Mr Justice Rohinton Nariman is brilliant brave and most eloquent not only in his knowledge of law but in the culture of of our country and forewarning of the most disturbing state of affairs . 🌚😡Most admirable 🙏💐
Every Indian who is interested in protecting our democracy must and should watch his speech. Clarity with simplicity and wisdom gives us goose bumps. We have hope in such wise men that our constitution still can be protected.
Every citizen must listen to this great scholarly analysis of recent trends in the governance and judiciary with respect to the constitution of India and its safeguard.
Surely the suggestions and the light focused by His Lordship Justice Nariman on all the wings of governance in the present time are valuable and it shall not only rejuvenate the system but it shall help find concrete ways to strengthen it. Felt elated to listen mesmerizing lecture ...thanks
A new shocking work tiitled "The Lucifer Effect" by Philip Zimbardo highlights how Power corrupts & total power can corrupt totally thru an experimental research, which formed the basis of the award winning film "The Stanford Prison Experiment"!
True sir, not sure where is this Nation heading to ? Lack of wisdom, spinelessness, no determination in upholding constitution, the character of judiciary is worrisome. I wish entire judiciary of India watches this and have some sense of justice delivery system and constitution of India.
You need to understand the importance of it. It is not that they cannot do it while they’re inside the court or before their retirement But, it is the due respect given to the institution of Supreme Court. It’s a balancing act between giving respect to the institution & critiquing its flaws. If the people who are inside critique while they are sitting over there, think about the public perception of SC? But on the other hand, if the Justices who have been there & seen it all don’t point out the mistakes committed who else will? So it’s a rather balancing act than a conscious decision to go against the very Institution they belong to.
TN Seshan is remembered for electoral reforms. He was appointed CEC by minority Govt backed by Congress. MS Gill is remembered for introducing EVMs. He was appointed by minority UF Govt backed by Congress. Gill went on to become Congress MP and Minister. So shall we cancel Seshan’s reforms and banish EVMs? Opposition was not consulted earlier while selecting ECs. Now as per the new law brought by Modi Govt, Opposition will be consulted. It is not expected of a retired Supreme Court judge to indulge in sweeping and shallow political statements lacking in both reason and logic, apart from being devoid of facts and reality.
I have seen judges giving lectures in seminars but doing nothing to safeguard therights of people to live with dignity when in power. I have filed cases in Allahabad High Court for exclusion of cerebral palsy candidates from teaching opportunities in higher education. On one hand Central Government allows people with cerebral palsy for assistant professorship but on the other hand State Government of Uttar Pradesh is not abiding to it, it is close to 2 years now and the case is moving very slowly
Inshort Solutions are with Forums and Tribunals lead by independent minds well Justice advocated for Retired Judges by Bar but must also include other fields relating to justice i.e. legal researchers and advocates.❤ Lectures and Speeches aren't enough therefore these "lecture" speeches outside the bar and bench be specific and bidirectional dedicated sessions including with civic forums , symposium, talks, workshop but be specific as with lecture which lacks and doesn't become behavioural and participatory but the same authority seeking(though they are against authoritarian regime and little anti establishment of religion and politics) nature which we try to avoid and just agreeing or disagreement on the propositional nature of contemporary cases which isn't enough and not looking at the larger larger picture i.e.beyond criticism and educated solutions and towards the nature of cultivation of institutional nature of thoughts towards Constitutionalism, as law making isn't a just solution and neglecting emotional structures, the socio-economic nature of laws and including the social morality in the debate which isn't considered in writing judgement as aren't legal but important in life and concepts of justices.
Also does it not mean that the solid pillars that uphold our Democratic Constitution, (the stumbhs) have been eroded for a fancy of one , against the nation
Instead of going by majority why can’t President asks for one representative each rather than go by majority and hear them out in a debate . And then come to conclusion ? In any case do we really need governors ? Other than mischief making what else are their work these days .
Very bad idea to have elected by advocates. Thousands of advocates are practicing many of them can be planted by vested interests or parties to select the selection ctee of retd judges
these honorable judges are always refering to foreigners' works mostly the whites. But most brilliant era and literature that is native to Bharat none of them read . Immense knowledge is there in Indian lumiraies of past. Most of this is in Sanskrit and most of it is burnt down by Muslims who did it to every country they invaded. But still some literature and some luminaries of India's knowledge is still available. But the Congress government hid it. Hope In future our native cul true and jurisprudence will come to our people.
