Landmarks #02: The First Footprints 

Yes indeed Ref. ahnz.anarkiwi.co.nz/1860-kohimarama-conference/

Two dirrerent versions to suit the paheha deception

@@_tusk no just recorded history.

That's what the Maoris did and why the Maoris did it right up to the 1800s. But this is about anthropology not torturing spirits.

The maori have already said there was already people there.

Sweet potato. No doubt they built up a sweat gardening.

'Aotearoa' has been politically charged in the last 10-odd years in a way we didn't mean back when this show was made.

You should go take a uni course in archeology! Go see what you find out. Prove them wrong mate, im sure you can.

do something that realy upsets our political bullies , look at all the amazing stonework , and think for yourself

@@iancassie9840 But imagine if you could prove the mainstream archeology wrong in their own language? Would stop everything beyound a doubt, get the truth out there.

There were pre Māori settlers here. Buildings like Otago Bots High school proves it.

Only if you think all White people think the same and have the same version of history. Do you?

Who's "us"? Not hard to guess.

racist

Same Old Same Old LAND GRABBING media funded bludgers. It ahould be outlawed aa Criminal terrorism assault. Today mega corporations from london stock excahnge & wall st bankers & ITs have invaded. These puppet Maori Media liars from Auckland & Rotorua are their agents.

No skills at that level of culture just cults and ritualism. And there could be no rituals for something beyond basic experience such as crossing the ocean to a new land. You've been misled by revisionism I'm afraid.

You spout a load of rubbish.

Exactly right!

@@GaryPeters-nv8pj Said the guy spouting rubbish.

Not debunked at all. Great face masks and carving but no writing, no metal, no charts, no math. So..... no "..and return". One way trip. D.A., NYC

These people are not Maoris.

​@@anarchisthistoryofnewzeala541 you should mive to Australia you will blend in well with the mass of thieving racists

Interesting counter-theory of yours. But then how do you explain why the greatest sailors in the world gave all of that up to eat dogs, rats, and ferns?

@@anarchisthistoryofnewzeala541 because after several generations there was no need to go back to the islands. This landmass is bigger than all the islands in Polynesia put together - and was more protein rich and I dont understand why you think they only ate 'dogs, rats and fern' but it may highlight your own prejudice towards Maori. The addition of crops like kumara ensured quality carb supplementation and no need to cross the southern ocean which was a perilous trip even in today's circumstances.

@@tommcg7564 New Zealand right now doesn't "need" to have international trade. You seem to think there comes some point where trade should stop even though there were things only the Islands had or only NZ could offer. What nation every disbands its transport infrastructure to replace it with none? Besides, if the Islands didn't have something worth being able to travel for what about the rest of the world's oceans? For the World's Greatest Sailors it wasn't just giving up on coconuts but on the treasures of all the world.

@@anarchisthistoryofnewzeala541 have no idea why you cite the "need" for trade. It's irrelevant as times were different thing i.e. they didnt run on a currency system which today's capitalistic nations rely on. They had everything they needed