Тёмный

Lecture - Richard Hays - Did Moses Write about Jesus? The Challenges of Figural Reading 

fleetwd1
Подписаться 15 тыс.
Просмотров 29 тыс.
50% 1

Lecture by Richard Hays, "Did Moses Write about Jesus? The Challenges of Figural Reading”
Given 7pm - 9pm on May 23, 2015 at The Lanier Theological Library Chapel in Houston, Texas. It is part of the Lanier Library Lecture Series. A series devoted to bringing world class lectures to benefit the community of all those who might be interested.
I am indebted to the generosity of the library to allow me to share these videos of theirs. Please support them by visiting their website for more information and resources:
www.laniertheologicallibrary.org/
In his lecture, Richard Hays will illustrate and explore the surprising ways in which the four Gospel writers interpreted Israel’s Scripture as a witness to the identity of Jesus. The talk will first summarize and then extend the hermeneutical proposals explored in his recent book "Reading Backwards: Figural Christology and the Fourfold Gospel Witness." What might it mean for readers in late modernity to take seriously the interpretative methods employed by the Gospel authors? Are Christian claims about Jesus bound inextricably to these interpretative methods?
Richard Hays bio info:
Richard B. Hays, Dean and the George Washington Ivey Professor of New Testament at Duke Divinity School, is internationally recognized for his work on the letters of Paul and on New Testament ethics. His scholarly work has bridge the disciples of biblical criticism and literary studies, exploring the innovative ways in which early Christian writers interpreted Israelʼs Scripture. Haysʼ work focuses on New Testament theology and ethics, the Pauline epistles, and early Christian interpretation of the Old Testament. He received his Master of Divinity from Yale Divinity School and his Ph.D. from Emory University.
In the field of New Testament Studies, Hays has often been identified with figures such as N.T. Wright, Luke Timothy Johnson, and Raymond Brown. Some of Professor Haysʼ studies surround the narrative interpretation of Scripture, the new Testamentʼs use of the Old Testament, the subjective genitive reading of pistis Christou (“faith(fuleness) of Christ”) in Paul, and the role of community in the New Testament. Hays is well known for his criticisms of the Jesus Seminar and the modern Historical Jesus movement. He has also been vocal about his criticisms of Dan Brownʼs best-selling The Da Vinci Code for its controversial historical claims.
His book The Moral Vision of the New Testament: Community, Cross, New Creation was selected by Christianity Today as one of the 100 most important religious books of the twentieth century. His most recent books are The Art of Reading Scripture (2003, co-edited with Ellen Davis), The Conversion of the Imagination (2005), Seeking the Identity of Jesus: A Pilgrimage (2008, co-edited with Beverly Roberts Gaventa), and Revelation and the Politics of Apocalyptic Interpretation (2012, co-edited with Stefan Alkier).
Professor Hays has lectured widely in North America, Europe, Israel, Australia, New Zealand, and Hong Kong. An ordained United Methodist minister, he has preached in settings ranging from rural Oklahoma churches to Londonʼs Westminster Abbey. Professor Hays has chaired the Pauline Epistles Section of the Society of Biblical Literature, as well as the Seminar on New Testament Ethics in the Society for New Testament Studies, and has served on the editorial boards of several leading scholarly journals.
As a theologically conservative Methodist throughout the course of his career, he has remained committed to his Wesleyan roots in emphasizing the importance of charity and friendship in the Christian life. Moreover, Hays is a committed pacifist and makes his position clear in The Moral Vision of the New Testament, in which he argues that Jesus Christ taught his disciples to be non-violent.

Опубликовано:

 

19 июл 2015

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 27   
@stephend7420
@stephend7420 23 дня назад
Just caught this wonderful lecture on RU-vid. Amazing!
@TK-qu1ht
@TK-qu1ht 9 лет назад
Spot on! Thanx Mark for streaming this cutting edge thinking to us in the Hinterlands.
@pumpkin1982
@pumpkin1982 2 года назад
This book is very well written and brilliantly explained.
@Stsebastian8900
@Stsebastian8900 5 лет назад
Oh my, thank you for this! What poetry to my ears!
@d.torrent1822
@d.torrent1822 2 года назад
So basically read anything Dr. Hays puts out. 👌
@d.torrent1822
@d.torrent1822 2 года назад
Also noteworthy is Dr. Stephen B Chapman at Duke, associate professor of OT
@johnvincent7744
@johnvincent7744 3 года назад
Phenomenal insights. Thanks so very much!
@fleetwd1
@fleetwd1 3 года назад
my pleasure
@ziontheelder1697
@ziontheelder1697 2 года назад
34:07 1. A Gospel shaped hermeneutic requires us Read backwards. 2. Scripture must be interpreted through the cross and resurrection. (Jn. 2:22) 3. A conversion of imagination 4. Pay Attention to the large narrative arch. 5. 6. Recover where statements come from. 7. Thesis: the gospel writers see in Jesus the fulfillment of the OT Messiah of Israel .
@fleetwd1
@fleetwd1 2 года назад
thank you for highlighting where Richard Hays highlights 7 things to be concluded by his presentation and then moves into concluding remarks. it might be good to go here first then revisit the entire presentation to "as it were" read his lecture backward but make sure you include his concluding remarks after points 1-7. in concluding Richard makes reference to Jesus' meeting the disciples on the road to Emmaus and the eyes being opened eventually to an event in 2 Kings 6 where Elisha claims there are more on our side than theirs before the eyes being opened to seeing a previously invisible reality before Jesus disappears. He then claims this event of having blind eyes opened is only found in this one reference no where else in Hebrew Scripture. So if Luke 24 is indeed an Echo of eyes being opened as in 2 Kings 6 to see a spiritual dimension of reality, what would this add to our reading a powerful application which should not be missed follows but is worth hearing in total rather than being truncated in too few words and ends before Q&A at 101:58
@janosterud4188
@janosterud4188 2 года назад
Great Great final statement 😊💗👍👍👍👍👍
@paulwilson4738
@paulwilson4738 2 года назад
Your comment does not imply that the rest of his lecture was lacking in real ways, surely? It was all very useful and understandable to any discerning Christian who has paid attention whenever any Biblical text presents itself, I think.
@d.torrent1822
@d.torrent1822 2 года назад
Biblical Interpretation in Ancient Israel Book by Michael Fishbane Book Hays referenced
@ILOVEYESHUA1ST
@ILOVEYESHUA1ST Год назад
So this is a wonderful teaching that I’d challenge on just one note. The failure of the reformers and their post reformer students is to singularly stress the lens of the death and resurrection as the primary control in employing the art of figurative reading of scripture when additionally failing to stress the physical return of Christ and the implications for us as we read yet unfulfilled prophecies. That in fact is what we see with Paul’s defense before the various governors in the book of Acts, the climax of his defense was the judgment of the living and the dead by this man who God appointed Jesus Christ. This is the emphasis lacking in Protestant gospel as well as theology to some extent. As Christ open ended the minds of those disciples concerning His first coming we need a second visitation to open us to all that scriptures say concerning His return.
@gonzalezgonzalez9494
@gonzalezgonzalez9494 2 года назад
MAN'S WISDOM NO ANOINTED
@nimilshah6689
@nimilshah6689 4 года назад
16:00
@apolloarman
@apolloarman Год назад
Highlight: 49:23
@josephscuruchi9762
@josephscuruchi9762 9 лет назад
This man does not do justice to the foreshadowing of Jesus in the Old Testament.
@winterpromisepublishing1258
@winterpromisepublishing1258 8 лет назад
+Joseph Did he ever deny foreshadowings of Jesus in OT? I don't think so. Hays is talking about the fact that there is MORE than just the "foreshadowings" of Jesus from the OT in the gospels. The gospel writers were saturated in the OT and the Lord used the history of Israel to inform us about Jesus and His mission.
@billwilkie6211
@billwilkie6211 6 лет назад
Fundamentalist?
@chrislaird4576
@chrislaird4576 6 лет назад
What does that mean? It sounds like a swear word?
@allnations360
@allnations360 5 лет назад
How so, Joseph?
@amalbarathi4070
@amalbarathi4070 5 лет назад
Never spoke to the point so boring.
@tonywilliams49
@tonywilliams49 4 года назад
People can inject anything into religious text they want to. The trinity now this. Don't be fooled.
@nigelpierre1991
@nigelpierre1991 2 года назад
Who is Jesus?
@davidwoods6015
@davidwoods6015 2 года назад
This is absolutely fantastic in the way we see scripture. Richard Hays has opened an understanding that far exceeds anything that has come before. Be gone is higher German criticism and liberal theology that has stolen much of the power and truth of the biblical accounts both Old and New Testaments.!!!!!
Далее
Построил ДЕРЕВНЮ на ДЕРЕВЬЯХ!
19:07
Where Did Moses Write of Jesus in Genesis?
45:39
Просмотров 7 тыс.
N. T. Wright on Paul’s Trinitarian Theology
59:34
Просмотров 103 тыс.
Matthew 1-2 with Richard Hays
1:12:58
Просмотров 3,2 тыс.
Naked Bible 371: Reading Moses, Seeing Jesus
1:06:42
Построил ДЕРЕВНЮ на ДЕРЕВЬЯХ!
19:07