Kate Micucci Explains Hawk Tuah to a 5-Year-Old 

They did have Kimia Behpoornia and regularly have Caitlin Reilly & Lisa Gilroy who are all on Dropout stuff too! Love that you love these wonderful people!!!! Agree that the show is making lineups of absolute crush city residents from all over comedy!!!!! Yay!!!! 🏆👑💞

​@@eacomedy and now Zac Oyama!

Best answer.

This wins the internet for today.

Definitely one of the best descriptions of the Electoral College I have ever heard.

Did something happen?

@@vlotty9 she's recovering from cancer. Do not recall what variety.

​@@jbponzi1 I think breast

@@Anzy.99 lung cancer. Luckily it was caught early.

@@volz519 It is a LIITTLE fucking wild that people are willing to comment on other people's health without any knowledge. Glad you gave a quick correction to the others (as far as I know). Weird to think that we used to have a polio stricken president who most people didn't know was in a wheelchair, and now we've just got constant speculation into any celebrity's healh (and an actively cognitively impaired presidential candidate). Seems like we're going in 2 bad directions, hopefully stupid assholes stop talking about a political spectrum soon.

I echo James... "You got a smart-ass baby!" 😆

Best comment award goes to you!

Almost like this might be a pattern..... hmmmm......

The two would be utterly indistinguishable

@@brandonmroe265 Not true. You would have to reference Nixon, Reagan, The Duke, New houses only costing $15k.

Well that would be way better than, Let an 86 year old congressman explain to the voters. Q: "What is the electoral College" A: "It's what we have because of illegal immigration. Q2: "But the electoral College literally does nothing about illegal immigration, as it's already illegal to vote as an undocumented immigrant. On top of that there was literally no such thing as illegal immigration till 1924" A2: That is because trans people are telling you to change your gender" Q3: Do you know where you are? Can you count to 10? Are you high? A3: Why do crayons taste like wax? Is it because of the Jewish space lasers? Q4: Can someone call a doctor, this guy is either crazy or had a stroke.. A4: "I'm not a stork and I am definitely not lazy, I just want to take a nap. It is normal to sleep 18 hours a day.

He understood that he could make something thats supposed to be funny so that we dont have to constantly stare things that are unpleasant in the face and made it about himself quite selfishly.

You are allowed that ignoras a Canuck. Enjoy your free speech.

What do you think is wrong with the Electoral College system and in what way do you think we do things better in Canada?

@@Cimreau What kind of troll are you? Can't you read? First of all, I listed THREE things wrong with the EC. Secondly, unless you have NO education you should already know that. Why would you expose your own lack of knowledge or understanding like that? It only makes you look bad.

Yeah, the EC does the exact opposite of what it was intended to do sometimes.

@@Cimreau - the fact that they can totally ignore the votes of the state they represent and can decide to vote how they wish with no legal consequences; - the fact that the system can produce several winners that didn’t win the popular vote (that were not voted by the majority of the population); - the fact that it makes some people’s vote count 7 times more than some other people’s vote. It seems to me that those are three huge problems that undermine democracy and are three good arguments to tear the Electoral college system down.

She's a comic who loves to laugh and you would be surprised how that's not necessarily a requirement haha A GODDESS.

She really does have a beautiful laugh and smile!

Always.

Yep, for decades.

Yep. She's great in shows like Raising Hope and Scrubs

Kate Micucci is so adorable that her parents both went "awwwww!" when they conceived her. Then they went and took the now fertilized egg for ice cream.

Garfunkel and Oats -- Enjoy! Also, a few episodes of Scrubs. She's great.

If he does that will be the reason why.

Also, those 538 people vote how ever they want with no requirement to vote like you want! Merica!

Circular logic at it's best! (Or maybe worst.)

And hiding behind the couch: Thomas Lennon

Not fair. Only White Male Land owners get votes. MAGA.

Two Oateses? That'll get confusing.

True. Too many Oates. Throw Art Garfunkel in there instead. 😂

Also pretty much missed a bunch of Guy's electoral college answer. Hey CBS, pay your subtitle writers more!

From Wikipedia: Reply guy is an internet slang term for someone who excessively responds to social media posts, often in an annoying, condescending, or overly familiar or flirtatious manner. Reply guys are often men, often have few followers of their own, and tend to respond to posts by celebrities, those with large follower bases, or women. The phenomenon has been called an example of benevolent sexism. Ambivalent sexism is a theoretical framework which posits that sexism has two sub-components: hostile sexism (HS) and benevolent sexism (BS). Hostile sexism reflects overtly negative evaluations and stereotypes about a gender (e.g., the ideas that women are incompetent and inferior to men). Benevolent sexism represents evaluations of gender that may appear subjectively positive (subjective to the person who is evaluating), but are actually damaging to people and gender equality more broadly (e.g., the ideas that women need to be protected by men). For the most part, psychologists have studied hostile forms of sexism. However, theorists using the theoretical framework of ambivalent sexism have found extensive empirical evidence for both varieties. The theory has largely been developed by social psychologists Peter Glick and Susan Fiske.

In short: A reply guy is a creeper.

A working class trans woman went viral for her "very demure, very mindful" skits, immediately some random dude bought the copyright/trademark so they could cash in on it and now she can't sell any merch, etc. because of it. But it's a wider issue too, a lot of popular culture in the west comes out of minority groups like the LGBTQ+ and/or BIPOC communities. They then become fashionable/trends and are taken over by the mainstream, often losing/undermining the original meaning. See also: afro hair styles that are deemed "unprofessional/unpresentable" then become the hot new trend when adopted by white celebrities - but still unacceptable for working class peeps of the culture it's stolen from in their day jobs.

@@helenl3193Thank you!

@@helenl3193 Thanks. I was aware of the skits but not that the phrase had been trademarked by someone else. I also had to look up Reply Guy.

@@helenl3193thank you! I think the demure lady should sell merch of the random guy’s picture with the caption of “thief” or “exploitation” or “small penis”.

@@helenl3193 yass, queen

He's not so smart about how to talk to kids. Don't let him teach a five year old anything...he'll just make them feel stupid. He used this platform to show off his knowledge instead of just doing the actual assignment.

@@rustinstardust2094 wow, someone's upset

@@cweretelnyk He cheated and won. I hate cheaters. Do the fucking work.

@@rustinstardust2094 I feel like you did not understand him and are upset.

@@davidbeppler3032 Oh, I understood him. A five year old would not. Which was the whole point of the theme. But he got points anyway. Weird how this went over your head.

If you know how to handle micucci, you won't have to hawk tua on it. It provides it's own 💦

@@themaggattack What was that about your cucci?

Guy's 5 year old might not be happy, but they will be ready and informed for the thunder dome to come. I hear he is consulting with the USMC to design a suitable jungle gym.

No. No, he didn't get this game at all. Just used it to show off what he knows.

@@rustinstardust2094Wow, the joke went right over your head huh?

@@freyaegrey You mean the joke where he didn't have to follow the rule of having to break it down for a 5 yr old & instead just went on a woke rant to get bonus points so he didn't have to do the assignment like the real comedians? Breaking it down is a skill. He doesn't have it.

@@rustinstardust2094 He started out trying to dumb it down but accidentally used some big words. He was playfully called out on itz so he leaned into it on the second joke. And the entire segment was "woke." It's not a bad thing.

Oates!

incorrect. it absolutely was to maintain the institution of slavery and the control of white southern land owners. You are trying to ascribe modern justifications that weren't present when the electoral college was created. It's not about states with low populations, it's about states that were dependent on slaves making up the majority of those populations, who were not allowed to vote. Kansas, California, Colorado... did not exist yet. Guy's explanation of the electoral college was factual, and only history-denying conservatives who believe in unpopular policies they know won't get them elected, continue to espouse this made up fear of "majority rule" in predominantly rural states. Like nearly everything truly broken in this country, it's STILL about slavery. (fun fact, go look up how long conservatives have been yelling about "socialism" and take a guess where that comes from!) And hold on, did you just try to speculate on "what if an election was only about making an appeal to specific states"? You mean kindof like how there are only a handful of "battleground" states that matter NOW, and every politician runs to Iowa for the early caucus and pretends to love corn for two weeks? Are you kidding with that nonsense?

@@Templar462 * I have voted Democrat for many years and will likely continue to do so * I know American history decently well (but wouldn't call myself an expert per se). * I used Colorado as an example of population to size. * New Hampshire, Vermont, Maine would never ratify the consequences if it gave e away total control to highly populated states. * IIRC it was Franklin who "borrowed and amended" a form of government from the Indians to find a compromise to ratify all the states. Yes, the issue of slaves was highly relevant (as it was for most of American history) but absolutely not the only purpose, AT ALL. * your revisionist, cancel culture, 10 minutes of an Onion Article is ignorant and literally dangerous. I used Kansas as an example because that's farm country. Something New York needs. But why should they have Zero voice compared to New York when there literally no way to attain population density. * Yes, the battleground states get the most attention but look at the specific states I referenced (totally in jest .... for the less informed .... you, that means as a joke or light heartedly), those states are particularly non representative. Though the focus is on battleground states, that's only because the politicians have concern on the whole country instead of blowing off 95% of the area, in land space. I only responded because of your pompous, think your smarter due to your ignorance drove me crazy and needed correcting. Otherwise, I don't "internet argue", so, vent whatever, wherever you want, IDC ... Read a book (not the onion and the huffpost), learn some stuff, THEN ope. Your mouth lest you look like a completely fool again.

So your theory is 5 states deciding on who would win the election? Sounds pretty much like what is happening now. The current system disenfranchises people to vote that would vote differently than the majority in their state. I live in a Red state but am very liberal. In the end my vote means nothing nationally because this state will never be blue. Now maybe more people in my situation would vote in elections if their vote actually mattered.

Congratz!

That’s… part of the joke

Lol, sure. Would it be more your taste to have Joe Rogan and Rob Schneider on?