yes cause he just wants the truth..the no bullshit truth and its pointless to lie to him cause he will call them out for lying Hes given real truth seekers and free thinkers a platform to challenge mainstream historians.
I mentioned the pyramids possibly were not built as tombs and the sphinx could be much older than we think on a reddit thread and was BRUTALLY attacked by people who literally have never read anything on the topic other than having been told in school. It was insane how close minded people really are
No burials ever took place in the pyramids, ever. The sphinx is from 24,000 years before Egyptians when Africa was a jungle and the Lioness Goddess ruled and is the reason for only one and not a pair, why it is not aligned with the pyramids. The Egyptians defaced the lioness with their pharaoh as the culling of the divine feminine for the patriarchal uprising.
If Zahi Hawas wasn’t hogging the whole scene as if he solely owned it, so much more would’ve been explored and discovered by now. His crimes are crimes against humanity
I'm not an archeologist or any other "oligist" but in my layman eyes and after having watched vast amount of videos and read books about the subject I'm fully onboard with Robert Schochs dating of the Sphinx and I'm also fully onboard with Graham Hancock's ideas that mainstream archeologists who deny this and hold the "Clovis first" line do it just to protect their own reputation. Those people aren't scienteist in my eyes, they're ideologists. A true scientist follow the evidence wherever it may lead, if new facts are presented new conclusions must be considered. Same thing with Petrie's granite drill core no 7 who indicate they made this with a technology we still don't understand, even prooved later by Dunn & mainstreamer don't wanna hear this at all... It's laughable imo, makes me lose trust in science...
I understand in the abstract : linear-momentum, gravity, & fusion, but I couldn't prove the theories. Math is not my strong point, but logic and the ability to consider a different perspective is. "Scholars " get comfortable with their set-in-stone beliefs, and anything that challenges that is met with derision.
“As someone with no training, no understanding of the relevant science, and no ability to critically analyze anything be said on this topic, I am convinced shock is correct because it “feels” right”
One noticeable difference with the Sphinx and the body is that the head is much smaller in size by comparison. It is believed that the head was originally a Lions Head and later carved into the Sphinx which would explain the small size. I believe the Egyptians did not build neither the Sphinx nor the Pyramids, but they inherited them as such. The positioning of the Pyramids alignment dates back before the time of the Egyptians. The Anciant Sumerians I believe were far more advanced than anyone can imagine given the stone work found around the world dating back thousands of years that we cannot duplicate today. Maybe someday we will unlock the secret that eludes us today on how advanced ancient civilization really was.
@@KrossBillNye that civilization could have also ruled a larger part of the universe. Perhaps a large contingency of them foresaw some coming catastrophe and bounced.
- Before the sphinx was coverd in some sort of plaster to protect it from detorriating any further a wheater pattern could be seen that could only be caused by heavy rain fall. - The last time such heavy rain fall occured in Egypt was +/- 10000 years b.c. - The oldest parts of the temple in front of the sphinx appear to be older than the 3 big pyramids, all the pieces of the temple that are from the same time as the 3 big pyramids are believed to be renovation/restoration work. - If you look at an arial picture of the 3 big pyramids of Giza they depict the position of the constalation of orion from +/- 10000 years b.c.? - The Sphinx is aligned with the constellation of Leo around 10500 B.C. during the start of the age of Leo. Archeologists always thought that the face of the sphinx represent the pharaoh Khafre. Frank Domingo, a New York Police Department forensic expert once compared the head on a small statue of the pharaoh Khafre with the head of the sphinx and concluded that they don't look alike. The forensic draftsman concluded after carefull research that the head of the sphinx most likely resembles an African individual (Nubian). Pliny the Elder's account of the Great Sphinx dating to the 1st century CE states: "[the inhabitants of the region] are of the opinion that a King Harmais is buried inside it...." (Pliny Natural History Book 36, Chapter 17. ) It is thought that the burial may not have occurred during the actual building of the Sphinx but much later. Could the face also be this King Harmais, recarved at the same later date...? The "secret Chamber" beneath the Sphinx is not really secret at all. It was known about for centuries, but forgotten in our own time. It was last described in print in 1953... yes, as recent as that. Countless subsequent speculations about secret chambers have all been published without anyone having any recollection or knowledge of the many accounts of the real secret chamber that have appeared in print since 1672. Published accounts of the chamber appeared several times in print during the 281 years that have elapsed from the first to the last mention of it. The location and measurements of the entrance shaft are known, as is the location of an apparent "burial chamber", which has been entered by several people. It appears that no-one today that claims to be an expert on the sphinx knows anything about these previous accounts in print. A third tunnel into the Sphinx body is located on the north side of the sphinx, and has not been opened since 1926, when Emile Braize opened it. There are photographs available showing 2 workmen stood within this opening.... This tunnel has never been explored since it was sealed by Emile Braize in 1926 with bricks and mortar. There is also a little known cavity beneath the altar of the sphinx, which today is covered with a modern metal grille, but descends into a cavity below. During Henry Salt's "restoration" works in the early 1800's he entered this cavity, Apparently a passage ran from this cavity, again, into the body of the Sphinx, however, following an argument with Count De Forbin, (author of "Travels in the Holy land"), Salt and Forbin alledgedly had an argument about this cavity, with Forbin insisting someone should crawl along the passage contained within, but it appears Salt could not be bothered and "dealt with the situation" in the manner of a diplomat, simply by sealing the tunnel off and settling the matter by brute force! This brick wall remains until today.. and still, once again, no-one has even thought of knocking it down to have a look! All of these tunnels are well documented, but seem to be ignored by mainstream egyptologists... (surprise surprise). But it is all out there...
@@user-px2sn8pr5t it may be the natural disasters that have wiped out human kind multiple times in our past history. The government wants us to pay for climate change, etc. They don't want mass hysteria & people giving up on credit payments and work if everyone found out we were destined to be wiped out in a flood in a couple years.
Him being mad is what gives it away in my opinion I'm no archeologists but I do feel like I have a pretty good idea on how the mind of man works and I think it's safe to say the reason they don't want that information out is because egypts income and tourist market will be greatly affected if it is discovered that there are older civilizations half of the people who go to Egypt will start to go to the places that came before and Egypt will lose alot of money and it always boils down 2 money unfortunately
@@buxeny718 yes I agree that is part of it, but who’s to say the Sphinx isn’t older than those places? I think his career is finished if they unbox the whole surprise. He’s racing his personal gains. We’re trying to study Mars with robots and we can’t even solve our own mysteries.
It's becoming very apparent in all the scientific fields, there are too many individuals claiming to be the Science, therefore standing in the way of Science. Great work..
Nah that view is a thing but you can't do it in black and white because governments need legitimate scientists to lie for them (because countries lie to each other still) - so we need rebel scientists AND scientists both.
@@kpeezyforsheezy Science is the testing of theories against evidence, there is no proof/evidence the sphinx is as young as mainstream Egyptology suggests yet there is geological proof/evidence of it being much older.
no group of people would live next to these kind of things back in the day, in fact out of fear, they would live very far from it. The only reason why they can co exist alongside it is because they built it themselves
The alignment of the Sphinx is off when compared with the alignment of the pyramids. The direction the Sphinx looks towards is in alignment with the constellation Leo, but in our ancient past. It can be traced back to a time when the constellation Leo was prominent on the horizon and fell directly in line with the gaze of the statue. If I remember correctly, that alignment only happens during a time period between 10,000 to 12,000 BC. The Spinx was built to face Leo in our ancient past.
@@jeffreyadams9422 it would've been built in a time the alignment was with Leo, thus predicts the age, which would make it much older than mainstream archeologists say.
Based on the evidence the only conclusion is that it wasn’t built by the Egyptians because it’s evidence of construction suggests it was before their time. I believe there was a rise and fall of a great technological advance society that pre dates our understanding or rather our acceptance of their existence.
It wasn’t built, it was carved out of an already existing hill/outcrop.....and the West rain erosion theory has been now been shown to be seriously flawed......
I mean, even the Bible mentions civilization before the Great Flood. Plus the book of Job mentions Snow and cold more than any other book of the Bible, Job is largely believed to be the first book in the Bible written and could've been during the Ice Age
Atlanteans, it all points back to a major, global, civilization pre flood/major cataclysm, even the Egyptians spoke of those before them, and the Sumerians didn't just pop up out of nowhere.
@@corrob they believe they've found it. It was mentioned in ancient maps in NW Africa matching the location of the eye of the Sahara. LIDAR shows dried up rivers connecting from the Northern mountains and a sea access to the South.
@@happymedium. oh i know all about that, it will just take time for it to be accepted, everyone knew the Vikings came to North America long before Columbus, but it still took decades before it was accepted.
Think of it like this, the Egyptians were so different from us, with different kinds of architecture and knowledge and this was 4000 years ago. Now imagine how different a civilisation was 15,000 years ago.
The fact that the head of the Sphinx is way smaller than the rest of it points to the likely possibility that the head was carved out of the original head which was much bigger than the one we see today. It makes no sense that they would create the Sphinx and then give it a pea head. My theory is that the Egyptian civilisation was built around the Sphinx that was already there and one of the pharaohs at some point had the head of the Sphinx recarved in their own image from what ever the original head was. I think that this has been done several times all around the world, civilizations have been built on top of the remains of even older ones. We find smaller stones built on top of huge megalithic stone slabs with totally different construction methods indicating that they were built by totally different peoples.
That isn't just your theory, I heard that this was the case when I was a young boy in middle school. That originally it was an actual lion's head that was reworked into the face of a pharaoh.
A homeless gentleman standing outside Dunkin Donuts posited to me that great civilizations have risen and been erased by cataclysm many times,playing out over hundreds of thousands of years.
I found this so interesting and revealing. It’s amazing that there’s no definite way to know, but so many are closed minded and won’t even entertain alternative theories to what we consider ancient Egypt. Hopefully we learn more within my lifetime but I won’t be holding my breathe considering it’s always such an uphill battle.
Some people are closed minded and some people will believe absolutely anything. Both types get ignored by the majority and fight against each other. It is a good system for the rest of us.
What are you wanting the answers too? Because they are there, just because the high ups at egypt wanna hide the when and how for tourism to make a quick penny doesn’t mean we dont have the answers for when and how.
There's definitely something wrong with the sphinx story. The Egyptians were so precise with all their monuments, but all of a sudden said, "Hey let's build a big ass lion body with a mismatched tiny human head." Ummmm no!👎
@@andrewpfeifer2808 I’m not sure I follow what you’re saying. How could something predate the earth it was made from? And if you agree with me on that then what part of the sphinx possibly predating the flood from the Bible is illogical?
Having traveled Egypt during the 1970's during my mid twenty years of age just by observation I felt that the head of The Sphinx to be shaped, or carved out into a head of a pharaoh perhapsduxring the time period of 4000-4,500 years in the past, and the body certainly to be very much older.
i saw the Sphinx in feb. 73 and i actually was able to get up on the back of it. Its difficult to date. Mario Buildreps says around 5000 but could easily go 10000 years and still be within the geo due northern time frame. Pyramids are also older. Its all difficult. Two list of Pharaohs, one Giza and another which list all Pharaohs for 36,000 years. This is more accurate.
@@rikji I started following Mario Buildreps several years ago when he first proposed his theory about dating antiquity through Northern alignments and the ever shifting North Pole. Its a fascinating theory, but "western academia" will never accept his dateline because they are narcissistic, ego maniacs, who think they know everything! More importantly, they rely on federal funding/grants for their "research" and that, has to follow a STRICT narrative. Any deviation will get you blacklisted
My theory is simple. There has been world conquerors since the beginning of time. Egyptians simply took over what another civilization did but kept the sphinx and everything else as it’s just a marvel. Centered themselves around it as it is a great sculpture.
I can remember as a young child first seeing pictures of the Sphinx, and the first thing I thought was that it had a lot of water ware on it. Then being told that it was 5000 years old seemed possible, until I started to learn more about geology and the weather that was prevalent in the region. By the time I started middle school I had already questioned the age that I had been taught. And now there is a large enough body of evidence to make a reasonable declaration that it could be much older. I feel vindicated in my childish beliefs. A very similar thing happen with the Yellowstone area. As a child everything I had been taught said that there was a Volcano under the area. But existing opinion said no. Again I was vindicated in the 1980s when scientists suddenly decided that there was a giant coldarra there and that a Super Volcano lay beneath the area. And now there have been at least a half dozen Super Volcanoes Identified around the world. Just because scientist say one thing does not always make it right and as time goes by, the proof of things come out. Sometimes common sense is more accurate than scientist. As Sherlock Holmes says, if all other theories are wrong, the simplest is the answer. The simple answer for the erosion is that it is a lot older than we originally thought. The simplest answer for hot springs and geysers in the Yellowstone is that there is a volcano under it. And we know that for a fact now. The Volcano I mean.
I remember as a young child thinking how fucking retarded the sphinx looked like with its small pharao head and it annoyed me. Now learning it possibly was made to originally look like a plain lion gives me some feelings of satisfaction.
They are probably both right. 2,000-3,000 years after Gobekli Tempe, someone built a huge lion monument. Then, down the line, an Egyptian king said, "Put my face on that shit."
I've been following this discussion of older, wiped out civilizations, since the time I stumbled into Rogan's podcasts which led me to Hancock et al about 9 months ago. I read with some frequency but these theories whacked me in the head. I had no idea. Someone commented that he saw the Sphinx when a child and saw the water erosion on it. More power to him. When I was a child I saw a photo of the Sphinx and didn't think much of it but I only had one photo in some textbook and that was it. Even if they had shown those pictures of the sides of the Sphinx showing erosion produced by water (whether rain or flood) it wouldn't have meant anything to me. Same with the Younger Dryas, a new term now engraved in my head. Then I saw another explanation of periodic catastrophes afflicting the earth (in RU-vid, of course!) and something that really grabbed my medula and won't let go. Geologists took core samples in Iceland going down to 2 miles or so and after analysis they saw evidence of a geological & meteorological catastrophe that occurred about 12,000 years ago. Looking at that graph was fascinating and terrifying. Everything is "normal" for thousands of years and then BOOOM! and then back to "normal" again till the next event. It's great discussion and I am sitting on the fence watching the experts, whether degreed in Archeology and the other 'gys or not, debate whether civilization started 6K years ago or much earlier. This knowledge is consequential, duh, not only intellectually but these monoliths are the tea leaves, the bird's entrails, to see our future by understanding the past. It appears that our fate does not lie in our stars, but in our monoliths. Reminds me of a scifi book by Niven and Pournelle I read eons ago, the mote in god's eye, where the first aliens encountered by humans concealed a great secret, they had a violent past, their civilizations destroyed by war and each destroyed civilization formed a new layer in their planet. They knew about their nature and preserved their knowledge in special museums to use when ready to start a new civilization. So, Gobleki Tepi. I am amazed that most of it is still under tons of earth. Uncover that museum left by a previous civilization and see our stars.
In the Emerald Tablets of Thoth the Atlantean, Thoth says that he built the Great Pyramid and the Sphinx after the islands of Atlantis were destroyed. He landed in the Nile Valley and started the Egyptian civilization. He wrote that he built a chamber under the paws that had historical records from Atlantis and also a space ship that mankind would need one day to defeat some invaders
From decades of research and even from what I saw., I personally think it is well over 50 thousand years old and I think the face was originally a lion. I also think the powers that be already extracted the items under the paw. We'll never know.
I’m surprised that there was no mention of the head not being original to the sculpture. Even with all the erosion to the body of the Sphinx, the head is still way to small in correlation suggesting that the head was re-carved.
@@rrankcow9590 You are correct. I only brought up the point, due to the fact that Zahi Hawass the former Minister of Egyptian Antiquities, and others in the field, tend to reject the idea that the Sphinx was repurposed by the ancestors of the modern day Egyptian people. The Sphinx, as well as the pyramids, were built by a long forgotten people, and are far older than conventional teachings would have us believe. This knowledge is very dangerous, because it changes the narrative of the time line of human history, and therefore, it’s may interfere with some religious elements, by the ways in which we have them written.
Graham Hancock is correct! The Sphinx and Giza plateau was made to mirror the nights sky. Osiris belt and the Leo constilation because the sphinx was a originally a lion.
Surprisingly, NO IT WASN'T! It was a dog! Handcock is correct in saying it has a straight back like a dog, no haunches as a lion does, and its tail ends in a point like a dog, with no fur plume at the end, as a lion has! If your idea is correct, then the ancients who carved it made the biggest anatomical blunder in history!😂😂😂
"There is no evidence of an Egyptian civilization this old" except for the evidence we've been talking about for the past 10 minutes (and the King's list).
10 years ago I was at a Halloween party. I was greatly depressed because a girl I loved had just broken up with me. The host of the party (an Emmy award winning Discovery Channel videographer) brought me a piece of the Sphinx and told me to keep it. He said he got it because they’re constantly replacing stones.
Why do we assume that The Sphinx is even Egyptian? Just because it is in the area of the Pyramids doesn't mean it is connected to them. It doesn't look like anything else from ancient Egypt.
@@jtm6671 yeah, and thousands of Sphinx keychains. Did the Ancient Egyptians make those too? I suppose you don't think they were capable of making miniature copies of the Sphinx?
Having a newer civilization happen upon a massive rock that already resembles something they would see in every day culture, (i.e. seeing shapes among the clouds) and then deciding to carve a huge statue out of it to really immortalize the happenstance seems the most likely explanation. The rock is immeasurably old, but the statue was carved much much later. All the different chambers and burial tombs and refacing was probably done by future leaders and/or vandals.
Most bedrock and quarry areas are already 10s of thousands of years old. Of course it was carved on an old Rock unless they built a new rock to then carve up. That would be ridiculous.
The temple of the sphinx shows the same weathering and massive stones preserving the old ones, suggesting Egyptians were at the time trying to preserve something much older than themselves
My friend's father was an aviator during WW2 and he swore he took shelter in an underground chamber beneath the Sphinx to hide from Nazis. What really is beneath those wooden walkways they have erected around it?
It seems to date it at around the same time as Göbeklitepe in Turkey which is widely confirmed at being made around 10k BC. There should be more serious investigation into who those people were and what level of stonemasonry they were wielding. Archaeologists generally just give you a lazy shrug when you ask them about this.
It's interesting stuff. I'm just an armchair expert but I feel like it's completely plausible that some of those statues/pyramids could be much older than what's accepted among the historians.
So how did the Sphinx get buried under sand and forgotten about for over 1,000 years? That's crazy. It's like what happened in Central and South America I guess. People moved away and it got swallowed up by nature. But what made those people move I wonder? Great video. Thank you!
Central and south america were hit by disceases and the population died off and they had to rebuild but then the spanjards came back to conquer south america
👍Great Video .😉The Inventory Stela, however, states unequivocally that the Great Pyramid and the Sphinx existed long before Khufu (The Sphinx much, much longer) and that he built his temple near the "house of the Sphinx" and so possibly only renovated the Great Pyramid. Regardless of the interpretation as it concerns the Pyramid, it states the Sphinx was already there a great while. The Stela also mentions that lightening struck the tail of the nemes headdress of the Sphinx and destroyed it. This of course could only have happened if the Sphinx already existed in Khufu's time.
The carved head as we know it now doesn’t have the same weathering patterns as parts of the body and nobody really doubts that the rock itself is ancient. When Egyptologists talk about the age of the Sphinx, they are talking about the construction of what it appears to be right now, not how old the original formation is.
The head is also much smaller in proportion to the body which is why many have suggested it was re-carved later. The original may have been a Lion or Anubis head. It don’t think Egyptians were skilled enough to carve a massive statue out of bedrock but too lazy remove the erosion marks.
Wild…. because 10000 years prior to Egyptians would be roughly 15-16000 years ago. 16000 years ago the pyramids aligned almost perfectly with orions belt and the original sphinx aligned up perfectly with leo. (Egyptians removed most of leos head to make it look like a pharaoh
What about the maniacal screaming guy that banned countrys digging the sphinx after they found tunnels with radar. After that he made a movie about he finding tunnels under the sphinx but no was allowed to look inside. He said: we looked and there was nothing. Than he backfilled all holes with sand and than made a movie telling there never ever where tunnels. People showing him his own movie showing him going in the tunnels he starts screaming like a crazy maniac. He turns red screams almost start foaming at the mouth. So what is or was under the sphinx
Good question, but I think they noticed that it was carved out of the surrounding stone. So the inside of the stone should not have been able to erode until after it was carved (exposing it to the elements). Of course, I'm not an archeologist, I've just watched a bunch of videos on this topic
@@jostafro4967 sure, i am not pretending anything either, imo it is good to always ask question and not jump to conclusion too fast.l Anyway, this whole thing is fascinating
the erosion is obviously older. So the valley with a hill in the middle is older. The Sphinx may have been formed later from the hill. the head does not have the same erosion.
I can totally see that there was a giant rock there in the middle of the river some 13k years ago and some rich guy was like "I want the peasants to build a statue there." And he made it happen. Bet you there was a bridge even.
This makes sense... It's actually quite logical 🤔 I originally had a similar thought, but more like a decoration or just for the sake of doing it, "art"; but a bridge makes more sense.
I thought it was the Turks, but apparently an Arab Muslim leader named Sa'im al-Dahr in 1378 became jealous that locals were making offerings to the structure and he vandalized it. He was punished for his actions.
No. We would have to invent special cranes capable of lifting many times more weight than those on earth today. But in another 5 centuries or so we might?
We do not possess the technology of the ancients we are still in our infancy compared to their technology. We can levitate drops of water but haven't come close to the weight of 2 tons of stone, yet. We still play with cumbersome expensive yet weak tools.
I believe that there was an older civilition older than the one they claim is the oldest. Heck those finds in Turkey alone proves them wrong on that score.
Looking at the sphinx, one could think the head was constructed to emulate the head and crown of the pharaohs. I contend that the crown of the pharaohs was designed to emulate the head of the sphinx.
The whole body of the Sphinx needed that "ancient" restoration which the old egyptians did. And as such they also changed the head which is pretty obvious. Compared to the body the head looks much newer and despite not being buried and protected by later erosion. Logic dictates that egyptologists are wrong somehow somewhere which makes other explanations more likely. At 3:03 you can even see the vertical rainfall erosion on the body of the sphinx. On its right side. The back of the Sphinx seems a little tilted to it aswell, so that easily proves that water was running off its sides. The original Sphinx was completely carved out of limestone whereas all the additions are made out of blocks. It wasn't built it was sculpted.
The so-called main stream academics are usually very competent in their field of research and have expertice knowledge way above most of us other. But few of them are trained in answering questions adressed from the public. And what I don’t understand is why so few of them make a serious attempt to debunk (or confirm) controversial theories like this one.
They understand that words don’t do the trick, especially when people become vultures following any self-correction they may make later in their work or their wording. That is why cancel culture is a horrible thing. People are terrified to even speak their voices, why would they even try to talk to people when others like them receive the most unfair forms of treatment on a frequent basis? They also do a lot of work, A LOT. They do not have the time to even be looking at theories 9 times out of 10, because of the huge amount of work they have on their plate, along with maintaining families typically. The best thing competent people can do is to not join the vultures, including friends. Use your own decision-making capabilities to form logical conclusions and don’t be hateful when providing your knowledge, they do that out of ignorance and not wanting to be wrong most often.
Because it probably gets quickly frustrating spending your life researching and working on something, and then trying to explain it to Google professionals who read a blog, watch a RU-vid video, and act like they have a valuable opinion.
They do, they have. But as always, it's far easier to relentlessly spew bullshit than it is to debunk it. They can claim all this weathering as something, but the short answer is none of them contribute by producing proper peer reviewed and published work; because none of the claims actually hold any basis. Besides, being a public speaker or persona and debating people on Egyptology is not part of what they do. It's not quite as stupid as say, flat-earth; there is legitimate questions, circumstantial evidence and possibilities that are enticing to people who want to believe a fantastical story. But the short answer is it's very likely far more mundane than that.
@@naycnay Good luck getting peer reviewed and published when your work if published would bulldoze hundreds of established careers. That's for any field of study, you choose.
@@Rid3thetig3r I don't think you understand the peer review process. They could submit junk, but their junk doesn't even meet the first hurdle. A hypothesis is not enough, and you can just stack hypothesis on hypothesis on hypothesis. You need to take one measly thing (even if it's discreditation of another publications findings), prove it and build your foundation to lay the next, then the next.
During the African Humid Period the Nile was much higher and stronger. The additional rainfall fell in more places than just over the Sphinx. Even Randell Carlson says there was tremendous flooding. Pollen and mud core sample definitely show the area around the Sphinx was underwater till 3,500 bce.
I always thought it was built during the 'age of Leo' (10750 BCE to 8600 BCE?) and originally was a Lion. At the end of the age of Leo it was then changed to its current depiction.
I don't know the entire history, but the Turks were in Egypt in the early 1900s and used it as target practice. They shot the nose off if I remember correctly.
I believe the Sphinx is around 100,000 years old or older. The Pyramids are also older than 4500 years. They are not as old as the Sphinx, however, much older than currently believed. I put them at 10,000 years old! And they wonders of Giza weren't built by the Egyptians! They were built by a far more advanced civilization that perished with the Big Flood! That civilization was far more advanced than we are today. With all of our technology of today, we still cannot build Pyramids as we see on the Giza Plateau.
@@QuiksiIver how can you be that sure ? Science ha? Science theories changes every day, and keep in mind that most of the legendary stories are real but in other eras from the start of humans but these stories are from +10000 BC maybe more, so maybe it does not make sense for you now but always remember that when you have seen something from 10 years your mind will slowly forget some details, and you start to tell you sons grandsons and the story will continue for the next generations with only 10 % of even less of its true content, get the moral of these stories. God exist and everything happens in this world because of his will not some ice was melt blablabla we know that? Ok what made them melt? The sun, why did the sun have some reactions ? By its self? Those old civilizations was saying like these days no god and science proved and then what they all disappeared , and now same people come to say same bullshit, same mankind uses his brain without any proves to deny god
The Nile was closer to the Giza Plateau thousands of years ago. You don’t need tens of thousands of years of rainfall to explain the erosion, you only need a few thousand years of flooding from the Nile River. There’s even a giant hole that leads to tunnels under they pyramids (that have been filled with sand by Hawass) like every fountain or dam has today to keep water levels where you want them. The flood wouldn’t need to come from the bottom. It could literally have acted as a catch basin for flood waters coming up and over the river banks
@@clintscollectables River flooding doesn’t automatically mean that all of the floodwater is flowing just like the original river. In fact, a lot of river floodwater barely moves, especially when you get further from the source. So….YOU are wrong.
That’s why I love KMT and it’s history every layer pulled back leads to more questions. What we do know for certain is that a great ancient civilization built it.
Just look how weathered the body is compared to the pyramids. It's so old it's basically melting and turning back into sand whereas the pyramids are still clearly stone blocks.
The pink elephant that never gets addressed is the simple fact that THE PYRAMIDS ARE SITTING IN THE MIDDLE OF THE DESERT. Would literally take millions of various types of items and materials to construct this building. Hammers, chisels, wood rollers, rope. They must’ve done to the “Sahara jungle”, what Fijians did to Easter Island.
I don't listen to Egyptologists anymore. The Sphinx and the great Pyramid were not built by the Egyptians. They were built by another advanced civilization. I also agree with Graham Hancock that we are a species with amnesia.
We don't know but evidence sides better with Dr Schoch. Egyptology is a religion that needs to break out and accept the old paradigm needs to be open to the views of geogologists and other experts as well as Egyptogists.
older rock newer statue makes the most sense. No one mentions the style of head dress on the sphinx which might provide a clue to the age of the carving.
Got a look at the back of Sphinx,in one of the photos,was surprised to see it was made of blocks,is their a room behind the blocks?, couldn't imagine it'd be all block 🇮🇪
Probably started out as a lion.... A lot older than what we are told..... Even if some know... We will never be told about its past.... Got to keep a secret..... Secret.
I think there was a very specific reason for building pyramids where they were built especially the largest one at Giza. Why transport red granite for hundreds of miles when there was also sandstone in the red granite area. I believe they were power houses possibly built to fuel crafts so that the civilisation could return to where they came from taking their tools and equipment with them.
Giza was constructed in time of Pharaohs if not mistaken, so it's not as ancient as Sphynx. But Giza held secrets of chemistry being utilized there. It was some sort of a practical power station for sure, thanks to chemistry and engineering.
@@BIOSHOCKFOXX pyramids of giza were not constructed during the tims of pharaoh’s its obvious the pyramids and sphinxes are much older than 10k years ago, the pharaohs era where around 2k 3k years ago
Sphinx - I have and am doing much research and studying of videos on ancient structures . It is very clear just at a glance, the erosion on this is self evident. I feel it was there first and they found it, . The Egyptians could have even used that area as a water holding tank, much like we use man made lakes. It could have been a mixing pond for something , who really knows. I would think with all the tech we have, it could be settled with science in very short time. Then we get into - Who , When etc..
Prince tuthonomons? Cant spell it. His grave survived from grave robbers due to being "buried" during flash floods that put alot of sediment and rocks over it. Is it no possibility that erosion comes from flash floods also? Would be interesting if it was as old that some claim, but i dont believe the "archaeologists" bias, they are extremely open minded.
@@TheOnlyJoshH Well erosion doesnt have to come from the last ice age, there is still Flash floods of rain in eqypt now and then.. and since the Sphinx is basically in a quarry. The water would travel down to it during these events that happen now and then, and you have seen what happens when it rains in the desert right? Look up Flash floods marocco and such.
This is a recurring theme. Sites in Peru show evidence of this blatantly. Even the INcas told the original spanish explorers that they did not build the amazing perfect fit stone structures.
We've got precision drill marks showing the bore rate was spinning at double the rev speed of modern ones and they where cutting through solid basalt like hot wire through cheese. This is us in our current technological progress rate sometime in the next millenium. We are talking about lazer drills and levitating huge weights of stone and then melting them instantly into shape in situ. It's godlike technological advanced supertechnology. And it proves that more advanced civilization was here eons before recorded history.
