Great info. I have found some success doing a slightly different method. I use a similar point system, but I do 2-4-5 instead of 2-3-4. With the same caveats for low pairs and the 4 to a straight or flush. I'll also play a 3 point hand if it is 3 to a straight if they are connected, 6 7 8 or 8 9 10, for example. I know I give up a few % by playing 1 point tighter. But I do it to try to make my bankroll last a bit longer by folding the marginal hands.
Played your game online. Purposely folded hands; sequentially hands showed were winning in desending order from four of a kind. Is it designed to stop you from folding good hands?
Wouldn't counting the remaining cards left in the deck (number of "outs" left to improve your hand to push or win) give you a % to win? Example: At the 9:48 minute mark of the video, you have 8 cards (aka outs) that will give you a win, two 5's, 3 kings, and three 4's. There are 4 cards showing with 48 cards left in the deck. 8 "outs" divided by 48 is a 16.7% chance of not losing. This is a terrible game. Losing in the long run, guaranteed .