I hope they make the new King Tiger that costs millions of dollars and has the most advanced weaponry and computer systems in the world and with no other tank to rival it's tech. It'd be perfect.
@@Bernd-m2o The MAUS would definentley be a major threat on the land tbh with the accompaniance of other medium tanks but even if modernized the MAUS calliber would be abt like 140mm by minimum (main cannon) and actually the main reason MAUS wasnt sent into full battle even if 4 were pretty much completed is bombers like the MAUS is so slow that aerial bombers will destroy it easily but now there are things like the A-10 and SU-25 and lock on bombs the MAUS would struggle to survive the battlefield like its gonna need something to protect it from aerial close air supports a lot and the MAUS will be hella expensive meaning that 1 destruction of a maus from aerial bombing which is very likely will be a big loss and waste its better for germany to stick to making medium-more proven weapons like Leopoard series
@@-ascendantcapricorn8370 Which T14? The one copy which was burning on the 1st showing? It is one of the "Wunderwaffen" which never show up on the battlefield. Its a bitter joke.
Mehr Kanonenfutter fuer die Ostfront. Am Besten setzt Ihr die Oma Courage da rein und stellt das Ding als Zielscheibe fuer die russische Artillerie an der Front auf....
Неплохой обзор. Однако принципиально нового ничего нет, просто собрали набор из уже имеющегося в наличии и предлагают несколько варианов комплектов. По факту хорошая модернизация Леопард-2.
ну хз там стоит автомат + все эти технологии необитаемой башни. новое орудие новые боеприпасы управление дронов прямо с танка Короч от Леопарда там только корпус поэтому это не модернизация
@@ІгорОниськів-ю5ю 1. Шасси и башня 1979 года принятия на вооружение. Тащить это все еще на 100 лет вперед экономически не целесообразно. Это старый танк в который воткнули новую пушку. 2 Пушка малого калибра. Нужен 140 мм. Как это и планировали в 80-е годы. Это уже перечеркивает этот макет. Его нельзя принимать на вооружение. А двигатель ? Это же не серьезно. Дроны танку вообще не нужны.
@@СергейЗамудряков-л2т Ничего подобного. Башня там новая. Ибо они установили новое орудие. Так же автомат заряжания. Ну и отсек для беспилотников. Всё это невозможно установить в старую башню без существенных переделок Новое 130 мм орудие на 50% мощнее прежнего. Корпус у него тоже переделанный а не 79 года. Просто сама база взята от старого леопарда а также двигатель и трансмиссия. Ходовую доработали. Так же делали с Абрамсом новым. У них всёх корпуса огромные поэтому им незачем создавать новую базу. Ну и управление беспилотниками с танка тоже намного расширяет его возможности. + новый КАЗ который отражает БОПС и атаки сверху. Так же возможность необитаемой башни. Танк получился добротный и впринципе под стать новому поколению танков. Но Абрамс новый мне больше понравился
Честное слово, мы, немцы, купили ваш бензин, вы купили наши машины... идеологическое дерьмо должно быть закопано, мы все достаточно покаялись в своих грехах. Ресурсов этой земли недостаточно для всех людей на земле. Мы просто должны регулировать это, для этого мы должны глобально справедливо договориться друг с другом о том, как нас станет меньше и у нас будет будущее. Убивая, мы разрушаем только то, что любим, и то, что извращено. Каждая страна на земле породила так много умных умов, что если бы они были удостоены чести, как они того заслуживают, мы все сегодня были бы одним целым... людьми/друзьями/соседями на уникальной земле. Мы должны отстаивать нашу любовь друг с другом. Вот чего я желаю своим детям и внукам, за это надо бороться честным словом.
The coolest part is the modularization option and the 130mm gun (8% size increase provide you 50% increase in penetration). I was expecting some more radical changes like unmanned turrets and engine and driver in front and gunner in back. On the other side, a proven chassis and hull will increase ready to market time a lot and the commander in the turret still provides some advantages if you loose electronic and need to keep going.
@@ronaldotrumph8960 and 8% bigger diameter is not what gives the 50% extra penetration, but the extra propellant thats in the longer casing as well as longer sabot allows for more penetration.
my question is why why would Germany put this in production they can give there troops ammo in they can barley produce leo 2s in large number they should focus on the resupply of there divisions.
this is an independend deveolopment of rheinmetal, and the german military focus always has been qualitiy over quantity, and a replacement for the leo2 is long planned by now.
To my layman's eyes, the frontal area looks like one big shot-trap? Between the turret and the hull? It's like guiding the shot to the 'throat', no? Even more like the early ww2 Panther models had?
Please don’t forget why Japan or German lost was partially due to it’s weapons production time. It’s too advanced and took too long to make with too little units.
@@Graczent.D gotta balance quantity with quality, lets take for example the territory of the USA, are you able to defend that with 100 extremely advanced tanks or 1000 less advanced tanks?.
@@Phantom-gc2ns 100, 1000 Tanks are more, but will be able to defend themselves less, which means youre gonna lose more of those more rapidly, no APS, no Softkill Protection Systems, no Advanced, FCS, Thermal Imagery for Commander, no Anti Loitering Munitions Measures, no Scouting vehicles themselves, also 1000 crews will still be more expensive and more valuable to lose than 100, people always forget how expensive training on Tankers is, and that they require Logistcs too.
@@Graczent.D you're missing the point, when you are defending a territory, u must have numbers to defend an area. a few advanced tanks cannot defend a border for example Germany shares a 3,767-kilometre border to the east. if the military cannot produce enough tanks to efficiently/effectively cover an entire front due to cost then the only alternative is using simple and less expensive tanks. Russia is an exception where decent tanks are being crewed by a poorly trained crew. similar to soldiers, special forces(good but expensive = less numbers) but regulars are the backbone of an army to win,
Почему человек не ценит совместную жизнь, вероятно, останется загадкой до Нашего конца. Видите ли, гугл-переводчик многое упрощает для понимания и означает общение друг с другом.
No. The basic forms were taken from the KF41 IFV, its further development and even some parts are the same! (this is both a manufacturing advantage and a maintenance advantage if someone uses it together with KF41 IFVs). I saw the KF51 live, it looks fantastic live, it was on display at the handover ceremony of the Hungarian Rheinmetall KF41 factory!
the shape has at least two functions one is hidden inside multiple angled plates to break up both HEAT and SABOT penetration. Second it may some stealth usefulness in coatings and shape vs modern thermal viewing systems possibly also vs ground radar systems.
Hi, have you entered our iPhone giveaway yet? Head on to our RU-vid Community page to join and increase your chances of winning a brand new iPhone15 : www.youtube.com/@defencecentral/community
Hi, have you entered our iPhone giveaway yet? Head on to our RU-vid Community page to join and increase your chances of winning a brand new iPhone15 : www.youtube.com/@defencecentral/community
The turret design is a weakness, by tapering the lower segment and exposing the turret ring. If an APFSDS munition hits that turret ring it will pop. The Abrams design is more effective
A APFSDS goes through the armor or disintegrates. At the end the gap you need to hit is the same. If you hit e.g 100mm too low/heigh, it will not ricochet into the ring. Therefore not sure what you have in mind here.
Blablabla, and clickbait. It’s not a tank, it’s only a study, and is not working. The price is uncertain, and nobody knows if Germany would buy this tank. Hugs from Berlin, Germany
Voll funktionsfähiger Prototyp keine Studie.Ich hab nach meiner Bundeswehrzeit lange bei Rheinmetal gearbeitet und die Kunden wollen testfertige Prototypen eine Studie findest du bei dennen nur am PC alles andere funktioniert.Der KF 51 wird wahrscheinlich ein reines Exportmodell wie der Lynx insofern wird hier nur gezeigt was auf die schnelle machbar ist.Der Preis der hier gennant wird ist Blödsinn,die Preisfindung geht über die Stückzahlen.
simplicity??? yes, until the 80s in the Soviet era! Now there are not individual tanks, but networked machines that share data from all sensors, radars, cameras, thermal images (and drones, helicopters, other vehicles too!!!), you know where the enemy is before you know your own your sensors could see it. These tanks know immediately and exactly where the enemy is, how many vehicles they have, categorize the targets based on type and distance, they distribute among themselves which one is in a better position, they also share the coordinates with the artillery 20 km further back immediately and automatically, which is within range the correct type of projectile is already loaded... An independent enemy tank that can only rely on its own sensors has no chance. The opponent doesn't even have a chance if it were better than these, with more precise sensors with a longer range... ...but this is a top category, I don't think there is anything better!
