Laurie Passionately Kisses Amy | Little Women (2019) | Love Love 

Nope she was clearly upset n lonely that moment in the book. I agree she might not have loved Laurie. But yeah he was not gonna wait forever.

@@EloraSelah she had already met the German fellow Mr Bear

i like this version more than, someone too young to know what she want in her life.

I don't think she loves him in that way in this version either. I think she's just scared shitless and lonely and she reached to familiar. But don't really think it would've worked ever.

Yes, that's the truth because Jo said she wanted to be a single woman❤

I feel like women, in general, are the best at and are at their best when they support, help, motivate, encourage, inspire, and strengthen others. It's like they're the ultimate and invaluable 'support class.'

@@minnie2352 cringe

@Minnie With all due respect, I do not see that in modern women nowadays. Maybe if it was 30 years ago, I would agree with you. All I see nowadays is women wanting to know what the men can do for them It’s nice to believe, don’t get me wrong, but being realistic here that’s not most women anymore.

@@mar_bl2158 None of my friends or people I know expect men do things for them. Of course they want partner in life, but they don't expect men give them everything. They are independent women.

​@@mar_bl2158Then you need to get out more, because the vast majority of women are what minnie2352 described.

She got it off her chest, and it gave him food for thought. And eventually they realized that each was truly their "one".

😂

We kiss👉🏻👈🏻

Did the book portray Laurie falling in love with Amy? I wished they depicted it more in the movie

​@@julietruong6525 It does, I love it

​@@julietruong6525in books you will feel Amy deserved better than Laurie he loved her but she wasn't his greatest love while for amy he was hers greatest there is a imbalance in books while in movie it's been better because it showed he truly loved her the greatest

@@divineflu34567 i think he really was in love with Amy. When he wanted to write an opera about Jo, he couldn't remember anything good about her, so he came up with a new character that was suspiciously similar to Amy. 1) Then he tried an opera, for nothing seemed impossible in the beginning, but here again unforeseen difficulties beset him. He wanted Jo for his heroine, and called upon his memory to supply him with tender recollections and romantic visions of his love. But memory turned traitor, and as if possessed by the perverse spirit of the girl, would only recall Jo's oddities, faults, and freaks, would only show her in the most unsentimental aspects-beating mats with her head tied up in a bandanna, barricading herself with the sofa pillow, or throwing cold water over his passion a la Gummidge-and an irresistible laugh spoiled the pensive picture he was attempting to paint. Jo wouldn’t be put into the opera at any price, and he had to give her up with a “Bless that girl, what a torment she is!” and a clutch at his hair, as became a distracted composer. When he looked about him for another and a less intractable damsel to immortalize in melody, memory produced one with the most obliging readiness. This phantom wore many faces,𝙗𝙪𝙩 𝙞𝙩 𝙖𝙡𝙬𝙖𝙮𝙨 𝙝𝙖𝙙 𝙜𝙤𝙡𝙙𝙚𝙣 𝙝𝙖𝙞𝙧, 𝙬𝙖𝙨 𝙚𝙣𝙫𝙚𝙡𝙤𝙥𝙚𝙙 𝙞𝙣 𝙖 𝙙𝙞𝙖𝙥𝙝𝙖𝙣𝙤𝙪𝙨 𝙘𝙡𝙤𝙪𝙙, 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙛𝙡𝙤𝙖𝙩𝙚𝙙 𝙖𝙞𝙧𝙞𝙡𝙮 𝙗𝙚𝙛𝙤𝙧𝙚 𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙢𝙞𝙣𝙙’𝙨 𝙚𝙮𝙚 𝙞𝙣 𝙖 𝙥𝙡𝙚𝙖𝙨𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙘𝙝𝙖𝙤𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙧𝙤𝙨𝙚𝙨, 𝙥𝙚𝙖𝙘𝙤𝙘𝙠𝙨, 𝙬𝙝𝙞𝙩𝙚 𝙥𝙤𝙣𝙞𝙚𝙨, 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙗𝙡𝙪𝙚 𝙧𝙞𝙗𝙗𝙤𝙣𝙨. He did not give the complacent wraith any name, but he took her for his heroine and grew quite fond of her, as well he might, for he gifted her with every gift and grace under the sun, and escorted her, unscathed, through trials which would have annihilated any mortal woman. 2)Tumbling about in one part of the desk among bills, passports, and business documents of various kinds were several of Jo’s letters, and in another compartment were three notes from Amy, 𝙘𝙖𝙧𝙚𝙛𝙪𝙡𝙡𝙮 𝙩𝙞𝙚𝙙 𝙪𝙥 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝 𝙤𝙣𝙚 𝙤𝙛 𝙝𝙚𝙧 𝙗𝙡𝙪𝙚 𝙧𝙞𝙗𝙗𝙤𝙣𝙨 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙨𝙬𝙚𝙚𝙩𝙡𝙮 𝙨𝙪𝙜𝙜𝙚𝙨𝙩𝙞𝙫𝙚 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙡𝙞𝙩𝙩𝙡𝙚 𝙙𝙚𝙖𝙙 𝙧𝙤𝙨𝙚𝙨 𝙥𝙪𝙩 𝙖𝙬𝙖𝙮 𝙞𝙣𝙨𝙞𝙙𝙚. 3)He found nothing to perplex or disappoint, much to admire and approve, for overlooking a few little affectations of speech and manner, she was as sprightly and graceful as ever, with the addition of that indescribable something in dress and bearing which we call elegance. Always mature for her age, she had gained a certain aplomb in both carriage and conversation, which made her seem more of a woman of the world than she was, but her old petulance now and then showed itself, her strong will still held its own, and her native frankness was unspoiled by foreign polish. Laurie did not read all this while he watched her feed the peacocks, but he saw enough to satisfy and interest him, and carried away a pretty little picture of a bright-faced girl standing in the sunshine, which brought out the soft hue of her dress, the fresh color of her cheeks, the golden gloss of her hair, and made her a prominent figure in the pleasant scene.

Nobody says that

@@anaisabelribeiro2721 i've seen many people say that they would never forgive their sister like jo forgave amy, and comments like "personally I wouldn't let that slide" etc. so yes, a lot of people do say that and blame amy for "betraying" jo.

Seriously know one says this enough. People just love to hate on amy simply because she did whatever jo couldn’t do like convincing her aunt to take her to europe. Meanwhile amy was highly adaptive and flexible when achieving her goals

that is what is happening with women now

Nobody says that and no-one who really read the novel or watched this movie thinks Jo realised she messed up and wanted him back. It was only in a moment of lonely weakness she wanted to ask for Laurie back but it was a mistake and she knew it.

A third best scene to add to that is when Amy says she knew she would always marry rich. That was the best scene for me by far.

YES

At all. Amy never will be empowered. She needs a man, Jo is the only one.

Laurie never love jo or if he did then he will wait but he wouldn't!!

@@barbarablue2571 you need to get over Amy LOL it's the fifth comment I see from you talking bad about Amy and defending Jo when NO ONE ASKED ABOUT or put them in competition.

Which is why I prefer the 1994 version of the movie. Amy asks Jo to tell her the truth, since sisters are a stronger relation than marriage, if she minds that she and Laurie are married, and Jo tells her that she does not mind, that she was surprised at first, and that they were now family as they should have always been. This version, with this scene, just doesn't feel right to me.

Yes, but this is more dramatic and heartbreaking

Right! You can see her true heart there. :-)

she shouldn't have become his fiance in the first place, it's never right to waste someone else's time

@@aliali-ce3yf yes but do you blame her? It wasn't easy for women in that time

@@coquette7794. There was nothing wrong back then, or now, wanting to marry a rich/wealthy man, and have children, and take care of the children, the husband and the home. Motives can still be wrong when a woman marries a poor man.

@@aliali-ce3yf. Maybe no one should date and get to know each other, and get engaged only to realize that they aren’t right for each other. It’s called love. Sometimes we get it right and sometimes we don’t. Better Amy broke off the engagement once she understood she didn’t love him as she should rather than go ahead and marry him only to divorce him.

Yess❤❤❤

87

You mean in the second book?

Muad'ib leads the way

Jo didn't love Laurie. I don't think Jo took Laurie for granted. She just didn't have romantic feelings for him.

She didn't take anything for granted, she simply didn't love him . romantically, nor did she want the brutal confinement that being a wife meant in that day and age. Ppl still struggle with Alcotts feminism, the idea that most ppl want marriage & thats great, but some women don't, especially when marriage means fewer freedoms, which at the time it absolutely did

fr

Agreed! Florence Pugh is a force of nature! Loved her in Oppenheimer. She shines in revealing complexity in her characters.

@@toninatoli Her role in Oppenheimer was so poorly written though, like you should go look up the actual biography of Jean Tatlock, they did her dirty. And likewise they could've given Flo a much meatier role with less er... I'm a seductive communist vibes. She would've killed it. Many men high up in hollywood aren't interested in giving women meaty roles unfortunately.

Lol but there are reasons like hers where she wanted him back not out of love but be loved by him

87

so i always thought bhaer was just "imaginary" as some kind of 4th wall breaking since the publisher wants the woman either dead or married, and he also really didnt get a story apart from 15 mins? i thought it fitted, i dont think jo needs a husband

@@FloThePro1231 The Book did an incredible job of describing their relationship development. Definitely would recommend reading! The movie opened it up differently, but is still a great one!

@@elinaoberemok1732 i am reading the book and i hoped that i would be reassured thinking bhaer wasnt real but i guess he is real, just thought it would have been nicer if the story ends with jo not having to have a man in order to be happy and it would have been funny if bhaer was just "written in there" so the story ends with a married woman because thats what the publisher wants

@@FloThePro1231 99% of people need love and family to be happy and for that you need a partner with whom you can start your own family. believe me you don't want to live alone in old age or look for help from strangers but from family. I personally need a man to have a happy life and family.

I do sort of like that they did it this way because it feels like the director paying homage to the author. When she wrote the book she didn’t want Jo to end up with anyone because she had modeled the character largely after herself, but her publisher pushed her to marry Jo off in the second book-ie. Bhaer.

It was totally unfair of them to not notify her. She could’ve shared last words with her but in the end only visited her grave 😢

Bro she rejected him once. She was under no obligation to love him. I think the book made her want him in the end despite desiring to be single and then marrying the critic guy because back then ALL books had to end with the women married off. So just imagine her not writing that letter, and not marrying that man. She never toyed with Laurie. Even if you look at it this way, she was afraid of being alone. It doesn’t matter though. She found love and so did he.

@@saitamatrash2527 actually the book never wanted her with Laurie either and she never changed her mind. She always wanted the professor.

@@saitamatrash2527 Same as Laurue.He is also under no obligation to love Jo forever and come running whenever she wants her back.She had her chance and she let it go.Amy and Laurie found each other.They don't owe Jo anything.

@@saitamatrash2527 in book jo never loved laurie, in the end she didn't regretted turning him down, movie makers did it to make it more dramatic

@@saitamatrash2527 i could be mistaken but I don't remember book jo ever regretting turning down laurie, nor did she want to get back to him.

I wonder if the book portrayed Laurie falling in love with Amy. I felt like the movie should have at least one more scene of the two.

Why did they do that in the movies? It’s so unnecessary

True

I felt like her letter was in the heat of the moment. She was saddened by Beth’s death and she realized she was truly lonely since all her sisters were off in their own paths. So hearing Laurie, someone she adored in the past coming back, made her think she loved him but all she craved was the familiar nostalgic feeling. Even though it wasn’t in the book, it sort of makes sense

But in the movie Jo never wanted to marry Laurie. She loved him, but she said she did not want a marriage with him

One of the reasons why I disliked this movie. Previous version so much better. 😎

​@@destinychild4659 finally someone else who disliked this version. I really hated it.

Beth dies???😢

@@dhanushramadoss6809 Sorry if I accidently spoiled You the story. Unfortunately it happened.

@@julkasteven8198 Nah I was just quoting Joey from "FRIENDS" . You didn't spoil anything. NW

@@dhanushramadoss6809 I see. 😊

Haha...nice one

❤

Which book is it? I looked it up and saw different copies

@@mya1256 Little women by Louisa May Alcott.

@@denny6005 thank you! 🥰

I'm beginning to think that Denis Villeneuve did that casting on purpose.

Spoiler 😢

As is tradition