Тёмный
No video :(

Keynote Lecture: "Global Poverty", Abhijit Banerjee 

Paris School of Economics
Подписаться 16 тыс.
Просмотров 6 тыс.
50% 1

From June 5 to 7, 2024, the Paris School of Economics (PSE) and the Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) organized the second edition of the PSE-CEPR Policy Forum.
The PSE-CEPR Policy Forum 2024 was devoted to discussing emerging issues among leading researchers and policymakers, reaching a large audience that includes government officials and legislators, the media and the academia.
More information: www.parisschoo...

Опубликовано:

 

26 авг 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 20   
@anon7641
@anon7641 Месяц назад
One Bengali married into the Rothschild Family- the wealthiest n most dangerous family on the planet!!! Amartya! Now another one is on his way !!!
@miraadi97
@miraadi97 Месяц назад
Deakin GIFT University Main Milenge Prof. After Lunch in Buisness Analysis Department 😅.
@rgg1642
@rgg1642 Месяц назад
Poor countries don't need income redistribution. They need good governance, education, jobs etc.
@rakhimukerji7937
@rakhimukerji7937 Месяц назад
Those are income redistribution. POOR DO NOT HAVE ACCESS TO THOSE Facilities and need govt investment.that is redisttibution of incomre.
@SudeeptaChakraborty
@SudeeptaChakraborty Месяц назад
Redistribution doesn't mean to take from someone and give someone else. All these things you are saying, good governance, education, jobs etc, all needs focus towards redistribution of national wealth, resources, energy and allocate in a more equitable manner. For example, good governance can only happen if the political power is redistributed to include more and more people instead of political oligarchs.
@anamoyranjan447
@anamoyranjan447 Месяц назад
As the goverments of poor countries are rather rich they have an awesome lot of money for social spending, is your fallacious argument, I suppose!
@rakhimukerji7937
@rakhimukerji7937 Месяц назад
​@anamoyranjan447 This does.not have to be a huge amount of money.This may be improving access to.service.
@kabirkumarmukerjee-mustafi5124
@kabirkumarmukerjee-mustafi5124 Месяц назад
Until we know what to do with money we will continue to make it and let it be.
@pcaso
@pcaso Месяц назад
Giving lecture on Poverty in an air conditioned auditorium in Paris- what a hypocrite
@ManOfSteel1
@ManOfSteel1 Месяц назад
guy is having problem explaining
@johnjacob413
@johnjacob413 Месяц назад
No country is poor in the strict sense. Minimal government and maximum governance should be the order of the day and to stay. Now we have all the tools to solve the problem. Basically human beings primary objective is to solve problems. Not to discuss problems. Just go ahead with the solution. Think tank, policy makers and rhetoric are only aids to waste time money and talent. Get to the problem and find means to solve the problem. After all Nature dictates 1. keep blood in circulation or else result is death 2. Keep water in circulation or else result is disease and ailments. 3. Keep money in circulation or else result would be poverty. Hence ENSURE THAT ABOVE THREE ARE CONSTANTLY IN CIRCULATION. NO STOPPING.
@Hypocritial
@Hypocritial Месяц назад
Entrepreneurs and innovators end poverty NOT these academicians(of economics)
@tubelz
@tubelz Месяц назад
Had India followed the advice of great economists like Milton Friedman and Friedrich Hayek Indians would be rich today. Please check out the discussions between Ajay Shah and Amit Varma here on youtube.
@provashmallick2191
@provashmallick2191 Месяц назад
​@@tubelz Thanks for the recommendation
@tubelz
@tubelz Месяц назад
@@provashmallick2191 Amit Varma also has a podcast, The Seen and Unseen. Brilliant Discussions on the Indian economy. Ajay Shah has written a book you wish to check out, "In Service of the Republic". Milton Friedman came to India in 1955 but his advice fell on deaf ears. His memo to India is online and worth reading even today.
@Hypocritial
@Hypocritial Месяц назад
@@tubelz would have been better than following keynesian
@SudeeptaChakraborty
@SudeeptaChakraborty Месяц назад
​@@tubelzHindsight, of course, has a great evidential value. Only that following Friedman's economic vision will need you first to be a first-world country with pre existing financial and industrial 'space' to grow and a large middle class with spare, disposable income to drive consumption.
Далее
Esther Duflo and Abhijit Banerjee | After Poor Economics
1:15:11
Whoa
01:00
Просмотров 22 млн
HOW DID SHE DECIDE TO DO THIS?!
00:27
Просмотров 7 млн
Living Through Revolutionary Times
53:41
Просмотров 143 тыс.