Labor’s energy plan will cost ‘$1.5 trillion’: David Littleproud 

So you support a corrupt politician who's going to sell more of australia to America Thanks ya tosser

Shows you have no idea 😂

@@jennymills3147 Peter Dutton, Peter Dutton albos idol I guess if he tried really hard ...I take it back Pauline Hanson all the way.

I agree, but on the other hand better if he stays to ensure Labor sinks even lower as we approach the next election.

And it’s only taken Albozo 2 years to divide & damage our country, faster than the Whitlam government in 1972 & Krudd in 2007!! 😢😢😢

You have just been lied to by David Littleproud and you didn't notice ? Its a whopper of a lie as well and you believed him ? So this David Littleproud is stupid enough to believe that 82% Renewables by 2030 would cost $ 1.5 trillion. Either that or he is deliberately lying. Its obvious that there is ZERO chance that 82% would cost $ 1.5 trillion. We have put 32% Solar and Wind in already. So 50% to go. Anyone see us spend $ 500billion doing 32% ? Not even close to that was spent. Honestly its is so dumb lying to us and assuming we are all stupid. A back of envelope tells us this. We have 10GW of Wind installed at $ 2.75bn / GW = $ 27.5bn and we have 9GW of Solar Farms installed at $ 1.6bn / GW = $ 14.4bn. Even add in the Consumers Roof Top Solar as a cost. So Solar Rooftop is 20GW at $ 1.5bn / GW = $ 30bn. So we have spent to date on generation about $ 72 billion and that's for 32%. So $ 112bn to reach 82% Even add on all the transmission $ 25bn and 3 massive Water Batteries $ 35bn and 30GW of Grid Batteries $ 12bn. We manage to get to another $ 72bn. So a total of $ 185bn to reach 82% by 2030. They won't spend this much cos they won't reach that target and are more likely to be 60% by 2030. What a whopper of a lie from David Littleproud or he is that dumb no one should ever elect him.

@jkwmyplace1254 true but I have been noticing he is bending over a lot more.. sorry I ment campaigning 😆 0

Totally agree. Bowen wants to get a Nobel prize for being the first one in the world to get a country totally on renewable. He's as evil as he looks

You're right in saying "aust's to poverty". ABS data concludes that the Govt sector(nations revenue consumers) has successfully economically enslaved a largely disarmed civilian population (nations revenue producers)on a gearing of 1:1.60 against(not incl military in govt sector). And the divergence is/has been accelerating at a most alarming & offensive rate and far beyond global parity tolerances.

And we own something again would be nice instead of being owned.

However that's for when you'll be fifteen years older , but your kids.will love it . But that's if things go smoothly for construction.

Preach it 🙏

Also sounds far more competent then Dutton sorry I mean voldemort I think you've gotts loom at their talk time in parliment, Dutton gets wiped constantly, he's a tosser

ABSOLUTELY!👍

Because they want a state of *_permanent-blackout._*

It is not 4c per kw overseas. Do some research rather than make things up like David Littleproud

We have been saying for months and months...and he says it with a sneer

Of course, because he is a one-eyed Labour supporter. If you want someone who is worse, try Sarah Ferguson of the ABC {Australia’s Biased Current Affairs}.

Dutton is a tosser and will sell your country to America as liberals have been doing for the past few decades

Bruh. The coalition hasn’t even released costing for the year 0 of their strategy, let alone year 100

@@6braceface find any negative you can mate doesn’t make labor right

@@6bracefacetypical brain dead comment. Even if we ignore the fact that this a brand new policy vs a policy Labor has been gibbering on about for years without releasing the true costs, the full cost of both plans need to be compared over 100 years

Powering Australia with nothing but wind and solar over 100 years would incur infinite costs.

@@6braceface Bruh spending trillions to link solar farms and wind farms makes no sense. Let's see Labour's costing and plan for full baseload power.

It wasn't millions he spent it was hundreds of millions, as in at least 450 million.

Plus renewables have a life span of 10 years then you have to replace them and what do you do with the old gear ? I would like to know that before I die my children and grandchildren will have power !!!!! Go for Nuclear power.

What has Tanya ever done in decades of being in parliament?

But that doesn't cover 100% energy generation that is only for about 4%. Total if all nuclear could be close to 5 to 10 trillion

Surprised and happy the LNP party is championing public power. Normally a socialist policy.

​@stewartbrooker not socialist at all for government to provide infrastructure

Its not just that, Nuclear can provide baseload power 24/7 whereas renewables can't.

A century? You really believe that?

@@indiathylane2158 even if it's only over 30 years, it's still cheaper...

@@timewastemaster Waiting for proven, reliable figures from both sides. Not seen them yet.

$387 billion is just for the nuclear part and due to size it will only generate 3.7% of our needs by 2050.

If I recall correctly, we had a PM that wanted to Nationalise our resources about 50 odd years ago. Given the vested interests of the largest US petrochem corporations, whom lobby the US Government in such situstions, and private investment by the Royal Family in a lucrative extraction company which I believe is now called Rio Tinto; They more or less applied a soft Coup to said PM's Government for daring to suggest such a thing. The official from the US Government said to the newly installed PM that "The US will never AGAIN interfere with Australian Politics".

Brother hi five lol I agree coal is proven and china ain't going to blow up any of their coal power plants so why are we bothering with the little emissions we put out.

@stuarthaynes1737 yes!!! let's build 20 and go nuclear as well just to get manufacturers back in Australia.

Agree

Littleproud did brilliantly

Here you go - this is a rough guide and reflects current prices. It will be cheaper cos Solar and Batteries are falling in price. So this David Littleproud is stupid enough to believe that 82% Renewables by 2030 would cost $ 1.5 trillion. Either that or he is deliberately lying. Its obvious that there is ZERO chance that 82% would cost $ 1.5 trillion. We have put 32% Solar and Wind in already. So 50% to go. Anyone see us spend $ 500billion doing 32% ? Not even close to that was spent. Honestly its is so dumb lying to us and assuming we are all stupid. A back of envelope tells us this. We have 10GW of Wind installed at $ 2.75bn / GW = $ 27.5bn and we have 9GW of Solar Farms installed at $ 1.6bn / GW = $ 14.4bn. Even add in the Consumers Roof Top Solar as a cost. So Solar Rooftop is 20GW at $ 1.5bn / GW = $ 30bn. So we have spent to date on generation about $ 72 billion and that's for 32%. So $ 112bn to reach 82% Even add on all the transmission $ 25bn and 3 massive Water Batteries $ 35bn and 30GW of Grid Batteries $ 12bn. We manage to get to another $ 72bn. So a total of $ 185bn to reach 82% by 2030. They won't spend this much cos they won't reach that target and are more likely to be 60% by 2030. What a whopper of a lie from David Littleproud or he is that dumb no one should ever elect him. PS I hope you didn't fall for Davids lies.

Yep, just labor does that. Right.

Yes and for that we build a Renewable grid. We are not wasting public money on Nuclear and then screw the consumers and Australian business with the excessive costs. The price of electricity matters. Look around the world and 15 X the amount spent on Nuclear is spent on Wind and Solar. That tells you the economics.

He's actually been caught lying - were you fooled by him ? Read this for some truth ... So this David Littleproud is stupid enough to believe that 82% Renewables by 2030 would cost $ 1.5 trillion. Either that or he is deliberately lying. Its obvious that there is ZERO chance that 82% would cost $ 1.5 trillion. We have put 32% Solar and Wind in already. So 50% to go. Anyone see us spend $ 500billion doing 32% ? Not even close to that was spent. Honestly its is so dumb lying to us and assuming we are all stupid. A back of envelope tells us this. We have 10GW of Wind installed at $ 2.75bn / GW = $ 27.5bn and we have 9GW of Solar Farms installed at $ 1.6bn / GW = $ 14.4bn. Even add in the Consumers Roof Top Solar as a cost. So Solar Rooftop is 20GW at $ 1.5bn / GW = $ 30bn. So we have spent to date on generation about $ 72 billion and that's for 32%. So $ 112bn to reach 82% Even add on all the transmission $ 25bn and 3 massive Water Batteries $ 35bn and 30GW of Grid Batteries $ 12bn. We manage to get to another $ 72bn. So a total of $ 185bn to reach 82% by 2030. They won't spend this much cos they won't reach that target and are more likely to be 60% by 2030. What a whopper of a lie from David Littleproud or he is that dumb no one should ever elect him.

Too much common sense. I’m with you, I find it just unbelievable levels of stupidity

You're right. Crisafulli is not a leader, nor does he represent conservatives, yet he is still a better bet than The Giggler Miles. Go with One Nation! Preference all other conservative independents below that, but make sure you know where their alliances and own preferences go... not to Labor or the Greens! We must end up controlling who gets in government like the wicked Greens do now. We can do it.

Why? Plants need it.

Bowen actually said in one of his rants that his renewables had been costed against not knowing the cost of nuclear, but he has never given us a number, just lies.

Some one should set up #hideous blight on social media where Australians can send photos to to show what is being done in their area and the destruction of the environment and wildlife habitats

Try to do some thinking for yourself else you will be lied to So this David Littleproud is stupid enough to believe that 82% Renewables by 2030 would cost $ 1.5 trillion. Either that or he is deliberately lying. Its obvious that there is ZERO chance that 82% would cost $ 1.5 trillion. We have put 32% Solar and Wind in already. So 50% to go. Anyone see us spend $ 500billion doing 32% ? Not even close to that was spent. Honestly its is so dumb lying to us and assuming we are all stupid. A back of envelope tells us this. We have 10GW of Wind installed at $ 2.75bn / GW = $ 27.5bn and we have 9GW of Solar Farms installed at $ 1.6bn / GW = $ 14.4bn. Even add in the Consumers Roof Top Solar as a cost. So Solar Rooftop is 20GW at $ 1.5bn / GW = $ 30bn. So we have spent to date on generation about $ 72 billion and that's for 32%. So $ 112bn to reach 82% Even add on all the transmission $ 25bn and 3 massive Water Batteries $ 35bn and 30GW of Grid Batteries $ 12bn. We manage to get to another $ 72bn. So a total of $ 185bn to reach 82% by 2030. They won't spend this much cos they won't reach that target and are more likely to be 60% by 2030. What a whopper of a lie from David Littleproud or he is that dumb no one should ever elect him.

True and the Grid will use Gas Turbine Peakers to back up Solar and Wind. It works just the same as you.

Not just Bowen, Albo & all of Labor would be a good start.

Its because 19 countries DO NOT find Nuclear profitable and there is NOT a single country currently building out a Nuclear fleet rather than Renewables. The world spends 15 X the amount spent on Nuclear on Wind and Solar - tells you about the true economics doesn't it ?

here are some figures for you So this David Littleproud is stupid enough to believe that 82% Renewables by 2030 would cost $ 1.5 trillion. Either that or he is deliberately lying. Its obvious that there is ZERO chance that 82% would cost $ 1.5 trillion. We have put 32% Solar and Wind in already. So 50% to go. Anyone see us spend $ 500billion doing 32% ? Not even close to that was spent. Honestly its is so dumb lying to us and assuming we are all stupid. A back of envelope tells us this. We have 10GW of Wind installed at $ 2.75bn / GW = $ 27.5bn and we have 9GW of Solar Farms installed at $ 1.6bn / GW = $ 14.4bn. Even add in the Consumers Roof Top Solar as a cost. So Solar Rooftop is 20GW at $ 1.5bn / GW = $ 30bn. So we have spent to date on generation about $ 72 billion and that's for 32%. So $ 112bn to reach 82% Even add on all the transmission $ 25bn and 3 massive Water Batteries $ 35bn and 30GW of Grid Batteries $ 12bn. We manage to get to another $ 72bn. So a total of $ 185bn to reach 82% by 2030. They won't spend this much cos they won't reach that target and are more likely to be 60% by 2030. What a whopper of a lie from David Littleproud or he is that dumb no one should ever elect him. PS Solar is 30yrs and Wind 25yrs life span but they are a fraction of the cost to extend those lives. ie A Turbine is 3 new blades and a generator. Solar will probably be half the cost for 2 x the power in 30 yrs. They are also far far cheaper to run than a Nuclear plant.

Nope The World has found that Wind and Solar Power deliver exactly as expected and rarely suffer cost over runs. For this reason the world is increasing the installation of Wind and Solar based on its success. That is the real world happening in front of you. Its why The World spends 15 X the amount on wind and Solar as we do on Nuclear. Try living in the real world not an imaginary one.

Well, as for private investors keen to make a profit, Labor spokespeople are currently blaming the high cost of power on Energy Companies profit gauging, to counter the claim that the cost of renewables is driving up prices. If that's the case why should we believe that Energy Co's WON'T continue with that practice when they invest in all renewables?

Gas is baseload until nuclear is built

It would be better to conserve the gas for industry use . Australian start-up ventures have to move to America due to high cost of gas in Australia. But at least ½ million immigration brings some revenue into Australia and helps fuel the property speculation industry..

NO ONE intends to build a Renewable Grid in Australia without GAS TURBINE PEAKERS. To do so would simply cost too much in backup storage. So when you hear the phrase Renewable Grid think 90% Renewables and maybe 10% Gas for backup.