सबसे उम्दा उदहारण है आपका in circumstantial evidence Thank you for being there for us I m lucky even many of us are lucky and many of the coming generation will be lucky to have your free lecture in such a detail explanation. Thank u sir g May you live long And I want to do Intership under you so that I can learn something more.
Sir..Just begun your lectures. Simple and very well explained. Thank you for the good work .. Regarding the circumstancial example you provided, shouldn't EFG plead to right of defense of self and property , since A was an intruder ?
sir you explain really well , I am glad I found a teacher like you this is a small request that there is soo much light comming from the left side this is making the board shine please reduce light this will make videos clearer . LOTS OF BEST WISHES TO EVERYONE
Hello sir I am from Maharashtra. evidence is not that difficult as we think, I understood it after watching your lecture. Thank you so much for making such tough thing easier for me. 🤗🙏
Thankyou so much sir for these detailed lectures. Keep guiding the students like us. And please answer this. Can an accused be convicted solely on the basis of circumstantial evidence?
Very nice. Best think in your lecturers is giving examples in each and every point. Kindly explain substantial evidence. In Pakistan now evidence act repealed and there is Qanun e Shadat Order 1984 but most of provisions are same. I am Aamir Manzoor Aslam Advocate from Pakistan. I am preparing interview for post of Public Prosecutor. I wish if you share email. Thanks sir.
Substantial Evidence refers to evidence that a reasonable mind could accept as adequate to support a conclusion. It also refers to the product of adequately controlled investigations, including clinical studies, carried out by qualified experts that establish the effectiveness of a drug under FSA regulations.
Sir I have two questions. 1- are all circumstancial evidences secondary evidence? 2- CCTV recording secondary evidence hogi ya circumstancial evidence?
Circumstantial evidence are not secondary but indirect evidence, CCTV footage is a primary evidence but u need to complete the test that it is not tempered and the original source is still safe. We produce circumstantial evidence when we don't have a direct evidence. Secondary evidence are those which can be produce in evidence if conditions of sec 65 r fulfilled.
Sir, Padhate time Aapke pas kaunse notes hote hai bta dijiye... Taki hum bhi Us notes ko lekar baithe Aapke lecture dekhte time...! U r doing very good job for us Sir... Thank u so much sir...! 🙏🙏🙏
Sir can you plz tell us the metirial from where we can get this notes? Though you are a great teacher but I am facing some problems while taking notes.plz sir it will be very helpful
Good afternoon sir...I am satnam jawandha advocate from sunam district sangrur....I want to appear in eaxam of adj...sir I read about the judicial notes .. how can I get these judicial notes..
Sometimes police uses 'Stock Witnesses' which in turn are being pressurized to do so, who do not know the facts and are sure to turn hostile ,they r stock witnesses
Anything said or done immediately before, at and after the act falls under sec 6, so after after the act includes everything. For example . Ashraf v. State of Kerala, (2015) 411 KLW 036 The declaration was made by the victim himself, immediately after the incident of sustaining injury by him. In the said circumstances, the evidence of PW5 and PW6 about what the victim/deceased said immediately after the incident, is admissible under Section 6 of the Evidence Act. Apart from Section 32 (1) of the Evidence Act, the aforesaid statement of the deceased can be admitted under Section 6 of the Evidence Act on account of its proximity of time to the act of murder.
Good Morning sir g Plez ye bta dyen direct evidence humesha fact in issue par dy sakty hain e.g A nay B ka murder kia C nay dekha to ye to direct evidence hai ... Relevant fact par agar koi evidence day raha hai e.g Gun house wala court mein a kehta A ny gun purchase ki to kya ye b direct evidence hai ..????
At 13 min eg. Of circumstantial evidence is given . isn't the call received by B's brother E and saying we ve beaten A a direct evidence as Later A was found at petrol pump in injured state injured
We do not used the word real but we used the word relevant/irrelevAnt. So u can say that real evidence means the relevant evidence. (person who saw/hear/ perceived something through his senses).
The Supreme Court has said that a rustic witness was “bound to get confused and make some inconsistent statements” if he is subjected to “fatiguing, taxing and tiring cross-examination” for days. As compared to an educated witness, such a witness with rural background cannot be expected to remember every small detail of an incident and the manner in which it happened.
Camera is not a witness who prove it itself but it can be proved through witness only, that's why I said its a circumstantial evidence, sir I m working as a ADA, SO don't worry never teach u wrongly
@@harpreetsinghkahlon2827 Oh it mybe true our teacher just today teach us actually maybe she thought us something wrong or mere samjhne m glti hui hogi ... meri koi glt intention ni thu btw sir and thnkuu
