Lawyer Recaps & Reacts: Rittenhouse's Attorney Mark Richards 

hey he killed white guys ......I have no complaints

Binger was not wrong. Kyle Rittenhouse was on trial for murder.

@@donnabrockbank8296 Binger made it political instead of about the facts of the case. The evidence didn't support the charges, Binger tried to shoehorn it based on one inconclusive blurry picture to try to claim provocation.

Binger was slick? I didn’t see that at all..

Binger was trying to prove murder.

@@miajackson3559 Slick no slimy yes.

@@miajackson3559 slick in a slimey sleazy way.

I think the pixel thing was dirty and proof the defense knew their case was about to fall apart

@alikat1053 💯

It’s pretty silly to pretend this was just a guy using a gun in self defense. He probably had an issue with people thinking it’s cool to grab a gun and go play militia inside a riot zone

@@Bhubnipz No, this was about an idiot Prosecutor thinking he can gain political power by trying to prosecute an OBVIOUS self defense case.

It was to deter people from murdering and claiming self defense. How's that going?

@@donnabrockbank8296 no it wasn't. Have you seen ANY of the footage?

I think I would dispute you on that one. Teenagers are passionate about everything they are interested in. If it's girls and cars, that's what they're passionate about. If it's politics and climate change, then THAT'S what they're passionate about. My daughter was incredibly politically active before she could ever vote. I don't know what Kyle's politics were, but he put himself in a position to get into trouble and that's what happened. In other words, he acted like a teenage boy.

@@athanksgivingbaby570 Remember that 9 year old girl who publicly criticized her school for supporting BLM while prohibiting all other forms of political expression on campus? That happened this summer (in MN, where else) and it struck me how young she was, but 17 is old enough to be VERY political, although it depends on the person, as always.

The 2nd amendment. Right to carry arms.

@@alphablobmom5521 It's a rare teen who is interested in politics. I think in Kyle's case, he had gained this training as a first responder medic and simply wanted to put his new found knowledge to use. I think for him it was an altruistic opportunity to help where help would be needed. Yet, he had the wisdom to understand he was heading into a conflict zone and may need to protect himself or others at some point. He was right! He was able to protect his life when insane adults tried to destroy that young boy.

Exactly. It was suppose to be a murder trial.

@@donnabrockbank8296 Yes, it was, but you can't have a murder trial if there was no murder.

Bald guy was great

@@orkinho1 Yes, I agree Corey Chirafisi was my favorite. He did an excellent job at cross examining Gaige Grosskreutz.

@@ItsMe-vd4qi My favorite too. Both attorneys had good qualities, but I honestly believe Corey is the better lawyer. Richards missed a few good points in closing and failed to object a few times when it was clear Binger was out of line. Yet, that could have been strategy...what do I know? LOL

Thank you!

We’d love to!

Andrew .. Legal Mindset is on there Now ... Nick Rekieta would love to send you the Link

That is so sad! I know I am late to this video but Kyle broke my heart

@@jenniferthomas5926 He was deeply traumatized by the attacks on his person and that he had to act to save his life.

Thanks!

@Саша А and following that logic, the DA's office might have been able to get more time to reconstruct their trial strategy and plan. That's their job if they really wanted to get a conviction.

@@dawndacquisto wow that’s a great point I never thought of. That would make a lot of sense. The previous attorneys had never even tried a murder case before so the DA’s office probably prepared completely differently

Thank you!

We pulled info from new and old interviews, but used clips from his interview right after the trial. He is very consistent in what he says

Thank you! Merry Christmas

@Саша А it was a real panic attack. He was afraid he might go to prison.

What a moronic comment.

@Michael Miller he shot and killed someone. Instead of giving him medical aide taking him to the hospital then having them call police Kyle Rittenhouse ran from the scene of a murder he committed. Gaige Grosskreutz went after Kyle to help get to the police safely. Kyle told Gaige that either Rosenbaum had a gun or K. Rittenhouse didn't do anything. Then Gaige Grosskreutz heard the crowd yelling.

@Michael Miller there is such thing as self defense. Kyle Rittenhouse and the defense proved to the jury that Kyle Rittenhouse was in fear for his life so it was found self defense. The verdict was not guilty of murder.

@Michael Miller Kyle Rittenhouse pulled the trigger shot and killed 2 people and maimed another by blowing his bicep up. One was armed with a plastic bottle, one was armed with a skateboard, and the maimed one turned his body in time not to be dead. Gaige Grosskreutz did not pull the trigger. Gaige Grosskreutz saw Kyle shoot and kill a man right in front of himself. Grosskreutz did not pull the trigger.

The jury knows Kyle Rittenhouse is guilty of murder but took the path of least resistance. Even a marshmallow murderer affiliated with the Proud Boys would not do well in prison.

Kyle Rittenhouse should have gone home when he lost his military body guard. Kyle should have stopped to give medical aide to Rosenbaum after he was no longer a threat to Kyle life. Kyle should have called the police to come to him. Instead Kyle Rittenhouse chose to run away. Then killed another person and maimed another. At some point how is it still self defense.

The thing is, the Rittenhouse case was a triumph of justice in the face of a wicked mob. Binger happily played the role of a 21st century Pontius Pilate trying to feed the mob a just and righteous man and the jury system worked in an almost stereotypical perfect manner. The prosecutor was swayed by the mob to seek Rittenhouse’s life. However the safety in our justice system that is guaranteed by the Constitution did not allow Binger to unilaterally bend to the mob. He instead had to empanel 12 people to judge the facts. Anyone who watched most of the trial knows the prosecution case went sideways, yet the prosecutor who was clearly devastated that the truth was coming out in open court, tried to defy the judge’s rulings in a frantic attempt to make himself the mob’s champion. In the end the jury went to deliberation, and in spite of having some sense of the gravity of the situation bravely delivered a just judgment. It is literally what was envisioned by the jury system. It stopped a weak or corrupt official from punishing a just man for political expediency. Given how ruthless the left is (and most who oppose Rittenhouse are flaming libs), in the pursuit of their lawless and Godless objectives, those who are on the side of law and justice should raise their voice and shout in triumph at such a major and righteous victory. A significant factor in why the world is going in an immoral direction is that those who are of the truth stay silent as evil roars their ugly voices.