So the 1950 has 65 hp on a 3 cylinders engine and the 2250 also has 65 hp but a 4 cylinders engine. Why build two tractors in the same serie whit 65 hp?
Because the 2250 is bigger and has a higher wight so he pulls better and the 1950 is faster up hill because his wight is lower. I think you know what i mean.
Blaggy And of Course the 1950 is shorter also. It looks soo sweet but where is the exhaustpipe? Any one have any experience whit this cab? I have sat in one once but I thought it felt a little cheaper than the sg2 cab. Standing pedals coming up through the floor instead of hanging pedals from the console didn' t felt so thight and steady. Visability whit a loader on is probably better in this one though.
Was growing up driving one like this at a farm, It was actually good at its time and was still very good, Guess its a good option for they who consider to buy one even today for just small use, Jes the brake pedals and Power of braking could been better :)
@@charliemccahill2131 I have many hours as a kid in a Fiat 680 Dt when I used to follow the nearby farmer. It was good tractors and liked that the Pina farina design of the cab made Fiats look their own way. They didn't had as much glas and vision to the sides behind the driver as for example JD and Fendts at the time but other things was good. On the used market they're an interesting choice, the price compared whit for example Valmet is good.
I own both Fiat 70-90 and John deere 1950. And I would say the comfort of the cab is better in the Fiat. You also got 2 options on Fiat comfort (shown in video) and Super comfort. The space and comfort is way better in Fiat, but on the other hand. The 1950 cabin has better ergonomy with hydraulic and 4wd engaging. And much better view.
