Landscape Photography Glencoe - Multiple Exposure 

From the series the 3rd and the last are absolutely stunning.

I think this is what Monet would have created if he was using a camera. Well done Sir!

Stunning! What a wonderfull, abstract technique.

Some fantastic images there Gary. Well done. Dreamy abstracts, like paintings.

¡Sorprendente.!, unas imágenes fantásticas. Quedé con la boca abierta...!!👏 ¡Muchas gracias por compartir tanta experiencia..!🙏

Poetic and with a touch of Monet :)

Great one again, Gary. Firstly, Loved the main intro images, just gorgeous. The ICM’s, a couple in the beginning did not grab me but the rest I would have been proud to have taken them. Thanks again and looking forward to your Skye images when you get back, enjoy and thanks again.

Beautiful, original concepts and execution. And wonderful music.

Great images, very creative and mystic.

Awesome images Gary.I would be happy with most of the last series of images especially 1-3-5-6-11-12-13 which were beautiful shots

I have been doing multiple exposure photography using flowers and have figured out a how to sequence. First step. No more than three exposures. Step two, when taking each exposure check your light meter, exposure one correct exposure, second one under expose around the 4 stops mark, third exactly the opposite. Look at your subject and decide what is your main object within the picture as this should be your first exposure. Multiple exposure is not an exact experience and one can never take the same shot twice. With some subjects, for example the tree canopy of narrow country lanes, I hands free, result multiple exposure and icm combination. As I said earlier not an exact way doing things but works for me.

Thanks for another video! Looking forward to reading your article! 😊 I'm planning a trip to the Isle of Skye this autumn, so looking forward to some inspiration in your next video!

I have not done this for a long time but I did like the result. Set the camera up for a 3 to 5 second exposure focus on your subject and step back. Then hit the shutter and walk forward trying to stop where you set focus plus giving enough time to hold the shot steady to capture your subject in or slightly in focus. Your recent videos have inspired me to give it another go ty.

Quite liked even the images you considered "not working". It's all a matter of personal taste and what you are seeking in your images. Great images Gary and has inspired me to do more of this. Would love to visit Scotland where my Grandfather came from.

Thank you for sharing your work. The music was very fitting. Might I recommend an album by Checkfield? The title is, wait for it … Through the Lens

Were these created in camera or individual shots re-composed in Photoshop? I loved almost all the shots! Wonderfully inspiring video

Hello. So, the final image shown was the absolute standout - For Me. And that's the point (well, one of them), isn't it? There were images in your 'disparaged' pile that i really liked a lot, and some in the second series that i found easier to pass-on-by.... I can only guess that you and i have similarities but, in the final analysis, we are not the same! Nice that you shared the exploratory nature of that project with us - the working up of the material to something that suited your vision. Right... i'm orf to read your article. Likd&Subd (w. gusto!). All the best from a cabin in a swamp in a rainforest in New Zealand.

You might like those that "didn't work" if you imagine someone else made them.

Very interesting results. It is clear that details work relatively well. I was just wondering wether more comparable images to Pointillism would work. I have seen images in the Netherlands were it works in less wild and broad landscapes. Looking forward to see how you continue your learnings!!

Wow....I love Glencoe....maybe someday I will get there.....Anytime I try ME Its difficult to know which ones are good and which are bad because its a personal choice...for your images with the wee hut, it may have worked better if you had masked out the hut and kept it as a relatively sharp subject and leave the rest of the image as it was.....Is there a certain number of images you would normally use for an ME or do you just stop when you think the image looks good?

Gary, your "good images" are beautiful, but I also thought that some of the "bad" ones were quite good! I am not clear as to wether these are true in-camera double exposures or if they are "intentional camera movement". Can you please clarify? Thank you for your tutorials!

Translate to English please