Karl von Habsburg: Without Ukraine Europe is not completed 

His grandpa was 2 years emperor of A-H and last czech king

His line its not illegal

@@cash_only All monarchy lines are illegal, they all began art some point, and killing many others on the way, just as "legal" as they. And if those others would have won, their lines would be the legal ones. Each time they won a war against other noble dinasties, they convinced themselved god wanted them to win the war, so they reign "in the grace of god". They also masacre in the grace of god, and execute oponents in the grace of god. They even kill their brothers or fathers in the grace of god. All monarchies are at first "illegal".

Led ww1? You think he charged head first into the enemy? More like started it and sent millions to the meatgrinder causing millions more to have terrible grief.

Exactly, if the EU became a monarchy, HIMR Karl von Habsburg should be the emperor. Glory to Emperor and King!

​@@tschechischelander based

@@newhorizon3229 Karl von Habsburg and Habsburg-Lorraine in general are the most legitimate because their family ruled the Holy Roman Empire continuously from 1438 until 1806 (with a short break between 1742-1745). The EU should build on the HRE, which was its ancestor, and therefore if the EU were to become a hereditary monarchy, the Habsburg-Lorraine dynasty seems to be the best. The fact that they consider themselves Europeans and the father of HIMR Karl von Habsburg HIMR Otto von Habsburg was the head of the International Pan-European Union after the death of Richard Nikolaus Count von Coudenhove-Kalergi also plays into their hands. The European Union as a decentralized federation and a hereditary monarchy (elected monarchies, such as the HRE, do not ensure what we expect from a monarchy, i.e. continuity) would mean a stabilizing and protective element for Europe and its nations, such as Austria-Hungary was in the Central Europe.

Yes, this short round faced, big nosed, brown eyed person, who looks more like a Spaniard or what in Germany they believed Jews should look like, is the "legit" heir to the HR crown. Makes you think.

Emperor, not King.

Could you direct me to information that allows for further investigation of this assertion? Very intrigued, as l note that he emphasizes the importance of personal sanctions and indeed as of this date, that is exactly what is being pursued. Makes me think that he is very influential.

@@bradley6357 even if he was in charge he wouldn't be called "Emperor" anymore, Austria is just one state of majority German people. He would be just King

@@ericcameron3176 trust me bro

And coburg gotha. All of them makes me sick though. We the People do not want and do not need them. Not even one of them.

Fun fact: Both of them are Charles

The globalist halted the monarchies, limited them. Listen to the Benjamin Freedman, 1961 speech, Y T.

@@NewRepublicMapper Yup, Karl is the Germanized name for Carl or Charles. And to make things merrier we could add the current King of Sweden, Carl Gustaf XVI, another “Charles” name related monarch.

Isn't Kaiser a little bit grand for a small nation? In my opinion the title would be Archduke (Erzherzog) instead of Kaiser. You know it's weird to call post WW1 Austria as an Empire/Kaiserreich.

@@DMH-bt2zo really,, Gustav? But they do have the name Karl in Sweden, don't they?

Kaiser schmarn, das ja.

His line of Habsburg didn't do too much imbreeding.

jaw*

It’s mainly the Spanish Line that did the most inbreeding and their line mainly died out.

The Russians weren’t friends either

🤣

But Habsburger s lower lip is still there!

All of them lost.

- Was not it due to the actions of the anti-Napoleonic coalition that Napoleon lost? The allied forces defeated him in the Battle of the Nations near Leipzig (1813). Therefore, Emperor Napoleon I Bonaparte was defeated by the allied armies of Russia, Austria, Prussia and Sweden. Was not it the Battle of Waterloo (1815) won by Great Britain, Prussia, the Netherlands, Hanover, Nassau and Brunswick-Luneburg, which forced Napoleon to abdicate? - Is it only Russia that fought against the Quadruple Alliance (in particular Kaiser Wilhelm 2 and Franz Joseph I)? Maybe it’s worth reminding you that it was Russia, which made a separate peace treaty with the Quadruple Alliance, the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk in 1918? Did Russia actually sign the Treaty of Versailles, which ended the First World War? - Was not it the USSR (read Russia), which allied Nazi Germany at the beginning of World War II, signing the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact (23 August 1939). Didn't they start it together in September 1939 by attacking and dividing Poland? - Later on, during the Second World War, did the USSR (read Russia) fight against Germany exclusively on its own having already become an enemy of Germany, after an attack on itself? P.S. I would like to first hear your attitude to Russia's attack on Ukraine.

Don't include Hitler as an Austrian, he's a dictator of Germany

@@gdipmediacenter2455 I got a simple data and historical rebuttal details for the Russian fan base claim from you! thank you!! Hahahahaha

Look into Major Jordan's diaries from Federal Expression. Dan Smoit, "A Republic, not a Democracy", from Federal Expression. In the Continental USA, in the New England area, and in Central and South Central Louisiana, there are persons of Acadian heritage. The language is English, some do learn French, yet are USA citizens. The same with persons from Mexico, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Argentina, and the Phillippines, to add examples. Generational heritage and are good to have.

He’s opposed to Russia influence in europe

Look at the events leading up to 1933. The getting persons to work and keeping streets, bridges, and buildings, just a few examples, in working order.

Eastern Europe not allowing the overreaching taking of Westetn civilisation by the opposes of this civilisation. The Ukraine has been, since 08th Century, a part of Russia. Look into the Budapest/Bucharest, 1992 agreement, and the Minsk agreement. The USA and globalist over threw a truly elected President and Mayor's. Moved in Rockets, Artillery, and BSL laboratories, the same to Taiwan and main land China.

He is against Aggression, who is now russian commiting on another Sovereign country

@@CapCody Ukrainian na$is have been commiting agression against their fellow citizens for the last 8 years. First tanks attacking estern Ukraine were the Ukrainian ones. After the people in the east of Ukraine rebelled against illegitimate government of pro-na$i puchists in Kiev. Why na$i sympathisants in Kiev had the right to take guns and overthrow the democraticaly elected president - and take American money for it - while the people in Donbas had not the right to follow the example of the pro-na$i puchists? Except they rebelled against the na$i puchists, not legitimate and democraticaly elected head of state.

Absolutely !

I would rather say that Kiev is the Rus and Muscovy is a latter wannabe extension.