Kingdom of Heaven - King Baldwin IV 

wow... i did not recognize!

Same here and i saw the film a couple of times. Great Acting

Edward norton

S. Fray imagine being King Baldwin and Smoochy in one lifetime

This is one of my favorite movies and he's an actor that I love, and I never knew this, holy shit.

well he also had the timbre, melody and pace of his voice, but I see your point-

Well said, mate!

He also has Aces up his sleeves

Norton's soft voice and his expressive eyes really made the movie... He sure kicked Orlando Bloom's ass here!

Israel has defeated Muslims. Regained Jerusalem in the Six-Day War.We do not return Jerusalem to Muslims.From Israel.

That was powerful, moved me to tears. The hand of Elohim was on this King.

Sums up Feudalism.

Hola, he se todo tanta curiosidad por saber más de esta historia verdad o ficción, me atiende entretenida porque cada día quiero saber más sobre esto, y ese timbre de voz asemeja la tristeza y resignación q Siente dentro de si

french king .

It wasn’t his only victory against Saladin. He kept Jerusalem safe from the more powerful army of Saladin all the days of his kingdom. Baldwin was a great and just king.

@@foxbodyblues6709 also just for making peace with saladin

@@foxbodyblues6709 Saladin also won against him

@@ahmadyounas7372 All in all though, Baldwin was one of the few who Saladin was outmatched by.

+ARCtrooperblueleader True, it's interesting how Norton pulls the character so well.

+ARCtrooperblueleader I also think it is the best king role I have ever seen :-)

Roses are red violets are blue is that english 'cause i can't understand you

Red Rose what's wrong going to club and fucking?

Nothing wrong for u - europians, but for muslims its wrong, nd we r not going to live ur life style.

Thomas Mart he crushed saladin at montgisgarde with about 2000 men

A noble, brave and wise king.

@@arawn1061 no he fought 1 fight and won that and the reason Salahuddin didn't take Jerusalem earlier was because they had a treaty.After Montgisard Salahuddin won three times 2 against Baldwin and one against a templar fort on Baldwin's land but these battles were never recorded or presented like the battle of Montgisard...People were biased with the history and glory of muslims and will be After Montgisard Salahuddin also deafeated Baldwin in the battle of Marj Ayyum... God bless you

@@malconxrar7375 Not only one fight. Baldwin also defeated him again in Battle of Belvoir Castle after Marj Ayyun. By the time of Haitin, Baldwin already died. Saladin is an excellent commander. It's fair to say that Baldwin was indeed amazing to won against a man like Saladin. A leper and a young king that can achieve that much achievments during his short lifetime. The treaty does not change the fact that the raid in Montgisard is carried by larger force in Saladin side. You don't need to get salty and start to pull that 'history are biased and greater glory is on our side' card. We all know that the crusaders were lost in the end and your side still won. But we appreciate what the young king achieved during his short life. We payin resepect to him. If you want to explain the history, you can explain it nicely and with sophisticated sentences. If you don't like it just go to other video, the one which is not about Baldwin. You accuse other people as biased but you also biased by not explaning the real history and undertone Baldwin achievments. Don't be a hypocrite.

@@beren1898 I'm indian and know a lot about diff. kings. But this king 'Baldwin IV' is different. He has the most charming personality and most epic story.

Only then does that man truly begin his own game.*

Where is the directors cut?

The director's cut is infinitely better

@@fridolinmaier8806 agree. Takes the film from a 6/10 to a 9/10 IMO

@@fridolinmaier8806 agreed it’s a master piece

he was known for his wisdom. even while he died at only 24 years old i believe.

A real life Master Yoda

People who have to deal with diseases and disabilities have incredible insight way beyond their years.

He's fairly accurately portrayed, except he was not some kind of benevolent ruler who transcended religion, he did persecute Muslims, and he became lenient later only because it was in terms with peace treat between Salah ad-Din. ... Well, at least that's what I learned for my Crusade class, but considering age, that still takes some insight to actually play ball.

Isn't it a command in your Quran to forcibly convert others to your faith and don't you force citizens who are not Muslim to pay jizya? Does not your faith command if a muslim rejects his faith and wants to become a christian to be put to death? Do you find these things respectful of freedom or reasonable?

Even the movements of is body look like Marlon Brandon.

Oh my... I never realized it was him. I can hear now that it is his voice. But he does not sound anything like what he have before.

He aimed to sound like James Mason, i don't know if that means he failed?

HOLY FUCK! I didn't even recognize him if even by his voice.

Wow iv watched this movie many many times and i never realized that was edward norton but as soon as i read that now i can hear it easily, always been a fan of him

simen andersen lmao, don't be a millionaire! Just be rich enough to sustain for ur family and ur meals and utility bills

When I was 16 I got a girl pregnant and my life ended 😳

lol

haha

@@BipoIarbear lol!

Loved how they made Baldwin a stoic philosopher on this movie. Don't know if he was in real life, but those words contained great wisdom.

Ricard de Virgo He was a real person a really good King that I won't forget

I think Baldwin within the film Kingdom of Heaven, realised that ones faith relies not on an ideology destined for the masses but from within radiating outwards, upon others. Pure Truth and honesty.

rainmaker711 o

rainmaker711 but we must abide by those appointment over us, and the argument of self is flawed..

And I have much to answer for...unfortunately. I've made many poor and devious decisions in my life.

@@jebbroham1776 That maybe ... ... but, for what it's worth, I believe it is better to show remourse over past deeds, than to pretend to never have done them at all ... that is what it is to, genuinely, be a repentant sinner ...

And if we do not end up before God, if there is no accounting, we will still have lived better for it.

@@billwithers7457 That's the thing right - It doesn't actually matter if you believe in God. God in this metaphor can also be replaced with yourself: because in the end you must live with the things you have done, and the choices you have made. No matter the excuses you make, you know your own honest truths, and though you can lie to everyone else - someone who knows you completely (like God, or Yourself) - will know the truth of your actions. The point of this speech, IMO, is to be good because it is the right thing to do, and to seek virtue for your own sake, because in the end you must be able to live and die content with the way you chose to live.

Probably my favorite quote of any movie

A little late but it would make an awesome and historically significant costume.

@@vroucolaque5475 well, just look at those creepy "plague masks"! 😱😱

@@vroucolaque5475 those are scary masks.

@@vroucolaque5475 of course... Reading about the old plagues haunts my dreams but I am working on research on it for a paper. It is very scary stuff.

@@vroucolaque5475 I think it would cause a panic. See, I am a teacher at an elementary school. They might not get the Crusader vibe but some may definitely get a Poe's "Masque of the Red Death" vibe! (I have such bright students... Also, I may have read them E.A. Poe writings for Halloween!)

Except for "render unto Caesar what is Caesar's" etc

Agree. Baldwin's charisma is off the charts scale high. He would have no problem assembling an army of hundreds of thousands to follow him.

Christians lost when the catholics Roman church corrupted the religion via constantinian conspicy of roman temple of making Jesus god and trinity. it no longer remained the monotheistic religion which Jesus(AS) preached.

@@samiullahk7223 The Papacy was built on controlling and power, and not the teachings of Jesus.

As far as I’ve read about history, we don’t know much if anything about his character really. But what we do know is the political and military actions he had done in his short reign, and by all accounts his actions just speak of a man who was competent, courageous, and constantly worried for the future of Jerusalem.

🧎‍♂️ ⚔️

* frenetic applauses *

Me 30, still dumb like a kid. 😂😂

Alexander the Great died in Babylon at age 32 in 323 BC. Between the ages of 20 and 32, he had conquered the entire world known to the Greeks, stretching from the Ionian Sea and the west coast of Macedonia all the way to the Indus River.

I agree. And we should always look for what we have in common. We are one humanity.

@@monmothma3358 the only thing that we have in common is that both sides believe in god.

You have nothing in common with us, except that you claim belief in the OT saints and so called Isa, who is some sort of islamic Yeshua, and the fact that you are monotheists.

I wish he would do more roles like this.

I think you watched too much gay porn on the internet.

Red Rose u an arab? Funny, my kurdish friend told me that amongst his people, Balduin is respected as a great man like Salahadin. Saladin was himself kurdish so i wonder, why do you resent the Leper king of Jerusalem?

So true. The first time I watched the movie it was not the directors cut and it was not as good. Then when I saw the directors cut it made sense and filled in the gaps.

The Director's cut is light years better than the Theatrical cut. That said, I actually prefer this scene in the TC. For some reason they used a different take of Edward Norton in the DC and the scene ends up feeling a bit too much like a philosophy lesson. The whole part about "a king may move a man" is played a lot more intellectually in the DC than it is in the TC. Here, we see the speech played in a more personal way, as though the king is thinking of his own mortality.

It really is!!, I loved the original then the directors cut case out an I thought oh yeah it will be nothing brilliant maybe an extra scene but it’s a whole different movie, luv it

Thats the way scott intended it but the movie moguls didnt think a film almost 3 hrs in length would be popular haha did they not watch lord of the rings people want more if its good content which it was

you'd think studios would've learned their lesson from Blade Runner and release a legendary director's film as intended instead of ruining it only to lose box office money on what could've otherwise been a massive hit.

tell that to RC church, the propagaters of original sin 😜😆🤭

I am an Atheist and I still live this message. This really does not have any connection to a religious objective. Its a purely moral one. And before you ask. Morals and religions are not the same. Just look at a Republican

Valuable advice for a Diest or a catholic who are not saved and which think there actions amount to something before God . I’m a born again Christian who has accepted Christ because I know my actions alone do not make me worthy to stand before Christ my lord .

C. Ichongiri But Saladin was never like that. Saladin was horrible. When he took Jerusalem, he only kept people alive to enslave them for money or to rape the women.

Saladin was already quite honourable for his time, and quite progressive given the values he grew up with. There's only so much historical figures can do to transcend the social norms of their given society, and double that for rulers. An army, for example, was able to be mustered because the soldiers in it were properly motivated - by opportunities for plunder, rape and all sorts of monstrous behaviour in the aftermath of a won battle. As a general and a king, you cannot simply decree that 'there'll be no raping on my watch' without losing at least a quarter of your army, or have them deliberately hold back or rout. There's nothing Saladin can do about that, and the mercy he's shown is already impressive considering the alternative.

Evangelos Tse Wrong, that is a myth cooked up by Muslims because Saladin was sometimes merciful when he thought he could get more out of a situation. For example, the reasons he kept people alive in Jerusalem was to ransom important figures and to sell others in slavery. Saladin was just your average Arab at the time. The only difference is that he was merciful when he knew he could get more out of a situation Saladin participated in Jihad and terrorised non-muslims. Baldwin IV, on the other hand, is an underated hero. This man was a leper and still led with conviction. He still led his men into battle even if he was badly injured.

louis2816 You know, it's funny: it would normally be easy to believe this narrative you've just offered. However, I've literally just finished a book on Saladin, by John Man; and it was even more illuminating. Apparently, the magnanimity and generosity of Saladin which we (in the West) have come to learn of was as a result of chronicles of us (westerners) through the ages - for over 500 years up until the 19th century, the Muslims didn't take much interest in Saladin. However, such was the impact he made in Christendom that he gets mentioned in the work of various Europeans, from Dante to Voltaire, to Sir Walter Scott. Honestly, @EvangelosTse is right: Saladin was VERY progressive for his time and is deservedly respected. I mean, one of the example accounts in the books provides a shocking contrast between him and Richard I (the Lionheart). Most people have grown to look on Richard as a hero (and he was indeed a brave and inspiring leader of his army); however, Richard did some really f****d up thing with the 2600 Muslim prisoners he'd taken at Acre, in the full view of Saladin. Obviously retaliation for such is what one would expect of any person in a similar situation - and indeed Saladin wanted to. But, when the time came when he took Jerusalem, he saw (a long-term) vision to change his mind, successfully convinced his advisers to allow this change of heart (not an easy thing to do), and was still objective enough in his respect for Christendom such that he did not raze to the ground or loot its sacred Holy Places in Jerusalem. I am yet to hear of or read about any of the Crusaders reciprocating such respect to people of a different faith. Saladin was markedly progressive for that time.

I have no idea why you say 'Saladin participated in Jihad' in the way you'd say 'Saladin participated in the Holocaust'. A holy war on the Muslim's side is still a holy war, you know. Try to see past your modern sensibilities.

the rule òf Jihad, if the enemy wants peace, give them that until the peace satys, they get to rule. after all all abrahamic religions are abrahamic first, islamic dominion comes next. aallahhu alim

no. atleast in real life the saracens wouldn't have initiated the conflict, that being the third crusade.

Islam doesn't want peace, never has and never will, they want to make everyone else submit to it.

TRULY,TRULY ALL ABSOLUTELY BEYOND UNIMAGINABLY UNIMAGINABLE TRANSCENDENT TRANSCENDENTAL BOUNDLESSNESS LEVELS OF AMAZINGLY AMAZING AMAZINGNESS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NICE,VERY NICE. JAEDEN ABNER D'SA. NICE,VERY NICE.TRULY,TRULY ALL ABSOLUTELY BEYOND UNIMAGINABLY UNIMAGINABLE TRANSCENDENT TRANSCENDENTAL BOUNDLESSNESS LEVELS OF AMAZINGLY AMAZING AMAZINGNESS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NICE,VERY NICE. JAEDEN ABNER D'SA. NICE,VERY NICE.TRULY,TRULY ALL ABSOLUTELY BEYOND UNIMAGINABLY UNIMAGINABLE TRANSCENDENT TRANSCENDENTAL BOUNDLESSNESS LEVELS OF AMAZINGLY AMAZING AMAZINGNESS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NICE,VERY NICE. JAEDEN ABNER D'SA. NICE,VERY NICE.TRULY,TRULY ALL ABSOLUTELY BEYOND UNIMAGINABLY UNIMAGINABLE TRANSCENDENT TRANSCENDENTAL BOUNDLESSNESS LEVELS OF AMAZINGLY AMAZING AMAZINGNESS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NICE,VERY NICE. JAEDEN ABNER D'SA. NICE,VERY NICE.TRULY,TRULY ALL ABSOLUTELY BEYOND UNIMAGINABLY UNIMAGINABLE TRANSCENDENT TRANSCENDENTAL BOUNDLESSNESS LEVELS OF AMAZINGLY AMAZING AMAZINGNESS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NICE,VERY NICE. JAEDEN ABNER D'SA. NICE,VERY NICE.TRULY,TRULY ALL ABSOLUTELY BEYOND UNIMAGINABLY UNIMAGINABLE TRANSCENDENT TRANSCENDENTAL BOUNDLESSNESS LEVELS OF AMAZINGLY AMAZING AMAZINGNESS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NICE,VERY NICE. JAEDEN ABNER D'SA. NICE,VERY NICE.TRULY,TRULY ALL ABSOLUTELY BEYOND UNIMAGINABLY UNIMAGINABLE TRANSCENDENT TRANSCENDENTAL BOUNDLESSNESS LEVELS OF AMAZINGLY AMAZING AMAZINGNESS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NICE,VERY NICE. JAEDEN ABNER D'SA. NICE,VERY NICE.TRULY,TRULY ALL ABSOLUTELY BEYOND UNIMAGINABLY UNIMAGINABLE TRANSCENDENT TRANSCENDENTAL BOUNDLESSNESS LEVELS OF AMAZINGLY AMAZING AMAZINGNESS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NICE,VERY NICE. JAEDEN ABNER D'SA. NICE,VERY NICE.TRULY,TRULY ALL ABSOLUTELY BEYOND UNIMAGINABLY UNIMAGINABLE TRANSCENDENT TRANSCENDENTAL BOUNDLESSNESS LEVELS OF AMAZINGLY AMAZING AMAZINGNESS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NICE,VERY NICE. JAEDEN ABNER D'SA. NICE,VERY NICE.TRULY,TRULY ALL ABSOLUTELY BEYOND UNIMAGINABLY UNIMAGINABLE TRANSCENDENT TRANSCENDENTAL BOUNDLESSNESS LEVELS OF AMAZINGLY AMAZING AMAZINGNESS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NICE,VERY NICE. JAEDEN ABNER D'SA. NICE,VERY NICE.TRULY,TRULY ALL ABSOLUTELY BEYOND UNIMAGINABLY UNIMAGINABLE TRANSCENDENT TRANSCENDENTAL BOUNDLESSNESS LEVELS OF AMAZINGLY AMAZING AMAZINGNESS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NICE,VERY NICE. JAEDEN ABNER D'SA. NICE,VERY NICE.TRULY,TRULY ALL ABSOLUTELY BEYOND UNIMAGINABLY UNIMAGINABLE TRANSCENDENT TRANSCENDENTAL BOUNDLESSNESS LEVELS OF AMAZINGLY AMAZING AMAZINGNESS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NICE,VERY NICE. JAEDEN ABNER D'SA. NICE,VERY NICE.TRULY,TRULY ALL ABSOLUTELY BEYOND UNIMAGINABLY UNIMAGINABLE TRANSCENDENT TRANSCENDENTAL BOUNDLESSNESS LEVELS OF AMAZINGLY AMAZING AMAZINGNESS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NICE,VERY NICE. JAEDEN ABNER D'SA. NICE,VERY NICE.

Everyone except Orlando Bloom

@@davidepoggi736 Nah. Bloom did it right, man. I've seen the Theatrical Cut and the Director's Cut of this film. In the Theatrical Cut, I did not like his character so much. I thought Bloom really missed the mark. The problem, though, was not in Bloom, but the information that was cut for the theater. The Director's Cut actually explains his character a great deal. It explains why he is so gloomy and silent. Point is, he actually did a really good job, here. It's not an easy thing to play a quiet protagonist.

No, it's King Baldwin, not Jesus Christ.

It is a great movie though. The theatrical version was a travesty.

His voice wow

Movie was great, too. It was perhaps Ridley Scott’s last great film.

Thats amazing

Yep look it up. The “battle of Montgisard”

Bruh

Montgsird happened in 1097 something ??

@@gulbergislamabadwithejazaf7518 1177...

Didn't know who it was under that mask until now. Amazing. Never would have guessed.

Me too

My Name Is Gladiator

James Carmichael hahahaha!!! good one!!!!!

The real guy was not like this. This is just hollywoods take on it.

watched it 8 times

ny_kia31 we Will get more from the idea of Baldwin

So you don't want to learn the more interesting story?

sometimes it is good to keep things unknown for our spirit and imagination.

you should learn more about him, he was a good christian king

He was actually very accurately portrayed. He was accounted as a brilliant military general and philosopher.

yeah, because you know, capitalism and profit dictatorship can't stand a two hours and fourty minutes film on an interesting subject, too risky, would ruined their benefits, dammit. Poor them. Hopefully they have the superheroes blockbusters to harvest the green sheets.

Love it. Let’s complain about capitalism while using your phone, internet or WiFi service, all on an app or website...Lmaoo what an idiot

@@tonygaertner8863 what does any of that have inherently to do with captialism? or do socialist or communist countries not have cell phones and internet? lol

Austin Michael Because every single one mentioned is related to capitalism? All of those profit from capitalism, you only have it because of that system.

@@tonygaertner8863 Oh goodness you're denser than a rock.

@Satanogoat Rex no it’s leper

@@stealth1384 no it's leopard

@@aktchungrabanio6467 a leopard is an animal, a leper is someone with leprosy. Baldwin IV had leprosy, therefor he is a leper. Do you fucking understand now?

@@aktchungrabanio6467 a leopard? Seriously? Lmfao

@@stealth1384 balian's father wept because he had to tell Baldwin's father that his son was a leopard, aka a furry

the only Nortan we know is the fraud antivirus company 😆😜

Watch the director's cut man, trust me. This movie will become a lot my re likable when you watch it

so you found out what was Gods last commandment?

amitsidhar1982 the theater cut is wildly inaccurate and does him no justice, the directors cut is much better

Baldsin

Baudouin IV de Jérusalem , french origine

His french ass hole will bring lots of joy to Saladin, they will make french love also )

his family were French, but he was born a christian in Jerusalem, , which was its own kingdom, so, no, he is not French. and like I said before, they wouldn't do that, because Baldwin was a leper, Salah Ad-Din was married, and they were not gay

Saladin was bisexual for one of versions, and Baldwin was single. :) So, hot french love is possible :) Even if Baldwin is a leper, he has the right to love and sex. I read about him, he was a good, brave and noble boy. He was a handsome young man with blond hair and blue eyes before he began to wear a mask and cover his face.

rclines001 agree except for the fact that there is No god

There should be more persons like you rclines001. More persons to think by themselves, in peace with their mind and heart, with a proper education of respect and kindness. It's hard to be good, but that's possible to work on it and improve ourselves day after day to the salute of our soul. We are our own guardians.

@@arawn1061 Care to explain? You say that without reason. Please, tell us.

@@fratervinny simple. Pray all you like. Noone answers. There is simply no proof

@@arawn1061 Oh, great. Another one.