John Stossel | The Ben Shapiro Show Sunday Special Ep. 27 

He’s 72 in this video looks like he’s in the 50’s (from my personal experience no data) people who have always looked younger usually live longer

@@calebowens6414 You mean 71.

Vyllain Da Rogue nope he was 72 at the time he is now 73

Stossel is Ashkenazi Jewish. I think they tend to live longer.

He did that story??? Wow!!! Yeah that’s pretty great. And yes I’m glad he said keep ETA.

SS10121618 hes looked the same for 25 years lol

He is a sensible man who probably stays away from hard drugs and anything else that damages the body, but he assumes other people are as sensible as him; and that is greatest flaw. Apart from that he is a breath of fresh air.

Is he really? Legit thought he was in his 50s.

Hes in his 70s?! No way!

Josh Mitt 73

Erik Kislik exactly

Next I want Owen Benjamin.

Your God must hate you.

Manhole Eunuchsbane fuck off

@@manholeeunuchsbane6197 The effort it takes to go to videos you don't like to play troll in the comments........pathetic. Go watch something you like, you'll be a happier person

@@amgsince2017 Jim Acosta loves him some Jim Acosta.

Sir Alfred Lawrence, so no personal freedom. What your asking for is North Korea, serious question: How does what I do in my house directly effect anyone outside of my house? The only answer I've heard is that the government is responsible for it's citizens actions, which means that citizens don't & are slaves/livestock. Every country in history of civilizations has revolted/conquered or collapsed because of corrupt government (10,000yrs & 1,000's of countries with no personal sovereignty or infallible rulers). The ruling class expands with each new form of government to allow more rulers/tyrants to have total autonomous power over peoples lives.

@Just think, What if you beat someone? Who advocated violating someone's rights? Was a response to specific subject matter, your statement has no relevance

@Just think, Purple is just another concept of Yellow

Agreed. How funny. I've leaned more on the conservative side longer than I've realized--ever since I was a kid! I too have always appreciated and agreed with Stossel's perspective on his reports over the past couple of decades!

@Ace Millner what the actual hell

Thomas Bond second favorite. Seamus from freedomtoons.

He's the only reason to subscribe to Reason TV's channel. The rest of them are phony libertarians.

Reason TV has a lot of good libertarians. Matt Welch and Nick Gillespie just to name a few.

@@LoganLiberty Gillespie is exactly one of those open border types I'm referring too. Real ones to me are guys like Penn Jillete an Neal Boortz.

With Shapiro so roided up on his CrossFit supplements, I’m surprised he didn’t beat the crap out of stossel

@@CamoflaugeDinosaueJohn seemed to find the ads entertaining. I like his reporting and I agree on a lot of items. Many Democrats can look at some of these items: ending the war on drugs, the military industrial complex, the criminal justice reform, legalizing gambling and prostitution.”

Stossel = Superior sleep-aid.

Why do you think he stossel is boring? His calmness ?

@@Hermboldt -No, calmness is fine. You don't have to be loud and animated to be interesting. I just don't think he has much to say.

@@manholeeunuchsbane6197 You shill on daily wire channels too? Interesting. Though I have to say, this kind of shilling, where it's more subtle and not so 'on-the-nose' is much more palatable than other shilling methodologies I've seen you and others employ. If you did this sort of thing all the time, I probably never even would have noticed that you were a shill. Not only that, it seems much easier for people to approach and engage you, when curiosity drives responses instead of rage.

@@mrholdbutton971 -It really depends when you catch me, Mr Hold Button, and both the topic and the tone of the poster who is engaging me. I have no problem engaging in measured discussion from time to time. That said, I also enjoy colorful insults and the like. I don't stick to hitting up one channel. Typically I post on Shapiro, Crowder, Tim Pool, Dan Bongino and the Fox News Channels. Often times what channel I'm posting on dictates the tone. For example, I started doing this over on Dong Bongwino's channel, so many of the posters over there are familiar with me. That dynamic tends to lead to more measured posts over time.

John Stossel on the Sunday Special = Might as well go back to sleep until football starts.

"Liberals might as well believe in magic" That's a fucking good bumper sticker!

@@morlu8281 Libertarians are close brothers to conservatives and even have some agreements with Republicans. They have almost no agreement with the statists ie.,Liberals,Democrats and Progressives.

Morlu the problem is those crazy leftists/progressives are flowing freely through the main stream media, academia and Hollywood...ie they are front and center for everyone to see and hear. “Regular” / “classical” liberals are no where to be seen in everyday life outside of a random individual walking around staying quiet.

@@EDTHEWATERGUY not so much to the Trump faction of Republicans. The Republican side that doesn't like Trump, and are fiscally conservative get along pretty well with right-leaning libertarians.

Now, they’re basically one in the same. If you’re a anti-Trump rhino, now you’re just the same as the left. The uni-party.

Noel Rojas then someone needs to host those debates. Major networks do not care about libertarianism and the green party

They are. Ron Paul is a Libertarian and ran for president twice. However, I think he did run as a Republican.

Real libertarians like Austin Peterson. Not fake libtardtarians like Gary Johnson

@@GApeech08 correct. The better option would be to fill the Conservative party with libertarians

You need to listen to Bill Burr's ads on his podcast.

Cody LaDuke - ...funny : )

I’ll go buy some RU-vid ads that just have Ben Shapiro ads on his podcasts.

🤣

Honey, I'm about to finish, but if you want to receive it you'll have to go over to dailywire.com and subscribe for only.........

😂 very funny

talks roflmao 😂🤣

😂🤣🙃

The Juice?

Ben is too “racist” for that ahahaha

Thomas sowell is too old though

@@alexanderg8466 hell naw. Lets get thomas on. He may be 90, but he is still sharp, and hasnt lost his mind

@@johnathanvale8634 true, he is a don

bonhamrichweckl was great. It got cancelled last year. (cries)

@@nathanthelibertarian1406 It sure is a shame. But he still does stuff like this which is good

bonhamrichweckl yeah, I love reason and stossel tv

Member when the media wasn't radical left and didn't refer to border laws as racist? I member

Member Chewbacca?

Yeah...I 'member. Member Star wars?

'Member when Luke Skywalker was a happy optimist? Or even when Finn was a major character you could look up to? I 'member.

Mutant Macrophage oh yeah, I member.

Actually, Reagan was a Libertarian at heart

Rusty Wood music He said libertarian things but in action he wasn’t really libertarian.

@@RustyWood Reagan was an authoritative conservative

@@sirmount2636 here's a clip of Reagan on Libertarianism ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-bYwQxvFAIJY.html

@@RustyWood The guy passed endless gun control legislation , lmao , + Progressive tax system ,he is authoritarian

Libertarians today aren't like any of the ones I grew up listening too. Bunch of open border commie wannabe anarchists. Stossel is great.

Yea Ben and Larry Elder's brand of Libertarian, or "small l libertarian" as Larry puts it, is virtually identical to my politics.

watched some of stossel's content about him freeloading the system in his younger years, I gotta take some notes!

Libertarian is citizen sovereignty limited only by Non-Aggression Principle, may not initiate use of physical force/violence. The Democrats, that destroyed their party with Marxist Dogma, have been trying to do the same to Libertarian goals. So what utopia goals are you referring to?

Libertarian utopia? I don't understand. But to say it's as far fetched as communisms'. Shows how more you have to learn...

Allen, I agree with your point whole heartedly. I think it would be interesting to see a study to see how many of these liberal protesters have actual jobs. My perception is that the large majority of them don't work and/or are in college and don't work.

Best and most succinct put down of socialism I have seen in a while.

I was lucky. My parents had me do chores and save my allowance and showed me that a dollar is worth something and nothing was for free. I had a Christmas where I got no gifts because of not doing chores and getting bad grades, and just acting like a bad kid. Guess how many Christmases I had no gifts? Just the one. I learned the lesson of bieng responsible and doing what I needed to do to earn what I wanted. That needs to happen, but these parents are just giving the kids everything they want and not creating responsible adults.

Socialism is attractive to those who were not traumatized from the communist years. Soviet Union destroyed socialism. Venezuela didn't work out. Cuba had to slaughter thousands to achieve it's goal. I hear this shit all time time. Guess what. Soviet Union established a totalitarianism society. Dictatorship. They lied to the people ....they destroyed the socialist ideology. Did you know Lennin had several assassination attempts by SOCIALIST. This state capitalist pigs lied to the people. Venezuela was infiltrated. Cuba had the right idea but landed under the "God that failed to transition" scenario. Noam Chomsky explains it well. Look, I've read Friedman and Chomsky. They are both smart individuals with great intentions. I believe we can take a step ahead by establishing a libertarian socialist economy. Less government but stronger communities. States get more power and the federal goverment just stays in place to protect citizens from State corruption. Do I make any fucking sense or am I another left idiot?

but in socialism, it's not free.. you're taxed, which ends up paying for it. so YOU as the individual end up paying for it already. :/

We can cut our military budget in half and still be a global superpower rivaling no one

You realize 1/4 of bases abroad are useless?

@@vasilymelnikov7346, I agree. I think there are a lot of bases in the US that are just kept going due to political pressure and the Federal gravy train as well. I'm for an overwhelmingly effective military presence not a wasteful one.

"giant fan of John Stossel" That is a sentence I never thought I would see in print.

@@manholeeunuchsbane6197 why ?

@@rodemnayir9954 -I just don't understand why anyone would be a giant fan of John Stossel. He hasn't been relevant for like 2 decades. And even when he was, he was kind of a hack. 20/20 was always kind of the red-headed stepchild when compared to 60 Minutes, right? To each his own, Rodem. I'm not meaning to be a dick, I just don't think he's much of a journalist.

@@manholeeunuchsbane6197 I just really like his show on Reason tv and he seems like a really nice guy.

@@rodemnayir9954 - I must admit I haven't seen him on anything since his 20/20 days.

DUDE. My exact thought

John Stossel and Ben Shapiro are two of my favorite public people ever.

@@CuriosityasaCompass They are pretty cool critical thinking individuals

Stossel would have demanded historical accuracy!

😆

I completely agree with this, and there are already some excellent games out there with serve as highly promising proofs of concept. I was extremely impressed with a game called "Democracy 3" back in high school, in which you served as the head of a democracy with hundreds of manipulable policies at your disposal and almost two dozen unique and overlapping demographics you had to try and appease, and of course part of your responsibility included managing the budget. The general goal was to improve your country while keeping enough people happy enough to be re-elected. What impressed me was how well the game was able to present an unbiased vision of democratic politics and recognize the more practical aspects of governance. Another, smaller game exactly in the sort of vein you're describing is the free browser game "electrocity", a simple town management simulator centred around energy production and pollution control. It was actually made to be played in classrooms and teach kids the nuances around balancing the needs of people with the costs of pollution. The game grades you at the end along a number of different metrics, such as city population, energy self-sufficiency, environmental impact and population happiness. I found it to be surprisingly fun, and ended up playing through the whole game four different times. TL;DR you're absolutely right, there's definitely a great potential for videogames to potentially serve a more educational role.

Video games are a black hole that suck young boys souls

Great, great ideas! I think I'd like to learn to play as a 51 year old to better understand government systems! Any ideas on what's already out there for purchase?

"I was born with 4 extra incisors....in a privately run hospital..."

I think to a point you are right. But I do agree with Ben in a sense that as a society, having an established culture and moral is needed to function and move forward. Because without it there’s no baseline to set when it comes to decisions as a whole. It’s why places like Japan have such low crime rates and peace in their culture.

But we could be. Expectation creates reality.

I don't need an army, I need twenty good men in helicopters. Then we shall have our utopian Libertarian Republic of spontaneous order and market anarchism.

Aaron R let’s go steal some land in South America and build this utopia

@@EndsleyIV China: hello there my new slaves.

Only if we take the vote back from non land owners and womxn

We also ran on the militia system until 1916, which is a key component nobody wants to discuss it seems

more like liberfailurianism

@@thepatient89 More like NPC

So you want the right to enjoy the benefits of a relatively free country with protected borders, but you also don't want to have to contribute anything to it? Wow, and you Americans call the left wingers lazy.

@@Jakvox3241 Uh, point out _specifically_ where I - or anyone in this thread - said we "don't want to have to contribute anything to it?" No? I didn't so. The point of my post - which you egregiously evade and ignore - was that _proper_ government functions should be paid for, but _not by taxation_. Just as "left wingers" do, you distort/misstate a position and then attack that false claim rather than what someone _actually_ said. That is a "straw man fallacy," which, since you seem sadly lacking in the ability to engage in proper critical thinking/argumentation, you are apparently innocent of knowledge in that area. Since you said "you Americans," I assume you aren't even a U.S. citizen, which makes your comments even less relevant and more pointless and lazy.

Boss of what? A fucking Taco Bell?

@@manholeeunuchsbane6197 ?