Jordan Peterson, Eric Weinstein, & Dave Rubin LIVE! | POLITICS | Rubin Report 

Lol, the world would appreciate that

I feel your pain. Eye rolling and turning their body away from you, is a clear indication.

who interrupted who?

Finally😀

I'm working on that myself

lol bravo sir

Agreed

Go meta, look from the outside, see your view and others without your own or their state contaminating it Spend time thinking about what to do from there before coming back to yourself And if you compare to the past a lot spend more time in the moment Also if you know the person is on a tape recording (ideology driven ie Democrats, feminist, religious ideas ect) or arent looking for discussion you may need to use casual conversation away from those topics to change beliefs such as all or nothing, us them, projection planting seeds from them to find later opening the door for them to notice cognitive disenance

N kimmo

Both modern psychology and Vajrayana Buddhism (the later has been brilliantly expressed by the H.H. The Dalai Lama) have found the selfless compassion is better than empathy

He released an update a few days ago that he was working on a new book, so hopefully that was actually him and he is on his way to a healthy recovery and just taking some time to get back to 100%.

JJMaccky thank you so much for the update my man, that made me super happy to hear. Stay strong and safe out there 👍

Devon Campbell he has posted a response to recent times on his website a few days ago, I don’t have the link but it’s worth a read..... I’m so glad he is on the mend 😁

He’ll be back!

Lemme know if the big guy upstairs gets back to you on that one lol, good luck

Indeed, my brain is still in recovery mode from taking in too many important, high-level ideas.

No! This is not logically possible. Or, speaking modally, possible only in an impossible world.

I just wish the politicians would get beyond the surface level. Anytime a politician is criticized by another the "discussion" immediately devolves to name calling and the slinging of accusations that are unfounded.

It is impossible as long as political ideology is the driving force behind political discussion.

Dr. Edward Freeman or if a presidential debate being this good is not an impossible event, then perhaps it occurs in a possible world, though much unlike the actual one.

Goosebumps...

Do your job. The archetypal religious lobster lives.

Don't think Rubin is capable of learning anything but other than that you're right.

This was like the concentrated Joe Rogan energy I was looking for

William Bodie - Giving that Dad (Peterson) is in the audience, I’m reminded of the maxim about not saying anything if I have nothing nice to say. I should follow that advice more.

I agree it's great, but it is not free. You pay for it with your personal data and by watching ads.

@@liamkelly8524 True, but you know exactly what he meant.

I suppose we also pay in the time spent consuming lol @@liamkelly8524

I love Absolutely about him too. It’s inspiring communication and care for the topics.

Eric is on the left like he said it himself, but he is not radical and he is also very reasonable, and very importantly he agrees that social issues should be resolved socially and is not government's business.

@@dasuperbudda01 not terribly left then, more liberatarian...Dave should really live by his principles and get an actual leftie on the show. Perhaps Sam S$der?

@@estebancomulet because Eric's view is more complex than is being led to believe here, so he's left according to his own astute perspective. But people far left see him as right and people far right see him as left. As the saying goes, if you're not liberal by 18 you don't have a heart, if you're not conservative by 23 you don't have a brain. I think Eric has integrated his world view into an intelligent heart of a intellectual view

Social issues should not be resolved by the government, which is why we need to have unregulated abortion clinics

Reality has a well known liberal bias, I take issue with that.

Darth Malnu... You are doing something right my friend. Carry on with your parenting. He's a lucky kid! 👍

I'm not sure you thought that whole statement through. apparently your 9 year old son "had no clue what the hell they were talking about" and yet "was in awe of the intelligent discourse". which is it? either your 9 year old is smart enough to understand (at the very least) that it is intelligent discourse; or he's an idiot who's fascinated by incoherent gibberish?

@shem I can't comprehend the poor state of life you must be living through, in order to spew such inconsiderate hatred towards a fellow man who shared a very loveable story. The ability of a child to read the gesticulation of his father and the gentlemen on the screen, would have been enough to awaken his archetypical understanding of the hero figure, thus leading him into a state of awe of a discourse he could not understand verbally. Moreover, i wish you the best of luck in life, hoping that a change of state will lead to a change of heart. Much love!

@Daniel Abella no.

My two year old watched this then told me I’m a heathen.

lol! yes, he does!

Joseph Burrichter 😂

Yup. Easy day at the office for Rubin!

Although more exciting than tennis!

Rubin does a good job of not interfering with the discussion. But does put forth auestions that further the discussion. He s a good interviewer

It's kind of a cool point, don't know if there is a shortage of uncles but definately of articulate brave public figures that speaks sensible and truthfully, a philosopher if you will

Sandmanuel yes, he can actually discuss left wing issues in a reasonable and logical manner, and even though I don't fully agree with him on everything he makes very good arguments. That is something that is currently very rare from the left who seem to be more interested in silencing than discourse. I've definitely been questioning my lifelong liberal leanings as of late because the only intelligent discussion I see is not coming from the left. Eric made me feel like a liberal again.

I think Eric Weinstein is coming at these issues with the right goal in mind and for the right reasons. So there are people who talk about the pay gap as if it is a problem because they see the world as a battleground between men and women. Whereas Weinstein is thinking about whether there is a way to allow more people to achieve their potential. I'm sympathetic to the idea that taking time out of a career to raise a family can set you back in the career but that is a choice women are allowed to make if they are lucky. I have no problem with part time work or even delaying work until later in life because we live longer - so perhaps a person could enter a company in their 40s and be valuable or perhaps that is impossible. It's about coming at it from a humanist perspective rather than a selfish conflict perspective - which is odd because the left see themselves as the empathetic side but I see their grievances and solutions as more based on negative emotion.

Zac Atkinson everyone here is commenting on Eric is a good left winger politician and I’m a right wing saying this and then you come out and say *the* *left* *is* *cancer!*

I am new to listening to this channel and to Eric. I agree with you. It is quite refreshing to have examples where were disagree yet can stay respectful. As a pastor once said, "it is okay to disagree while not being disagreeable." Also the same person said " we do not need to see eye to eye to walk side by side"

Don't stop the empathy, but know how to turn it off when the situation calls for it.

lol you don't see the patriarchy like the left because you don't have a political agenda to push down people's throats.

was gonna comment this in reply to the other comment but seems more fitting to post it directly to you given its about you (lol) You dont see the patriarchy because you’re successful in an aspect of your life. The issue with the left is that they simply aren’t. Ive lost several friends over this past election cycle (all lefties). Not a single one of them would i label successful, and every single one of them has a sector of their life wherein they have failed (dating, school, work, etc). You have succeeded in the work sector (and id be willing to bet the others are fine too). You see that your sex didnt prevent you from “winning”. You see that the argument that society is holding your sex down is bogus and false.

Well said👏🏻 But,,, your comment doesn’t fit the narrative, so I will just pretend I didn’t read it & continue pushing the “narrative” LOL🇨🇦🖤🇺🇸 I’ve discarded so many facts they could fill a library or the cloud🌩

Dumb shit has tens of millions in the same time. You are just keen for intelligent conversations so personal depth perception takes over reality.

surprised it doesn't have millions of views by now!! this is as gold as it gets! This and the one where it was these 3 plus Ben Shapiro.

[fart huffing intensifies]

non academic researchers living in iran also enjoying this!😁

Glad to hear that @@ehsanmazandarani1886

mr worldwide

There is plenty of him on RU-vid. I tend to lean right. I do love listening to Eric as well as Jordan. The thing is you will be labeled right or left. As long as you realize that you are deeper than any label, you will be fine.

You can find his published works online with a quick DuckDuckGo search. It’s unbelievable the access we to these people.

You can hear more from him at his podcast,The Portal!

We should hang out sometime?

a bit phat though

Douglas Thompson it's like he knows what's going to come from jordan and he is just ready with next gem....he is the most intelligent person in the whole idw fraternity.

hoe Sand Which eric has domain knowledge of multitude domains...economics, mathematics, physics, tech, biology and so on...sam doesn't have much domain knowledge. He is good at argumenting on a particular subject related to religion.

They seriously bounce off each other almost like sharing a brain.. No problem showing serious respect of each other.

@@joemilburn2260 Sam Harris isn't a neurologist, he is a neuroscientist which is completely different from being a neurologist that is an actual medical doctor with a specialisation in a neurology field of medicine. Sam Harris didn't do any research or lectures after getting his PhD in neuroscience. He is definitely more of a writer and philosopher than neuroscientist.

I would find a self titled "Intellectual Dark Web" pretentious if Eric wasn't so fucking right on.

Max Derrat, My Brain was stuck in third gear.

I was just thinking the same thing. Him and Slavoj Zizek give me hope for the left

cause he has religious faith

You can say the same for Jordan. There is absolutely nothing about him that is anything but liberal and progressive unless youre a radical and then, well, anything and everything is right wing.

He isn't necessarily left wing. He is a classical liberal which is usually a relatively progressive right-wing individual (economically).

Eric was good here, I found he was driving most of the conversation, while Peterson was mostly just interjecting with his usually bland generalisations of hierarchies and metrics. You should check out Chomsky as well.

Fancy shmancy words

@@NessieAndrew no, that's called proper speech

What he's actually saying is... the problems are being too narrowly defined by the people who think they have all the answers.

@@BoundlessRoamad aka: they are too stupid to realize they are wrong 😂

@@NessieAndrew It is English, actually. An articulate manner of speaking.

Thanks for making it into one sentence that covers this profound much-needed discussion that many of us needed to hear.

Yes. I have seen Eric in conversation with Peterson, Harris, Murray, and similarly hyper intelligent people that I agree with on *most* things - and every time, I end up thinking "Damn, Eric is REALLY smart".

you phrased it well. Thank you. I'm so grateful that sensible left leaning intellectuals are getting the spotlight and not having their words rearranged into click-bate soundbites for the right. Infact its conversations like this that can eventually collapse the chasm between the left and right.

@@tednemeth3510 It is bait, like "bait a hook". Not bate, like "masturbate". Though, the latter is probably somewhat applicable also. I agree, by the way, but it is not only "the right" making click-bait soundbites. The entire reason classical liberals like Harris or Peterson, or even very liberal types like Bret Weinstein, get "adopted" as demi-gods of the right's rhetoric-machine is that the "progressives" attack anyone who disagrees on any one issue (which is the opposite of what the word liberal ACTUALLY means). It is easy for "the right" to validate their sales-pitch that these people are on their side when their opposition is actively trying to demonize them. It was clearly demonstrated first by the "illiberal left's" assault on Harris, for his approach to radical extremism, and then even more so with Peterson and Weinstein. All of whom were behaving as rational liberals when they infuriated the collectivists masquerading as liberals. Would not surprise me if Newt Gingrich actually created the progressive-movement, because there has never been anything so good for the republican party as people on the left acting like fascists. Now the right gets to keep being fascist, but look like the more sane of two options. I have heard 2 people this week say "classical liberal means Republican now". I can not imagine a way to demonstrate more disdain for language than to make such a overtly false statement - but it sums up perfectly exactly the sales-pitch of the Republican party. "So you do not agree that Peterson is a misogynist for stating that gender is one of many factors that determine pay? You do not think Bret Weinstein is a racist for going to work on No-White-People-Allowed day? Well congratulations, you must be a Republican!" Except - that is not just wrong, it is actually completely backwards.

Yes, Seems truth and real intelligence is the new cool, but primarily TRUTH!

Yes.

It’s great because it reveals so many people are capable of playing much more abstract games then the news/media discussions that have been taking place for years. It’s almost like they intentionally dumb things down and it’s not because people need it...

my debt to guys like Rogan and Rubin grows everyday.

If only the Inklings had had webcams

Joe Rogan did not introduce the long format. I’ve been watching European TV for 30 years they’re the ones that introduced at Americas only caught on the last few years.

Agreed, as a conservative Weinstein only lost me a little bit when he said gay men are afraid of kissing, the gay parade just went through my town and I'm still explaining to my children why there were naked men dancing to techno music on trucks while spanking eachother with leather whips. Other than that, an excellent discussion.

JettBlackheart83 - I'm pretty sure that Bret Weinstein is on the left or a "classic liberal" as is Dave. People always call Jordan Peterson "far right" but I think he's technically more centrist. I've worked in counter cult ministry + I'd advise you to stay away from the "far progressive left". From my perspective their indoctrination is similar to people in cults! They have a group think mentality + are no longer capable of evaluating new ideas independently without feeling threatened + when they are together in a mob they are scarey! Maybe Dave will have some good suggestions for you.

MAGA is mentioned at 1:11:03 (:(:(:(:

Christopher Hitchens debates and Q&A's. (socialist in early career, changes mind based on facts & has seen first hand the worst & best of world. In his late interviews and debates says firmly believes in foundations/ideals of socialism but it doesn't work & ALWAYS leads to mass murder.) Sometimes it gets hard to separate his views from facts in Q&A, but he is always intellectually consistent & owns his mistakes.

I would say to check out Stephen Frye who teamed up with Dr. Peterson for a debate about Political Correctness and was just the keynote speaker for the Bell Labs convention where he gave a really good speech about Artificial Intelligence that also helped (at least for me) define what frames "The Good Left." Left leaning Scientists are also good as they don't like using exaggeration because they're smart enough to not want to get caught in it later. The Asimov debates are really excellent examples of left leaning values (progressiveness, new ideas) as well. I wish you the best with your self education, I'm in the same boat. Now I just need to catch up with my classical education. In the interest of full disclosure, yes, and particularly now, I consider myself a leftist. :)

Try checking out Destiny on youtube hes a small youtuber with around 100k subs and he has debated a lot of smaller people on the right ru-vid.comfeatured

Jay L dude

It's like autocorrect with tourettes

Lol 😂 facts!

You know... I noticed that too

ONE OF US, ONE OF US

Interesting way of putting it

I love when people say things like this so that their intellectual inferiority is less depressing. I have 2000 intellect

We're all just a Dave... Simple minded person speaking...a Dave.

Dave is a conduit for intellectual discussion. He his helping make this possible, and for that he deserves applause, in my opinion.

There is just too much in this conversation. I listened to it once, I'm gonna listen to the Ben one. Now, I don't know about that one, but this one I'm gonna listen multiple times, there's many great points being brought up. I wanna make a list of those and research the hell out of them. Congratulations to everyone involved.

Sell it, sold my TV in 2011, takes a few years for your brain to heal.

I cut out my home TV cable and internet since 2008. 😁

Jordan Pederson is a right wing celebrity professor who does not use a fact based argument. He is not legitimate or representative of a consensus among his peers. Both Pederson and Weinstein are celebrities purely because they vilify the media and focus on the extreme left while glossing over conservative media and the extreme right.

Buck Starwell That is the pigeon holed, boxed in, inaccurate assessment of Peterson's dynamic, human subjective position, a narrative perpetuated by the MSM who attack him because they find him threatening to their scheme. You've missed the point and I would guess you didn't listen to much of any of these casts. The important thing about these individuals is not their respective positions, but that they seem to be the only ones willing to break out of the established slots of discourse and reach across their ideological landscapes to cooperate and have true, honest, necessary discussion to reach, in unity, for a rational attainable future, together. That's the only gateway into a future we will all want to live in: egos and subjective opinions on the backburner, in favor of unity and compromise for the good of all.

And Peterson uses facts and data, but also supports and theorizes using common symbolism, tropes, mythologies, literature, etc. From which he has intuited a real world, applicable philosophy that IS helping many people find meaning and purpose in their lives. If it doesn't work for you, ok, move on. People have widely varying subjective circumstances and philosophies. There will be no one size fits all solution. But a self-actualizing professor who discovers a way to positively impact hundreds of thousands of lives, and who is in-demand for doing so is far from illegitimate, and I predict that will become clear as the future unfolds, better for his having cared enough to try. What can any one of us say we have contributed to the collective benefit? You may not agree with his philosophy, but his efforts seem to be in earnest and have had positive results for many. Its easy for one who is not putting it all on the line to criticise those who are, especially when they are succeeding.

@@tarawoodard2737 why r u even reacting to... an animal lol

@@buckstarwell7938 Oh really! You don't say. Yawn ...

Gzuz Christus me neither, it’s strange but cool.

Exactly what happened to me. Until JPB came along the left wing narrative was the only one I ever heard. I just assumed that the right wing was a bunch of racist, sexist types. I now realize that Conservatives are not all racist, sexist types but are actually the reasonable ones in society. This is in large part because JPB has shown me a vastly superior narrative for society which is not based on Alt-Left toxic identity politics but is rather based on the importance of the individual as paramount and the beauty of Western culture. I would never have believed two years ago that I could be so red pilled today but I am eternally grateful to Dr. Peterson for showing myself and so many others a better way. I will be voting Conservative here in Canada in our next election and fight this Alt-Left nonsense.

Lol we have always been this way but your just now realizing it because your party finally lost there mind. I understand not all of you but i do feel bad for the Democratic Party when i think liberal first thing comes to mind is sjw/snowflakes But I know you all are not this way. I’m glad there are still classical liberals like Dave Ruben where we can have an open discussions about real issues.

Angelo Terrones Dude calm down. It's not a competition.

None of the guys you're watching are conservative.

Chaosdude341 agree, but I wish I could hear the end of Eric’s thoughts. JP keeps interrupting. Gaaaahr!

Couldn't agree more. Eric and Jordan are such a god combo. Eric kinda helps Jordan from his tangents. I really liked Eric's idea of steelmanning the progressives talking point, and essentially taking it from them and doing it properly

They do

Eric couldn't be arsed into more debates than he should be - he would be too busy counting money at the Thiel Capital.

Thomas Malcolm Macleay Are you kidding? Eric never stopped talking. The few times Jordan jumped in are the only times he got to talk.

So it's a political movement.

But your not, are you?

Kinda makes you feel like you can go out and solve problems? I mean, after you clean your room of course.

Jordan is a gift for our time. There is no one on RU-vid who has JBP's credibility, when you're not ideologically blind, there is no escaping his truth, a gift for our time. As more dirt they throw at Peterson, the more he impresses. He is a rock in heavy waters, does not go for cheap compromises, for shallow peaces, so clear, so strict, but then still heartly, following his own truth, still open for the truth of others, ready to go an extra mile for the others to meet in the middle, so no one is the winner, but an even better truth.

Hey Andrew! Finally these two get together!

+Words of Welke *You're

Schismatic well said!

The IDW is a stupid label that on serves to add structure to something that doesnt need it. No superise the concept was eric's doing. Overbloated elitist label.

It has utility. Anyone who knows anything about marketing understands this.

I'm also skeptical about the benefits of this label...the most important thing is that they will keep it at a minimum and not accept lightweights like candice owens, when milo exploded he only hurt himself, if he was part of the IDW it would hurt all of them, they have to be extremely careful who they let in.

I like this description. I like to visualize it as top-down vs bottom-up approach: Eric's fighting systemic corruption, Jordan's fighting personal corruption.

I know what you mean. I forgot he was there but when I noticed him again I had a whole new level of appreciation. He obviously holds his own with them but his purpose was to allow the two minds to come together. He did a great facilitating job.

thats when you know the discussion is amazing

btw Dolores, bring yourself back up online please

Chaosdude341 what pokemon is that tho

It's hard not to interrupt when someone talks as much as Eric. And Jordan isn't exactly the one to sit idly without his opinion being known......

I felt like that too till I noticed that Eric does speak a lot. Turns out that for me I was already familiar with most of JP's ideas and was interested in listening to Eric but I'd surely have wanted JP to speak up more if I'd come in without knowing about either of these people

Mugen Lor

You have to interrupt when the person speaks so much. Jordan is good at listening.

I recommend the Rubin Report with Eric and Bert Weinstein. They're brothers and have an equally deep and enlightened conversation.

Exactly right, this topic warrants a separate discussion.

The obvious one is: more people = more loans (banks make money) = housing shortage (real estate people make money). In short, rich people profit on immigration. But maybe he was thinking about something else.

Tired of the immigration mantra when it clearly shows that it is not working which means for a smart guy like Eric to advocate it means he's disingenuous.

He was probably referring to the H1b abuses that bring in under qualified immigrants to take the high tech/high skill jobs of americans for a much lower wage.

thats not whats hes talking about. hes talking about the transfer by immigration of wealth from employees to employers, ie from workers to companies.

Was it meant to be a competition? Seems antithetical to the spirit of the conversation. They worked well together. 😊

why didn't they insult each other more? My guy friends never say anything nice to my face, and I only compliment those bastards when there's no chance they overhear it...

^ It's only their first hangout in-the-flesh. They just aren't that tight yet, bruh.

Jordan Peterson is always respectful when it comes to listening. When the discussion is a debate and he is arguing a point he will defend it. The ones who disagree based on ideology are the ones who get upset and cry foul.

@@captainmaim Because they aren't 2 dude bros hanging out in their backyard?

It's no surprise either, Eric is an exceptionally gifted intellectual.

joe kean I don't think he's under rated I don't think he's been evaluated by enough people yet. I think he's even sharper than his brother although he's got a smokin hot and super intelligent wife.

I couldn't agree more. Its one thing to make good, well rehearsed arguments that form a coherent logical framework (JP), but to be able to do so on the fly, with interruptions, and with such eloquence just puts Eric in a different league. He is a real heavyweight.

Eric Weinstein is brilliant. There is no topic that I've heard discussed with him as a participant that he has failed to have a profound insight about. I've seen him with Lex Fridman, where he was superlative again. (Lex is definitely worth checking out: he 's an MIT engineer who makes deep learning and neural networks accessible to non-engineers. He has a marvelous podcast and a RU-vid channel.) Eric Weinstein is especially interesting when he talks about...higher mathematics. Yes. He makes that fascinating. I'm so happy that there are brilliant thinkers out there who are willing to face our current "cancel culture" times. That they can speak for 2- 3 hours with one guest or 2- 3 has restored my faith in humanity- and also makes me hopeful that this climate of being able to speak civilly and with interest to others with divergent viewpoints from our own will simply grow. That will only enrich us all. Jordan Peterson is simply my favorite Jungian existential psychotherapist on the planet. I could listen to him for hours, have learned more from him that from anyone else. He has had a terrible time with the radical Left, and I hope that he will be back and talking publicly again. soon. He has reached and helped so many people; his is a voice that I miss. Others to check out and support: David Berlinski, Joe Rogan, Peter Hitchens, Victor Davis Hanson, and of course, Eric Weinstein, Dave Rubin, Sam Harris, and Jordan Peterson.

SHAMIEN Peter Jordanson UTTERLY DECIMATES Rave Dubin AND MAKES HIM CRY1!11!

A true artist!haha

Hahaha, looking forward to next video of this one!

SHAMIEN Love your videos homie keep em up

upvote shamien to the top so that they know they are under surveillance

He's like trying to shrug Peterson off all the time, lol.

I disagree. One because of a point they made earlier and that was we have matured from what television media had conditioned us to be and that is to look for a winner in an argument instead of learning from a discussion through formats - like don't interrupt , interrupt or you are speaking for too long. Going by the majority of comments very many people were impressed by Eric's thought processes having not known him as compared to JP. Not sure I'm making any sense And two some arguments presented cannot be summarised from the top of one's head as we might want them to do .. it would be soo demanding of what these geniuses are venturing into and worse loose the audience having most not understand premises and fundamentals .. also not sure I'm making any sense - anyway , one love from Nairobi.

actually it's fun watching two super geniuses who are used to dominating conversations facing each other. may the best interrupter win! I get it, if I had that many brilliant things to say I'd be champing at the bit to speak too.

I agree. Watching Peterson constantly interrupt Weinstein was cringe worthy

"The Eric Weinstein show" featuring.... those other two guys. A monologue with brief reactions. Interesting and insightful nonetheless.

The thing that makes it extra hard being the lone woman, is that men get really threatened by it. I've seen it before in more low brow male dominated jobs too. They just can't relax when a chick is doing the same work as them. It's exhausting to be that woman. Who wants to feel like shit everyday? Why not just go do something else that doesn't have that pointless tension?

I think you are mistaken about the men feeling threatened by the presence of the woman. Rather, I would suggest, that the sexual frisson of having a whole live woman, sending out pheromones and having hormonal cycles that alter her skin tone, her scent, her hair lustre, lip plumpness etc etc, let alone her moods, is enough to unsettle men! Men working with men know what they are doing and what each other are doing, but they do not really know what women are all about (and neither do women of course, but that's just how it is!). To expect a working environment that is 'comfortable' or conducive to full productivity once a woman shows up is not reasonable! We all know that, actually, but no one is stating it! Why not? Is it a taboo now? Apparently yes. And if a maths or physics dept full of 24 year old single men suddenly has a 24 year old woman in it she will definitely be the object of virtually all of their desires, and a total distraction. How d'ya handle that? They suffer, and she suffers. They know that most of them will be losers in that mating game, and that the 'alpha' will win her, and thus they will all feel like 'betas', and she knows that jealousy and failure will be the effect of her choice, for the losers. And choosing a man from an great array of good men is hard for her too, so she's almost bound to make a hash of it leading to all sorts of intrigues and emotional disruptions in herself and in them. It's a nightmare for them all. Better by far to have men and women occupy areas of interest without the weird pressure from others to do the work of the other sex! What is all that about? Girls and women should be given an education like that of boys, but with each sex having the additional angle on their speciality, for them. Girls need to know, in a positive and uplifting way, that they have the means of reproducing a baby right there in their bodies, built in, and excellent - indeed they should be specifically taught that it is a glorious task, with heaps of great feedback as the children mature, as long as she selects a good, capable man, who can earn well, and who wants to dedicate his efforts to her and their growing family. Better for her, better for the children and better for the men. Women will find endless meaningful avenues of intellectual and earning value during and after this proper biologically appropriate stage. I certainly have! Yes, the traditional patterns are indeed superior. Obviously. Those who despise such things are the trouble makers. Look what trouble they have made for us all! Any great invention or theorem that a woman can be credited with is NOT due to her sex, and in the vast majority of cases a man could have achieved it just as well, and probably did. There has been nothing to stop women from being fantastic composers, yet few have been. Many play in orchestras, many listen to music and are deeply musical, but few give the sort of focused attention to composing symphonies or operas. And don't tell me it's because the male domination of the field precludes them! It does not. To quote the famous Nobel Laureate, the physiologist Tim Hunt "Let me tell you about my trouble with girls … three things happen when they are in the lab … You fall in love with them, they fall in love with you and when you criticise them, they cry". He didn't get a Nobel Prize for nothing! Indeed he nailed it

Polite Q I'm in such a "Low Brow Job" and you're half right, none of us guys want to report to HRM over bullshit that would have no repercussions among men, but require us to walk on eggshells when there are women around

Exactly Nightdare. You and the guys would be perfectly able to get on together doing the work, whatever it is, but once a female rocks up, you are all somewhat put out, as they seem to want things to be less male! Well, they should have gone into a different job! And in Scandinavia, that is exactly what they freely do. FREEDOM!!

Yeah, that's about it Mr Q and Mr Hamilton above, appear to be under the impression that men are either jealous/incompetent or oversexed None of that, it's about not being able to act/express freely what can be done among male colleagues alone without far reaching repercussions Now, I would feel like some chauvinist, if I wasn't constantly supported in my opinion by women who admit they rather work with men than women

George Madarasz Well said. Meetings of minds, such as this, are a joy to behold.

lissened? is that a word?

How many languages do you speak, best laser ever? How many can you write? What a great time to be alive, right, Per? Amen.

i mostly just speak the one language but i make dumb spelling errors in zero languages. spelling errors are actually the fault of post-modern neomarxist feminist sjw's thought so it's actually all their fault.

Apologies. I didn't realize you were limited. Best of luck to you.

lissen here you neomarxist, im not limited in any way; i have all the power of a masculine lobster, you better not force me to use pronouns you marxist

I can see why? I was watching Eric Weinstein and Roger Penrose interview today and repeated several sequences

the phrase echo chamber is a great stupid equalizer, it ignores facts, reality and truth. It it true that we're all in this echo chamber which agree that the sky is blue, but description things this way doesn't solve any problems.

@@dasuperbudda01 I have to stay aware of my own biases. It keeps me on my toes.

@@momentary_ sure everyone is biased and there is no way to produce a human that's not biased. Bias is not much different from perspectives, for one to have any unqiue perspective, it will also mean that person is biased. It's probably good to know what are your biases but I think just like being nice, being inbaised is not a virtue and is.. pretty unimportant. The greats in history are All basied one way or other, but they were greats and remembered for what they did not what kind bias they held.

Wow, good self-aware and respectful insightful comments guys. I wanna ask puddington, I agree that I can't make it through one of their articles let alone videos without nausea and my malignant white priviledge flairing up lol but do you feel the same way about fox, breitbart? Can you make it through 20 seconds of their nuremberg rallies? Not being hateful just politely rude

@@bobboblee5646 Fox comes off as pandering to me. I agree with them more, but I feel like they're just milking me for views. These long form discussions seem more genuine so I can accept them to a higher degree.

*hint* it's always appropriate.

Wind Lord 100%

It's depressing to see how far the BBC has fallen regarding honest journalism, it's actually shocking and very dangerous.

BBC is basically a propaganda machine

Don't you mean non-objective? It's the same in Denmark. Ever since moderate democrat-socialist leftist party won the election 2 years ago, I have noticed how the biggest danish newschannel on both TV and radio have become increasingly sensationalist and almost exclusively feature news that paint the right in a bad light by trying to demonize them as much as possible. I can really just feel it in their retoric how they have been taking over by neo-marxist fascistm, as JP would say, mostly because the journalists in charge of these news outlets want to appease their fellow ideologues in parliament. As the above comment said, it has basically turned into a propaganda machine. Actually, it seems like many different sort of authorities in my country have become infected with this leftist BS propaganda, and it just makes me wanna burn the whole thing to the ground and replace those authorities with sensible people.

@@aurelia8028 good luck finding sensible people. At least if it does all end in fire, the idiots at the extremes are likely to shoot themselves in the foot.

carlotapuig, It was really fucking good, and I don’t curse much, lol.

Yeah they are definitely on a closer level. (Lol probably both 150+ IQ)

Andrew Buonaccorsi I found that refreshing too. Jordan wasn’t across from a silly tv talking head. This had real meat

Eric is smarter than Jordan fundamentally his work on the mathematics of reflexivity will turn your mind inside out.

Alien doesnt mean he is smarter than jordan. Just means his intelligence in the fieod of math is higher. He is a mathematical genius. Jordan is more of a genius in other intellectual areas.

Just because someone is smarter in a particular field doesn't mean they are smarter overall.

Imagine Camile Paglia and Ben Shapiro talking at the same time.............

YES

And then please edit out every time she says "OKAY" so that way it can cut the video down to half the time.

ScumbagSteve Uh, sorry no this is not possible. You see the universe simulation is currently hosted on a Series J Webserver (SJW) which can barely handle a single Shapiro or Paglia conversation process due to a faulty logic expansion port not being able to support any logic upgrades. They'll have to take turns until we can finish migrating to the Series A Nextgen Intel Terminal with Yolo support (SANITY).

This woman, like Harris, is a titan from a past time. She NEEDS and DESERVES a spot in this team