Kubernetes vs. OpenShift 

"Openshift guards you from running around with scissors" - love it!

exactly the video I was looking to see for quite awhile. thank you for this

this is just amazing qaulity, i love it and Thank you IBM

Finally an explanation that actually answered my question. Large corporations have certain needs that are streamlined in Openshift.

very good video always wanted to know about Openshift

Thanks this video was very clarifying!

Excellent presentation

Excellent overview for OpenShift vs Kubernetes .

thanks a lot a great point of view for Openshift vs K8s.

long live kubernetes

Excellent explanation sounds like something for Watson? Lol great videos folks.

S2I if I understand correctly is github actions - but you get charged for it?

Kubernetes support external load balancer too, like from AWS GKE and MS Azure. Rancher or kubeadmn updates the cluster very easy too.

You can do all the openshift features in kubernetes with few additional operators. Only potentially killer feature for OS is multicluster.

as user of openshift and k8s, problem with openshift was that is soo big, that managing it was harder than using clear k8s

S2I can be easlity replaced by standard ways like buildpacks.. Openshift is too costly..

The Day 2 operations are great, but for developers there are better ci/cd alternatives in the market

OpenShift is amazing!

I have the exact same handwriting as this gentleman.

Nice👍

Cool

Are these "guardrails" hard rules?? If so then it limits flexibility of deployment.

Better go with rancher and RKE2, you have more features than this and they are free!

Why doesn't OpenShift come with LoadBalancer support? Services of type LoadBalancer are stuck in Pending state forever. Should paying customers really have to install projects like Metallb themselves and manage the lifecycle on their own?

Sorry guys, independent of what one might think about OpenShift, the claims of what is hard in vanilla Kubernetes are plain wrong. Good selling points for the overwhelmed CTO, though.

I don't see the benefit of OpenShift on public clouds if you don't have a very large set of clusters to manager and you already run OpenShift in a private cluster and you're looking to streamline. Where OpenShift is a contender is where you need to run clusters on prem and especially if you don't already have a team of kubernetes experts in place. But IMO Red Hat should offer more out of the box to really stand out amongst the many alternatives. VMWare Tanzu doesn't look really mature yet and I don't think they have a huge uptake (I could be wrong) but I think they're heading in the right direction, especially in terms of CI/CD. Rancher is very interesting as well and have come a long way since they're humble beginnings.

Great explanation. But how you are able to write reverse 😲

Kubernetes vs. how much does it cost?

You’re outlining writing a Dockerfile as a pain point here, really ? I don’t think you sold s2i to anybody here, all developers nowadays write for containers as the new standard, am not sure where the problem in what you describes until min 3:00

Turn your own knobs.

Arjun vs Karna, Sugreev vs Bali

OC is a certified Kubernetes. All of other things is only for take your money.