LG QNED81 4K Smart TV Review | 65" 

Thank you for the kind words!

Hi! I've found in general that LG TVs always seem to be the most consistent when it comes to colour. But it seems that the higher end QNEDs like the 81, 86, 91 and 99 all have the best colour output due to their 100% colour volume tech so the picture stays bright without losing saturation. I personally have been preferring LG tvs over Samsung and Sony as of late but each brand has it's own merits!

I don't know, that stand is pretty big so you can put the TV where you want

Feet is already plural. Feets?

Enjoy your new TV!

Hi, so this model supports all those apps but doesn't have dolby vision. It does support 10bit HDR (high dynamic range) though!

Hi at 3:47 in the video you can see a starfield test which shows there isn't any major bloom or bleed - I have seen some tests online which show black/grey uniformity issues - but in real use case I found the display to be perfectly capable with a range of media including darker image and HDR content. I did use the TV with all the lights completely off as well although I didn't shoot it and I found the performance was even stronger as there was less glare and reflection on the screen.

@@BoxCoUk Thank you for your reply. I'm planning to buy the LG 55QNED81 TV in Bangalore, India today. I'm now satisfied that there is no Screen Bleeding issue in the dark with this TV.

@@thenextlevel8307 Bear in mind this is the 65" with the IPS panel, whereas the 55" uses a VA - I would expect the viewing angles will be a bit worse but I think the overall the performance should be very similar.

Yes, some LG QNED81 4K TV owners have reported experiencing screen light bleeding issues in dark rooms. This is especially noticeable when watching content with dark scenes, such as movies or TV shows. The light bleeding can appear as a glow or halo around the edges of the screen, which can be distracting and detract from the viewing experience.

​@@BoxCoUkwhat panel does the 50" have

Hi, it's hard to say which would be better as I haven't had the chance to review them in person - what I can say about TCL is that they're cheaper models. You'll likely find that the main drawback of the TCL vs most LG screens is that the TCL may have less depth in colours and contrast. It may also have a cheaper/smaller processor making it run slower in apps. That being said it also comes at a much lower price and you may not notice these drawbacks until you look at the screens side by side.

Not too sure on the TCL 645K but this TV has 2 HDMI 2.1 ports which support 4k up to 120hz, you can see these at 1:04 in the review. (worth mentioning only port 3 supports eARC/ARC) Hope this helps in your TV search!

bought the tcl 645k and gonna return it and get this instead the tcl does 1080p @ 120hz but it can’t do 4k @ 120 only 4k @ 60

@@jojominecraft2354 Ah that's a shame - hopefully the new one can keep up with you!

Hi, this question is a bit difficult to answer as OLED TV's are generally in a higher price and spec bracket as well as considered to be more premium. In general they have richer and deeper colours and a wider dynamic range both increasing contrast and deepening blacks. You might also want to consider a model with Mini LED, and check out a few of our other TV reviews if you're still unsure!

The LG QNED81 4K TV is a great choice for watching movies. It has a high-quality picture with excellent contrast and black levels. It also has a wide color gamut that can reproduce a wider range of colors than traditional TVs. This means that you will see more realistic and vibrant colors in your movies.

Sorry to hear that, we haven't got our hands on this model atm but from memory I really didn't notice much, if any, bleed - unfortunately though bleed is individual to every panel so your mileage might vary.

Here are some of the top features of the LG QNED TV 4K 75QNED826RE (2023) - 75 inch: QNED Mini-LED Display: This display type offers excellent picture quality with deep blacks, vibrant colors, and wide viewing angles. 4K Resolution: The 4K resolution provides stunning detail and clarity, making it perfect for watching movies, TV shows, and playing games. Real Depth Enhancer: This feature adds depth and dimension to the picture, making it look even more realistic. α7 Gen5 AI Processor 4K: This powerful processor upscales lower-resolution content to near-4K quality, and it also improves image and audio processing. webOS 22 Smart TV Platform: This user-friendly platform gives you access to a wide range of streaming apps and content. HDMI 2.1: This connection type supports a variety of features, including 4K at 120Hz, Variable Refresh Rate (VRR), and Auto Low Latency Mode (ALLM). Game Optimizer: This feature optimizes the TV's settings for gaming, including reducing input lag and enhancing visuals.

This model does not have mini led . Just normal led with nano cell and quantum dots. No mini led. Mini led only on models 85 and up

The QNED81 does have motion smoothing and it's enabled out of the box in the sports mode. I do review it in the video and as you can see in my opinion the smoothing is a little bit too strong and results in some slightly jarring movement. That being said it all comes down to preference, and the QNED81 performs comparably to the smoothing on other brands and models.

If the review is anything to go by, I wouldn't touch this one with a 10 ft pole as I only ever watch football and cricket. My last tv was the 2020 Samsung QLED and the motion smoothening in fact made it worse (like trying to fix something that ain't broke, but ending up biting more than it could chew). Long balls and crosses would result in ghosting and there would be five blurred balls arranged almost like the 5 in a 🎲 (seriously). Disabling it and setting judder reduction at zero actually made it watchable. Other than that it was an absolutely stunning display. I've learnt it's wiser not to go by those samples of 4k or 8k footage as that's basically glossing about the strengths of the TV and shielding it's shortcomings. I can't say this tv has that too, but the ghosting is present as clear as day. I'd check if the settings can fix it.

I can't fathom how not having jarring motion would come down to preference. What are the case scenarios in which one would prefer to have it?

@@PemaWangchuk12 Many modern smart TVs have some form of motion smoothing enabled out of the box which some enjoy for adding a few frames to things like gaming. Personally I find QNED81 smoothing to be very strong but it's all quite comparable with other displays in this price bracket, if you enjoy the added motion to fast action then you may want to shop around and see which display has the best smoothing. If you prefer to turn it off/down that should be possible with any display really.

@@PemaWangchuk12 You really need a panel with 120hz refresh rate for watching football and sport in general.

Hi, after a quick look I can't say for sure which will be better as I can't do a side by side comparison. But the specs do seem quite similar and both TV's are coming at attractive prices. Ultimately I think they'll both perform well but the QE65Q77BAT might have a little bit better contrast and HDR performance given that it's a VA panel. Personally I prefer IPS displays for colour reproduction and viewing angles so I would go with the LG but I think both are great options.

@@BoxCoUk Thank you for your answer

Hi, if you watch at 3:47 you can see a starfield test which in my opinion shows a good black uniformity without bleed or bloom. This is the 65 inch model though and the smaller models seem to use a different panel type (VA not IPS) which could mean there's a difference in performance between the models. Unfortunately I've only had the chance to use the 65 inch so I can't say for certain that that's what the reviews are mentioning. This model does use edge-lit backlighting which means a full array screen will likely have better contrast and black/grey uniformity - but this would also come at a serious cost comparatively. In any case I really didn't find backlight bleed or bloom to be an issue in content but there are claims which suggest weak contrast and poor black uniformity. Ultimately the screen itself is of a good quality for the price, the TV has a very good build quality (although the stand could be improved), and while there are some downsides i.e glare (this was the biggest issue for me) I found the colour richness and depth of image were more than capable for viewing most content including HDR.

@BoxCoUk Hi Thank you, thank you for your helpful, detailed, and unbiased response to the question. Taking on board your opinion I think you would classify this tv as a good buy still in late 2023? Or would you recommend going for a tv with similar specs but full direct? Maybe the LG tech compensates for having edge light, and there is not much difference with full direct? Your advice be appreciated. Thank you for your helpful answer, with prices coming down I am trying to make the right choice Thank You 👍

@@audi4581 If you're in a good environment where you can dim the lights etc. then I definitely can say this would make an excellent purchase especially with the price coming down a fair bit. The only major downside for me was the glare on the screen as it's quite a glossy panel. In my opinion the TV is quite fast with opening and switching apps as well, so it definitely does feel quite modern in that regard. You might not notice much of an increase if you're upgrading from a fairly recent (2 years old or younger) model, but for anything 3 years or more you should notice a fairly decent boost with speed. A full array back light generally does increase black and grey uniformity compared to edge-lit so there's definitely a difference and it can be noticeable (especially when put side by side) but I wouldn't personally be so critical of a screen at this price point as the competition won't necessarily be that much greater. There are QNED TV's that use Mini LED though and those should have much better backlight technology, although at a much increased price.

@@BoxCoUk Hi Thanks for taking out time and going into detail with the questions - much appreciated. Your responses have helped a lot and given a better idea of how the tv will be on a day to day basis. With the cost of living it's good to buy a product and be well informed. From reading your messages I think this tv on most accounts is very good with a few weak points. More annoying (edge light and ips panel) as opposed to deal breakers or major issues. However, as you mentioned in your responses and in the video. Using the tv in real life these issues seem to on the whole not affect the viewing experience. With the current cost at approximately £700/£800,the model seems like a good buy. Being an LG, build quality and LG tech behind the tv. OLED and Full direct will be nearly double or more, a lot of money. Thank you for the help and feedback. Much appreciated and thank you, keep up the good work and content. = )

@@audi4581 Hi, thanks for the kind words, glad we could help and I hope you enjoy your purchase!

I just ordered QNED86 65 INCH & will be delievered by day after.. I would recommend to atleast save a but & go for qned86 as im sure it will be worth it

@@mrxcredible7012 hi.. thanks for sharing your experience and thoughts! I bought the QNED81 (QNED80 in India). Overall the performance is good.. not as good as an OLED or FALD..

It's 120 hz

Remote with NFC.

The LG QNED82 is a better TV than the LG QNED81 in terms of picture quality, brightness, contrast, viewing angles, and motion handling. However, the LG QNED81 is still a great TV, and it is a more affordable option.

Is not like folie, is like polyester bag... something like that

Hi, I'm afraid it doesn't support either dolby vision or atmos.

Hi do you mean the 50" version of the QNED81? As I believe that also uses an IPS panel and is, apart from size related performance indicators, otherwise identical in performance. But in general it really comes down to preference, IPS panels generally have better viewing angles, colour reproduction, and are capable of higher refresh rates. VA on the other hand generally produce better blacks due to their better contrast and therefore produce a really nice deep image. All that being said the two perform comparably and ultimately it all comes down to what you need and what you plan to use the TV for! Hope that helps :)

@@vedantpatel6592 Ahh, you're right but after having a look at the 65" again the panel is essentially a hybrid anyway, so the performance between models is going to be very very close. It really will come down to preference and needs for what suits you and your environment best.

It's rlly similar..depends on your room

Hi, the panel is edge lit.

Definitely Sony XR serien or KD serien.... amazing they are and Top quality 👍👍

Sony sir

I have LG Qned 999 -75 inch don't bother to buy this garbage from LG doesn't matter which Model from Qned....go with Sony from the start👍👍👍

I think all of these TV's would be good choices, in terms of a clear best I'm not too sure as we can't do a direct comparison. Have a look at this review we did of the Q60B: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-cwsZHNOW5O0.html and let us know which you end up going with!

@@BoxCoUk Thanks for the response.. checked all the TVs on store going with LG

@@ajaychilukari9802how its been?

Yes it uses AMD Freesync in its Game Optimiser mode, you can see this setting at 6:12 in the video.

How are you finding it? Really considering getting this tv for my ps5 I want something good but affordable

@@jevz7512 it's the best TV I've had, I had a Samsung qled just before but the home menu was terrible and the game mode not great either, this is perfect I have a ps5 too and it's great for gaming, 120hz mode and game mode easy to use

@@sean7332 thanks I think I’m going to end up getting the qned miniled version of this

@@jevz7512 nice! Enjoy

@@sean7332 thanks

I have read at multiple places and even on website that LG QNED 81 series does not have MINI LED Without mini led does it really give a edge and is it really QNED or worth it ?

Same question I have..😮

​@@shivakrishna9984me too

For the best possible picture quality: LG QNED81 For a more affordable option: Sony 82L

@@trendyprojectors4743 but I went with sony x82L bcz it's better in HDR performance and less blooming in dark environment

It depends on what you want from a TV, they both have their differences, especially in the picture style and the features LG and Samsung offer. You should check out both of our video reviews for the Nano96 and the QN85A to help you decide 😊

qn85a is much better tv for gaming and for movies.

I'm afraid it doesn't have either.

Yes, this TV uses edge-lighting

They normally retail for a bit more than that in the UK, but they also tend to drop a bit more in sales than that. If you're buying new it may be worth to look for a sale, or consider buying the 65" considering box.co.uk is currently offering this model for £1099.00 including VAT.

Hi! It's a combination of Quantum-dot, mini LED backlight. It's kind of an LG exclusive

@@BoxCoUk but in lg website it doesn't say mini led anywhere in the specs. Only QNED85 and above models have mini led but this QNED80 AND QNED81 is just a combination of qled and nano cell.

@@dracometeor17 Ah yes you're right - that's our mistake. While this specific model doesn't use mini LED most of the other QNED series TVs do. It is a bit difficult to know for sure given the naming convention but given it's a big marketing grab, you can be fairly certain that if mini LED isn't advertised boldly on the listing then the panel likely doesn't have it.

Why Whats the problem with it ?

@@wesleybollens7327 This Qned 65inch is absolutely Garbage for this Money! 1. Internet connection no matter how Ethernet wired or Wifi is always lost every day. 2. The image... if I'm watching sport, football or something that is fast moving, you can see a shadow behind the subject like a ghost, or something like that because it can't describe otherwise! I've set up the best way for the sport watching but absolutely nothing good happen. 3. As a smart tv must when shutting on to appear the smart screen with all Apps, but instead is opening for the cable option to be used..but these days almost no one uses cable tv .... streaming and there you need to see the apps as the first option, that's my opinion...ya apps are pops up on the bottom for very short...few seconds and if you don't touch immediately it disappear and you must touch the home for apps again...for me this is inconvenient as well! 4. If you have connected for example a firestick, it is also annoying that when i go out for one app from LG it pops up the firestick to go ...but without touching any Taste... crazy tv. 5. The store for Apps, if you want to download an app but first you want to read what does this app and if you don't want that app and you have no other options but to touch the back button and instead to go in the store to see further the list with what did you searched...it goes total out on the main screen 🤦🤦 This tv normally Price was "2800€" but I bought it on BlackFriday last year for 1700€ but I'm telling you this tv is worth Not more than 500€ even for this 65inch. I've not so much time to describe more and clear but I hope you understand what i have written here! Tks for the question 👍

He is a bot comments this on every review

@@Ggeditz1 @EditorHalal what is your problem...?? I'm telling you the truth and I'm a bot 🤣??...ok doesn't matter.... please buy...all of you buy this shitty tv...no problem for me👍👍 good luck

@@dannytelo2327I will trust independent and respected industry reviews not people in the comments. Name a better tv for the price point, then back it up with real world reviews.

If you are looking for the best possible picture quality, then the LG QNED81 is the better choice. However, if you are on a budget, then the Sony X82L is still a great TV.