Great meet! Thank you so much for uploading it! Great vault from Elena, KJ, Makenzie, Cally, and Haleigh. Great bars from Hailey, Cally, Kiya, Elena, Olivia, Haleigh, Alyona, and Sami. Great beam from Haleigh, Shealyn, Arianna, and Raena. Great floor from Anna, Hailey, Olivia, KJ, Haleigh, and Sarah. Great vault and beam from Josie, and Isabella. Great vault and bars from Jillian, and Raena. Great beam and floor from Christina and Aleah.
just here to say that the scoring across all of NCAA gymnastics is so inconsistent it makes some of these meets hard to watch. more often than not I end up skipping to the end to see the final because watching the whole thing is getting hard.
The male commentator talking about the gymnasts smiles and glassy eyes??? like sir?? Questionable commentators like this make me appreciate Bart and Kathy, and Amanda Borden so much.
@@emmanuelconstantino1578 we were closer to the vault than beam we sat like right in front of the vault but I didn’t really see what happened at beam for them to let her redo her routine
Man with all the reactions I thought that the redo was the only reason LSU lost. They were down anyways, and I think the judges are required to offer a redo in that circumstance. I know she fell before the beam malfunction, but it didn't change the outcome so????
Wtf the judges are NOT “required” to offer a redo. She missed, it’s her fault for hitting the end cap on the beam that’s not supposed to be stuck in there, it’s meant to be loose. That’s definitely not an equipment malfunction.
Yes, the would have won. The score on the TV was wrong, and without a redo, KY would have dropped the redo score and counted a 9.6_ score. LSU would definitely have won!
Score on the tv was wrong. LSU won after the last routine on floor, 197.450 -197.275. Improper application of the rules allowed Angeny to water down her second attempt to cull the 9.6 that was on the board.
Can anyone explain the whole beam end-cap thing? I heard people saying they're "not supposed to be in there" but they're there for all of the beam routines so I'm confused. Are they supposed to be there or no? If yes, why are they loose? If you watch 1:11:00 you can see her foot does step on it and that's why she fell on the dismount (because it comes out as she steps on it) so what are the actual rules? Katelyn Ohashi did the same thing back in like 2016 and the judges also let her re-do her routine but I don't remember people being upset about it? So I'm just curious what the actual rules are
No. With Ohashi’s routine, the beam pressure and vibration knocked it off just as she was dismounting. That was not her fault. Angeny MISSED the beam and hit the decorative end cap with her foot knocking it loose. You can see it from replays all over RU-vid. Plain and simple, Kentucky Coach berated the judges until they allowed a redo. Then Angeny did a less complex version of her routine to cull the 9.6 they were currently counting. No worries. Kentucky prob won’t make it to the SEC finals or out of the NCAA regionals.
that's definitely not an equipment error. her foot landed on a place where there was no beam. that's on her, not the beam. katelyn ohashi did the same thing several years ago and she didn't get a redo
I completely agree. So many gymnasts in college are doing only two. There should be some sort of incentive to do 3 passes bc that third pass takes so much more endurance.
@@jamesbagley2937 I know I publicly posted this but wasn't seeking rude comments I am just advocating for fair judges scoring find another post to troll and scrooge on A lot of gymnasts in college are underscored in college and a lot are overscored
@@laurenk4017 how was my comment rude? All I said was that if you did a bit of extra research then you’d know there’s more to a floor exercise routine than sticking all the landings. If you actually looked closely rather than just focussing on landings, Worley’s full-in double tuck had a major leg separation which they probably deducted for amongst other form errors. Her routine was scored fairly.
@@jamesbagley2937 just curious what your experience is Since you are talking about extra research As I have heard commentators say judging is subjective I can go back and review and inform myself because that's the type of person I am. Your comment just came across as snide. I just watched an athlete who got a low landing on bars score a perfect 10. Just seeing unfair scoring in collegiate gymnastics lately. Favoritism and Bias. I have my favorite teams and that keeps me watching but the scoring 🤷🏿♀️🤷🏿♀️🤷🏿♀️🤯🤯🤯😤😤😤 sometimes
@@laurenk4017 I completely agree about the judging biases and unfair scoring. And you’re right, judging is subjective but only up to a certain point. A massive leg form error shouldn’t be a subjective decision, it should be an unanimous automatic deduction that’s taken, but that isn’t the case with some routines. This is why NCAA gymnastics needs to be fixed.
@@Elitegymnasticsfan26 People see things through their own experience and expectation. I never got to the floor routines since the first and beginning of the second rotation indicated the way things were going to go. Again, judging can be weird, especially from the audience. I had seen both teams before doing very similar routines at other meets with scoring very different.
You are right!! It was so frustrating!! LSU was underscored, KY was over-scored or both on all events except floor. The worst examples were bars and beam!! Most glaring….9.825 for Kyia Johnson vs 9.875 for Shealyn Luksik on bars. Johnson with a tiny hop on her landing vs Luksik, who had two short handstands, was too close in one of her release moves and had her chest down on her “college stick” landing. (Bryant & Durante were also too low on bars when you consider Worley got a 9.9 with a short handstand and a small hop on the landing. It was crazy!! And that’s just one event!!!!!)
Was there and watched every routine. Judges were sometime so split, it would be .15 difference between two judges for LSU. And the floor scoring for LSU was so bad. While the Tigers didn’t perform their best, they should’ve walked out with the W. That was Kentucky’s highest team score of the season. I think there was a couple of judges trying to tank LSU scores some and inflates UK scores. The scoring difference between the two sets of judges for the final routine score was just bizarre…too bizarre to not be intentional.
Low key, floor is not my favorite event to watch anymore. It was always unlikely that they mess up on 2 passes in a 3 pass routine, let alone 1. So allowing them to do 2 passes over 3 doesn’t really make it a nail biter anymore 🙄 it’s like you know they’re not tired at all and are most likely going to make the only 2 tumbling passes they have to train in the gym everyday lol makes it boring imo.
@@therealjamesmccrary I understand that because the other pass is replaced with leaps but a couple years ago you were REQUIRED to do three until they lifted that, making floor less exciting to watch. I’m not talking about the technicalities because of course teams are going to opt for the lesser passes because it’s less mistake and better scores, I’m just saying it’s not as exciting to watch anymore.
@@stephaniekinsey3538 never matters. Just why wouldnt they get a better crown that actually can stay on their head so they can celebrate better rather than holding the crown not holding the crown oh crown falling oops cant high five
@@EvaSofie sometimes the scores don't update until the very end as far as when they drop the lowest score. everyone else i've talked to said LSU would have won. if they only lost by, what, .05? then if they counted that 9.6 for UK, then obviously that would be a noticeable difference
She's not even close, but the scoring was still bad tonight, everybody who's complained about lsu being over scored at home, including me, can see they were chronically underscored in this meet
@@Rkees5 I agree, the scoring on the same routines (one from LSU, the other from UK) was dramatically different. I'm someone who has complained about LSU's overscoring at home before, and this meet felt like the judges were trying too hard to make the critics happy, to the point where they severely underscored LSU
I don’t feel bad for her. When she got the green light on the redo, she didn’t even perform the same routine. The whole dispute from Kentucky was as suspect as the judges granting the redo.
