Note: the Lenovo LOQ u r testing in the video is a 2023 model, not a 2024. Though changes r very small, 2024 model looks nicer and cleaner in my opinion (without those blue accents on the back)
depends on the model 2024 loq 15 looks better than 2023 loq 15 but loq 16 2023 has same screen and design as legion 5 2024 (they literally rebranded it from loq 16 to legion 5 because there is no loq 16 2024 + same plastic build) and 16:10 looks way better than 16:9
Hey. Have you had a chance to compare the loq with a g15 of similiar specs? If so, which one would you reccomend and is the loq a quieter less hot choice?
Note that the 2024 models of the LOQ have been experiencing motherboard issues with hundreds of cases of the motherboard frying itself. This is a problem with the intel cores, so you may want to spring for one of the 2023 models instead.
Why add such a negative description about the Msi cyborg 15,I have a Msi cyborg 15 and it runs every game at rtx 4050 I 7 12650 h,I’ve seen 90 w rtx 4050 beat full powered 3060s ,it is still a really capable gaming laptop and deserves to be respected and you should now that,
The Lenovo LOQ and Asus TUF just performs better then the Msi Cyborg 15 on the gaming aspect. Its not a bad laptop at all, just for the price the other two options are better. The fact that it max reaches 45W with a good CPU like the rtx 4060 confirms that the MSI cyborg 15 is developed and made by marketeers.
I own 2 Asus Rog Strix scar 17 i9 10980hk/ 32Gb ram, 2tb ssd, 8gb 2080 super and 2 MSI Intel Core i5 9300H - (8 GB/512 GB SSD/4 GB GTX 1650 Max Q) . I'm using them both for past 4 years. I will buy Msi over asus any day. Just because optimation on MSI is amazing. Rog control software is just bad. Fans keep on running like crazy for no reason. Everytime you open it, it will install updates, every fucking time. And yet no bugs get fixed. It have so many unnecessary tabs and conflicting settings and wost of all they got a whole promotional content on et(fucking ads) in a premium product. Rog give best hardware, I looks good on really good on paper but reality disappoints me. It's software optimization makes it slower and annoying over time. MSI ages well and is fun to use. Asus is just frustrating.
If i were you, i wouldn't be concerned too much about the cyborg's inability to show accurate colours within its screen, since you could always buy an external monitor. There's a lot of affordable monitors out there, and my suggestion is to look for editing dedicated monitors with great colour accuracy, along with just enough refresh rate (60-100Hz) so that way you don't have to waste those extra money on refresh rates you won't even use while editing.
