Lecture 12 - Claim Construction 2 

This is a stellar critique of wishy-washy judicial opinion writing.

Clear as mud, thanks professor.

I love that near the end of each of these lectures, the professor turns into a demonic creature speaking the tongue of satan and then returns to human language. Comic relief 😂

The Provisonal Patent Application does not require Claims.Will the Specification suffice, with particular emphatic protection by citing the Invention ?For example, in the preamble preceding the Specification, begin with the heading,"claim of invention"

This sounds a lot like the arguments for and against the “plain meaning” approach in contract interpretation.

Professor Wagner, in close of Lecture 12, you refer to a recent case, Tavo vs. Sanders, promised for further discussion. Where is the discussion? I look forward to hearing your perspective. Please direct!