d swear on the Bible for Bart, Bart left his home and left it out of his documentary.

Skyfacer anyone who wants ro find the truth will seek and evaluate all pertinent evidence. You have no idea of all the evidence I have searched. The original press conference pertains Buzz s recent interviews.

he is a fraudster

@@kimbird6554 and it doesn't sit comfortably with him. But he has no choice but to lie.

He's just a Hollywood actor. Nothing special