The atmosphere must have become electric there watching these two prodigies take on each other & fight till the very end , both kramnik & kasparov at their very top performance!!!! best match ever seen.
what a privilege those arbiters must have being sat right at the board with the players watching the action unfold !! i would pay to have that seat for a single game between these 2 players :D
prince paolo robles I was happy it happened. It allowed me to re-analyze the position where it was no longer a game of Book moves - unless this is one of the Games that highlighted for the public the fascinating complications arising out of it....
I hate being biased but kasparov has some Psychological issues with Kramnik for some reason but strength wise..he is the GOAT!!!!! for me after looking at many of his games.
Kramnik was very hard to beat. His game was super precise, and Kasparov attacks that worked with other GMs mostly didnt work against Kramnik. Eventually, Kramnik learnt that Kasparov would take more risk, and beating Kasparov is a matter of making Kasparov self defeat himself by overstretching his own games. By the world championship 2000, Kramnik even traded queen early, and tiring out Karparov with boring Berlin defense. But it worked. Hats off to Kramnik in finding a way to beat the 100 eye Baku monster. I used to hate Kramnik, calling him Drawnik along with his anti-fans. But I've grown to admire his style. Kramnik simply understands chess positionally better than Kasparov.
@@wintersoldier5769 Anand had the same psychological problem vs Kasparov. Eventually, he had even bigger psychological problem vs Carlsen due to Carlsen universal style and lack of weakness. If he had played his usual fighting chess vs Carlsen, I believe he would have fared better than his 2 world championship chances vs Carlsen.
@@chessten bullshit kramnik could beat kasparov in 2000, it was just a rigged games (fixed and faked). Kramnik even lose in candidate to shirov that year. Kasparov played like shit, when he down point he agree to drawn in 13 moves with white lol
@@jojoaja6106 dude ... just check their head-to-head record. Kasparov back then had problems vs Kramnik. Now that you quoted Shirov, Shirov had absolutely rubbish result vs Kasparov. Even Kasparov had no interest in playing Shirov, which would be expected to be terribly lopsided.
@@asamiyashin444 yes... these days chess is complete memorization nd shit.. very boring.. the players only think about themselves wanting to win or draw.. missing those old days where the so called Tal sacrifices everything for the auidence😭😭... missing those days
I don't know much about that game but I found little bit of time went somewhere... 9 min of game play time and may be 30 sec start and finish... That is why that psychologist named Albert's picture is there... Approaching light velocity and watching from ground is a madness... But it is helpful here...
@@WeCube1898 For older chess engines it is somewhat true but for alphazero/leela/new stockfish that's totally false. These learn everything by themselves.
@sudhir Not really. These engines are over 3500 ELO. Magnus has as many chance against these as you have against Magnus. 700 ELO difference means you have no chance at all.
@@princepaolorobles6403 It makes no difference what the time control is. This is supposed to be a gentleman's sport. You will abide by the rules or you don't play at all.
