Legit Or *Not* Back To Back *Marvel* Video Please Like The Video I Tried At LEAST Can *Deadpool3* Save The MCU? Please Follow My Instagram Here ► instagram.com/warstu Support The Channel By Become A Channel Member Here ►www.youtube.com/@Warstu/membership Let’s Talk Below
The biggest problems with "the Kang Dynasty" is that it's based on Kang, one of the lamest characters in all of Marvel. That and the fact that Majors is one of the worst actors I've ever had the misfortune of watching. His over-acting was so cringe it was difficult to watch his scenes. F Kang, bring on Doom!
I think Kang was pretty good. I think Jonathon Majors got his name dragged through the mud over something that wasn’t as we know it. I’m not dismissing his issues with his partner at the time. But with her trying to take back what she said I believe she guilty too.
The only reason they fired Kang is because Ant-Man 3 was a bust... Had it did close to a billion, they would've sweep J. Major's dilemma under the rug and proceeded.
Stuart Stuart….man I wanted Kang Dynasty to just be called Kang Dynasty and make it a Kang Origin Story, from his birth to discovering the multiverse, Ramatut, Scarlet Centurian/Iron Lad , Immortus, multiversal war, creation of TVA, to He Who Remains death, to the Council of Kang, to the exiled one unaliving “the one with the Hammer”….starring Jonathan Majors
@6:28 Yes the fans cried themselves outta an epic movie you are correct with the whole “Kang was beat by ants lie.” Which was not true and needed to happen to push the events of Kang Dynasty in motion and set up his redemption arc.
I've watched Quantumania 11x. It's my most watched mcu movie. Love Kang. It could have been saved by adding to 1 line of Janet describing Kang to Hank and Hope. "Down here he is too powerful. I couldn't beat him. If he gets out he will be able to control time again and will be unstoppable".
So, Kang Dynasty would have been based on the " Time Runs Out " storyline but instead of the Beyonders, the main antagonists would have been the Council Of Kangs and Thor, Hyperion, Starbrand, e.t.c. would have been replaced by the movie characters of the past.
Jonathan Majors told TMZ that he is "heartbroken" by the news that Robert Downey Jr.'s Doctor Doom will be the new villain of the next two "Avengers" movies, effectively replacing Majors' Kang the Conquerer. Marvel fired Majors in December, the same day he was found guilty of two misdemeanor counts of harassment and assault. His villain, Kang, was created as the new Thanos of the Marvel Cinematic Universe and would feature prominently in "Avengers: The Kang Dynasty," which has now been scrapped and replaced by "Avengers: Doomsday," starring Downey. “Yes, heartbroken. Of course,” Majors responded when TMZ asked if he was hurt by the new direction Marvel was taking. “I love Kang. However, Doctor Doom is evil.” TMZ later noted that Downey was being given the opportunity to lead more Marvel films despite his own history of legal troubles. Downey was arrested in 1996 for possession of heroin, cocaine and an unloaded gun and received three years of probation. He faced many other legal problems in the years that followed, causing some Marvel executives to worry about casting him as Tony Stark in 2008's "Iron Man." "I think it's only fair that Mr. Downey has been met with patience, curiosity and love... and that he will be allowed to work [his] art and be creative at that level," Majors said of how Downey was given a return despite the legal problems. "I didn't really understand that." Would Majors want to return to the MCU as Kang? "Hell yes! Hell yes! I love it. I love Kang," he said. "If that's what the fans want and that's what Marvel wants, then let's move on. Hell yes."
@@NIGHTGUYRYAN Well, what do you care about? I love Jonathan Majors is great as Kang the Conqueror, He Who Remains, Victor Timely, Immortus, Rama Tut, Scarlet Centurion and all their variants. And also as an actor
Does anyone remember how much shit RDJ was in to? He had to get Mel Freaking Gibson to bond him for Iron Man because no one would insure him. That may be what it really comes down to. If Majors can't get the high dollar insurance for the movie, they can't use him.
The idea of anchor beings is a bit dumb TBH. If the universe needs an anchor being to exist, then why didn't the universe die before the anchor being was born? Wolverine was only alive for 200 years, so what was keeping his universe alive for the 5 billion years before he existed?
Kang should have killed Ant-Man and Hank Pym in the first 10 minutes of " Quantummainia ". That's the version we NEEDED. Marvel nerfd his arrival. 🤦🏻♂️
I was just called a "Bitch" by Josh from Den of Nerds for wanting what you just read, and being a Kang fan. ...I really want to fight, and need a plane ticket.
Josh has never read an Avengers comic that wasn't written by Brian Michael Bendis or Jonathan Hickman. He has no reference for Kang, because he has limited comic book knowledge.
Theres two logans at that point deadpool is not an anchor . Thats why the timeline was saved because a second logan steps in when the original dies in 2029
Marvel wouldn't make Spider-Man the anchor being of the MCU, period. He's a Sony property. They don't have full-control over his character, they wouldn't base the existence of their entire cinematic Universe on one of the few characters left that they still don't actually own. If the MCU has an "Anchor Being" (A plot-device highly speculated to just be the result of rewrites following Jonathon Majors' termination, and thus a narratve one-off essentially exclusive to Deadpool & Wolverine-- ultimately inconsequential to the larger Multiversal Saga, and the various other MCU titles therein) than it's obviously Iron Man. Especially, since "Anchor Beings" are practically synonymous with the "Star" of each respective Universe. Which, explains the ending for ""Deadpool & Wolverine" heavily-suggesting that Earth-10,005's Deaadpool, and the "Worst" Wolverrine effectively replaced the original "Logan" as Earth-10,005's "Anchor Being" (Now, Anchor BEINGS) following the events of the film's climax. Thus, likewise cementing them as Earth-10,005's "Co-Stars" (Formerly, Star) in the prrocess.
What I'm still interested in was how was He Who Remains and Alioth originally supposed to be involved? To me he was the most interesting of the variants.
I also like how Marvel is intentionally leaking the Kang plots to let people know they originally were cooking still but people started crying so much they had no choice but to change course.
People are upset because this isn’t how we wanted it, Doom needs his own saga to fully flesh his story out. This is to late of an introduction, it’s like if Galactus was introduced in Captain Marvel so he could also be a big bad in Endgame. JM’s Kang was so good despite what you think about Ant-Man 3, his interpretation of HWR, Victor and Kang himself was just perfect but because what happened, his career completely got ruined and replaced
The issue was that the mcu was looking real bad then we finally got a character that was good only for the law to say he used too much force in self defense 😂 and running to protect himself. Now we got a pop up movie with a character we love but how did we get here. Also Ezra miller is stop running free
@@Byronic19134 What " cooking" are you talking about? GettingTobey's Spidey and Hugh's Wolverine killed by the variants of a lame c-list villain who jobbed to Ant-Man?
Think its funny how literally every single time something like this happens, its always a pipe dream... I mean think about it of course they can make anything sound good now that it's not being made...always happens
Speak for yourself. I loved Kang. He was a multi layered villain. He was NEVER defeated by Ant-Man. He was maybe trampled by hundreds of thousands of sentient technologically enhanced Ants. But his plan was ultimately just delayed, there was no defeat. Watch the film again…
Yes he appears in Loki as the guy literally controlling and manipulating events throughout history at the end of time. How is that weak? He apppears in Antman and is pushed into his multiversal engine which was something that had to happen to push the story forward with the Council and set up his arc for redemption. It all had a purpose.
The. Can do like they did in dr strange 2 MOM because they paying RDJ the bag he probably have a cgi moment where he has to be dr doom and iron man talking to each other that’s going to be weird tho 🤔
I don’t understand this variant thing at all just to say “ hey look it’s Tom cruise of hevry Cavill’”. I just don’t get the point just to show a different actor .
Showing a different actor is a visual representation of the character having completely different personalities and just mixes it up for the viewer to help it easier to keep track of.
Bro the disrespect to your credibility is crazy for your channel to be so small it’s crazy you literally have leaks years before they come out and you get no love but I’m giving I’ll your flowers bro 🤞🏾🙌🏾
*Vader breathez heavy* spiderman/madam web ONLY exist ta explain tha multiverse... think about it... who watchez over MULTIPLE universez??? Trick question... dr strange watchez from tha shadowz wit clea... BUT fantastic 4 r tha guardianz ah tha multiverse... guess who dr strange introduced spidey 2 after MULTIPLE avengerz told spidey he 2 immature ta be on ANY serious team... now guess who LEADZ tha fantastic 4 in 2099... spidey dr strange n tha fantastic 4 watch tha multiverse... spidey just in his neighborhood on standby while strange explorez all outcomez in ah pocket dimension... then fantastic 4 n antman assist watchin tha multiverse... guardianz ah tha galaxy tha marvelz n thor watch space... side team bein hulk n his children tha valkariez adam warlock n silver surfer... xmen n tha tva watch tha timeline... ironic considerin they fuck up tha timeline more than loki... tha avengerz watch earth in general... consider tha mcu team... black panther namor cap falcon winter soldier... tha midnight sunz (tha serial killerz in marvel) watch tha ethereal plane ah earth... ppl like tha cast we saw on screen in deadpool n wolverine basically show this az well wit tha team bein tha more HARDENED heroez like blade deadpool wolverine gambit electra johnny storm n even ah few we havent seen in tha same room such az magneto ghost rider dr strange wanda ironman hulk punisher shang-chi luke cage n ah few otherz... *Vader breathez heavy*
The DEI Kingdom you are saying who originally signed the guy to play every variant and be the over arching villain after just seeing initial set footage fired him for being Black? You see how stupid you sound?
Marvel wouldn't make Spider-Man the anchor being of the MCU, period. He's a Sony property. They don't have full-control over his character, they wouldn't base the existence of their entire cinematic Universe on one of the few characters left that they still don't actually own. If the MCU has an "Anchor Being" (A plot-device highly speculated to just be the result of rewrites following Jonathon Majors' termination, and thus a narratve one-off essentially exclusive to Deadpool & Wolverine-- ultimately inconsequential to the larger Multiversal Saga, and the various other MCU titles therein) than it's obviously Iron Man. Especially, since "Anchor Beings" are practically synonymous with the "Star" of each respective Universe. Which, explains the ending for ""Deadpool & Wolverine" heavily-suggesting that Earth-10,005's Deaadpool, and the "Worst" Wolverrine effectively replaced the original "Logan" as Earth-10,005's "Anchor Being" (Now, Anchor BEINGS) following the events of the film's climax. Thus, likewise cementing them as Earth-10,005's "Co-Stars" (Formerly, Star) in the prrocess.
