Тёмный

Lattice 

Neso Academy
Подписаться 2,7 млн
Просмотров 283 тыс.
50% 1

Опубликовано:

 

3 окт 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 92   
@_PAYALGAIKWAD
@_PAYALGAIKWAD 2 года назад
all videos are arranged so well in a proper sequence
@trusttheprocess4775
@trusttheprocess4775 2 года назад
Fantastic videos. These videos are alone going to help me pass maths this semester.
@nins1709
@nins1709 Год назад
Thank you so much. Your one lecture clears all my doubts about the lattice topic
@marcusmors8485
@marcusmors8485 5 месяцев назад
Thank you, it was easy to understand and you set the previous knowledge requirements from the start.
@martinmallol4559
@martinmallol4559 Месяц назад
Loved the explanation, you helped me a lot. Thx!
@ambikas4905
@ambikas4905 2 года назад
Well explained,with more examples,there is no doubt n understand
@ankitpanwar5032
@ankitpanwar5032 Год назад
Thank you❤❤ neso academy, I grateful to for my sessional exams
@rishabhm456
@rishabhm456 Год назад
Hi five bro 🤜
@pranavnyavanandi9710
@pranavnyavanandi9710 2 года назад
Please list the related playlist in the video description as well, it makes it much easier to navigate.
@kashmirking2446
@kashmirking2446 2 года назад
Thank u so much sir.....all videos are in proper sequences
@bj_ets8010
@bj_ets8010 2 года назад
You are a life saviour sir🔥💯💥
@jordynbell02
@jordynbell02 2 года назад
This video is absolutely amazing!
@benalbritton
@benalbritton 2 года назад
FYI, you don't call the symbol for the empty set "phi". Phi is a greek letter that looks a little similar to the symbol for the empty set, but mathematicians are not using the greek letter phi in this case, it is just it's own symbol that denotes the empty set.
@AkamiChannel
@AkamiChannel 5 месяцев назад
Yeah that was surprising for such a well-presented and informative video to make this error
@fammusikka6767
@fammusikka6767 29 дней назад
@@AkamiChannel Perhaps not super-surprising? It's possible to be knowledgable in a field without having heard the terms of the field spoken in _english_.
@_PAYALGAIKWAD
@_PAYALGAIKWAD 2 года назад
thanks a lot sir..Your videos are so easy to understand and organised...
@chiragmehta2955
@chiragmehta2955 2 года назад
sir your voice so soothing ..after hearing that it makes maths a very easy subject. thank u for ur hardwork.
@barlog6679
@barlog6679 2 года назад
wouldn't b GLB(f,g) = e?
@agnidebmukherjee9756
@agnidebmukherjee9756 2 года назад
Yes true..
@agnidebmukherjee9756
@agnidebmukherjee9756 2 года назад
@@adityanprakash1281 not at all
@csbytes137
@csbytes137 2 года назад
Same doubt
@barlog6679
@barlog6679 2 года назад
i figured it out, the elements that can be GLB in (f,g) are e and b. Since you cannnot determine whether e is greater than b or b is greater than e due to the lack of relationship between e and b, there is no GLB. The same logic applies to determine the GLB and LUB of other pair of elements.
@its_ayush7286
@its_ayush7286 2 года назад
@@barlog6679 thank you for pointing out my same question and also for giving the answer of it. That is something that i didn't know.
@mahendrakergaurav5867
@mahendrakergaurav5867 2 года назад
thanks man,apppreciate your work
@MaryamKamar-e6r
@MaryamKamar-e6r 11 месяцев назад
this guy is an amazing teacher omg
@madapanameena1320
@madapanameena1320 8 месяцев назад
From figure (a) Consider the incomparable pair (d,g) GLB(d,g)=f LUB(d,g)=¢( null set) So, this is not lattice. I have doubt .. please clarify that.
@adityaralhan1154
@adityaralhan1154 5 месяцев назад
Lub of d and g is g
@satyamtiwari331
@satyamtiwari331 7 месяцев назад
fantastic explanation
@zeusbgmi6476
@zeusbgmi6476 2 года назад
This is somewhere excellence is found!
@saiyedasiddika3974
@saiyedasiddika3974 2 года назад
It’s really helpful
@praveenkumarchettiyar2695
@praveenkumarchettiyar2695 Месяц назад
Thankyou sir you rescued me a day before exam 😊😅
@Akshay_pratap_singh_007
@Akshay_pratap_singh_007 Год назад
Very well explanation Sir !!
@sidrahwaris7885
@sidrahwaris7885 2 месяца назад
thank u so muchhhh very helpfullll!!!!!!!
@bbmathematics224
@bbmathematics224 6 месяцев назад
Excellent method..❤
@teneplays
@teneplays Год назад
8:45 example 3 was the same as in my notebook
@suhankrishna4567
@suhankrishna4567 5 месяцев назад
i will pass because of you. god bless you!
@y.8901
@y.8901 Год назад
Hello, at 7:25 can we say that the lower bounds of (f,g) are b,e,c,a but since b and e are not comparable -> No upper bound ?
@doesnotexist8873
@doesnotexist8873 Год назад
yes
@rajeshprajapati6662
@rajeshprajapati6662 Год назад
Upper bound of (f,g) is h. There is no lower bound for (f,g). You should have written "No Lower Bound".
@prithwihegde349
@prithwihegde349 5 месяцев назад
​@@rajeshprajapati6662hey y e can't be considered as GLB? Please could you explain...
@engineerguruji2
@engineerguruji2 2 года назад
Thanks so much
@brainexercise1234
@brainexercise1234 Год назад
Nice explanation
@DuongNguyen-en1pi
@DuongNguyen-en1pi 2 года назад
6:12, example 2 (a), what is the GLB and LUB of pair (d and g)?
@enes5345
@enes5345 2 года назад
GLB d and LUB g
@marah8158
@marah8158 8 месяцев назад
@@enes5345 couldn't be like this? GLB is f LUB is ø how GLB is d when they first meet in f?
@yeongwooh4921
@yeongwooh4921 Год назад
GLB(f,g) for all pair isn't defined, thus the set is empty. since the two preceding lower bounds are incomparable, we can't define greatest lower bound.
@wrath2801
@wrath2801 11 месяцев назад
bhai tu IIT ka hai?
@pahadiraishgamer1777
@pahadiraishgamer1777 2 года назад
Very helpfull
@Bbdu75yg
@Bbdu75yg Год назад
Amazing !🎉🎉🎉🎉
@bhaktikhokad7113
@bhaktikhokad7113 Год назад
nice expalined properly
@likithgannarapu8454
@likithgannarapu8454 2 года назад
at 8:15 in example(c) why didn't you consider (b,c) as incomparable????
@rajeshprajapati6662
@rajeshprajapati6662 Год назад
You can consider it and you will find that unrelated pair (b,c) has GLB = a and LUB = g.
@osamansr5281
@osamansr5281 2 года назад
what does the "rank" of a lattice mean? what's a "rank-1" lattice?
@egehanyildiz
@egehanyildiz Год назад
sir in example (b) isnt GLB of f and g is a? By following the path downwards we can find a lowerbound
@rajeshprajapati6662
@rajeshprajapati6662 Год назад
Lower bound of (f,g) - abce Let's check for GLB : a - All elements of LB related to a ? No [Using Hasse Diagram] b - All elements of LB related to b ? No [Using Hasse Diagram] c - All elements of LB related to c ? Obviously No [Using Hasse Diagram] e - All elements of LB related to e ? Obviously No [Using Hasse Diagram] So, GLB = Phi
@anushiya4453
@anushiya4453 9 месяцев назад
thanks man!@@rajeshprajapati6662
@arunsuresh8547
@arunsuresh8547 8 месяцев назад
In fig (c) why don't you consider f,e and d,c as incomparable pairs ?
@isai5813
@isai5813 2 года назад
Please add python and Dynamic programming courses too
@Kuldeepsingh.
@Kuldeepsingh. 2 года назад
great video sir
@leonthethird7494
@leonthethird7494 Год назад
You're a legend
@engineerguruji2
@engineerguruji2 2 года назад
Good morning every one
@amruta2114
@amruta2114 Год назад
Thku
@aaravjayalwal3416
@aaravjayalwal3416 Год назад
Way better than nptel
@SasiprakashSasi-e8y
@SasiprakashSasi-e8y 12 дней назад
{1,2} lub is null then how it is a lattice
@kasiiragavarapu673
@kasiiragavarapu673 Год назад
At 6:17 why don't we consider (g, d) to check either they have glb and lup
@doesnotexist8873
@doesnotexist8873 Год назад
because d is related to g through transitive property
@parmeshwariswami3530
@parmeshwariswami3530 7 месяцев назад
Sir ji direct product of lattice explain videos
@nehakhanolkar3861
@nehakhanolkar3861 6 месяцев назад
Can someone please explain what do we mean by 'incomparable elements '.
@nileshmishra5482
@nileshmishra5482 5 месяцев назад
It means if neither aRb nor bRa..
@lloydmoore6507
@lloydmoore6507 Год назад
Doesn't 3 also divide 12?
@sabrinahhewitt119
@sabrinahhewitt119 8 месяцев назад
Love🎉
@shankarpubg9413
@shankarpubg9413 9 месяцев назад
Wow 😲
@AnushkaSingh-sl3zn
@AnushkaSingh-sl3zn 6 месяцев назад
b,c ???
@noelomidze2079
@noelomidze2079 2 года назад
კიუელები გამოჩნდით xd
@grey3037
@grey3037 День назад
hello 1 year later dd
@noelomidze2079
@noelomidze2079 23 часа назад
@@grey3037 bro gamixarda :DD
@grey3037
@grey3037 9 часов назад
​​@@noelomidze2079mec, ar movelodi chemians tu vipovidi aq:]
@08_it_aditkumar15
@08_it_aditkumar15 Год назад
Wtf?
@arunsuresh8547
@arunsuresh8547 8 месяцев назад
In fig (c) why don't you consider f,e and d,c as incomparable pairs ?
@shivanikj3047
@shivanikj3047 2 года назад
Thank you 😃
Далее
Lattice (GATE Problems) - Set 1
9:54
Просмотров 37 тыс.
Hasse Diagram
17:08
Просмотров 319 тыс.
КОТЯТА НАУЧИЛИСЬ ГОВОРИТЬ#cat
00:13
Poset (Lower and Upper Bounds)
15:39
Просмотров 152 тыс.
Complete and Bounded Lattice
12:11
Просмотров 65 тыс.
Introduction to Partial Ordering
15:34
Просмотров 213 тыс.
Lattice (Complement of an Element)
9:55
Просмотров 45 тыс.
Poset (Minimal and Maximal Elements)
13:39
Просмотров 157 тыс.
Lattice-based cryptography: The tricky math of dots
8:39