It's unbelievable how Komova, clearly superior to Wieber, still loses first place. I didn't understand their score on the beam. It seems to me that they had equal difficulty scores, but the scores are very discrepant. Wieber did well, despite her atrocious form. But I didn't see any big mistakes about Komova. Poor girl.
This era’s Amanars were so half cooked, I mean she starts twisting before her hands even leave the table lmao, and she barely finds the landing in time.
No. A world champion hasn't her legs fall off in her AA bars routine. And a world champion doesn't fall down the bars at the apparatus final. Komova has everything, the highest level in tumbling and the best in artistry. Wieber shows what she's able to do.
@@GoldForAnnayou’re just hating on wieber at this point, komova’s beam was shaky af which is why wieber was able to catch up to her, and then wieber had a pretty clean floor (apart from the 0.1 penalty for the step out), meanwhile komova’s landing all had deductions (some major). Yes komova blew her out of the water on bars, but Wieber blew her out of the water on Vault. Both are incredible athletes, which explains the results
I like Komova overall when compared to Wieber, but when people say things like "underscored" or "robbed" without pointing out specific D or E scores based on the 2012 CoP, then their assessment has a lot less weight. Weiber's cumulative D score absorbed her big deductions on Bars. Komova had small errrors in Beam and Floor, but they were in aggregate pretty large and yielded a lot of deductions. Komova's overall atistry beats Wieber's hands down. However the 2012 CoP didnt weigh that as much in the E scores. So stop making empty statements without context. I think they were too lenient on Komova's wobbles on beam, which could've led to .2-.4 more in deductions. Wieber shouldve gotten .2-.3 more deductions on bars. They were a bit too harsh on the vault scores for both, about .1 each. Not sure if the outcome would change even with those discrepancies.
Pues a Jordyn weber le dieron la medalla pero todos sabemos que Viktoria Komova fue la verdadera campeona absoluta en 2011 y en Londres 2012 también lo fue y muchos no reconocemos a Gabrielle Douglas como campeona olímpica y tampoco a jordyn weber y mucho menos a carly patersson 2004
Thanks! Great work putting together the comparisons _and_ using the high quality videos. Maybe you could do for other finals as well, like Hurd vs Black (2017), Melnikova vs Leanne (2021) or Andrade vs Jones (2022)? Sadly FIG never released the detailed scores from that final, so we can, at most, suppose the E-scores based on the possible D-scores given. For example, Wieber's vault received a higher execution than Komova's (9.216 vs 9.133), what seems unfair. I think Komova had a superior program, but had more visible mistakes on BB and FX and that summed with a little help from the judges for Wieber.
Komova didn’t do an Amanar at these worlds. If she had she would have crushed Jordyn. That’s what made the difference at the Olympics (one thing out of many) by the Olympics Komova’s start values combined were a point higher than Jordyn’s.
This is the first thing I saw when I started watching. Komova did a DTY and not an Amanar. She was capable of an Amanar and it would have made way more sense to do one. It cost her the win.
I think in the very near future. I believe they’ve already started using AI to judge still rings but I think within 10 years there will be advancements in analysis
I forget how well both Weiber and Komova danced. While Komova has a more balletic style, Weiber is certainly a comfortable and competant dancer that uses good extension and body form. They both generally had control over their landings, and both used quite modern music (at the time) to get the speed needed for the very difficult tumbling. Komova was far better on bars (consistently) and Weiber had the stronger vault. Neither were particularly consistent on beam, which proved problematic in the end for them both. It was always who performed best on the day would win... this time, it was Weiber's.
Well, from what i just watched I think Komova should have won the gold, Weber made more mistakes, the difficulty in her routines were less than Komova....
I think why she scored so low is because the L-turn, front aerial, and wolf jump are supposed to be connected but she missed it which drops her difficulty, and she wobbled on all three skills in a row which affected the execution. Breaking connects costs more than people realize.
Komovo baubles big time and at least four times on the beam. Jordan did not. From what I saw, Jordan deserved the win. On the her floor routine, Komovo did not land her second nor her last jump well, and she fell out of one of her turns. Yes Jordan stepped out of boundaries once, but her jumps were all clean, and her quadruple turn was flawless. Sorry, didn’t think the Russian was superior in any way in this competition.
