Killgore Slaymaim, Champion of Khorne 

Well if this is true that certainly does make him better than initial guesses, but I still think he should provide a global bonus for like weapon strength or melee attack. And this special bonus should be displayed more readily for people on his trait, cause the issue with the text near the top of the info card is that not everyone, especially veteran players, are gonna pay attention to those because those bits of green/red text are merely indicators of what a unit does, and are sometimes wrong. Like saying a unit is anti-infantry, but it's not actually anti-infantry, because it lacks an anti-infantry bonus, and has no abilities that make it truly anti-infantry. If I see the green text saying something new then sure I might hover over it, but I also might not. Whereas I'm always checking unique traits for their effects. I also think that all the options need a few unique skills. Not a ton because some of them, like the nurgle lord, already have a fair bit to spend skill points on. And Killgore I think needs a slightly more beefy unique skill line that really adds on the melee buffs. You could have a skill that grants him deathbringer, something for gorefeast, or giving him the hungering blades passive to add on top of the hellblade passive he gives the whole army. Make him a truly unrivaled hero in melee that just brings the pain. As well as mentioned before providing more bonuses to the faction, cause 1 great personal buff, doesn't come close to as good as 1 good or even decent, factionwide buff. And this video made me a bit sad cause I'm a Khorne boy, granted I haven't played Norsca in a long damn while, so I never looked at these characters before either. I just was always playing Skarbrand or Archaon (and would just confed Valkia).

According to the modifier in the game files, it doubles his damage vs units at or below [iirc] 33% health. Not sure whether the multiplication is before or after resistances/armour.

@@otwk Well it wouldn't really matter if it's applied before or after, if he does 1000 damage, and the enemy has 50% resistance, then regardless of whether it's before or after the total damage he does would be 1000. 1000 x 0.5 = 500 x 2 = 1000 or 1000 x 2 = 2000 x 0.5 = 1000. Armor would be the same thing but only applied to his base damage.

@@darkrite9000 Ah, right.

Edging Khorne is the most dangerous thing to do. That is why you finish Khorne.

@@Turinnn1 C*m for the c*m God.

@@DrFeltcher Thanks. I hate your comment.

@@Turinnn1 Anytime my man lol

@@DrFeltcher C*mzerkers of Khorne will ravage your body... Thoroughly. Repeatedly. You put this idea in my brain...

Ca should give stupid bonuses theres literally no point in dedicating yourself

"blueballing the 4 Chaos Gods" Also known as Chaos Undivided. And yes, having the gods fighting each other for you is better than getting the full influence of one of them.

@@Gronnrag Chaos undivided is blueballing the 4gods

the legendary quadruple cock block, only ever heard about it in stories

Meanwhile Burblesmirk Spewpit is way better than the standard great unclean one. Horrible Regen for any unit and factionwide character HP is something most legendary lords would be glad to have.

To be fair, those skills don't really do much I think the most useful of them is the leadership and melee damage buff from the lord redline? Definitely not the khorne authority XD

Oh rly, did you come up with it all on your own? That's really impressive!

The other campaign that Legend loaded was from an older video where he reviewed an Ice Troll doomstack under Burblesmirk. It was incredibly powerful. Only difficulty with it is maintaining the troll's leadership!

Yeah imagine that guy in a mammoth stack, regenerating mammoths would be insane.

Wow that's an epic bonus.

By how much?

@@ToonLinksDair 25 %

You can only unlock one character from max dedication.

multiplayer campaigns are *really* buggy with these sorts of things, yeah

get the "recruit defeated legendary lords" mod. together with sfo it makes most of the long term motivation in my games. also defeated ki factions will band together and therefore get stronger. games in which a whole race is completly eradicated early are rare and most of the time you have at leas a small bubble of that faction fighting tooth and nails with all the legendary lords together. it has some gameplay advantages (you don't get shut out of some defeat traits so easily), but i also like it a lot from a lore point of view.

You technically can if you play the right way, but there are certain factions where it's more difficult than it should be. Like if you're playing Malekith, it's actually pretty easy to confederate all the dark elf LL's, but they have a much harder time getting him. Just get an alliance with them and drag them into wars with all the demons/high elves/etc. Get Morathi in war with all the high elves and the Lizardmen and 200+ relations and she'll confederate. Confederating Tyrion as any other high elf faction is next to impossible though since Tyrion is unaffected by enemy strength ranking in diplomacy. Boris also can't confederate Katarin or Kostaltyn to save his life and they can't get him without getting him in 20 wars. One of the most difficult ones is getting Zhao Ming or Miao Ying. In my Zhao Ming campaign, I had to get all of Cathay and drag Miao Ying into 10 wars with Ogres/skavens/chaos/orks before she confederated on turn 140 with her 2 settlements and 400 relations. It's definitely harder than it should be and I personally find confederating high elves to be the most difficult of any faction/race.

a like minded soul!!! i hate my list of early turn saved files. tons of'em!!

I know from multiplayer games that slaanesh is affected by the rampage effect of witch elves. So if it was the case in WH2, its no longer the case in WH3. However, wh3 has this 'immune to contact effects' trait, which might block it

Werekins were immune to psychology though. Saw the indicator so that guy is even more wasted on that army than legend said.

@@gruuts1844 It wasn't the case in WH2, this guy is talking nonsense. Immune to Psychology only ever affected Fear and Terror.

isn't it only melee defense that gets reduced by tired and attacks from behind?

Uhh, so it basically turns your army of snow barbarians into mortal part of Daemons of tzeentch faction.

infinite value. Despite all its flaws, the TWW series is worth its price ten times over, maybe even more. If only it was easier to get into...

@@Sercotani Tell my bank account that 😢. For the love of Khorne, they need to give us a bulk deal if i have to buy 3 games separately plus 12 seperate lord dlc and A BLOOD dlc to play 1 gamemode ln 1 game with the characters and armies i like and want to try.

With single entities one full army is already more than what can effectively be brought against it, exception full missile armies. So no Lancasters law in this case.

@@ruukinen you are of course correct. I realized that there should be more caveats added to my comment. Issue is, that 4 times the damage is wrong either way (even as an approximation). If even 1 stack can't fight effectively against a single entity (which of course is correct), then it might be many times greater than 7 times the damage taken as well, due to how much longer it would take to fight against 4 armies (which i reckon would be more than 4 times as long). Or it might be less due to other factors. In hindsight, i should probably just put this into the comment, but writing it all out properly isn't something I'm either keen on doing, nor is it probably necessary to get the point across.

@@theStamax No what I'm saying is your approximation is more off than just the simple 4x calculation. Since if the opponent already cannot fight you effectively with all their troops and you quadruple the amount it's just the same as adding 4 consecutive battles into the mix. Depending on the make up of those armies the ratio might be slightly higher (more high damage units such as heroes) but it will never be close to 7 in this particular case.

@@ruukinen Yes, I thought I made it clear that I understood the 7x times part being not correct (very unlikely at least due to the army composition necessary essentially never occuring). Again, in hindsight I should have phrased it better. My point was simply, that x4 isn't correct either, because it isn't JUST 4 battles consecutively. There are so many factors at play including army comp, larger enemy army size (reducing maneuverability), army losses, etc.

@@theStamax Ah. Yeah you are right that it isn't that simple but as a rough approximation it should be fine. If we are talking actual 20 stack of balanced army against other armies then Lancasters law might come into effect like you said, since then you do have the frontage to pile in more troops.

Seems counter-intuituve to make a crapstack with endgame hero.

200 is enough to negate any base damage. More armor doesnt do anything

Masseuse

You can try making one and sending it yourself

@@daimpthing well i wouldn’t have commented asking someone else to do it if i wanted to lol

@@riley_028boooooo

Axeface Warfucker

Then don't build a character stack. You have that choice!

Don't build a hero stack then? The only time anyone builds a hero stack is late game, where you can afford to be funky with your units

@@daimpthing Yeah, you are probably right.

Nah. This is bad information. Azrik does provide global spell cost reduction and Kihar at least comes with upkeep cost reduction and a dragon. Killgore is by far the worst.

He never does

I mean he literally said at the start of the vid he's done the skin wolf one before?