Kara Swisher Talks AI-Generated Scams, Tech Regulations and Trump's Stance on Banning TikTok 

LMAO I had to see whether or not that was true... Donald Trump passed out copies of a Forbes list of top-paid entertainers when huddling with Buffalo Bills execs to bolster his bid to buy the team - while refusing to reveal his financials, it surfaced in court Tuesday. “He gave us handouts of the Forbes list of the top-paid entertainers,” Don Cornwell of Morgan Stanley testified.

It's so odd how people either see him as the punk that he is or they believe the fairy tale lie he portrays himself to be.

@@marshalbaek5580 Do you really think there is much of a middle ground with open fascists? People either think he's the bee's knees, or they they see him for what he is, a buffoon. The NFL is very much all about the money, so when he was just another horse's ass that inherited some money I'm not surprised they didn't take him at his (worthless) word. Still, I bet they'd bend over backwards to help trump buy a team now if they thought it'd get him elected, trump's whole platform is screwing over the poor and helping the rich. The rich aren't especially bright, but they understand that a 'politician' like trump is an investment, if he actually wins they win big, and if he loses they lost money they literally will never miss.

Kind of like all the US banks did.

@@robertw1962 Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. And here we are. Now what?

best moment for sure

That was a great moment! I agree!

She has changed though. She’s far too chummy with the rich and famous, and got way more self centred of late. Used to like her but not so much anymore.

@@MeppyManNot really. Maybe she’s a bit more transparent about it now, but as she’s said: she’s not chummy, they just call her because they’re insecure and she’s not really friends with them. She tells them to grow up usually lol.

would love to see her appointed to a cabinet-level position to help put the yoke on tech company political power/influence, but she'd probably turn it down.

@@jamesclaytonbowman5977 she’s far to friendly with those running those very corporations.

I've seen Kara speak to a tech CEO at a conference. Barely touched on any hard hitting questions, and easily took his actually baseless answers

I gotchu fam ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-unoyN3n-n6Y.html

In France, evening talk shows often have 30 min interviews with the main guest. Just sayin. :)

All of them

😆😆😆😆💋💖🌵👵🐺🖖Hahaha!!!!

They're both probably traveling to Georgia

Let's see, the square of the hypoteneuse is equal to 50mph times 1.33 kids per WHALE! I'm just wondering whose wives they'll be inside.

You. Rock

She’s a phony. You of all people know that.

It's very good

She said the internet was invented in 1962. 3:18 Only off by about a decade.

@@dahawk8574The roots go back to 62, yes. For all intents and purposes, it’s fine to say 62 for most people.

@@Mediaright That is as foolish as crediting the US Interstate Highway System to Henry Ford, because he built cars. And then attempting to defend the assertion by saying that Ford's Model T constituted the roots of the Interstate. It fails to fill any intent or purpose. You either don't understand what the internet is... a network of networks, or you're lying. Kara is not stupid. So the question here is why would she tell a blatant lie over a fact so simple.

Go to Pod Save America, they did a long interview with her a few weeks ago.

And to be clear, based on what you say the objective is for AGI, it does not exist today and there is not enough tech that works today that can state AGI's "objective" will materialize with complete 100% certainty.

Yeah I found this jarring too. It may just be a slip of the tongue, but because it's a relatively hot-button issue, it's going to have some people claiming we already have AGI 😬

@@ballman2010Same. I think she meant "Generative AI"

@@ballman2010 I found Israeli philisopher Yuval Noah Harari's AI commentary from his current press-run to be even more egregious. He was on Meyers last week and later Colbert, making Machine Learning to be some kind of bogeyman "digital consciousness that makes decisions that can harm humans." Sort of the "scary AI will control humanity" conversations your dad drones on about. Stephen Colbert called him out on it, saying all the datasets provided to ML models are made by humans, therefore the AI can only predict, create, or find patterns within the human dataset; NOT create entirely original ideas. Harari pushes back by saying algorithms like the Stockfish equivalent for Go play the game unlike any human player. But I feel this comparison is not evidence that refutes Colbert, and actually relies on older machine learning systems versus the GANs and deep learning systems we're obsessed with as a society today. I will be impressed when we find a communicator who can adequately convey these concepts in an exciting way! That person will truly inspire a generation of kids to get into the field, the way Carl Sagan did for astronomy.

@@evan1337 That makes more sense. Currently AGI doesn't exist, and may never exist. But LLM's can generate new content on demand. Just wait until they get good enough to use your metadata to customize every webpage and banner ad for each individual user.

Well, maybe CPB.

No. No we don’t.

LOL you expect a lot out of NBC. Those guys haven't even acquired the Peacock domain name, it takes you to an unsecure phishing site.

Peacock's posting time is so weird! It's like 3am or 4am for shows. When NBC was on Hulu, shows would appear at 2am

@@debbiedoodiedandi They posted this episode 1pm edt. Why?

It's losing money, the ones buying shares will lose everything and say they did it to support their strong man.

Money always wins.

Exactly

Chud thud

Bingo.

She's talking about packet switching, which researching started on in the 60s.

You're kinda right, but it wasn't completed when it was invented. The internet really wasn't useable until 1969. A lot of people think it was invented in 1994 when Tim Berners-Lee created the World Wide Web for the CERN computers. But the idea to create what would be the internet started in the 1950s

​@@likebot. Ideas are not the same as inventions. This is why nobody says Leonardo Da Vinci invented the airplane. "The internet really wasn't useable until 1969." Here you too have the wrong decade. The internet is a network of networks. Therefore, you need more than one. You need to connect them together. This did not happen in 1962. Nor did that happen in 1969. Inventing one part does not give you a legitimate claim for inventing the whole.

@@debbiedoodiedandi She did not say 'packet switching'. She said the Internet. These are two very distinct things. Please see my preceding reply about inventing a part versus inventing the whole. Notice how no one claims to have invented AGI because they created the Perceptron. We are talking about steps that lead to an end result. The Wright Brothers made no claim to being successful in powered flight on the date that the canvas used to cover their wings was invented. Necessary, but FAR from sufficient.

@@dahawk8574 I can't disagree with most of that. But the internet was up and running by 1969.

She’s fake. Don’t believe it.

@@andybaldman you sound fake too!

@@mariavm9178 Well I'm very much not.

@@andybaldman insecure for sure! Bye!

@@andybaldman LOL! Awww how cute another lonely pathetic Troll clearly in need of attention - there you have some - you're welcome ! You know she;s not a fake you don't even care poor baby