That's correct! However you just have to make sure your "source" is that Math block I talked about rather then your end-result lambda value. (Unless of course you have close loop turned off). I'm not a fan of how link handles this. It's very misleading for beginners
Keep the vid series going👍 much needed content on the link system, I bought an 06 STI with a G4X and been having issues finding tuners familiar with them
Great vids man! I just tuned a link ecu pnp for the 92-95 civic and it was a huge learning curve coming from Hondata. Wish I would’ve seen these vids before. They sure would’ve helped.
I was on a hondata then a haltech 550 and now thinking about link for an integra. How do you like it? I just started and use to haltech program and price wise it's only a few hundred more for link. But I like the look of nsp software.
@@jvh22a nice , I’m gonna tune a buddy’s car on haltech 1500 soon . So I’ll have to learn that one very soon as well . The link was good , I’m sure I’m barely scratching the surface on the capabilities but so far so good. It’s just a n/a b20
Thanks for the video's, very helpfull. Do you have a mixture map setup suggestion for g4+ users, with CL lambda ON, No math blocks for us g4+ users My current mixture map setup gives me a very irregular/spikey fuel table.
You cannot use the mixture map feature with closed loop turned on and just lambda feedback. You need that math block to exclude CL correction otherwise you're just correcting the small amount the CL system couldn't account for. If your VE table is way out of wack, I would suggest turning CL off and driving around a bit with quick tune to get some rough numbers in the table. Then start blending your table manually. Or you can use the quick trim method and reviewing your logs for how much CL has corrected for certain load cells. Lastly, bump your allowed correction for CL up to like 40-50% and allow it to work harder if needed. Then turn it back down once it's in the ballpark
Yeah I'm pretty sure that will work, I've never monitored iat correction closely enough. Not sure if it's a +/- correction or a percentage of lambda target
Thanks for the vids bro. 😎 just have a question. When we turn off the fuel corrections. Is that only when we are making changes or n the fuel map so we know that what we are doing is making the changes? When we finish the tune do we turn this back on?
Personally I would always leave fuel corrections on and use that math block I outlined in the video to exclude corrections from your ve table building. Additionally when you're done fuel tuning turn on long term fuel trims and monitor that table once in a while
I haven't done it myself but yeah you just need to setup a second fuel table and set a condition to trigger it. Either a switch or some other conditions
Technically if you have your fueling mode setup correctly and a flex fuel sensor it should automatically account for the different fuel blend and hit your lambda targets. A second fuel table is kind of a hack because your volumetric efficiency of the motor isn't changing when you switch fuels
