Kato Kaelin on Taking Stand 3 Times in OJ Trial, Prosecution Making Him "Hostile Witness" (Part 11) 

Hahaha..i know right😄

I did it's a great interview

I'll never pay you vlad.

I know right You know this It's gonna go on until like part 30 before he releases the full interview I usually stop watching them around this point so I don't ruin the full interview But I ain't paying to get them early

😅😅😅

Believe me. He didn’t get away with it. He avoided things here…when he takes his last breath…his real sentence begins. You don’t get away with things there. He’s gonna wish he paid for it here instead of there and was honest

Kato was just using the poolhouse decoy to get to the honey baked ham.

Marlon Brando

No he isn't,. Fuhrman is

@@thebettingpublicsportsshow Fuhrman is infamous

THIS. All of THIS.

Thanks captain obvious. You must have so much empathy 😉.

What's equally sad is the fact that it was also forgotten that you have to actually prove that the accused committed the crime.

@@WildL23 they did prove it is just racist ass cops made it reasonable to think the cops set him up

@@nattturner They did not prove it.

I was 15 with a major coke habit

I was 10 lol

YOU WERE 6... YOU WEREN'T THERE!! LOOL

@@halColombo how is that possible lol

Easy. All my friends were 19,20+. They fed me for fun I think looking back

What's the board of directors?

If that’s your takeaway- you need to get taken away.

haaaa.... Trader joe's employee !!! great call

True! He was SOOOO witnessissy.

Before I go to sleep, I listen to Katos voice because he is so calm, and obviously telling the truth

Nah. It wouldn't have mattered. That jury was never going to convict OJ Simpson.

The cops blew the case by jumping Oj fence without a warrant and planting evidence. It backfired. I do believe he did it by the way.

@@princellasmith7562 He did not do it

There is nothing Marsha could have done to win this case. The jury heard the evidence. The jury heard the timeline. Marsha was handicapped by her own way of thinking. Only 1 mistake was made by Marsha Clark. OJ's people think differently than her people. But Marsha Clark didn't realize that because she never pays attention to OJ's people. A jury of Marshas people is willing to convict OJ without a smoking gun. But a OJ's peoples jury will never convict OJ without a smoking gun. The only mistake that Marsha Clark made was that she assumed she knew OJ's people well enough to think we would convict OJ without proving that OJ did it, and without a smoking gun. At the end of the day there are no smoking guns in this case and it is not a proven fact that OJ did it. A high powered attorney like Marsha Clark will never know how an OJ's people person thinks. I'm not going to destroy OJ Simpson's life without a smoking gun. You all are crazy. Would you convict your brother without the prosecution factually proving that he did it and without a smoking gun??????? No. Well why would OJ's people do that????????????

@@princellasmith7562 Exactly, because there was no smoking gun. Not only that, there was not enough proof available to factually confirm OJ did it.

we talk about that in the next couple of clips

Ok so are you releasing them now or..

@Hal Colombo no, they never paid for their crimes.

@@vladtv F*ck yeah

@@Osiris064 what? Vlad? Is that you in disguise? 🧐😅🤣

This dude is a traitor like this makes me feel so bad for OJ

of ??

No he didn't they should have been sued for incompetence. Cochran could have gotten the case dismissed without ever going to trial but he let it proceed

simply fantastic !! lord help us.

It’s kinda Vlads style of interviewing someone new .. it’s like he’s reading their Wiki page and asking them what’s correct and what’s missing ..

🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯 that’s how you can tell he’s just making sh1t up.

Message !!! Htptiwny [viz, (May) Peace & Blessings be unto You All]

@@blackshogun1622 Message !!! Htptiwny [viz, (May) Peace & Blessings be unto You All]

She wasn't done with his pockets, plus he threatened to call the IRS on her ass.

There's no if. What planet are you from

I agree. I mean what made him snap like that and why that night? A few possible theories are #1 the Glen Rogers theory that OJ paid Glen to rob nicole and he ended up killing them or he was with OJ and things got out of hand. #2 OJ in a rage killed Ron and thus had to kill nicole since she witnessed it.#3 he just snapped for some reason. I do wonder what was happening leading up to the murders between OJ and nicole.

They can’t solve it because no weapon or bloody clothing was ever found, and the glove didn’t fit.

Yes I can see that as a reoccurring guest like Boosie

If that trial happens today, it's done in a month, and OJ is in jail. It was the introduction of DNA into a courtroom. No one had ever heard of DNA, and the jury didn't understand it. On top of which, the jury was primarily black, and the black community was still reeling from the Rodney King beating verdict. Today, this would have been an open and shut case.

@@princellasmith7562 Your probably, MOSTLY, right. However, if they still had bad police practices in forensic collection and questionably immoral cops involved and as I said a rank poor prosecution, coupled with great defence team, then maybe it's hung! Let me add, I'm not suggesting that OJ wasn't involved but can you prove it beyond a reasonable doubt with all the problems I listed.

@@rakbhogal3293 out of all of that blood from Nicole's and Ron's bodies literally only one other person's blood was found there, and it was OJ's. Those were extremely VIOLENT and gruesome murders. Google the crime scene photos if you can stomach them. Anyone involved in that would have cut themselves some kind of way, and their blood would have been there. Yet, not a single other human's blood was there. It was OJ Simpson. Period.

@@princellasmith7562 As I said, I don't doubt that. But, that doesn't mean he would be definitely found guilty. Unfortunately, that's not the way the legal system works. Which team is more competent and has the best story can overcome any evidence.... Unfortunately! History is littered with men and women that had damming evidence against them and with help from money and other variables, they got off!

Only 1 mistake was made by Marsha Clark. OJ's people think differently than her people. But Marsha Clark didn't realize that because she never pays attention to OJ's people. A jury of Marshas people is willing to convict OJ without a smoking gun. But a OJ's peoples jury will never convict OJ without a smoking gun. The only mistake that Marsha Clark made was that she assumed she knew OJ's people well enough to think we would convict OJ without proving that OJ did it, and without a smoking gun. At the end of the day there are no smoking guns in this case and it is not a proven fact that OJ did it. A high powered attorney like Marsha Clark will never know how an OJ's people person thinks. I'm not going to destroy OJ Simpson's life without a smoking gun. You all are crazy. Would you convict your brother without the prosecution factually proving that he did it and without a smoking gun??????? No. Well why would OJ's people do that????????????

Tbh though I think being Kato would probably be even crazier. Imagine you are a fly-on-the-wall bud of OJs who is just an aspiring actor lucky enough to get all of the benefits of being a part of his entourage while trying to make it big in the biz and then one morning life as you know it changes immediately. One day poolside with girls at the playboy mansion with your celeb best friend, the next day you are searching for apartments and attorneys as a broke actor!

For sure! But imagine being guilty and trying to keep an act or being innocent and being in that situation. It’s a nightmare. I don’t think there could rationally be a comparison.

without all the press etc I doubt he would have managed to persuade the jury to give a not guilty verdict

You sir are an empathetic man. I respect that

Especially after killing two people he must’ve been shitting himself

OMG... most genius blurb ever written !!!

That aged interestingly 😂 how was the verdict being the only Black kid?

@@slickrick2420 I’ll never forget. I was in the cafeteria and they had it on the tvs. Time slowed down….NOT GUILTY. The shock and anger was all around me. I put my head down and a few tears rolled down my cheek. Happy tears.🥲 It wasn’t about the double murder that he most certainly did,it was a lot deeper for me and others.

@@JeffWarren47 I get that 👍🏽 It was a big deal and it changed everything. Thank you for sharing

No he was high all the time. Course he dose not remember shit.

😆😆good one

not him

😂😂😂 so many tears

@@totite22 mos def not him. Lol

@totite22 yes it is...its encryption...tupac's friend kato is just how they hide it

The crazy part about it, is that the jury was mostly constructed by the prosecution. She thought that a predominately female jury would convict an alleged woman batterer without proof

Right. Kato is wrong. OJ gave Kato free room and board. Or at least free room. If Kato is going to imply or directly say OJ did it without a smoking gun and without it being factually proven that OJ did it then Kato needs to pay OJ back for that free room. With interest. Who is he to judge OJ? I can't even get free room from my own parents and siblings.

@@WildL23 kato just a heaux ass freeloader

I don:t appreciate a person responsible for two murders is walking around...

@@Soonerking OJ was acquitted of all charges dumbasss! Get over it he aint do it

@@Soonerking Shutup. You wasn't there. You don't know who committed those murders

I own that couch today !

Let's be real, to be impartial with this case is very difficult. The guilt is over whelming

@@ji5340 the guilt of being innocent?

@@ji5340 it's not overwhelming there's an intelligent argument to why OJ is innocent but no one cares to entertain it because of the racial element. The pitch forks are still out for this man

@@PardonMyPresence Very over whelming. First off the man is showing his guilt by the famous car chase, Innocent men don't run. Then there's the 108 exhibits of DNA evidence and 61 drops of blood that are mixed between all three. That also includes hair follicles and clothing fibers mixed between all three. If OJ wasn't a celebrity and most importantly if he was white he would have been found guilty. Certainly, race played a part.

@@ji5340 the guilt of the LAPD planting evidence?

How? He exhibited traits and actions of an abuser. His stupid azz Bruno Magli shoes that he said he would never phking wear were seen in 30 different photos by various photographers. GTFOH.

@@Soonerking u gtfoh bitch it's my post lmfao