Kareem Abdul-Jabbar | Nick Wright's Top 50 NBA Players of the Last 50 Years | No. 2 

Facts dudes a straight up historian of the game even if everyone doesn’t agree w everything he says he does back it up

He is a complete fool and so are you

What? You don't have access to Basketball Ref? He's just reading off stats, bro. This ain't physics.

LMao this guy just reading stat lines. Some of y’all must really be 14 years old.

@@Joes35 there's plenty mote context being discussed than just stats, but you'd have to watch the episode before you know what happened in it

Right he played it up till the very last second like there wasn’t a sole who didn’t know hed have LeBron no.1

nah bron has nick crossdressing photo montage in a hard drive. he would put bron as woman of the year if he could

@@steve13191 Jordan Stan detected

@@DWADEDABEST243 *jordan stan deleted*

@@steve13191 imagine saying nothing about basketball in a basketball discussion

If he’s your GOAT I ain’t mad but LeBron that’s a different story

​@@jerryjackson9148yea that's a different story cuz lebron is

He got #2 All Time correct..he just totally screwed up # 3 and #1🧹

@@alvinmiller6675 No he didn't lol. You would like it he did that. But what's been removed from these talks of longevity always matters how long can you sustain greatness and play at a high level. And even people hate LeBron for various reasons like, he's out spoken, he's the most talked about player probably ever, people want him to retire, but he seems to not be slowing down, people hating the records that he's breaking because their favorite player once owned them whatever the case. Bron is one of one, he's one of those rare athletes and he probably won't start really slowing down till about 43-45. It's some guys that's just that gifted. He will be at the top of all most everything considered with basketball in the history of a professional league. That's points, rebounds, assist, steals and blocks. I mean he's already l the only player EVER to be top 10 in the 5 mayor statical categories in playoffs and he's not the only great that's played 19 years. He leads all time in two categories (points and steals) and is second in all time in playoffs assist and he will add to all that before he's done. The points that he's responsible for from scoring and assisting it's easy to say no one in the history of the league is remotely close. And that's just the short of many things.

I always thought Lebron is number 2 but thanks to this video Kareem is number 2 and Lebron is number 3. Of course Jordan is number 1.

Total Achievements: (Titles / MVPs / Finals MVPs / 1st All-NBA / 1st All-DEF / Scoring Titles) 1) Jordan = 46 2) LeBron = 31 2) Kareem = 31 4) Kobe = 30 5) Duncan = 28 6) Wilt = 23 7) Magic = 20 8) Russell = 19 9) Shaq = 18 10) Bird = 17 11) Hakeem = 16 12) Durant = 15 There's a bunch of players with 14 Achievements. Stephen Curry has 13 Achievements. At the age of 27, Giannis has the best shot to make it into the Top 10...he already has 12 Achievements.

I 100% Agree! KAJ is my #1 as well. You can debate who is 1 thru 3 in the NBA, but from High School, to College to the Pros, there is one Man....Kareem! Best BB career ever! I would put him up there with Bill Russell and Ali for off the court as well!

Wilt tried the same and it backfired on him.

Two years of a young kareem btw

@@sambafarl700 Would have been interesting where he would have gotten drafted

@@tyjohnson3111 laker

@@sambafarl700 🤔 how come?

Total Achievements: (Titles / MVPs / Finals MVPs / 1st All-NBA / 1st All-DEF / Scoring Titles) 1) Jordan = 46 2) LeBron = 31 2) Kareem = 31 4) Kobe = 30 5) Duncan = 28 6) Wilt = 23 7) Magic = 20 8) Russell = 19 9) Shaq = 18 10) Bird = 17 11) Hakeem = 16 12) Durant = 15 There's a bunch of players with 14 Achievements. Stephen Curry has 13 Achievements. At the age of 27, Giannis has the best shot to make it into the Top 10...he already has 12 Achievements.

@@FreedomFighter2112 Delete this

@@tyjohnson3111 Why? The facts hurt that much?! lol

@@FreedomFighter2112 What facts? The fact is that you can’t prove to me a scoring title is equal to an All Defensive Appearance.

Bro, even is you take away scoring titles, Jordan is still the tops on the list. BTW, who are your Top 5? Can't wait to see your list

I think he really wanted ppl to listen to why he has them there then get distracted by highlights

@@jasondaley718 he also didn't want people to see the vast difference in skills between his top 3 picks.

@@jasondaley718 he also doesn’t own the rights to the highlights whereas everything he has posted is his intellectual property. Definitely harder to monetize if highlights are included.

@@bluewhale2846 There's substantial commentary and the content is transformative and educational, so any use of game footage would fall under fair use.

@@donaldlouwe3939 yeah but fox doesn’t like to take the risk so I’m not surpsrised Nick doesn’t as well. Fox Sports always remove the highlights when posting RU-vid clips

That was actually a really interesting comment to read. Thanks for taking the time to write it.

Isn’t the ABA & NBA game played totally different?

@@jamespuso1627 You're most welcome! Thanx for the comment.

@@tyjohnson3111 Their games could NOT have been that different - the two leagues played each other in many, many exhibition games (iirc, over a hundred games). EARLY ON, the NBA won most of them; but the ABA caught up and won so many games that overall they overcame that early deficit and ended up winning the majority of the games. There WERE some significant differences (only the ABA had the 3-ball then) and the ABA was called a "Forwards' League" - especially because of Dr J, Rick Barry and a number of other greats at that position. They DID play a little more open, run-and-gun style. Personally, I liked that style better, btw.

Jordan fans will tell you the watering down is actually a good thing because it made the league more fair, even though everybody knows that at least 5 of the teams Jordan beat in the finals had no chance in any other era.

It’s gotta be lakers at number 1

@@mistaincredible2573 NYY

Of course it is America’s team, the Dallas Cowboys, the only football team that God himself watches on Sundays, Mondays and Fridays.

@@StLloyd and they have been the 3rd worst franchise since they last won 💀

If we only look at a 6 year period the SFG 2010-2014 lol

I know

nick is a fool

I thought the same

He is

It does if he achieved more 🤷🏻‍♂️ but he did not lol Your argument is dumb

Maybe 1-3 steals per hame

I think a playlist would suit you better. They might do that if they haven't already. But all episodes in ONE video? You know how long that will be right? That's well over 10 hours. Maybe even over 20 hours. So a playlist of the episodes is just smarter overall from all angles.

@@diegobromfield well said

Well. Let's put it like this bc people tend to look at Kareem but don't fully grasp how old he was.. Nick used a lot of Kareem's college numbers. Now.. What would Jordan (and any other top 10 player) college numbers look like if they had played in college from 1966-1969??.. Think Jordan or any of the others would've won a few rings throughout the 70s??... Kareem was great. For sure. But the stats do not tell the whole story. Kareem was in the same position as Wilt and Bill.. His younger years were def in an different era..and any top 20 player would've dominated had they played in the same era as well. Most....MOST... GMs are drafting Jordan before they draft Kareem.. And that's the way I look at "GOAT Lists" bc it's all subjective.. But. Who would get drafted first most often?.. This "debate" will never go away.

I'm just thankful I don't have that "must rank!" Mindset. I love watching all the great players. My GOAT is Jordan. But. Hey.. LeBron is pretty fkn good, too.

Kareems 6 titles Kareem won 2 finals mvps

Here’s the episode with highlights ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Lg5nHTnXEJU.html

Why the last 52yrs? So he could overrate Kareem and cut Russell (RIP) and Wilt.

how did milwaukee do when Oscar Robertson retired when Kareem was on the team?

In the 1975 season (38-44), the Bucks were 9th in offense, 8th in defense, 8th in net rating, 13th in points scored per game & 5th in points allowed per game. Kareem only played the last 65 of 82 games where they were 35-30 with him & 3-14 without him in the first 17 games of the season. They finished 4th in the Midwest Division & tied for 6th in the conference. It should be noted that the DET Pistons in their division @40-42 & NYK in the Atlantic Division in the East @40-42 both made the playoffs as the final seed (5th). Kareem averaged 30/14/4/1/3 in 42 MPG on 51% FG (13/24 per game) & 76% FT (5/7 per game) coming in 5th in MVP Kareem was 3rd in PPG, 5th in RPG, 1st in BPG, T-18th in APG, T-16th in SPG, 3rd in BLK%, 9th in TREB%, 4th in DREB%, 4th in EFG%, T-11th in TS%, 2nd in MPG, 2nd in WS (6th in OWS-8th in DWS), & T-5th in Defensive Rating that season. 🤷🏾‍♂️ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In the 1976 season (40-42), the Lakers were 7th of 18 in offense & 13th of 18 in defense; scoring the 3rd most PPG while giving up the 17th most. However, this team had a better record than 2 West teams in the Midwest Division-38-44 Bucks & 36-46 Pistons who made the playoffs as they were the top 2 in that division. The Suns in comparison were 42-40; 3rd in the Pacific Division and the 3rd seed in the West. Kareem also averaged 28/17/5/2/4 in 41 MPG on 53% FG (11/21 per game) & 70% FT (6/8 per game) with no All Star help that season 🤫 Taking home the MVP that year Kareem was ranked 2nd in PPG, *1st in RPG* , 11th in APG, T-11th in SPG, *1st in BPG* , 2nd in BLK%, 3rd in TREB%, 2nd in DREB%, 5th in EFG%, 8th in TS%, *1st in MPG* , *1st in OWS & DWS* , & T-2nd in Defensive Rating. ******************************** Firstly there was 18 teams-not 16 which is the reason why the 1st seeds in each conference had a bye to the ECSF & WCSF respectively to face the winner of the 4/5 matchup. 5 teams each make the playoffs in each conference-so 10/18 teams make the playoffs. 10 of 18 teams in 1976 were under .500, ranging from 40-42 LA Lakers & *Eastern Conference* HOU Rockets to Western Conference Chicago Bulls @ 24-58. At the time both conferences were separated by 2 divisions. In the West, all the 4 Midwest Division teams had a worst record than the Lakers. The Lakers *(4th in Pacific, 4th in West)* had a better record than 2 West teams in the Midwest Division- 38-44 Bucks *(1st in Midwest, 5th in West)* & 36-46 Pistons *(2nd in Midwest, 7th in West)* who made the playoffs as they were the top 2 in that division--but were the 4th & 5th seeds in the West First Round Playoff facing against each other 🤔 The Suns in comparison were 42-40 *(3rd in Pacific, 3rd in West)* Prior to 2005, NBA division champions were seeded higher than the other teams in their conference, regardless of their record. Prior to 2004, when the NBA was aligned into two conferences with two divisions each, the division champions were guaranteed the top two seeds. This meant that top two teams in a conference (by record) would be seeded either first and second (if they were in opposite divisions) or first and third (if they were in the same division). Because of the NBA playoffs' preset matchups in the second round, this meant that the top two teams in a conference could never meet until the conference finals, assuming they both made it to that round. ******************************** First off the NBA went to 4 divisions across 2 conferences for the first time in 1971 with an increased number of teams. In 1970, there was 14 teams separated by 2 conferences *(East & West)* In 1971, there was 17 teams separated by 4 divisions into 2 conferences *(East: Atlantic & Central, West: Midwest & Pacific)* Eight teams still qualified, four from each conference. Hence, the division semifinals and division finals came to be known as conference semifinals and conference finals, respectively. The top two teams in each division qualified as the Eastern Conference, comprising the Atlantic and Central divisions, while the Western Conference consisted of the Midwest and Pacific divisions. The first place team from one division would face the second place team of the other division within their conference. In the conference playoffs, a division winner always held home-court advantage over a second place team regardless of record. *71’ BOS (44-38): 3rd in Atlantic; 3rd in EAST* *71’ PHO (48-34): 3rd in Midwest; T-3rd in WEST* *71’ DET (45-37): 4th in Midwest; 4th in WEST* All due to an outdated rule missing out on playoff basketball. Instead in the East, You had a *42-40 Bullets team (1971 Eastern Conference Champs; 1st in Central & 4th in East)* make it *(Central Div. Weakest That Season)* alongside a *36-46 Hawks team (2nd in Central, 5th in East)* ____________________ In the West, you had a *48-34 Lakers team (1st in Pacific, T-3rd in West)* and a *41-41 Warriors team (2nd in Pacific, 6th in West)* *The only two years where this “problem occurs” since the expanding into 4 divisions separated by 2 conferences is 1971 & 1976-the year before the merger that added a 6th seed 🤔*

@@ricardolozano5356 They played at a 49 Win Pace while healthy. Where does that rank in their conference again?

@@tyjohnson3111 that Kareem needed a pair of all time great point guards magic and Oscar Robertson

@@tyjohnson3111 the bucks won 38 games the first year without Oscar Robertson

Not too big of a deal to hav him over Jordan but it's blasphemy to have Bron above either of them

@@terricarter9435 it's all demographics/identity politics to you

@@terricarter9435 We all knew Nick was gonna have Bron #1. But honestly, every argument for Lebron at #1, Kareem has a better case unless you just prefer one play style over the other. I, for one, can't see any legit argument for the best player in NBA history having a losing finals record when no one else in the conversation has a losing finals record. It means from the jump you have to make excuses for him. He didn't dominate his era (based on wins), his stats aren't so far above his competition to give him an edge (like Wilt), he doesn't have the most accolades in NBA history by a long shot, he didn't have the highest peak, and his longevity stats are all trumped by Kareem. Nick should start his #1 ranking by just saying he loves Lebron and that's why he has him #1.

@@gumballwaterson1957 I agree with this take…after listening to this video having Lebron over Kareem is extremely egregious especially when you have to make so many excuses for his finals record.. Kareem’s numbers are ridiculous I’ve seen Lebron’s whole career which was impressive but the Kareem numbers are an encyclopedia itself.

Wow, how perspicacious of you! Lol.

He's been talking about LeBron being the greatest of all time for 6 years, he's not going to convince anybody who doesn't already think it lol

Emphasis on “HIS” GOAT

Point well made, but "climaCtic."

It’s not strange to rank bron 1. I would have tuned in more to see him try and validate Kareem 1 lol

Great idea, so many people are asking for more lists , another great addition

He's waiting for mahomes to potentially be number 1 before he ranks him

That was the previous ep man

I completely agree. However, using Nick's facts and evidence against him Magic is Kareems best argument for not being number 2. I actually didn't realize just how great Magic was until I watched this series. Now I think Kareem is bit overrated.

Lots of emphasis on numbers, with quiet tone, "but they lose". Opposite was done on Jordan video.

@@chickhearn4ever779 couldn’t agree more

@@chickhearn4ever779 he's setting the stage to make lebron number 1 with all the losing

@@chickhearn4ever779 huh. Lose lose where

Its nba players. Not basketball but good point

lebron and his 2011 finals meltdown

We can start with him not losing in the 1st round in the playoffs until 2021

Guess you'll have to watch next week and see the case he makes. I think LeBron will have a stronger case than people think

@@JayDaMan420 while playing garbage Teams in the first round prior to that year

@@JayDaMan420 that's a silly stat. You're ignoring the seasons LBJ didn't make the playoffs at all.

Bbref has everything he cited. Nick doesn't know stats

@@Chronz thanks for the clarification, I really thought Nick had memorised all of these statistics and wasn't reading them throughout. The way he presented the information was clearly what I enjoyed. But yeah, thanks for your input.

@@Chronz bitter. Lol

Total Achievements: (Titles / MVPs / Finals MVPs / 1st All-NBA / 1st All-DEF / Scoring Titles) 1) Jordan = 46 2) LeBron = 31 2) Kareem = 31 4) Kobe = 30 5) Duncan = 28 6) Wilt = 23 7) Magic = 20 8) Russell = 19 9) Shaq = 18 10) Bird = 17 11) Hakeem = 16 12) Durant = 15 There's a bunch of players with 14 Achievements. Stephen Curry has 13 Achievements. At the age of 27, Giannis has the best shot to make it into the Top 10...he already has 12 Achievements.

Eish; bet Lebron James just missed out!!

😂😂😂

Lol wow you're right

Sure, its like saying: Size doesnt matter. Its the how you use it.

Or delusional. Anyone that thought lebron would be 2 is

The fact he had an all time great on his team and still did the damage he does just reemphasizes his substantial greatness cause he shared the floor with a GOAT and still gave you 30-15-5 on most nights and won all those chips and records, people act like just cause Magic was there that he wasn’t given them that work, and even the game 6 performance by Magic, a case could be made that Kareem still deserved finals MVP because he averaged 30-10-5 in those finals

Kareem is also a HUGE reason why Magic is number 4.

@@blackwonderandre nonsense lol. Magic was a point guard the GOAT PG. his job was to MAKE SURE things were EASY for Kareem. Y'all gonna stop holding on to these fairy tales as arguments.

@@IknowMoreThanYou so Kareem wasn’t balling before magic?

@@tommyg421 He didn't win consistently without Magic. Pippen was great, but certainly not top 10, and probably not top 20 either. Probably top 30.

Does he dominate in Win Shares?

@@tyjohnson3111 yes, he’s 1st in Win Shares per 48

@@2682shark 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@@2682shark Wait did I just read you’re blaming players for their size 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@@tyjohnson3111 no you read that Jordan dominated the league while not having a size advantage

They should do that

The show is a podcast mon to Friday what more do u want lol

Nick's a bit too cocky. Skip, SAS, all paid their dues by being journalists then take artist. Nick started in radio as an option guy. On TV he acts like he's the only one to discovered Basketball Ref and Wiki lol.

@@kishonesnard8195 that’s true

Because goat is individual. Championships are a team accomplishment

How can a GOAT only go to 6 finals and play overmatched teams none of which were better than the San Antonio Spurs or Golden State Warrior teams. Tough for Kareem since he had Magic and tough for Magic since he had Kareem.

Same thing like people calling Messi or Ronaldo the goat. But they never even reached the Fifa world cup final

@@bgood4449 How can a goat hand pick his teams and still have a losing record in the finals...cp3 beatin the warriors and spurs with less talent on his team so they not unbeatable

since when is not making to the finals is better then losing in the finals, y’all act like jordan only played 6 seasons🤦🏽‍♂️

I can make an argument against lebron. You need stats and rings to be towards the top of these lists and lebron would have one maybe two if he didn’t team hop and ring chase. Kareem had magic but he joined before they even drafted him so he wouldn’t know. Jordan had pippen but again, Jordan was there first and they drafted pippen. I don’t reward ring chasers who join teams force them to spend every drop of capital they have to trade for all Star buddies then leave once they’re dried up or his hall of fame teammates show any sign of decline in their game.

Here’s the episode with highlights ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Lg5nHTnXEJU.html

@@limitedbom2206 none of this is a good argument to me … 1. He’s a free agent and can go to where ever he wants . 2. He wasn’t fortunate enough to get a magic or pippen drafted to the cavs but I guess that’s his fault for keeping them out of the lottery and they don’t land kyrie if he doesn’t win 3. He was leader on all 3 of those teams never played robin 4. Most stars ring chase but y’all don’t count the unsuccessful attempts 5. Nothing you said had to do with actual game …players can put themselves i positions to win if the franchise won’t All of that is excuses because we see teams before Lebron and after levron come together to win and it doesn’t happen Y’all will say Lebron had superteams then say 2012 heat can’t beat 96 bulls Then I say well if that’s the case that would make the bulls a superteam then y’all screaming no lol this my only response

Luka being 20 is less egregious than Kareem over Jordan, Luka is already 2nd(at worst 4th) best player in the game, unless he gets hurt or fall off a cliff he's going to be top 15 without trying. Kareem can't dribble shoot or pass, lets not forget nicks arguments for reem on first take were: highschool, college, what he did with magic and the media doesn't like him. Not many basketball things in there, other than longevity stats.

@@MoXy33 why y’all tryna convince me lol Idgaf who ppl have as the goat lol like idc if you wanna put jordan 1 or kareem 1 they all have an argument… and longevity is a good thing no clue why y’all try and act like it’s not but you got it

“Truth” lol

Who's been lying to you?

Bingo. And while Shaq was listed in the top 50 (his argument) Shaq was also not ranked. It was just a grouping for Shaq. He specifically has Luka at 20, and yet somehow doesn't have Jokic on the list AT ALL? It's inconsistent......

It doesn't need to make sense. Because this series is a personal ranking. Personal ideas, personal takes. Every single personal list, take or opinion in sport context is fanatical and cannot be considered objective. I kept an open mind to watch this as if I was watching a history documentary about ancient Egypt or something

@@jujutaco8487 He says that he put Luka there because of a precedent he had set about projecting their ranking. Hes said on First things first and his podcast he believes Giannis will be top ten yet didnt put him there? He’s contradicting himself which doesn’t make sense. And saying a list doesn’t need to make sense is just a silly argument lol

If you can’t make any argument then you don’t know basketball lol

I can make a argument that no one can debate me on. But most ppl don’t have any set criteria 🤷‍♂️

@@MLEMOBLIFEENTERTAINMENT make it

Haha Nick Wright only makes to people who need to study the games history. Nick lies and omits context A LOT to suit his narrative

still woulda been the top dog in the league otherwise

@@sgprince06 we don’t know that do we?

@@tomstorm7926 i dont see why he wouldnt be

@@sgprince06 because it’s not smart to just assume someone would dominate in sports in a whole different era. I’d like to think coaches and schemes got a lot smart over the years and knew how to stop certain players more so the in the past. Besides the evolution factor.

@@tomstorm7926 im saying who in the ABA was better than Kareem?

Nick made his list specifically to insult Wilt and especially Russell. Why the greatest of the last 50yrs? Why not since Bird and Magic got drafted or since the '77 merger? Oh that's right Kareem was draft 50yrs ago so..... RIP King Bill Russell.

How is Kareem better than Jordan? If Jordan had Oscar, Magic, Scott, Worthy, we wouldn’t hear the end from it from nut riders like you. 🤔🤫

Jordan’s legacy does not need protection. The only argument people use against Lebron, is losing. You can’t be #1 at any sport and be a loser

@@Norel_Nieves right right …. Um remind me how many seasons did jordan play and how many rings oh right so he lost to thanks .

@@soulzy3596 Jordan won 6 championships in 15 seasons. LeBron won 4 in 19.

@@joequinones7763 alright …. they both have fmvps for every single win , lebron is more all around and more versatile all while being top 5 scorer and top 10 assist ( unheard of ) plus in a harder league 🤷🏼‍♂️

Over😂

That’s not little known. That’s for the casuals who don’t know the history of the game. That’s for the people who discredit the levels of competition in eras as if the players are in control of it. You don’t seem to be one of those though. If Dr.J signs with the Bucks, does Kareem go to LAL?

@@tyjohnson3111 Most people are casuals but I get your point. And no, I don't think so. At least not that early. The Dr J thing is probably the single biggest "What If?" in NBA history.

@@fnjigsaw I think eventually they would have separated and Bob’s value could have caused him to get traded before 77’.

Cringe. No.

🐐👑

Goat JAMES.

Yeah obvs has to be Bron at #1 unless…… it’s Jason Terry 🤔

Wtf 😳

Facts bro

Lol reading stat lines for an hour is entertaining?

@@Joes35 why not try watching the series?

@@GIGAFAT3 I do. Did he not recite stat line for 40 of the 50 mins?

@@Joes35 he provided lots of context, including telling you what those players did in the games they played. Why are you having trouble following that?

You’re so smart 😅

That's about right. Plus Magic won Finals MVPs in '82. Only his 3rd season. Why was Kareem constantly being over shadowed by his point guard when he was the greatest living player at that time. Imagine if Scottie had won just ONE Finals MVP.

BRO STOP IT MIKE HAD GOAT HEAD COACH AND SCOTTIE PIPPEN. Without those two he a CHOKE IN THE PLAYOFFS.

@@coreythomas3633 Who is Pippen in your eyes? Dude was a 19ppg player in the finals. Lebron had Dwade with 21 Kyrie with 27, and AD with 25. (these are just the won finals, averages go higher if you include the lost ones) You act like he was on par with Jordan.

@@arguseyed9982 He’s not supposed to be his equal. He was supposed to supplement him as a #2 option on offense and PRIMARY PLAYMAKER. You keep harping on the Finals averages but not the playoff ones…I wonder why.

@@tyjohnson3111 Cuz thats what matters most?

@@arguseyed9982 🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡 that’s the ultimate casual take. Do the games to get to the championship matter less? So you literally must be one of the people who rather lose in the 1st Round than lose in the Finals. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 With that logic

Jordan having more finals mvps doesn't make him better than lebron or having more rings. He played way weaker competition. Yall love throwing team dominance into individual accomplishments and lebron and kareem played at a high level for 2 decades.

@@sportstalkonly1442 Lebron loss against the Dallas Maverick because he underperformed.

@@markthompson8246 and your point is?

Lol literally nobody discussed nicks list last week. Luka at 20 alone makes this list a complete joke. But keep thinking y’all making a point

@@Joes35 you got alot of hate in your heart homie…. And luka being at 20 is crazy, however my post said nothing about luka, good job grasping for straws tho

@@demetrius2607 lol hate in your heart? Some of y’all soft af. Anytime you hear something you don’t like, “you’re a hater”. Lol good comeback. I’m just laughing at you thinking this list is relevant to anyone except Nicks chorus of lebron fan boys. Literally no one cares about this list. Even FS1 didn’t discuss it except FTF. Nicks show. Everyone else taking it for the joke it is. Everyone talked about bill Simmons book of basketball when it came out. Because it was an actual objective look at the nba. Not some fan boys home made list.

@@Joes35 It's his opinion at the end of the day. If you think Jordan is #1 then cool! If you think Bron is the Goat, also cool! Tho these debates are fun at times, but people's opinions aren't up for debate.......my opinion! 🤣

@@Joes35 hypocrisy is real, you out here typing a whole book and trying to invalidate a sports commentator knowledge because he’s saying stuff YOU DONT WANT TO HEAR. If you truly don’t like something, don’t consume the product old man🤷🏾‍♂️ business class 101

Skip would never lol, but agreed

*Criteria

The list is about pro sports. Did the conversation have the same limitations?

I got Kareem 3rd. His teams basically disappeared in a watered down ‘70s. And in most of the 80s Magic was the better player.

@@aswanwilliam This isn’t true.

@@aswanwilliam He was apart of 3 60+ Win Teams & 3 50-59 Win Teams in the decade of parity that wouldn’t be matched until the late 2000s/early 2010s. 2 Finals Appearances & 6 Conference Finals Appearances. Didn’t play on a super team outside of 71’ Bucks. Faced off agaisnt 70’s Knicks, 72’ Lakers, 73’ Knicks, 74’ Celtics, 76’ Celtics & 77’ Blazers--all considered “superteams”; and their records would hold suit to that.

RU-vid doesn't allow explicit homosexual acts on its platform. He'll make an "OnlyStan" for that.

You really just found out who`s gonna be number 1? When he announced this series was my final clue.