Leopard 2 vs T-14 Armata - Which would win?

Подписаться 186 тыс.

Просмотров 1,5 млн

50% 1

Leopard 2 vs T-14 Armata - Which would win?
"# ad"
Amazon Prime 30 Free - Trial amzn.to/3JiHVY6
Microphone I use - amzn.to/3oPLRrk
Tank: The Definitive Visual History of Armored Vehicles - amzn.to/3JsKB5k
The next generation T-14 Armata could pose a formidable threat to Germany’s main battle tank the leopard 2. Although both war machines are hailed as exceptional pieces of military hardware, however one has to come victorious out of a battlefield. We thought it would be interesting to compare Germany’s Leopard 2 and latest T-14 Armata.
1. Overview
The Leopard 2 first entered service in 1979 and succeeded the earlier Leopard 1. The latest variant Leopard 2A7+ is an exceptionally well-balanced and well-engineered M.B.T. The frontal arc of the Leopard 2's armor can withstand large caliber kinetic energy rounds. The production of Leopard 2A7 started in 2014…On the other hand, the T-14 Armata is a formidable looking beast. The tank is based on the Armata Universal Combat Platform and comes with advance features. Due to high cost the serial production of the tank is not started yet. The delivery of test batch of 100 tanks is expected by 2022…
2. Performance
The German tank is powered by a diesel engine with power rating of 1,500hp. The tank has an automatic transmission and comes with 4 forward and 2 reverse gears. The engine can push the tank to top speed of 43mph on road…Similarly, the T-14 is powered by a turbocharged diesel engine that produces 1,200 to 1,500hp. The tank is equipped with 12-speed automatic gearbox attached to the engine making it a single unit that can be swapped out in the field in less than 30 minutes…
3. Crew Survivability
The Leopard 2 is fitted with composite armor kit. Which is built with nano-ceramics materials, modern titanium and steel alloys to offers 360° protection. Protection of the hull floor is also increased to withstand blasts from landmines and I.E.Ds…
On the other side, Armata's hull is built with a modular armor system. The armor is made of steel, ceramics and composite materials. The crew capsule is isolated from the automatic loader and ammunition to increase crew survivability. Its forward portion is covered with reactive armor, whereas the rear is fitted with bar armor to provide added protection against anti-tank RPGs…
4. Sensors
The Leopard 2 is equipped with stabilized optical periscope for commander for day and night operations. The periscope features thermal imaging device, a daylight camera, an image fusion function, fiber optical gyros, and laser range-finder…
On the contrary, the Armata is outfitted with multispectral sights with visible scope, thermal channels, and laser rangefinders for commander and gunner. The tank is equipped with wide angle cameras to provide a full 360° visibility and situational awareness...
5. Firepower
The German tank is armed with a 120mm smoothbore gun capable of firing all standard NATO ammunition and newly developed programmable HE rounds. These programmable multi-purpose rounds can engage targets behind cover and within buildings. A total of 42 rounds are carried inside the tank…On the contrary, the Armata is equipped with an unmanned turret as the crew sits inside the hull. The new unmanned remote turret of the tank is armed with a 125mm smoothbore gun with auto-loader. The tank can carry a total of 45 rounds. According some sources, the T-14 Armata could be armed with a new 152mm cannon in the future…
Conclusion
Watch the complete video for detailed conclusion.
FOLLOW us on Social Media:
► Facebook: thegrid88
► Twitter: grid_88
► Become a Patreon: www.patreon.com/grid88
Playlists
► Military, Army, Navy & Air force
• Military
►US Army
• Playlist
► SUBSCRIBE so you never miss another video: goo.gl/UYzU9H
Credits
1) “Indore" Kevin MacLeod Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0 License
creativecommons.org/licenses/b...
2) Bundeswehr
3) Минобороны России
creativecommons.org/licenses/b...
All content on Grid 88 is presented for educational purposes. The appearance of Bundeswehr and Минобороны России visual information does not imply or constitute the respective entities or this channel’s endorsement.
#Leopard2 #T14 #Armata

Развлечения

Опубликовано:

19 дек 2021

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 3,9 тыс.

@DS.J 2 года назад

Problem is that Leopard 2 is a serial production machine, well proven in battles and tested by various militaries all over the world from Germany to Singapore. T-14 Armata on the other hand is a limited production run, essentially a prototype which has not been tested in any war (including the ongoing Ukraine war) and will probably not be in the next 20 years. Armata pretty much exists only on paper and in computer games, not in real life.

@frenchmaverick3742 2 года назад

it would only serve if russia is invaded

@jasonmalone155 2 года назад

We’ll said.

@brutal_slav4257 2 года назад

No serial production already started and it is of course tested but not combat proven. Which combat did the leopard 2a7+ actually see because I actually don’t know myself

@headhunter1945 2 года назад

@@brutal_slav4257 Not sure about the 7+ version, but for Leopard 2 in general there's Kosovo, Bosnia, Afghanistan, Syria... the 7 is just improvement on the principle

@brutal_slav4257 2 года назад

@@headhunter1945 so basically facing much more inferior tanks. Also 10 of them got destroyed by Isis, half of them by anti tank guns. I don’t need to tell you that they have very bad equipment

@charlieyerrell9146 2 года назад

It all comes down to training. Well trained crews will always have the advantage. It takes a long time to train tank crews , they have to work as a team.

@I_am_Yarr 2 года назад

crew, command, reconnaissance, group interaction, logistics, communication, support that all matters. The soviet tanks at begining (for soviets) ww2 was better than Reich tanks but was vaporized by better comand tactics, comunications, air dominance in blitzkrieg. The chance Russia and Germany will wage war tends to zero. Even if Russia breaks american pet - Ukraine.

@BestCoachOnEarth 2 года назад

Training is not all, also tallent is important. Just imagine a good and a bad truck driver. Some have years of experience and they still suck.

@haldakcze420 2 года назад

In Israhell Merkava IV. it takes 4 years to make well trained survaiveable crew.

@goranbarisic2336 2 года назад

Of course. You don't give the best weapon of one army to go in battlefield without training or experience.

@tgg8267 2 года назад

Very true I know that from computer games even with medium tank I was able to be victorias most of the times due to skills and tactics.

@martinseel2837 Год назад

In both cases, it's about the soldiers and how well they are trained.

@Brian-om2hh Год назад

Plus the effectiveness of a particular tank relies on the logistical capability of army operating it. As we've seen, the Russians fall down massively in this area. It's as if they don't really see it as a necessity.....which it probably isn't, until you become embroiled in full-on combat......

@willl7780 Год назад

@@Brian-om2hh keep watching cnn

@Random_JapGuy Год назад

@@Brian-om2hh you say logistics how Ukraine react when most of eastern from train tracks, road, and bridge already blow by both Ukraine and Russia

@milossegrt1575 Год назад

@@willl7780Exactly. Critical thinking ability - not found.

Год назад

A comment and comparison by a former officer in Sweden working with tanks said there is a reason why so many have the Leopard. It is like a Mercedes, and others are not. The Russian is still a pre-production tank with a lot of design iterations and improvements to follow.

@lokilakitak Месяц назад

Yeah and I will tell you the reason. The reason is business. Money, money money. So I don’t want to destroy your nordic dreams about a German tank dancing under the aurora. On the other hand, we could saw leopard in action and I’m sorry, it’s not very good. You can’t save its reputation.

@lakismanavis2035 2 года назад

"Leopard 2 vs T-14 Armata - Which would win?". Easy answer: the one that actually exists (T-14 Armata is a prototypical concept, there are more unicorns in this world than T-14 units...)

@gustonzimasheen 2 года назад

Well said

@DasSnippo 2 года назад

Genau so sieht es aus!

@TonyMontana-vr8vv 2 года назад

Exactly very easy answer the leopard is not the youngest but it have a lot of updates and proof his skills one a lot battlefield. The t14 drives over the red place and when we remember us a the last parade not all of them finished the parade on their own. I think today the t14 is more a trailer queen

@desly194 2 года назад

😂

@williamzk9083 2 года назад

@@TonyMontana-vr8vv Armour on the Leopard has been contentiously updated with more advanced types (ceramic composite) and fire control, anti spall etc. Future upgrades are a 120mm higher pressure gun, possibly a 130mm gun, possibly nano ceramic Armour as used on the Puma, Active Armour. Germany (and Western Nations) put its effort in replacing its Infantry Fighting Vehicles and upgrading its tanks. There are some good ideas in Armata but those ideas are already in the Puma IFV (which has invincible Armour)

@mitchrichards1532 2 года назад

Leopard actually exists in significant numbers, so this is pretty easy to figure out. The Russians have some nice prototypes, but thats about it.

@charlieyerrell9146 2 года назад

The German army has been significantly weakend over the last fifteen years. Notably by Von Der leon when she was defense minister of Germany. It is not the military power house it once was. This is why they are now going to spend twenty billion euros on beefing up their forces..

@mitchrichards1532 2 года назад

@@charlieyerrell9146 That's true. The infrastructure, technology, manpower, etc. is all there. What has been lacking is the political will, but Russia has thankfully provided that. A resurgent Bundeswehr is just a few short years away.

@frosty6960 2 года назад

Watching this week of conflict. I realize i have overestimated the russian tech hugely. Shockingly shitty quality.

@mitchrichards1532 2 года назад

@@frosty6960 Seems that way, the truth is probably somewhere in the middle. Trying to put some context on it, the Russians built their army over the last 10 years...to fight a peer in a kinetic fight. Now they are mixing that with irregular warfare and having to work with significant civilian considerations. Historically, the Russians/Soviets send in their lower quality troops first in order to soften the enemy and define the oppositions strategy, strengths, weaknesses, etc. So I think their first rate formations are better than what we're seeing, but still below NATO quality. I think in a 1 on 1 fight similar size US formations would crush them.

@bigKARTOFFEL- 2 года назад

@@charlieyerrell9146 yes army is kinda broken, prolly not as broken as the ruski army tho that is embarassing itself in ukraine infront of the entire world xD

@drive4521 Год назад

Леопард 2/7существует в количестве 10 штук, а предыдущие версии этого танка - по боеспособностям на уровне т-72, т-90. Так, что за Арматой будушее!

@torben777 Год назад

Leopard 2 definately. It hold 3 important advantages 1. It actually exists 2. It actually works 3. It is developed by a country that can actually afford it

@infernalstormrider Год назад

You got it right three times

@rasmustorkel9568 Год назад

Exactly. The Russians appear to be capable of issuing specifications for a tank better than the Leopard 2. Building it is another story.

@Peregrin3 Год назад

Wrong, Wrong and Wrong, the T-14 does exist, it does work and Germany's army is an absolute disaster, it can barely scrape up enough tanks that actually work to participate in war games let alone fight in an actual war, it's not a question of money but absolutely terrible management. this is widely recognized. Also, 100 tanks for Russia is a test batch, for Germany that would be one-third of their entire tank force. The total number of Leopards 2s in the German Army is 350 and out of that only about 50-100 are in actual working condition.

@torben777 Год назад

@@Peregrin3 I suggest you get back to us when the T14 is spotted in any kind of successful combat operation. As for the number of operational Leopard 2 tanks in Germany, it is true that Germany has a rather small army because they since WW2 has been careful to be a more peaceful nation, but they do now have around 320 leopard 2 in the new models A6 and A7. That would in itself be more than enough to outclass everything that Russia has been able to send to Ukraine, not to mention that countless other NATO countries have large numbers of Leopard 2 as well. So be careful what you wish for. If NATO goes all in on updating Ukrane from T72 to Leopard 2, Russia are done in Ukraine, and if they send their few T14 from the red square parades to Ukraine, it will not change the outcome one bit. It will just increase the embarrasment, which is probably why they are keeping them home.

@leme5639 Год назад

@@Peregrin3 ah yes, I've seen T-14 in my dreams, they must be real :))) gtfo

@axelackens2157 2 года назад

The tank with the best trained crew wins

@XXXXXXXXXO 2 года назад

Whose air force rules the skies should win.

@alastair9446 2 года назад

No, the tanks that has the best support to spot the other tanks first.

@rainerzufall689 2 года назад

"The likelihood of russian and germany tanks fighting in some future war in europe is extremely slim." Really? How slim exactly?

@effen_aey_man 2 года назад

3 months slim apparently

@donarmando916 2 года назад

Not all that slim as we see right now in Ukraine.

@michaelbrenner7301 2 года назад

Extremely slim to the extent that any two modern tanks won't face each other without combined arms support.

@jasonmalone155 2 года назад

Seems a bit more likely recently.

@johnhodgson8684 2 года назад

Depending on who will restock the Ukrainian army after the war . I suspect all will be vying for business and it makes sense to supply top speck weapons to rebuild an army .

@valdeck553 Год назад

Soon, we are going to find out which one is better, aren't we?

@Danilla229 Год назад

tanks are not really designed to fight tanks. worst tanks enemy is artillery.

@skywalker791 Год назад

@@Danilla229 Wars are won by quantity not quality...by logistics and financial support... "this chocolate cake was made yesterday and has come over Atlantic..." dont you remember that movie about WW2 superior german panzers with fuel consumption problem while fighting weaker Shermans that have won the war

@Danilla229 Год назад

@@skywalker791totally true. althought it's rather quality and quantity combined. but quantity is crucial no doubts. quality alone only can win against pesants not an army.

@Valentin82. Год назад

@@skywalker791 Шерманы выиграли войну? 😂А не Т-34? Посмотрим статистику, какая страна уничтожила больше Тигров и Пантер?

@szbkos19140728 Год назад

Well, a hundred+ Leopard 2 against zero Armata. My bet is on the Leopards. And yours?

@jonathanbelanger6574 2 года назад

Whatever one gets hit first is most likely out of commission, I believe the Armata was built primarily to include crew protection

@dougretter 2 года назад

Well, that is certainly a first, for Russia! 😆

@gustavmeyrink_2.0 2 года назад

I believe the Armata was built primarily to be cheap and it is still unobtanium.

@asskirk 2 года назад

It's main purpose is to steal money from military fundings

@jonathanbelanger6574 2 года назад

Well I'm back after two months or so ,now looks as if the T72 can be knocked out by using a child's Daisy BB gun by the looks of what's happening in Ukraine lol

@Bustermachine 2 года назад

@@gustavmeyrink_2.0 IIRC it's supposedly a simplified refresh of an already simplified test bed of an ambitious late soviet design.

@timholtermann9586 2 года назад

Ein Panzer ist immer nur so gut wie seine Besatzung! Grüsse aus dem Leopardenland!

@moritzdurholt7702 2 года назад

Da ist jemand Weise

@ukharry02 2 года назад

Gilt auch für das Kochgeschirr, lol.

@m4nuz 2 года назад

Das beste Wort ist nur von Wert wenn es verstanden wird.

@jmjmjm05 2 года назад

So why Hitler becames your president?

@timholtermann9586 2 года назад

@@jmjmjm05 what does one have to do with the other?

@danielnewman4876 Год назад

If the features of T 14 are realistic and reliable and this beast become operational and battle approved it will a heck of a war machine

@janosbrellos8943 Год назад

is also worth noting that the T14 are all networked for guidance. And they all have a drone with a cable connection and can therefore be used indefinitely with everything such as day/night vision, IR, exhaust gas sensors, distance and target guidance functions. That means it is enough if one drone sees the target and everyone can shoot blindly to.

@ssource8342 Год назад

I Like how the video begins by stating the chances these tanks would go head to head being extremely slim, yet it is happening now. How fast the conjuncture changes!

@rainerstahlberg2486 Год назад

good observation. everything we were told proves to be wrong. meaning we should change as well.

@riceburner6739 Год назад

a year ago, the t-14 was the super tank concept, recent russian performance and modern equipment have been disappointing. so nah, go with german engineering

@brozjoszip6401 Год назад

@@riceburner6739 it is not over yet. Time is a factor. Energy of Europe is a factor. Just wait, and see the end. It will be sad. Never underestimate Russia. Many times this mistake caused huge problems so far.

@riceburner6739 Год назад

@@brozjoszip6401 it is reckless to underestimate an enemy, however being too cautious could also be fatal. to find the balance between both would be crucial. but for the time being, the numbers arent on russia's favor

@loksterization Год назад

Indeed, it's frightening. Next stop nuclear holocaust.

@simontenkate9601 2 года назад

Any tank is vulnerable. If you take the "motor" (the crew) out of the machine, it becomes only a piece of steel.

@tedmaxeffs 2 года назад

old warfare

@thoso1973 Год назад

T-14 is a prototype/testbed platform; there are no units currently in service. The few ones being paraded on the Red Square each year, are the only ones built so far.

@Subarublue1 Год назад

Trained in a Leo and now upgraded to 122 got second place 1999 in world championship and we kicked ass, my shooter took down a helli doing 200 km/h 3 km a Way. Still proud 2023.

@lokilakitak Месяц назад

Very interesting. I can’t find any information about any tank championship in 1999 🤔 So I’m not sure but I need to warn you, PC games don’t count. On the other hand, they have tank biathlon in Russia every year and I haven’t seen leopard gaining points there. So what’s your excuse?

@Hexigonic 2 года назад

If the Abrams would kill it then the leopard would kill it even harder The leopard was made as an MBT killer.

@tiagomonteiro130 Год назад

Don't forget the European tank competition were the Leopard 2 beat the Abrams and got on place number 1 actually Poland and the Danes were on place number 2 and 3 also with older Leopard versions means the Leopard 2 got place number 1, 2 and 3

@eagelseye8089 2 года назад

The most advenced version of the Leopard 2 is either the Leopdard 2A7V or the Leopard 2A7A1

@kajetus0688 2 года назад

we need tiger 3

@alex7741000 2 года назад

And we want Panther 3 and Mouse 2 .

@Ptolemy38 2 года назад

Still all leopards are slow. Best tank is t14. Light. Super fast. Auto loader. Best defense. And. Missiles available

@nagmashot 2 года назад

@@Ptolemy38 the T-14 is not light and has less power than the Leo2

@Ptolemy38 2 года назад

@@nagmashot is only. 37 tones. And horsepower reach 2000. 55 miles per hour. The Porsche. Tank call it

@kallepaxx4511 Год назад

Ich war 4 Jahre Kommandant auf dem leopard 2 a4. Ein sehr wirkungsvoll Waffe seiner Zeit.

@DjDime92 Год назад

"The chance of German and Russian tanks confronting eachother on European soil is extremely slim" -2023: Hold my beer

@glenarmy1 Год назад

The narrator needs a better crystal ball……and possibly timing hahahaha

@DaHund Год назад

Ich meine so viel Info kann man nicht in ein 8min Video packen aber viele Sachen wurden vergessen. Der Leo hat eine Vollstabilisierte Kanone und eine Trefferquote von 99% bei voller Fahrt. Einmal anvisiert bist du dran. Flares/Smoke hat er ebenso. Und so einiges mehr. Den Schutz gegen Raketenwerfer hatten zum Beispiel die Leo´s am Hindukusch. Ebenso hat der Leo2 auch ein "Universelles Fahrgestell" wie der Leo1, denn die sind in der PH2000, Biber, etc wiederzufinden. Es gibt so viele Extras für den Leo, frei nach dem Motto: Kein Limit nach oben beim Preis. In der selben, wo man das Getriebe des T14 ausbaut, baut man beim Leo den ganzen Motor samt Getriebe aus. Man verzichtet sogar ganz bewusst auf den Autolader, denn eine eingespielte Crew ist weit schneller als irgendein Autolader. Ein Autolader kann ausfallen, den Crewmate musste schon umlegen dafür. Jeder Schuss ein Treffer, also komme ich auch mit wenig Munition aus. Bei knapp 12t Unterschied und fast gleicher Größe, frage ich mich wo der T-14 die 12t spart, wenn er ja mehr Technik UND Munition an Board hat........ . Ich wiederhole 12 TONNEN!!!! Die Hauptgründe sind alleine schon: Der Leo existiert zu tausenden auf der Welt und er funktioniert. Der T14 ist ein reines Prestigeobjekt was sich Russland nicht leisten kann. Und durch die Sanktionen nicht einmal in der Lage ist zu bauen. Dazu ist der Leo weitaus älter der "moderne" T-14. Viele Länder fürchten den Leopard beziehungsweise deutsche Panzer sind allgemein weltweit gefürchtet. Das im 1 Weltkrieg so, im 2 Weltkrieg, das ist heute so und wird vermutlich auch so bleiben.

@InvalidDriver Год назад

Die gesamte militärische Ausrüstung kann Russland selbst bauen, das war es schon immer (Russland hat die Produktion von Chips, Wärmebildkameras und allem anderen, aber nur für militärische Zwecke). Das klingt nicht lächerlich, aber Sanktionen betreffen nur zivile Einrichtungen. Jetzt wird T-90MC in großen Mengen produziert, einfach weil es 4-mal billiger ist und die Anforderungen des Militärs vollständig deckt. Bezüglich des Gewichts: Der T-14-Turm wiegt deutlich weniger, er ist unbewohnt, die Frontprojektion ist auch kleiner.

@HrMattila Год назад

There are more in this than the specifications only. A trained crew, the use of ammunition in a combat situations and tactical movement are very important too. What is a tank worth, if the crew cannot handle it to perfection. Tanks are not just up against other tanks, but infantry with RPG's, airplane attacks, artillery attacks and mines etc. as well. The combination and mix of units (tank, infantry, air-support and artillery support etc. are important - relative to the specific battlefield / assignments and logistics etc.

@WackyJackyTracky Год назад

But this is a tank comparison video. And the T14 has some technological advantages to the Leopard that not even the best crew can equalize. Leopard is helpless against ATGMs and has a very vulnerable spot as seen in Syria

@jimmynolet3752 Год назад

T14 looks extremely small and low profile this suggests Russia is gonna run the numbers and build these in mass like Sherman's or they have major armor they are gonna tack on to the tanks

@einundsiebenziger5488 Год назад

"There are more aspects*/variables* in this than specifications ..." or "There is* more in this than ..."

@einundsiebenziger5488 Год назад

@@WackyJackyTracky In Syria, the Turkish Leopards of the outdated A4 variant, showed their vulnerability in close-range inner-urban fighting against infantry, which is not what this variant was designed for. If we're talking long distance, head-to-head, tank-against-tank fight, as in this case, this is exactly the discipline in which Leo 2 and the Armata are supposed to shine in.

@WackyJackyTracky Год назад

@@einundsiebenziger5488 No not all desastrous Lepard2 explosions were from inside the city, there where some longrange ATGM hits by Konkurs or TOW

@shanep212ify 2 года назад

Judging by the Russian tank crews getting flanked and abandoning wagons in Ukraine, a good crew would beat a T14 using a Volvo 740😂

@mra4486 2 года назад

T-14 wasn’t used but still Russia is as far from Kyiv as I am from my neighbors house.

@headhunter1945 2 года назад

@@mra4486 That is simply because that is how far their border is from Kyiv.

@marians7649 2 года назад

Well said

@CommunismiEstCacas 2 года назад

Judging by how weak and effeminate Westerns became Russia and China will rule the world pretty soon.

@sabersaber3059 2 года назад

Yes dreaming is good just by looking you get that wow . So smart

@atanasvasilev3228 Год назад

My money is on the t-14. A single one is probably better in all aspects than the leopard, but having two of them for the price of one leopard... leaves the cat in the dust.

@bonito34 Год назад

Lol

@user-th2jm9gu7o Год назад

It's impossible to win in a duel against a non-existing rival

@3hawer Год назад

The T-14 Armata has long been tested and is already in service. For your information.

@thomasbaagaard Год назад

@@3hawer then why is it not in use in Ukraine? How many exist? 20? The russians are dragging out old T62s from storage... why would they be doing that if they had any relevant number of T14s?

@Darkpara1 Год назад

@@thomasbaagaard they've got photos of one somewhere in Ukraine.... but it's probably hiding behind the line somewhere. They wouldn't want to risk their very limited supply.

@robby543212000 2 года назад

Leopard 2 was once tested by US Army and it outperformed the early XM-1. USA still decided to buy XM-1 (as M-1 Abrams) and improved it many times, but so has Leopard 2. If M-1 is often considered to be the best tank in the world, the Leopard-2 might even be better.

@OPShergottite 2 года назад

from what i read everywhere and which i hear in videos the newest Leopard 2 version (A7/A7+) is considered the best MBT in the world rn

@emdi8590 2 года назад

@@OPShergottite but it depends what do you expect from tank. Leopard, merkava, Abrams top 3...but Abrams have one big advantage. Abrams was tested in real war!

@robby543212000 2 года назад

@@OPShergottite Beside from those early tests in the 70ties Abrams and Leo 2 never fought each other in real combat ... so it's probably difficult to point a "winner". But more important in real combat which one has the better trained crew.

@kokomo9764 2 года назад

The Leaopard II is not better than the Abrams.

@kokomo9764 2 года назад

@@OPShergottite Read everywhere? Like where? Name a legitimate source.

@tomaszdabkowski499 2 года назад

It’s hard to compare a tank in the active service with a prototype. Russian army initially ordered 2300 T14s and that was reduced to 100 test vehicles. They even failed to reach that goal. The core of the Russian Army is still T72.

@TheCaptainbeefylog 2 года назад

@@VammainenSetaMies22 which the Leopard was designed to kill.

@tomaszdabkowski499 2 года назад

@Kimchii92 we all see what attacks Ukraine. Scrap metal.

@tomaszdabkowski499 2 года назад

@Kimchii92 modern tanks are only on the paper.Russian propaganda. They don’t even tell Russian citizens how many soldiers died or how much equipment is destroyed. They call it not war but intervention. Russia is poor as f**k.

@mrgently3449 2 года назад

@@tomaszdabkowski499 A: They admitted some casualties. Ukraine didn't tell anything about their own losses. B: Attacking is more dangerous and risky than defending.

@killjoy1887 2 года назад

@@mrgently3449 The Ukrainians don't mention their losses because A. Everyone knows they are going to be horrific and B. Anything less than 100% means the fight is still on they are up against the wall and they know it. Although looking at the opening salvos of the war the civilians may be a little safer now that they are being targeted given the number of hits they took when they were not.

@rickgoodwin825 11 месяцев назад

Which would win? The Lancet drone would.

@Grid88 10 месяцев назад

Lancet is one hell of a drone. it's asymmetrical warfare.

@waynejohnson1304 11 месяцев назад

Even before watching this, we already know which system is superior as many of the Leopard 2 tanks have been destroyed by the T-14 Armata in Ukraine recently. I will watch this anyway.

@ianmclaren5297 Год назад

Seeing as the leopard two actually is in service and the T14 appears to only be a prototype this question is stupid.

@johnlewis9907 2 года назад

Since the T-14 is basically a experimental tank with little chance of serious production, I’d say the leopard 2. And even if it was produced with the Russian defense industry it will never live up to the hype.

@miriamweller812 2 года назад

Tanks are not really of much importance anymore - and will mainly get destroyed by airforce.

@a0flj0 2 года назад

@@miriamweller812 Tanks will indeed get destroyed by air force - if that air force exists and is trained and equipped to cope with ground-based air defences. As can be seen in Ukraine, air superiority alone is useless if there is no coordination between airplanes, tanks and infantry, and everything, airplanes, helicopters, tanks and infantry, both in armored vehicles and on foot, is vulnerable against a well prepared and well coordinated combined arms force.

@miriamweller812 2 года назад

@@a0flj0 Ukraine never got air superiority in the first place, so all you can see in Ukraine is how a Nazi army is worthless, no matter how much money you put into it. USA should have done it the same way as with Hitler. When they supported him on his rise and with his Blitzkrieg, it was almost whole germany who went with him. Ukraine was a bad choice to repeat it, because while one half is fine with racism and hating Russians up to the level of being pure Nazis, the other half does not like it up to the level of fighting it to their death. The militant coup in Ukraine was not comparable to the way Hitler was elected and seen as savior. The coup brutally weakened Ukraine, the directly following civil war even more and many young men just fled from the army, so all the USA got for their proxy war were the crazy Nazis and some other idiots, who were dumb enough to fall for the lie that they are not slaughtering their own people in the east. Overall, Ukraine is bad copy of what USA did with the 3. Reich = supporting Nazis to burn down Europe so it becomes east to loot for them. That's why all it does is burning down Ukraine and ruining it forever. Not that our west cares, afterall, Ukraine also got some resources and to rob Ukraine and enslave its people is fine, too for our fascists. Of course they really, really, really wanted to have Russia, too, more than anything else.

@uwejenchen5685 Год назад

Now you can try to compare the T-14 Armata with the KF51 Panther ... that would be interesting ...

@stepzone674 18 дней назад

Leopard 2 has been on the market for a long time and therefore the crew has many years of experience and knows exactly what it can do and how much it can be pushed. The T-14 is new and not many have used it in war or have experience with it. Experience and routines in pressure situations are very important to get the best out of the tank you operate

@felix-u 2 года назад

Russia cannot mass-produce Armata. The prototype tank "Armata" broke down on Red Square in Moscow during the parade.

@alexanderholm9278 2 года назад

Not really, the driver didnt release the tanks version of a handbrake :P

@njnikusha 2 года назад

Russia is full of crap 😆

@butbutmybutt 2 года назад

everything has a beginning, but dont worry, thats not an issue anymore

@butbutmybutt 2 года назад

@So Woke ur very woke, thats why ur so smart

@ivanti7433 2 года назад

Fake

@michaelmuller5809 2 года назад

I am missing the information, that the main weapon is fully stabilized at Leopard 2, that means, you can lock your target with laser, set the weapon on the target and you are able to destroy your locked target when you are driving 70 km/h to uneven terrain. And you can release for emergency use 2 additional gears and additional horsepower to speedup to 90 km/h. This shortens the lifecycle of engine and gearbox but in war, that doesn't matter. Autoloader is crap, a good gunner crew of Leopard is loading faster and can switch between different kind of munition at every loading process. The Abrams tank uses nearby the same main weapon and at Iraq war, no russian tank has a chance to win a fight against an Abrams tank. Putin reacts as Adolf Hitler, is dreaming on "Wunderwaffen" but the Ukraine War shows, the russian Armi isn't so strong as Putin thinks. But for all (russians and ukrainians) we hope, the war ends fast, not to waste more blood and lifes for Putins stupid war.

@niklasd2131 2 года назад

That is not really correct. Germany under Hitler had many Wunderwaffen. Most of todays weapons based on Nazi stuff. Don't be foolish about that, Nazis was ahead of time. Problem was most technology couldn't be produced at that time in big numbers.....

@praetorians235 Год назад

Leopard 2 - the crew is sober ...

@gregwright9797 Год назад

The crew training and experience are most important.

@Finn-lh6yz 2 года назад

I don't think you can specifically say that one is significantly better. Both are equipped with the latest technology. The Leopard has more combat experience but is very expensive. In the end, it depends on the training of the soldiers and who sees whom first. It must also be said that the Leopard always performs very well in tests against other tanks.

@Finn-lh6yz 2 года назад

What actually happens when the automatic reloading fails. Technology is fragile and new. Can the Russian tank also be reloaded manually? In wars like Afghanistan, the whole thing is certainly good but what happens when the tank is fired at with real ammunition.

@user-du8vr3zb8g 2 года назад

@@Finn-lh6yz Перезарядить орудие в ручном режиме возможно. Это не новые технологии, это доработанные технологии конца 80х,начала 90х.Испытанные и обстрелянные на полигонах. Прототипом Т14 был танк Объект 292.

@zheckav 2 года назад

@@Finn-lh6yz Russian tanks have had automatic reloading for like 350 years now. New technology? Really?! Where have you been my friend)))

@KWCdiver 2 года назад

@@Finn-lh6yz It is possible to reload the gun in manual mode. These are not new technologies, these are refined technologies of the late 80s, early 90s, tested and fired on at training grounds. The prototype of the T14 was the Object 292 tank.

@dmitry5233 2 года назад

@@Finn-lh6yz russian tech may be crude but it never fails.

@MrTmn2401 2 года назад

Leopard 2, no doubt about that !

@Cristiano----- 5 месяцев назад

nah i go for T14

@5M4RT0N3 Год назад

Leoprad 2: exists Armata: cartoon

@mustafajamal3404 Год назад

Armata seems better but on the other hand its the skills and smartness of crew which make difference !

@johnkochen7264 2 года назад

As recent events have proven, it is not so much the specifications of your tank but the training of the crews that counts.

@robertmanfredthurrigl9424 2 года назад

The russian still have not gone away from their 3 crew concept! One of the reasons they had such staggeringly high losses in WWII was that a 4 men or even 5 men crew in german tanks depending on size always did better in engagements . i am amazed they have not let go of the 3 crew concept . Well, long may it continue because it means more dead russian tank crews on the battle field right now as we speak. May Putin shit hedgehogs soon and the Armata is untried and not tested . A case of a smokes screen and propaganda and premature ejaculation

@lglubbock7593 Год назад

@@robertmanfredthurrigl9424 you krauts still lost ww2 like ww1 and next one

@robertmanfredthurrigl9424 Год назад

@@lglubbock7593In WWI Russia signed for a peace. The Treaty of Brest-Litovsk was a separate peace treaty signed on 3 March 1918 between Russia and the Central Powers that ended Russia's participation in WWI . Russians are not doing so well right now are they . You make no sense. Germany is part of NATO and the enemy is Russia . ALL NATO members are supplying Ukraine so that Putins hordes are defeated on the battle field. This time WE are ALL in it together . Did that get lost on you? Lets hope it does not escalate . You are a bit one dim witted.

@Arie-Z Год назад

@@robertmanfredthurrigl9424 lol u still deep throating that US propaganda Ukraine's getting murdered along with their shitty NATO equipment.

@considermewrong6485 2 года назад

If one compares the actual footage of both one cannot deny the T-14 drives and fires very unstable. It shakes and tilts in all directions. The Leopard on the other hand drives like an ATV and when firing looks like being mounted on a concrete floor. Specs do not tell the entire tale: the footage shows T-14 Armata has one advantage. It can run away from certain death when it runs into a Leopard or an Abrams.

@markusweissenbock6337 2 года назад

Who would trust an Russian motor more than a German? I'd say, the most modern Leopard 2 versions would easily pull out more than 2000 HP in compat mode, maybe even more. While Russia has to run their engines pretty hot.

@glennjanot8128 2 года назад

The shakes and tilts aren't that disruptive when the cannon has a gyroscope system that keeps it on target. You can see that when a tank drives over bumps and the barrel moves up and down

@lglubbock7593 Год назад

ruskie tanks ran into berlin hurts dont it

@occamraiser Год назад

The Leopard 2 will win, because there are more than 8 of them and they actually work. It hardly matters how good a broken down T14 is or how good its armour is when it is attacked from all sides.

@ninosninakos846 Год назад

💪 Το Τ-14 είναι το καλύτερο Άρμα σήμερα!!!

@user-qw5tn6un9i 2 года назад

В России есть ежегодные соревнования , называются они--- танковый биатлон. Это соревнования на скорость, точность поражения мишеней, преодоление препятствий. Приезжайте танковыми экипажами, соревнуетесь с нами. Это мирные, честные военные соревнования на мастерство.

@Justice.and.Punishment 2 года назад

зачем им участвовать в этом позорище с изгоями, у немцев есть еще довоенные постоянные тренировки обычных солдат на танках, а не отдельных единичных клоунов которые выступают перед публикой

@Eneus1 2 года назад

После того, как у нас даже краповый берет начали покупать, я уже не знаю, где и что еще осталось честного.

@user-dj7jg2cl4l 2 года назад

Да они обосрутся сразу по этому и неедут чтобы непозорится

@user-qw5tn6un9i 2 года назад

Приглашают в Россию, не вна Украину, только в ней правит клоун и позорище . .. А не едут, значит боятся проиграть. Ежели министр обороны баба, да ещё и гинеколог...

@vandalfrojaanmes4344 2 года назад

В НАТО есть свои соревнования Strong Europe Tank Challenge

@DrCruel 2 года назад

The Leopard 2 will win because the T-14 Armata hasn't left the factory.

@rainerstahlberg2486 Год назад

Tank battle scenarios a la Kursk are rare in modern combat. So even the T14 superiority in reach (with laser-guided rounds) and rate of fire due to automatic loading might favor it in a duel, that has limited practical relevance. isolated or unsupported tanks are easy and favorite targets and have short survival time in modern combat.. But other than this is a fair and useful comparison, e.g. if you need to buy tanks. Thank you.

@janjansen6443 Год назад

Russia is supporting their tanks, is not isolated. Nato on the other hand will be unsupported and quite isolated seeing they have lots of different types of wapens mixed in with there own older weapon systems, limited training unless they will use more nato troops than they currently are.

@adamabele785 Год назад

If Russia could buy the Leopard 2, the Abrams or Challenger, they would. But they can't. That is all that is needed to say.

@BlitzHUB_Ky Год назад

T-14: why u think u better? Leopard: i am produced, i can drive T-14: "failed engine noises"

@bertoverweel6588 2 года назад

I drove the Leopard 1 in 1973 -74 43 Tank Bat , Aesk , for the Dutch army in Germany.

@disgustedvet9528 2 года назад

Armata's high profile will put it at a disadvantage presuming they finally build a few .

@tiagomonteiro130 Год назад

With weapons like anti tank guided missiles it actually doesn't matter how big your tank is or how strong the armor it will be destroyed it all comes down to the training of the crew

@BladeRunner2021_ Год назад

The 2 BEST Tanks in the World.

@007ShaolinMonk Год назад

Armata would definitely win. Because Leopard 2 is a real tank and Armata is an imagined one. Every time you compare something real and an illusion, the latter will always have better characteristics. There is more meaning in comparing Armata to German tank Maus. Both exist in the same reality.

@koklol2837 2 года назад

With these new tanks, they are so similar that I think in a combat situation it would come down to; which crew is better and who see the other first.

@DjDime92 Год назад

like tank battles ever happen nowdays. It's artillery vs tank usually

@DjDime92 Год назад

since tank is a tool of charging, both sides taking offense simultaneously died like a century ago

@andreasweber7828 2 года назад

Leopard-2, all the way. There’s a good reason that American tanks rely on German tech and precision by using the Leopard’s turrets and gun barrels . In that way the Leopard somehow had seen a fair bit of battle action

@hagotcha6055 Год назад

All true…but the even the german goverment started developing a new tankkind because of the t-14 armanta. They know that the leopard doesn‘t stand a chance against the armantas newest weapons symstems. In theory the Leopard wont even hit the armanta while it destroys the leopard completly …that‘s german theory btw

@OpenGL4ever Год назад

@@hagotcha6055 That's why the L/55 gun barrel was put into service on the Leopard 2 A6 and later. This one can penetrate the T-14 Armata.

@stalinliberator464 Год назад

german tech already lost WW2 to the Russians...all the way lol ))

@samuelhakansson6680 Год назад

@@stalinliberator464 How can "German technology" lose to "Russians"? The statement makes no sense.

@stalinliberator464 Год назад

@@samuelhakansson6680 how?just like they lot WW2 to the Russians. If historical facts make no sense for you...well, waht can i say

@pinto66 Год назад

At the 1:00 mark; that Leopard I is a Canadian Army tank, on display at the Royal Military College of Canada in Kingston, Ontario.

@MrRavtoo83 Год назад

Training, experience and professionalism of a tank crew is what would set things apart. A tank could be more technologically advanced, and have other superior features, but a well trained, experienced crew can "potentially" trump an opponent.

@paradox_gaming1176 2 года назад

Leopard is a Beast ^^

@hansvanbrandwijk2803 2 года назад

In war I have never seen the latest version of a Russian battle tank deployed. They only perform well on promotional material.

@tomitiustritus6672 2 года назад

Some T80 and T90 apparently deployed in Ukraine. At least i have seen the ukranian army showing them off as trophies. 'Terminator' light tanks were seen on trains near Ukraine, but not yet in Ukraine afaik. Maybe they want to use those for the cities. TOS-1 have been seen deploying into Ukraine, towards Kharkiv and Kyiv. At least one TOS-1 and one TOS-1 loading vehicle i have seen abandoned and possibly captured. PS: The russian armimg program since 2008 is introducing a wide range of new systems, but only in small numbers for the top units. Descending in unit hierarchy, the material gets older and older. The troops securing Moscow, Petersburg and Kaliningrad will be the ones with most of the new stuff. The ones they could expend to send into Ukraine mostly still use soviet era equipment. Rosgvardia units are probably not going to get their hands on an Armata in the next 20 years. That is, if Rosgvardia still exists in 20 years. Currently i don't make any predictions anymore.

@hansvanbrandwijk2803 2 года назад

@@tomitiustritus6672 And the (des)armata?

@tomitiustritus6672 2 года назад

@@hansvanbrandwijk2803 I have not seen any mention, picture or video of one. And at least according to Wikipedia, even the test batch isn't shipped to troops yet. The first batch should have shipped in 2022 when they are done with the testing, as of before the invasion and sanctions. So it's possible that they accelerate the program, given the new geopolitical situation and the impending rearmament campaigns in Europe. Or it could be that Russia can't even afford the first batch at that point, as rating agencies just rated Russia as "imminent sovereign defau!t", meaning Russia can't pay the interests on its state debts. It's really hard to say right now, as the predictions range from "HaHa, Russia doesn't care about your puny sanctions! Europe will collapse!" to "If this goes on for 3 months, Russias economy will be a potato field and a gas station.".

@hansvanbrandwijk2803 2 года назад

@@tomitiustritus6672 Thanks!

@milanjano8125 Год назад

Nowadays, they have almost the same weapons=equipment. The size of the tank is also important - that is, the target. But the most important thing is the training of the crew and their determination to fight for their homeland!

@jamesengelsma3 Год назад

What are the rubber flaps in front of the leopards hull used for?

@jas4371 2 года назад

The t14 is still a prototype and in testing face If Russia and NATO went to war the leopard 2 would probably not meet the t14 It would most likely meet one of the tanks that Russia is using in Ukraine And if I had to pick between the the leopard 2 vs the tank that Russia is currently using then I will pick German

@miriamweller812 2 года назад

Which would simply get destroyed by artillery and alike long before seeing any russian tank.

@jas4371 2 года назад

@@miriamweller812 well it's possible, anything can happen in war but this was about tank vs tank the leopard 2 vs the t14. It's difficult to put them up against each other because the t14 as far as I know is still a prototype and has not entered active service yet Russia is currently using t72, t80 and t90 again as far as I know The leopard 2 has been active for years and have seen combat and it's battle-tested The t14 as far as I know not seen combat most likely because they're still testing it learning it how to best use the tank in the future I can definitely see that it could be beneficial for crew protection that they are all in the Hall of the tank and not the turret But I would still pick the leopard 2 over the t14 because it is battle-tested and it has seen combat and has been proven to be an effective weapon

@crazyeye6424 Год назад

@@miriamweller812 You must be a nazi russian.

@Nick-mu9vu 2 года назад

My money is on the Leopard series, seen them when in the Canadian Army, such beautiful beasts

@WhiteWolf65 Год назад

Even if the Ukrainians don't get the 2A7's, they will have a tank that can turn the Russian tanks into scrap metal. The T-14 has to be on the battlefield to be considered, and as yet, it is nowhere to be seen.

@edwardmyers3244 Год назад

I know this is silly, but having seen how horrendous Russia's attempt at building a decent car have been, it is hard for me to imagine them building a complex tank that did not have serious issues, particularly in the early stages of serial production.

@anandawijesinghe6298 Год назад

T-14 Armata would win over the Leopard 2. I like its sloped turret as well . The question is which one would win based on specs, not on current availability.

@andrewworth4810 Год назад

The paper T-14 might be good, the reality is that it's not being mass produced because the real T-14 doesn't match the paper version.

@WanderingNoldo 2 года назад

It's not hard - in the long run the Leopard 2 wins. Why? Well, first of all they gotta build some T-14s. Maybe the T-14 will be better for the first 5 years, but then the maintenance of the Leopard 2 will be so much better. Also the training of the crew is better. Finally, when and if some T-14s are built they might be up against the Leopard 3.

@brutal_slav4257 2 года назад

Okay internet military expert. The maintenance of the Russian tanks are way cheaper and the engine of the tank can be replaced within 30 min in battle as he explained in the video. Serial production already started and the tank 2x cheaper

@alpearson9158 Год назад

@@brutal_slav4257 uh not without western electronics appaRENTLY

@garyhardison9265 2 года назад

1st step is to decide which army has the better training. I remember a interview from Desert Shield/ Storm back in the day with a US Army Tanker he stated "Our tankers where just alot better trained than theirs, you could give the Iraqi's our M1 Tanks and we could've used their T-72s and the results would've still been the same.

@Botulismustoxin 2 года назад

Maybe, but the Rheinmetall gun destroys the T72 in a distance far from the possibility a T72 could defend or counterattack your M1. In the first conflict I served in the German Army and they said the M1 destroys T72 tanks in the dessert with KE ammo in a distance about 3-4 KM.

@vonSchwartzwolfe Год назад

Well looking at the videos of Russian armor units In the Ukraine, moving down roads and fields or coming under fire, they have not been trained at all on how to use basic armor tactics. I think the Iraqi's showed better use of tactics.

@virginijusjauckojis1265 Год назад

@@Botulismustoxin And.... do you believe it ?

@melgarezuniverse1217 Год назад

Ok the conclusion is..the t14 is better ..the su-57 is the best fighter jet...s-500 the best air defence system.....hypersonic missilery and icbm are the best...to that you say what?

@vonSchwartzwolfe Год назад

@@melgarezuniverse1217 They are not being used very effectively.🤔 or the war would have been over in the 3 days Putin claimed it was going to happen the day before it started, 323 days ago.😁

@dearpc1555 Год назад

Nice Video

@Grid88 Год назад

Thanks for the visit

@user-vu9xl2yz4s Год назад

The Armata don't work at all, just a parade tank (when it not fail on this as well), since most of the fund end in an oligarch poket. Rather than use for it's dev. So Leopard win easy since it work at least. Most advenced russian tank is the T 90 bv.

@SteveMikre44 2 года назад

Leopard 2 is battle tested with advanced training techniques firmly established...

@LootGoblin4510 2 года назад

My money is on the Leopard.. But I do like the ability of the Armata to fire a 5km range missile.. maybe Leopard 3 might have similar and maybe some thought into moving the crew to a hull down position as well, with an autoloading turret.. but if you have jams or misfires... that could be interesting, also maybe why the West as a whole hasn't..

@AlexanderSmith764 2 года назад

But t14 is a true next generation tank

@Tyr002 2 года назад

@@AlexanderSmith764 The T-14 is not built! That will have its reasons ;-)

@Biboran. 2 года назад

@@Tyr002 Read the news of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation in January, on the 24th, a large number of tanks are expected to arrive, there will be 374 units in total

@Tyr002 2 года назад

@@Biboran. In Russia is always "a lot" expected! Let's wait for the confirmation ;-)

@bear76009 2 года назад

Obviously its the Leopard being the Armata is a prototype that isnt deployed

@Danielboondevis Год назад

in combat, the simpler, the more reliable, the better

@dwightd.eisenhower3729 Год назад

A non existing tank can’t be a threat

@USS-SNAKE-ISLAND 2 года назад

The T-14 is *thee* GREATEST tank ever designed! It cannot be destroyed by any other tank, not even at point-blank-range. It is armed with a 16-inch naval gun that is accurate to 24 miles. It can drive along the ocean floor at close to 50 knots. It can fly! It can shoot down fighter jets, satellites, you name it! And it is equipped with the PIONEER FH-X830BHS Double Din Stereo system. It even has an ice cream maker! ... *(JUST DON'T TAKE IT TO A PARADE.)*

@andia.4980 2 года назад

😅

@jounisuninen 2 года назад

Great vehicle. Does a tow truck belong to accessories?

@USMarshal99 2 года назад

And winner is the nearby farmer with his traktor🤣🤣

@ludwigedelmayer6217 2 года назад

The difference is, the Leopard is actually existing

@Bonerfyed Год назад

Idk if you heard but Russia has upped their production of equipment. Just recently they are producing the armatas finally. With the news of tanks being sent to Ukraine I'm sure we will see the armatas for sure. Just saw a video of Russians training in a t-14 Armata.

@narutoincore123 Год назад

Dude, don't watch russian propaganda. T14 does not exist and never will.

@MH-yp6wg Год назад

What it all boils down to is if the T-14 could be manufactured in masses in time, and if it is reliable on the battlefield. If both of these conditions are met, the T-14 with it's newer technology and newer concepts could be the winner in a direct confrontation, which of course any sane commander would avoid, so maybe we won't see it that often. The Leo 2 on the other hand is a proven design with loads of experience and a lot of logistical advantages (widespread use, Nato standard ammunition and the like) on it's side. So, if the T-14 has some design-flaws which take time to iron out, that war might already be over before the T-14 plays a significant role, while the Leo 2 is there and ready. Now, the german chancellor Schulz only needs to give it a green light...

@voss6930 2 года назад

Latest version is Leopard 2a7V*

@besnikillyrian8520 2 года назад

Make the germany big again 😉😉. Greetings to germany from albania

@maxiona714 2 года назад

Thanks, we will.👍 And I have good news for you as well: You can have Kosovo, and there will be a new peacekeeping alliance in the balkans, with all ex-yugoslavian nations, Albania, Bulgaria, the EU and Germany.

@igormerdzanovski7465 2 года назад

Shut up shiptar...

@besnikillyrian8520 2 года назад

@@igormerdzanovski7465 🖕🖕🖕😅

@yamaotak9871 Год назад

Beste Grüße Deutschland und deutsche Technik ist Beste im Welt 🇩🇪🇩🇪🇩🇪❤❤❤👍👍👍

@andreymavlyudov4174 Год назад

They haven’t been making this tank due to it being expensive even tho they still are producing them slowly but their t-90 tank is still very powerful and competes with every other tank

@natureb2267 2 года назад

Recent information suggests that either tank can be taken out from the air or on the ground. Without good combined arms capability tanks are just large expensive targets on the modern battle field.

@Bustermachine 2 года назад

That's been true since the battle of Flers though. Combined arms has always been part and parcel of tank doctrine.

@HellopeepsStavros Год назад

Absolutely right. Blow a track off with a mine, dead in the water. or mud.

@tobiasdobberphul9860 2 года назад

When the T-14 really gets in use Germany will provide the Leopard 3 beforehand ^^

@thar234 Год назад

With the ban of electronic hardware/chips, the armata wont see any production lines in the near future. Its quite clear, that both tanks wont miss a shot on each other, so in my opinion, the one tank, who shoots first, wins. Although i think, that the leaopard might have a better crew survivability, but who knows. If you want to compare tanks, compare mass produced tanks which are in use 10+ Years, or compare prototype tanks to each other, but mixing it, makes no sense.

@dusmannalinwad Год назад

thanks

@butbutmybutt 2 года назад

the best part of armata is the platform, u can exchange a lot of parts. u can change a tank to another kind of tank fast. and there is a remote control

@arnograbner4741 2 года назад

LOL! First they have to BUILD some T-14!! Now with Russia going bancrupt FAST - they will not have the money and also not the tech!

@Darkpara1 Год назад

We all know that Russian technology is always working.

@ralphscholz9533 2 года назад

Big question. How many of each can be produced during a conflict? It doesn’t matter how good your tank is if you’re outnumbered 20 to 1. That’s how shermans beat tigers.

@Scott-lx4ic 2 года назад

If you mean the film sequence here on RU-vid, in which 3 Shermans fight against a tiger: According to experts, the tiger would have won quite easily, it was only cinematically implemented so that the film is not over at that point.

@user-jn4qp3kn6c 2 года назад

Or T-72 against Leo)))

@mariomatura4308 2 года назад

Bullshit, Sherman you say ha ha..my son, T 34 won the war...it was easy to come 1944 in Europe with Sherman when Tiger no more left ha ha

@timholtermann9586 2 года назад

Der Benzinmangel und die dadurch eingeschränkte Bewegungsfreiheit hat doch wohl eher die Deutsche Panzerwaffe in die Knie gezwungen als die Shermans...

@user-jn4qp3kn6c 2 года назад

@@timholtermann9586 As in aviation, there is a shortage of personnel and a fallen quality of equipment. The tanks' real problems with fuel began in the Ardennes operation!

@ET-jv1wm Год назад

Theoretically, the Armata has the advantage in terms of offensive hardware. But I would still bet on the Germans because of their advantages in defensive capability, imaging, and target aquisition tech and software, etc. And I would definitely bet on German mechanical reliability vs. Russian mechanical reliability! But the big thing that wasn't addressed in the video was the human factor. Russian strategy, training, troop quality, morale, and logistics have been the biggest factors in the war so far.....

@user-nt1ip4vo9g Год назад

German reliability and complexity, or Russian maintainability?

@ET-jv1wm Год назад

@Андрей Спирт The Armata tank was designed and built around the German WW2 Tiger tank engine. It is one of the most unreliable powerplants ever created. So it's hardly surprising that we haven't seen any Armata tanks in the field yet.

@ifthakarkhan5281 Год назад

T14 Armata ✌

@Whatda25 2 года назад

Which would win? Stupid question, it does not address the quality of the crew.

@user-py5le3nr7z 2 года назад

No matter how cool a tank is, skill always decides

@MrFairness1 Год назад

T14 Armata of course.

@ivank.1193 Год назад

one tank is main battle tank in several countries, second one is created specially for 9th may parades as a prototype, and was not noticed in any warfare

@SS18w4531g00 2 года назад

A tank is a tool which is operated by crew. Seeing how capable Russian crew`s are, I believe the winner would be the nearby farmer with a towing truck :D

@v.d6809 2 года назад

Tank crew doesn't mean much if you have no infantry and air defenses. Anyone can sneak up on a tank..

@MrTmn2401 2 года назад

Aaaahahahahaha Comment of the day ! Love it.

@CombatArchive_1 Год назад

Brainwashed

@williamlloyd3769 2 года назад

Forbes article - “Germany has only 236 tanks in its inventory as of 2022.” Many countries around the world have bought used Leopard 2

@hansdietrich1496 Год назад

Yes. Compared to more than 2000 in the end of the cold war, the 200 now are a joke. They should have stored them just like the Russians, and sold new ones instead.

@Brian-om2hh Год назад

Remember though, if the situation ever arose (a war) where Germany would need to deploy it's tanks, then over 30 other NATO member nations would also be deploying their military assets too.....

@bonito34 Год назад

312