@@kohsmoger1567 terrible analogy kings were literally neck to neck with the mavs for two seasons now yall just be chatting it makes sense if the kings ever win a ring with fox before Luka they’ll prove him right
The real world isn't 2k. 2 ball dominant players who basically do nothing without the ball. There's a difference in being a great stat accumulator and a basketball player. They both have the same amount of rings.
Bro you never draft for fit in the nba if you are as bad as the kings at the time, and even at the time Luka projected to be a better player than fox as fox in his rookie season wasn't very good. That's the same mistake the blazers made when they took sam bowie over Micheal Jordan when they had Clyde already and wanting a big man. Portland still regrets that move to this very day. Also Bagley isn't even a king anymore and is on his way out of the nba. Even if you took Luka and traded him that is still more value than what you got out of that pick.
@@kohsmoger1567 is he a better defender? Westbrook averaged a triple double 4 out of 5 years is he better than them? Numbers are meaningless if they don't lead to wins. Has Dallas ever been a 3rd seed?
@@sidjones16 Brother dallas has been to the finals and been to two conference finals with Luka. Other than defense Luka is a better player than fox in every way. Your just making yourself look dumb by bringing up who is better especially if its about record. Fox has only been to the playoffs one time and had a top 3 seed once. And fox is arguably not even the best player on his team as Sabonis is the one that makes that team go. If they built around Luka instead of fox the kings would have been way better off.
@@sidjones16 Westbrook never made it out of the first round as the best player and never made it out of the second round as the second best player after Durant left him. So that is a bad example. Luka meanwhile made it to the conference finals without another all star and just this past season made it to the NBA Finals on a bum leg.
