Lies of History About Ancient Indians - Aryan Migration Theory DNA Analysis - FutureIQ 

Since you are educators, please, please check your typos. It's "White Man's Burden," not "BURDON."

Didn’t talk about Tamil language. He must be an Aryan.

​@@lawrencerichards4073 😅Maybe he didn't wanna talk about natives but rather what came in

Didn't speak about Vagesh Narasimhan research.

Totally bogus guys, they literally connected it back to white man’s story. As per white man’s story those people in Middle East came from caucuses. Their timelines also match up. Lot more respect to those creators who publish silly shorts & tiktoks.

TRUE

I think you meant Tamil. Most east Asian languages are inspired from Tamil script and not Sanskrit. Sanskrit has more ties with Arabic and some European languages but not south east Asian languages.

@@zachbercu3230 Of course there is Tamil influence in Indonesia, and some believe that the influence of Tamil culture is more dominant. One of the arguments is because there is a story about the Tamil version of the Rama-Shinta story matched with Indonesian version. Even in the earliest Indian epic, the Ramayana, Sugriva, the head of Rama's army, is recorded as sending his men to Yawadvipa, the island of Java, to look for Sita. ha ha ha... Also according to the ancient Tamil manuscript Manimekalai, Java had a kingdom with a capital called Nagapuram. After all, South Indian culture spread widely since the Pallava dynasty from South India in the 4th century. But there are also many records that show that merchants from Gujarat came to Indonesia to trade and spread Islam here, so that in the end our nation experienced mass apostasy for the third time by Indians. Aha ha ha...

@@zachbercu3230 Arabic is not similar to sanskrit at all. It's a semetic Language. And Indonesia has a huge sanskrit influence

@@ananymouse3988 The word india came from Indus river, Arabs were non existent when India was florishing in ancient times

There is. Andamanese Sentalese Tribes are Pure Ancient Hunter Gatherers 100% with no DNA input from outside. They're true indian in genetic sense

Tamil is pure language with out any language can stand

Tamizh has

@@RasimillionTamil/Tamizh like every other language in existence, has evolved and will continue evolving with every generation. No language is immune to evolution. A language can evolve slowly or fast depending on several factors but it has to evolve. Tamil has evolved from proto-dravidian just like the indo european languages have evolved from proto-indoeuropean and chinese langauges from proto-sinotibetian.

​@@Rasimilliondravidians migrated from one part of the african continent around 6000 to 8000 bce. if tamil originated in southern part of indian subcontinent then what was the language they used to speak when they migrated to south india from africa? a language can't be formed on its own out of nowhere without from the previous language. so if you're right then dravidians might have stopped speaking their previous language and directly made a new language (tamil) out of nowhere and labeled it as pure language? how ironic?

who cares that was migration or invasion? the important thing is they come from steppe eastern europe >

@@user_18789 Actually it makes lot of difference.

@@vivekthekk So it is better to get to know the reality Because it was Invasion, not immigration Because they replaced both their language and their religion We see this from the mistreatment of the lower castes by the upper castes and the denigration of blacks by the Rig Veda(that writed by aryans). When the other indo european steppe herders entered western Europe, they did not leave a single male farmer alive and Aryans are their cousins and barbarism is in their blood!!! they entered India without their female population As you know, when a population goes somewhere without its female population (like the Mongols), it means that they go for war or looting. How is it possible for them to enter India without their famale population and not have a conflict with the native people over their women? Do you think that the Aryans entered India and the people of the Indus Valley welcomed them with flowers and sweets? NO Genetics shows that the Aryans killed about 70% or more of the indigenous people of the Indus Valley and raped their women this is normal for bronz age even mongols destroyed central asia and its Iranic population killed 15 million people with high amount of aryan genetic and replaced them with turco_mongols Only 5% of Tajiks survived and fled to the mountains history maybe be sad but anyone can"t run away from it.......

@@user_18789 Yes Tajikistan - very fascinating indeed!! They did have chariots though and the males spread into the females. So while they didn't have domination by numbers they did dominate in terms of technology and breeding. I think the endogamous caste system by 100 A.D. is more a product of literacy having spread since literacy is left-brain dominant as ideology that gets passed on generation to generation. This is known as religion of course.

@@user_18789 As far as i know on this, the aryans immigrated in multiple batches, lived with local population, slowly understood the way to survive in Indian land. And their survival strategy is really cunning. Get the support of the power from king. develop and spread the idealogy of Varnas, Dont work, dont do farming, dont trade via sea (as it is even dangerous), basically dont risk life for anything and at the same time, get everything by making others work for them. Even at the time of war defeats, they made a strategy that they cannot be killed. So, all the track of Aryans shows no blood dropping, apply a cruel mind for survival. And to the surprise their idealogy is still in practise for a successfull 2000+ years. They used religion as a big tool. injected self biased ideas into the religion which works in 21st century as well. for ex:only Bhramins can be temple priest, wedding happens with their approvals, even PM of a country fall on their foot. etc etc.

I actually agree. Hes does say african towards the end

Those are the Dravidians.

And they were caucasian in the animation too 😂

Africans came 65000 years ago and the hunder gatherers came after 10000 years... both of them are different...

I am South Indian (75% Tamil - 25% Telugu) and I already know that I'm a Dravidian for a long time. Albeit born, raised and living 4 generations away from the Indian sub-continent, I believe I could still share my opinion. I have read of the Aryan invasions (I did believe it until I have a clearer understanding watching this upload) but I have in the last 8-9 years always acknowledge the FACT we Tamil people were originally from Africa. The prejudice is real!! ... even if one is raised outside India but it's not all black and white as you think, there are so many shades in between. For those ultra orthodox Hindus it's more about caste system and religion. .. But then,, even if you are from the same caste.. the last lingering issue would be - skin color! 90% of my society (in the country I live in now) don't believe in that anymore. Bad news.. the same 90% possibly do NOT KNOW much about DNAs, real time history and NOT we originally are Africans. I'm lighter colored and have relatives like me marrying either ultra light skin color and also absolute darkish skin color from different castes.. Why? Because we have learnt that a bird of feathers flock together only intellectually but NOT from understanding of our African black history last 70k years, When I personally highlight this to my orthodox family that still believe "" IT IS US WHO BROUGHT LANGUAGE, CIVILIZATION etc.. TO OUTSIDE NATIONS!! They frown with the "WHY?!1? BECAUSE THE WHITE MAN SAID SO??? "" It is in my own opinion again that one's religion itself plays the whole brainwash... " my way or highway..." doesn't matter that what creed, religion,, skin ,, nationality..civilization.. Having said, most Indians I know today don't really care about skin color these days. But if you are going to say things like .. ' HELOOWWW!! like we all were once from the African continent 70k years go and we moved here and fact that we are originally hunter gathering black people from Africa ....etc..etc... Damn!! definitely my people are NOT ready for it.

You have to account for the lost information and technology 40k years ago. But African and Asian cultures did meet in India as a trading hub.

@@genkideguire bro india is part of America, Africa and Australia, indian subcontinent is not whole land it's a part of many land, india has rich cultural and language like Tamil, even trading but that's one of part, Evan they have oldest Archeological proof before 75000 years ago But all are migrants from Africa not only whole world people start their migrants roots from Africa., And i am not from Africa, i am also from india, we should talk about truth., Thank you

So we are all a product of incest ? 😂😂😂

​@@user-fl4nw3ub7bunfortunately some people are still at the amoebic level, as per your statement.

No no indian have nothing to do with Afrika

well in the south and central part of india there's still a lot of black DNA left haha

@@samuraijosh1595 I know this.

lol we waz kangz ngga

@@AnnHexTheCryptoSpace we wuz whiet aryan Egyptian godz, building pyramids in the scorchin dezert but not europa🤷🏾‍♂️

​@@billiondollarbaby973 not only Indians, the whole world has spread from Africa originally

So true. Ram Ram from Sonipat. ❤

But what about the prehistoric dna found in Chennai

@@Mycosmicquest They are the pure hunter gatherers who left Africa 65,000 years ago & settle in Asia. They migrated all the way to Sri Lanka. They were in Sri Lanka by 50,000 years ago. The oldest human remains found in Sri Lanka is 48,000 years old, which is called Balangoda Man as the remains found in a cave Balangoda area. The Sri Lankan aboriginal people called "Vedda people" still live in Sri Lankan jungles, are the descendens from those who came here 50,000 years ago. The aboriginals live in North Sentinel islands (Andaman Islands) are also the same people.

That was how it was, till the Ariyan migration happened!

@@urbanmonkNH44 we have evidences which predates Both Aryan migration theory and AIT. And I didn't talk about OIT in first place. UP findings near IVC unearthed Chariots, helmets, Swords etc tracks back to 2000 BCE or More. Which predates All the migration hypothesis.

@@urbanmonkNH44 WHo told you? Yourself?

@@urbanmonkNH44 and Study done by US,ohio uni of human sciences and IIT, ASI shows NO evidence of a migration coming to indian subcontinent OVER 8000 year SPAN

​@@CHRS-ri5mfBut DNA evidences says otherwise. AASI is the original inhabitants. They mixed with people who came from Zagros mountains to create IVC. IVC started its decline by 1900 BC, and the Aryans or the Steppe Hearders arrived in 1800 BC. The Sinnouli artifacts shows similarities with both late Harappan (IVC) and Vedic culture. It may be better to separate the IVC and the Ganga-Jamuna culture and Sinouli is part of the second.

Peeped that too

Whether you are deemed a migrant or a refugee depends on what (or rather, how much) you bring with you... ;) -Shrikant

​@@TheFutureIQnon material stuff right..

😂

Most indo european groups spread their genes by their men (and we all know what that means globally-not very consensual love making) Interestingly most indo european invasions were extremely brutal and genocidal to the point where new populations were pretty homogenus which makes me think that it was indeed an invasion but that the pre herder mix were EXTREMELY resilient

Those refugees created India

Whoever came here accepted india as their own country except muslims. How much ever they live here in harmony, they always think arab and pakistan as their own country

What about the domination of modern India by the step herder (Brahman) DNA and their exploitation of the hunter gatherers even today in the form of RSS, BJP? Wake up! Islam is not the enemy, the CAST system is the biggest enemy of India! No wonder BJP is weak in the south

The same has happened to Iran. I don't think any region has been attacked as many times as Iran. But, eventually, all those invaders became Persianized!

@@yesu814 pakistan itself part of india ,given to them by indians

Lolz. When outsiders come they bring their own culture knowledge wisdom and traditions. So the land becomes a melting pot of different cultures and races. Like many so called Indian foods are actually from Arab Iran Turkey and central Asia.

I have seen many people from India with darker skin; I believe you have a lot of African-origin DNA. You did not mention the African Black race.

🤦 in case that all people would be african - the population in africa has also changed - & So the initial population that left africa are the ancesters of all three populations the study mentions make up the genetics of the people in the asian subcontinent.

For one, I don't believe Noah's Ark is anywhere near the Caucus mountains. If they journeyed from the East back to Babylon, then the Ark would have had to land on a high mountain range such as the Hindu Kush.

@@thelastshallbefirst6531 you right. 8 ppl spread around the World and started new civilization? Nonsense.

I believe Dravidians which are the darker skin Indians are the ones who arrived in Indian.

Every Indian discriminates "others"

@@outofturn331 nah there is a skin color related hierarchy. Only recently there might be some south indians being arrogant about being better educated but thats not to be taken seriously as really educated south indians would not discriminate.

Europeans???? Europe was non existance when steepes migrated to india, modern europeans are mix of steepe and native european hunter gatherer.They aren't steepe

@@binskee677 The skin colour related heierchy exist in every part of the world, even in europe. Northern Europeans discriminates southern ones. So don't blame india only

@@stephanatlas5331 dont go off topic I’m specifically mentioning what goes on in the deep root of India societies and it’s a fact!

He was trying to explain the fundamentals. Speaking of that subject you spoke would be another discussion in itself. Maybe you can ask the content creator to ask the guy to do a topic on that discussion you mentioned.

Sanskrit had its earlier writing system… bhrami etc.

They equally ignored IIT Kharagpur research,rakhigari excavation and khambat submerged city. So they took facts distorted it and came with challnel like idea so they can proove that Southern indian and northern indians have different ancestries. + Bramhins are more aryan in every part.( Propaganda of bramhical patriarchy)

​@@priyamtamrakar6035ok tell us what evidence do you people have ?

​@@alphaff9939proof is that savarkar himself believed that brahmins are outsiders

They said North indians and South indians have same ancestry, but with different proportions​@@priyamtamrakar6035

@@alphaff9939 Read 2022 calendar published by IIT Kharagpur. Rakhigari excavation report.Carbon dating of Bay of khambaat's submerged city. This is only tip of a giant ice burg.

Did Indians, Chinese, Italians, Irish people, Polish people, Mexican people, etc. invade America? Heck, why go so far? Did the Gujarati people invade Mumbai? Did the Shettys invade Mumbai? Did the Marwadi people invade Mumbai? A land that invites and welcomes people willingly isn't being invaded. It is being made stronger by the collective strength of the people who settle there and call it their own. You assume that the people of IVC were the "rightful" residents of the the land but how can you forget that they themselves were migrants at some point in time? - Shrikant

Thank you! Seeing comments like this does help -navin

Well said, uncle

The only positive comment here

Your perspective highlights the deep historical connections and cultural heritage of the Indian subcontinent, particularly emphasizing the significance of the Harappan civilization and the Telugu language. --- The root gene of Indian civilization can be traced back to the Harappan civilization, with a significant lineage linking all Indians to ancient migrations from Africa. This narrative challenges the simplistic historical accounts often propagated by European scholars. The grandeur of Bharat (India) is reflected in ancient Greek writings, which were deeply influenced by the rich culture and achievements of the Indian subcontinent. Telugu, a prominent Dravidian language, is believed to have evolved from Prakrit, with historical roots that include inscriptions and literary evidence dating back to the 3rd century BCE, particularly the Brahmi script seen in archeological finds at Bhattiprolu. This site is crucial for understanding the early development of Telugu and its literary traditions. Unfortunately, much of this archaeological evidence has been overlooked or dismissed by contemporary scholars. The destruction of Telugu cultural heritage can be attributed to various historical forces, including the Pallava dynasty, which, while contributing to the region's architectural and artistic developments, also led to the dilution of local traditions. The Sulabha Sutra, attributed to the renowned scholar Apastambha, who is believed to have hailed from the Godavari region of Andhra Pradesh around 800 BCE, is a testament to the intellectual richness of the time. His contributions to philosophy and grammar highlight the advanced state of Telugu culture during this period.

@@Apastambha you don’t need to mention the African roots all Homo sapiens are from Africa it’s the other identity the sarasvati river valley identity which needs to be asserted

👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾

Tamils are descendants of eastern africans. Your forefathers are black eastern africans who migrated to India.

@@humanist7619 that’d probably happened some 60000 years ago unlike Aryans who came just 2000 years ago to India now they want to take control of the whole country

​@@humanist7619 "Yes, all around the world, people came from Africa. Those who came first are the original inhabitants of the land."

Moreover he didn't mention that there was a land below the present south which was assumed to be connected with present srilanka and few islands...

They want to be Europeans don't want to mention Africa

Tamizh is not like that

@@kavithagovindaraj7531 who is tamizh??

​@@SpecialGlobalTalks tamil speaking people

Yeah outsider came and mix with natives and spread they caste based religion with native people god and created stories on it

@@ripsanskrit3609 there is no any native in India all are come from outside

Basically it appears that Africa is only the place where humans first evolved - and spread throughout the world Middle eastern farmer concept is noted as separate from their African ancestor bcz the 60k years in between changed them with visible physical traits, occupation n other behaviours Same holds for Steppes

Thank you

WORD!

i see no hindutva is happy with what he say

What? Hindutva bullshit here would Out Of India Theory, which is explicitly stated as clearly wrong. Even westerners agree that there was very little violence, and more a gentle and slow migration and mixing.

Ancient tamil literature mentions Aryans are elephant herders and dancers on the rope nothing more.

it's Arya..... not Aryan

​@@kartikshiroya2270Aryan is Tamil form for arya. Krishna is Krishnan in tamil

@@kartikshiroya2270 Doesn't matter , europeans created the term aryan based on refering the Arya in vedas

You are wrong steppe herders did not invent Sanskrit it was derived from Prakrit The Language used by The ASI And ANI People.

The links are included in the video description -navin

@@TheFutureIQ those are just book mentioned in in the video and other videos of yours... where are the research papers you mentioned...

​@@RaviShankar-lz7fjsee tye reaserach papers of hapologroups in google search it and see the sample an average Tamil is very much different from a kuruvasnhi of north india cause .see the faces of north india and south india see theire faces are different and the north indians tend to be more shining and light in colour .

@@RaviShankar-lz7fj the books have it i guess

😂

😂😂

Migration theory, not picnic. Earlier it was called invasion, now it is considered a slow migration - that happened after IVC had already declined.

Aryan refugee theory

Migration theory Lacks Evidence ​@@mrgyani

Invasion wasn't even there it's used as a strawman by hindutuvaddis

Genetic evidence proves otherwise

@@NadeemAhmed-nv2br lol,Aarya means a Sanskrit word which means skilled or respectable one.Dont know how idiots think it is not related to Bhaarat 😂

It's more of a migration theory. There is genetical/ linguistic data backing it

@@tomorrow. Migration keep happening all the time in all over the world. It should not be overhyped as FOREIGN gene or something

Thank you for the kind words -navin

A lot of it is following the right people on social media, and subscribing to the right substacks. Those give initial ideas, which I follow up by reading the relevant research articles on Google scholar or sci-hub or libgen -navin

@@TheFutureIQ acha! Good to know👍. Ty

@@TheFutureIQ 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

My north eastern friend said no one believed in usa that he was indian He was mistook as korean

@@michaeljosephjackson2364I live in the USA. No matter what you say, people will typecast you. I am fairly light skinned, but many people refuse to accept me as Indian because they believe if you are Indian you must be dark skinned. So I am not surprised about your friend.

@@michaeljosephjackson2364it shows that India influenced many different countries and spread Vedic knowledge throughout. Yet is cannot be accepted by the Europeans

@@AnnaJohnson-e7uVeda has knowledge?😂😂😂😂

You can't argue with people blinded by their faith. These people have been brainwashed into thinking that their land, people and culture was directly created by god, and has been the same since the beginning of time. This video is simply a lie for them.

Why a must watch? Do you have the scholarly temperament to evaluate is claims?

According to this man Brahmin s are having steppe DNA then why they were not survived in steppe. This man is sure shot leftist mindset and mixing all scientific studies for his agenda. I.e Nort Indian vs dravidian

@@sanjayp251 What agenda? Have you done your own DNA test?

@@jaychetra3250 A DNA test would be enough then

He said at 16:19 that the ARYANS were the Steppe herders , but that he did not to call them Aryans because of the racist connotations.

That part of the video was ridiculous. Steppe herders (barbarians) brought language and religion to a population that had been settled for thousands of years and was more advanced....that doesn't make any sense.

It's a fact. Their lifestyle is perfectly described in the old Sanskrit texts.

@@loksterization is it not possible at all, that they (steps folks) immigrated and adopted local culture and professions to survive? A Lot of Indian programmers migrate to the US and adopt the American lifestyle. Does that mean they brought programming to the US?? Try to find objective evidence of Sankrit already existing in the steps region. Without that, it is a sloppy argument.

@@blueSkyIs1 you don't understand. These Sanskrit texts talk in detail about the steppes where they came from. Facts are facts, this is not ideology.

@@loksterization Please post evidence and texts. And how you came to conclusion that they talk about Steps Also, very important! Why steps people don't take about their own place in Sanskrit that they are supposed to have been espoused??

That’s the bait and switch done by the mainstream academia.

@@ajqkit7gt that's excalty what tamil people say . South saivism is older than kashmir saivism

Im not that informed in this field but isn't Zoroastrianism similar to Hinduism? Also, other pagan religions which were in Europe and other areas too? Also, isn't modern Hinduism different from what it was thousands of year ago?

​@@niccolopaganini1782Adaitavad and Daitavad are two concepts of Sanatan Dharm...morderrn Dharma is largely Daitavadi...but note it..all this concept came from the ancient Dharma..it's not given to us by someone else

I think it is not Sanskrit that came to India but the precursor to Sanskrit was brought to India.

"Out Of Africa" theory was well framed by Whiteman.

Another case of challenges with listening comprehension

TAMIL people were called Dravidian by English men. The world Dravidian came from TAMIL word Thiruveedan means faithful and sacred Powerful men. Thiruveedan= Thiruvidan, Dravidan, becomes Dravidian, all ian, ism, ic comes from English. Indian, Dravidian Hinduism, islamism, vedic, islamic. Before , in ancient time we don't have papers and books nor photography. we don't have scripts, alphabets or letters. TAMIL language is the First, oldest, finest, sweetest and beautiful language and the first classical language in the world with the richest culture and highest civilisation and wonderful literature. God creates people of same colour the brunette colour first then the black, red , white and the yellow coloured skin people. The first world was TAMIL ruled by Paradan Emperumal (Paradan emperor, Baradan, Barad, Barat today india is Barath from the Parada Nadu. He , Paradan Emperumal with his eight sons and one daughter ruled also the Submerged TAMIL Continent Kumari kandam. Later his descendants went round the world, the Three crowned Tamil kings Sozhan ( Chola ) Cheran ( Chera ) Pandiyan ( Pandyan ) At that time we don't have God with Animals head. Rven indu Valley was not called indu. It was called Sindurai same as Madurai. In Tamil we don't put ' S' for Pluriel, only English put S . Indus, vedas, TAMIL put ' Gal ' Tamizhargal and the country was called Parada Nadu abd Tamizhagam or Tamizhaga Nadu. ( Or Tamizh Nadu) Water supply system in Sindurai ( indus) Valley Civilisation is the same as in South India, ( Tehn Barath) and specifically in Today Tamil Nadu. The TAMIL Thiruveedan ( Dravidian). Agriculture is from the Thiruveedan now in Tamil Nadu. New tech in agriculture is from the South india. Hindi, Urdu Persian, islamic, European languaged were not existent in the ancient Time. Nandri. 2.B C.........

‘native’ and ‘india’ are funny terms that you use that probably wont be recognised at all by people you are referring to. The initial ancestor DNA component in South Indians is greater, yes, but they do have other traces of DNA too, which doesnt make them any more native to the land than the north indians. Native word is generally used in English for people of a land existing before colonisation and resettling of that land by oppressive regimes. As the Dna evidence suggests however, the waves of people coming into the subcontinent werent colonisers looking to oppress but normal people looking to settle and intermarry the earlier civilisations. They are the ancestors of most south indians as well.

Well kinda trur yeah ......

Where is the proof that Harrappans spoke proto Dravidian ?

Incorrect, the keeladi excavation is dated to around 500 bce, hundreds of years before the aryan migration

@@technoyamraj research paper has come , go and read

@@Criticsyou give the link of the research paper

@@technoyamraj i have read long back , study Iq has put video on it U can check in youtube

Search Sanskrit was first found in

Aryans, whom he call Steppe Herders.

He clearly told that it was Steppe Herders

And Brahmins or so so called upper casts are having dense indus and ancestral hunters DNA 🧬. This is messed up than GOT

There was a big volcanic eruption (Toba) 74000 years ago, which resulted in ash deposits all over the Indian subcontinent. There's no evidence that any humans in India survived this. As a result, any modern Indians are descended from humans who came after this and anything earlier is prehistory -navin

@@TheFutureIQ Isnt there evidence from archaeological sites in India, such as Jwalapuram in Andhra Pradesh, suggests that human populations were present before, during, and after the Toba eruption ? Stone tools found in the layers of ash indicate continuous human occupation, suggesting that humans did survive the eruption and its aftermath.

It is possible. However, tracking DNA markers indicates that only approximately 10000 humans *worldwide* are supposed have survived the Toba eruption, most of them in Africa. While there are tools found before and after the ash in Jwalapura, no fossils have been found so we just can't be sure. In any case, even if some did survive, they don't appear to have a big impact on the DNA of the later Indians. -navin

There was never anything found as evidence of 1.5 M yrs stone tools. This is more Southie fantasy.

Homo Sapiens came to existence around 300,000 years ago. Before that they were primitive humans, probably from other branches of human evolution . All of them extinct due to various reasons. The last known species closest to humans/ Homo Sapiens were Neanderthals and never lived in Indian subcontinent. There for, what you have stated is a false narrative. I don’t think your claim is a pier reviewed genuine research.

Thanks for the kind and sincere appreciation. We hope we can keep bringing more such detailed videos to you. - Team FIQ

They are telling Britishers are your father and you are simply accepting without any research. Just think once, in these kind of theories why always foreigners are always coming to India and why not Indians were not gone to eastern world. They are just bluffing. Just think this way, if Indians gone to steppeherd world and they given birth to many babies and brought back their babies to India, then also same DNA patterns will come. Ok

​@@k.dineshkannana.kesavarama7749😂😂😂 omg...the hate for British is clouding your rational mind... There is no DNA evidence of your theory hence it wasn't the case. Abd ut doesn't make sense for people to migrate somewhere and to come back

@@pari0088 you love Britishers, no problem for me. Have you done any excavation under the oldest cities like Kasi in India, it may reveal our forefathers were not hunter gathers but a highly developed human beings. Excavations in the remote areas will definitely say you are the descendents of hunter gathers. DNA will not reveal the cultural heritage.

@@pari0088 Those who love Britishers will definitely accepted that Peter's theory,😂😂😂😂. I'm proud Bharatiya.

exactly

Mostly all the states in north india are mixed blood and these people only speaks hindi and they forgotten theyre own tribal original languages.

Ikr

@@sathishvijayan2160 Hunter gatherer isnt a ‘primitive’ term. Its just a way of life. That makes it no more or less primitive than agriculturists, lets say. Hunting and gathering food is the common way of living for almost every animal. There still are many tribes across the world which depend not on agriculture but on hunting, they have survived through just as many thousands of years as have the agriculturists, it is just as valid as any other mode of living. They have just as rich a culture and tradition. Hunting-gathering doesnt make them more or less of a developed human, thats just the pov of people who think of themselves as superior, living in a ‘developed’ world.

​@Namse21 ok so your ancestors might be hunter gatherers,ours were exploring the origin of the universe and writing the Vedas but not hunting and gathering

@@AJJYTHEGREAT ok? great? you think thats a diss??? even the ‘writers of the vedas’ and the PIEs had ancestors that were hunting gathering based. The first human species were hunter gatherers and even our species was hunter gatherer for majority of its span here on earth. (homo sapiens evolved around 250k years ago and agriculture was invented 12k years ago, so yeah for 230-240k years, every human was hunter-gatherer.)

@Namse21 we are talking about a specific period of history here, not about the whole human civilization

YES true. Most of these RU-vid Theorists are not true

@@sanjayb4159 you’re incorrect. Vageeshs paper from 2019 which is heavily cited shows a migration into India in the 2nd millennia bce from the central steppe Asians. The keezhadi excavations are dated to the 6th or 5th century bce, well after the Aryan migration. Where are you getting that keezhadi predates aryan migration and show no dna into India for 15k years ?

@@vipassana123 read all my other comments in the section for more analysis and then you may make more comprehensive reply

@@sanjayb4159 you’re comments aren’t comprehensive nor can I find them. Please refute my points

Then where did steppe dna come from and why is it highest in Ror? And please don't say that's scythians cause the eastern scythians were mongoloid shifted while western scythians were European shifted. Ror have DNA from none of those populations.

Not other,Real aryan word only found in Hindu text and ancient Iranian texts, europeans copied it from India

There has always been a tendency for usurpers, outsiders in any area, to claim that they always lived there, specially with small abodes and shops! Obviously they have been planted there by big goons! Supported by corrupt officials!

What about words words in non hindu text?.......talking about other races?

It's totally flawed video the research paper he's talking about is cell name and the thing is that the authors of that paper are now changed much of their opinion

@@Yashpromax It is the hindutwa influence on the authors , not any new findings !

@@tsMuthuraman-hm6wg 🤦🤦what a logic

The thing is that every one came from one thing that is sanatan that is called as jambudweep wich is now termed as pangea that's why there is one sloka in sanatan scripture vasudeva kutumbukam which means whole world is like a one family

@@mikeynimbavat1436 Was there any sanskrit in the pangea/ jambudweepa ?

The thing is that every one came from one thing that is sanatan that is called as jambudweep wich is now termed as pangea that's why there is one sloka in sanatan scripture vasudeva kutumbukam which means whole world is like a one family

Our Social Constructs is what makes us different. Trinidad 🇹🇹 USA

These two propagandists didn't even realise to discuss this ... They have come with a planned agenda

The timing of the migration are very different, the African hunter gather moved to India 65000 years ago, while the others were less than 5 thousand years ago. The African race in Africa is very different from the hunter gatherer that settled in the Indian sub continent. Both of them have had more than 40000 years to evolve seperately.

There is no such thing as steppe herders.

Thank you.

we have evidences which predates Both Aryan migration theory and AIT. And I didn't talk about OIT in first place. UP findings near IVC unearthed Chariots, helmets, Swords etc tracks back to 2000 BCE or More. Which predates All the migration hypothesis. The Gap between Sanskrit and The proposed migration, No archeological evidence of migration/invasion, Theory id 87% Based on Language words "matches" And not on Archeological. And pre vedic Tools, pottery styles were Already Found in IVC way before 2300 BC. Lastly Researches Done by IIT and Other anthropological units internations Found Cultural contiunity rather than migration

Well said.

That's why western steppe people eat fish and mostly Irish people were high fish eaters we can see Irish admixture in brahmins

Brahmin is a Varna/occupational group and the DNA of Brahmins of different regions differ significantly, e.g. the R1a (or Aryan gene) is highest in Northern Brahmins and it decreases considerably as we move down South India. In short, Brahmins aren't a homogenous group.

NONE

They're just repeating what the scholarly people said.

Felicity of diction

Whatsapp😂

​@@jayeshmonlbsyeah where it says hanuman flew to sun and ate it😅

Incorrect, the UP findings(Sinauli chariot) is dated to 1900 bce and has a cart (not a spoked wheeled chariot like the aryans) Even then, 1900 falls in line with the Aryan migration (starting around 2000 bce) and they could’ve been early central Asian immigrants before spoked wheeled and horse chariots were created

NO, its is Dated 2000 BC in upper bonds and UP findings are not only evidence we have.. Study done by US,ohio uni of human sciences and IIT, ASI shows NO evidence of a migration coming to indian subcontinent OVER 8000 year SPAN

@@vipassana123 NO, its is Dated 2000 BC in upper bonds and UP findings are not only evidence we have.. Study done by US,ohio uni of human sciences and IIT, ASI shows NO evidence of a migration coming to indian subcontinent OVER 8000 year SPAN

@@vipassana123 NO, its is Dated 2000 BC in upper bonds and UP findings are not only evidence we have.. Study done by US,ohio uni of human sciences and IIT, ASI shows NO evidence of a migration coming to indian subcontinent OVER 8000 year SPAN

@@vipassana123 No, pls be updated in New terms and reports which come over

Thank you -navin

1000%!!!! I noticed that too!!! It seems like he's trying to say there was no invason when the Mtdna and the Dna in the people in some parts of India shows there was an invasion!!!

@@khem127 Yeah that's the case . I think because of popular narrative these days people trying to be politically correct. The represent evidence shows there were numerous invasions, according to my understanding I think many Tribes came from the north and settled in Gangetic plain and founded 16 mahajanapadas.People can call it migrations but native people won't welcome outsiders gently. So Aryans had to fight with the locals. They were one of the best archers and horse riders. Warfare is not a new thing for them.

He talking how people of the same caste Carrys the same DNA

DNA analysis of 70 different groups (castes and jatis) of modern Indians and comparison of that with ancient DNA shows that there was lots of intermixing among the different jatis and castes until 1900 years ago. Then, 1900 years ago, the intermixing stopped, and the situation has *largely* remained like that till the present day. So it does mean that because different jatis and castes have practiced endogamy for 1900 years, there are DNA markers in a jati that are not found elsewhere and vice versa. -navin

DNA cannot be changed without severely affecting the health of the individual. Why would you want to do that?

​@@jamesaron1967individual's DNA didn't change. It mixed with other DNA from other people over generations. And the fact that these DNA sequences existed in people from the other groups proves that it had either no effects at all or no harmful effects at the least. Also, only the successive ones survive and the unhealthy ones are rooted out over generations either way. FYI, most of these genetic markers actually are redundant and have no functions whatsoever.

@@prashanttewari I understand, I was only replying to the other commenter who asked about posdibly changing his DNA.

Yes, and I'm guessing it's not politically correct for some reason.

Title of article: The formation of human populations in South and Central Asia.

But they are telling the truth.

Lots of evidences are there read it

You will find the evidence in the research paper links posted in the description

fredyjon81 Yes, it seemed obvious to me, I don't know why that particular Dna and Mtdna mixture was'nt obvious to him.😥😥

What a crock of s***. Real history is the vedas and puranas

yes

Sirf tujhe pata hai

​@@G00TUBE_Vishaila_WampanthiSirf tujhe nhi pata chala 😂😅😂

Truth is bitter but truth is truth.

kelvinkumarsr, I am amazed how people from India refuse to talk about the caste system and how it works. The Dhalit, shudra,vaisha,satriya, and brahman system introduced by his steppe herders for the last 2,000 years. A half truth is a whole lie.

That was a journey and half in just one comment! Thank you so much for sharing it with us... Appreciate it very much! :) - Shrikant