I cannot tell you how helpful your lectures are for understanding hard concepts in philosophy. Indeed, imparting knowledge is the ultimate charity. LOVE from Pakistan ❤
Beautiful! This idea of contrasting thinkers it's exceptional. The closer they are, the Better. I think It helps clarifying a lot. It helps specifying also.
“The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of men is a demand for their real happiness. The call to abandon their illusions about the condition is a call to abandon a condition that requires illusions. The immediate task is to unmask human alienation in its secular form now that it has been unmasked in its sacred. The criticism of heaven transforms itself into the criticism of earth. The criticism of religion into the criticism of law. The criticism of theology into the criticism of politics.” K. Marx
why are you throwing around the world categories as if Kant's categories are categories in the normal sense and not "Catigorical" production, which is precisely the production that is indifferent to all of our presentations?
He put the transcdental ideal of reality on stock and its not good enough he couldn't even write English and was obsessed with what's synthesis what's another way to think about metaphysic cocnepts? A prior? That's not good enough. Oh yeah, the ontology of heidegger being and time.
Why haven't you first explained the difference between the transcendent and the transcendental, before you leaped into christian transcendence. And on Friday we are again expected to go back to immanence and listen to a lecture on Marx's scientific economy... How can you sleep at night?
33 minutes in and there is nothing in this video that is informative about either thinker!! I don't believe you used to teach this. This is not teaching this is grifting.
