Journey to a Black Hole - Uncovering a Mystery | SPACETIME - SCIENCE SHOW 

Could you make a video of how our solar system moves through space? Then make a video how it moves through space relative to the milky way galaxy? Then make a video about how the milky way galaxy moves through space? I think that would be a super interesting video

Yes

I could make one. Looking for others for such a task.

@D MP my standard 'rule-of-thumb' ; If it defies Standard Physics, then the theory fails the first and most important qualifying state, 'Reality'. IMHO , no matter how much math you throw at it, if the thing falls outside of 'Physical Realty' then it falls into the category of 'Fiction'.

Never gets boring. 😄

Science is a slow process right?

NOTINMYARSE ! Haha. Nothing boring here!

NOTINMYARSE ! Maybe you need to widen your search. There is more then 1 RU-vid channel 😂😂😂

@@takster050974 Your right imao

You are memorizing garbage! Doesn't at all mean you learned anything but unprovable bullshit! Congratulations!

@@liamfslal oo your hard 😂🖕

Been waiting for someone else to point this out, lol

Yeah, seems to be suggesting something else going on there. Especially when you can plainly see Massive amounts of high-energy emissions coming out of the 'polar regions. Looks alot like light escaping to me.

@@timm4811 thats caused by magnetic feilds from the accretion disk.

@@cryies gravity doesn't cause magnetic fields, electricity does though. And if the current intensity s strong enough to emit ultra-violet, x and gamma rays, then the the electricforce is over powering any gravitational force. Which makes much more sense. All the way down to the atomic level the Electric force can be as much as 10³⁹ times stronger than the bond of gravity. So if you are suggesting that a ' black hole' is an electrical event, rather than a gravitational anomaly, I would agree with you. 👍👍

@Peter J Mallia the fact that light IS escaping defies 'black-hole theory, right ?? So an adhoc bandage was applied by Hawkins and friends suggesting 'some' do this. Questionable at best.

?

If they come back to this comment they will have traveled back in time through the RU-vid pyridoxal gravitational pull.

Hopefully your future grand children wake up to truth before your brainwashing gets rooted into their foundation of thought! You should promote open minded thinking! You probably wouldn't understand, but hopefully they do!

@@liamfslal You have to Imagine because the Universe is so Vast your mind can't Comprehend it if you don't Believe it you should do your own scientific research we knew alot of this thousands of years ago using a Telescope with 10mm lens you can go buy a 175mm Telescope for around 100 dollars

yea lol

Think I was still waiting for my old Dial Up modem to connect😂😂

"Ludicrous Speed!"

@@ro4eva "we ain't found shit" 🤘😂🤘

😂😂😂

Rydwan Fee 13:46, he did

At the speed of light time would probably become irrelevant, or even non-existent.

so what! You know what they meant, we know what they meant. take your ego down a notch

Advance close to the end. Let video finish. Close popup of suggestions for next video. Hit the restart button. Add Free

get adblock

@@geoffmooregm holy crap that worked!

How do you even use the internet without adblock

@@felixmuller1526 Yeah, seriously. People ought to be ashamed complaining about ads in 2020....yet you see these idiots all over RU-vid. It's sad.

According to present theory, if you had access to at least a pair of entangled particles, you might be able to get halfway way through.

@@timm4811 Its this kind of thinking (yours) that are going to get us to other stars. One thing it wont be is a chemical rocket. I do see needing fusion power or another form of anti-matter or some other exotic power generation to create enough power to "beam" us there whether it is as entangled photons or some other form then of course we will have a big philosophical debate over the whole "if you are disassembled here and reassembled there are you still you since they basically killed your first body, stored it, converted it, shot it out on a beam to destination and rebuilt your second body over there" Now, what did i do with my food replicator?

The entire theory is misleading

Actually, they probably aren‘t solid objects. The event horizon would simply be the point where the gravity is so strong that it requires a speed faster than the speed of light to escape the gravitational pull. In that case it is believed that all the mass of the black hole is so dense that it is combined into a single point, a singularity. This extreme point pretty much punctures space-time, so in a way, the term „hole“ does fit. Until we can examine black holes more closely, all of this remains to be proven or disproven, of course.

Sezuisa,.. more and more as I think about this stuff and try to wrap my head around it or wrap it around my head? I'm having a real issue visualizing the GR theory/ model in a 3D sense. Every physicist will use a two-dimensional model to describe a pretty simplistic principle of induced funnel orbit as I would call it. I call it this because they all seem to use the same type of visualizations with a stretched out trampoline sheet rubber sheet to whatever effect creates this funnel and an inherent direction for it this is where lies the problem for a three-dimensional model does it not? I mean really try to wrap your head around how the end of this funnel has to be anywhere and everywhere all points all possibilities every single degree minute and seconds down to microseconds on the outer Edge... For all intents and purposes, infinite possibilities/ locations all at once with respect to itself and an events location to it while interacting with it, almost like an electron cloud in the Heisenberg principle... shit maybe I'm on to something here maybe there's a correlation between the smallest micro and the biggest macro objects... After all don't we all feel there's something to be said there? I'm starting to believe the black holes are the key way to another dimension because there's just no physical way for my mind to take that poignant end of that funnel to where the singularity is to be assumed and imagine that in any and every possible angle/ degree to the system. I feel like I shouldn't have to describe this and everybody should see it as the obvious indescribable or even understandable conundrum.. I don't know how to describe it in less than many many words but to take that two-dimensional model and then simply say now imagine this in three dimensions to me is absurd... to take something that's very easily visualized in 2D and makes it impossible mathematically theoretically experimentally even imaginatively so I think it's a bad model and I have to wonder if even physicists out there really face the music and try to visualize how this can even be possible to understand much less described to someone else... I think to a 3D capacity intellect or creature, the fourth dimension spatially, that is not the one of time, is no less unfathomable than a third dimension is to a 2d capacity creature. To simply say now add a third dimension so nonchalantly and try to imagine it in three dimensions is irresponsible and almost reckless in the sense that it gives no credibility to the incredible degrees of freedom, insurmountable indescribable degrees of freedom that you get from just one extra dimension, being the third that is which takes everything from one and two combined and amplifies them and their sums so to say... the third dimension to the second is not even comparable to one or two dimensions. It changes everything on a seemingly infinite scale really.. if nothing else it can create things of infinity where I don't believe two dimensions can with any reasonability.. that one extra dimension it's almost like an entirely different universe overlapped on another universe. It's just not enough to simply say 3D is just one extra dimension on today as some 1*1*1 summarization.. I hope I'm not being confusing as it's very hard stuff to convey but I know that there's been many things that we thought we knew for sure for sure that have changed in the world of physics.. Another problem intrinsically relatable I see is how can you describe the accretion disk to not conflict at various angles what is it that physicists use to determine that and accretion disk turns 90° perpendicular to its spin to rotate half the sphere and turn 90° again to realign with spin I think it's the most absurd visualization that throws people way off other possibilities... Also to further describe what I'm alluding to with respect to said metaphorical puncture and it's location in an undiscernible fabric structure.. every visualization I've seen of an accretion disk seems to have a given plane respective I'm assuming to its spin direction... well gravitational forces being respectively the same all the way around this thing why should anything obey or satisfy its spin when orbiting the end other than maybe the fact that things just gradually aligned to the centrifugal force of it? I guess what I'm saying is, is that I believe classical physics with respect to black holes to be largely in error but all of these models seem to really avoid the elephant in the room that way.......

Perhaps this location for said singularity is dictated somehow by its spin among other things..... Or perhaps it's anywhere and nowhere all at once just like an electron in its range....

Sound like a reasonabl statement

@@timm4811 It was a "relative" one ha ..ha

I think that's only true for photons, which are massless. even if we reached the speed of light, light would still pass us the same rate. we'd feel time.

@@andromedaiscoming185 All objects moving at high percentages of the speed of light would experience time dilation. It's just that only massless objects can achieve light speed since an object of mass would require infinite energy. You as a passenger on a vehicle doing such speeds would not feel slower ultimately experience time at a "normal rate" but to any observer outside the vehicle you would be moving slow. This is the very foundation of the theory of relativity.

No one knows as no one has seen or examined one

It is a Sphere. It appears to be flat because you can't see the dimensions due to there being no light that escapes. It can't be looked at directly, but things moving around it reveal it's shape. 6:00 onwards is a good reference point in the video. Hope I helped.

@@D-Nation thank you I get it so it's shown in 2 dimensions but is really 3 so it's a sphere not a disc

There you go my friend. That's real space travel. Just gotta figure out how to do it. 👌👌

Yeah, it's a spherical hole. The way I always thought of it is a 2D hole is a circle, so a hole in 3D would be a sphere. You could go above, under, or around just like a regular sphere

@@science.and.beyond thank you

Thats what the powder's for Pablo

the sun does move threw space and we travel with it

Yes you're bubble in ocean simulation seems more accurate than you realize..

True, but there are always those who have never watched a video like this and didn’t know that fact. We were those noobs once

Yes, 26k distance would take 260k years traveling at 10% of the speed of light. d = rt --> 26k = (0.1)*t, t = (26k)/(0.1) = 260k.

This narrator tries way too hard too, he's so over-enthused about the most basic and random facts...like calm down already and just speak normally

Yup...👍😴

It would take 26000 years as seen from the perspective of a person on Earth. For the person traveling at the speed of light, it would be instantaneous. From a photons perspective, it lives and dies instantly.

Do a little math buddy. Black hole is 26000 light years away then he says that even if we achieve to travel at speed which is 10% of the speed of light, it would still take 260K (260*1000=260000) to go there. (260000*10%=26000). So nothing is wrong except you math😅

If you travel at the speed of light, you will get infinitely far in no time at all.

@@nolagemixam so what if you were to travel faster than light ? I believe the original time-honored statement was that "Information can never travel faster than the Speed Of Light".

I think your question is Valid. The way the theory is presented to us the explosion comes directly from the center. Which would leave no core intact. And N object in motion tends to stay in motion, especially in the weightlessness of space. An explosion large enough to rip a star apart in fragments should overcome any posible gravitational force remaining. So in theory, Myth Busted.

In another one he called Alpha Centauri our nearest galaxy 4.x light years away.

After listening to enough lectures by many physicists never mind these documentary style videos I'm finding a lot of conflicting information from peer-to-peer in the scientific community of physics..

@@claytonvicarious probably always will.

Is a garbage disposal a subway? Just sayin.

Take it step at a time to be safe. Short hike on a neutron star for starters. Not recommending that to you personally of course.

I'm still thinking about it because you never said stop thinking about it. Would say stop please, I don't wanna be thinking about it for the rest of my life.

No it couldn’t.. atleast not one that could be used by us

You mentioned the word reality in your question. That changes everything. But in theory I believe it's called an Einstein Rosen Bridge. Also in theory you could only travel half way across that bridge.

hahaha have another first lenguage than english, come again xD ist lustig die doku als österreicher zu schaun

and i mean, the channel ist call Welt, so the german word for world, what did you expect ? ^^

@@juliand.breakdown463 so what are the English words for einstein ?

Totally agree, totally unwatchable.

then dont watch nobody cares

"if you build it, they will come"

The problem isn't Necessarily the energy required. The real problem is surviving the unimaginable amounts of energy that exist in what we refer to as space. At this time its estimated rhat approximately 10 to the 39th ergs per cubic 'centimeter' are likely in deep space. That's enough energy to power our entire planet for 10 or 12 generations.

What does that even mean? Are you saying if a human reaches the speed of light time stops? If so you're wrong but it's not important because it's impossible to reach the speed of light. The faster you get, the heavier you get so it would take an infinite amount of fuel to reach the speed of light.

I find this theorem completely ridiculous. Let's say we found a way to refuel as we were traveling so we actually could reach the speed of light. If it takes light itself billions of years to cross a distance then your spaceship isn't going to do it in 1000. That is not how "speed" and "distance" and "time" works.

Time doesn't stop, but it very possibly could become irrelevant at the speed of light....and beyond. And yes, in theory which all of this is, The Universal Law used the word "Information " rather than the word "Nothing". "Information can never travel faster than the speed of light".

@@timm4811 Causality may become irrelevant but "time" ticks on.

we OBSERVE black hole ( the effect they have in there surrounding ) in the center of our own galaxy, so it is MORE than a theory, it is a REALITY. got it?

Ask the black astronomer with the mustache.🧐 He told me via video on RU-vid.but i can not explain to you. because i am not expert🧐 Star talk is the channel 😊

Here was, well, here, but in a far more incomprehensibly dense, infinitesimally small, and infinitely hotter state.

Wrong answer!

This comment deserves so much more than it got.

In theory yes they are objects but we really dont know. There are emerging theories that black holes are literally holes in space bc space is fluid like. Some even believe they lead to other universes or are worm holes ....id love to see inside one and live but that whole spaghetification thing doesnt sound to fun....lol

Unfortunately we do not agree your thought on the 2D theory with the ball doesn't work in space. Space isn't 2D unfortunately so that theory is wrong. The fact is I believe is that gravity is local and if that were true the ball and the 2D experiment I mean then all would be lost. Take a look at the map of the early universe the map or what have you. And what you see is all the matter is being pulled and I believe it's blackholes that are doing the pulling. If it was dark energy pushing the lines would be stretched and there not there being pulled. As I have said in the past black holes have a direct effect on what we call dark matter. Therefore I believe you don't fall into a black hole you are pulled the force is weaker outside the event horizon that's why stars skip rite on bye them until they get to close and they get trapped by the pull. No liquid only gas

@@StephenMiller2001 hello I love the series unfortunately I have to agree to disagree the spin of the object and the atmosphere of said object are what create the event horizon along with gravity but what is gravity? That's a good question glad you asked let's start with what we know no gravity in space so we know from that that the ball in the middle of a stretched out tarp isn't quite what is actually happening out there. Because gravity of course is made its not a constant. So what makes gravity we we know earth has an atmosphere a thin blue line and without that well we would not be able to stand on the earth and that also gives the earth an event horizon same thing with black holes only black spheres are perfect and spin very fast which in turn makes its event horizon what it is. Everything in space is based on the same principles just in different forms.all the matter is the same only different if u understand what I'm trying to say sometimes I believe we over think the questions and that inhabits our ability to answer them. We can make gravity so let's work on that and that will let us explore the universe thanks for the reply. Hopefully we can find some answers yours truly Lee.b

They can’t die. Once their gravitational influence affects as much as it can reach, their gravitational presence, or, force, will be eternally constant.

Nothing escapes from within the black hole, the accretion disc and resulting Quasar as the black hole feeds is not within the blackhole. Some matter is ejected as some is consumed by the black hole ..... as is my understanding, though definitely no expert

@@elijahfluw4347 not funny didn't laugh

@Wes Sanders daaamn that's crazy, but I don't remember asking

then dont watch it. do you really have to bitch about it?

"And out of the darkness came light".

A property of electromagnetic force in relation to matter. A Dipole interaction.

@@timm4811 What it is caused by?

Space is full of energy. Of all types. Matter is made of electrons (negative charge) and protons (positive charge). And neutrons (for balance [very simplified description]). Basically gravity comes from the interaction of positive versus negative in relation to mass (mass is a function of matter, not a physical element or entity of its own).

@@timm4811 Can you name the particular particle which causes gravity? Some say it is the Graviton. Is that true?

@@timm4811 Thank you for your kind answers. I am really delighted.

Really? Keep on imagining things and you too could possibly help these nazis make this shit up as they go along!