Wayland doesn't really add more performance. I have done tests myself and the performance is the same or very very slightly worse on wayland. You cant get faster performance than fullscreen x11 without a compositor, even theoretically.
@@notuxnobux "You cant get faster performance than fullscreen x11 without a compositor, even theoretically" - dubious claim. Since Wayland is a protocol, you can have such a small wayland compositor implementation that will be on par or faster than Xorg server itself (even without the X11 compositor on top of it). There's nothing, as you put it "theoretically", in X11 that makes in fundamentally faster than comparable Wayland implementation.
GE-proton in my experience, so long as you're running a reasonably recent proton, usually doesn't make much of a difference if at all. Some games it does, but not often
NTsync is going to make windows completely irrelevant WOW, can't wait for 50-150% improvement to all proton/wine games DAMN. With numbers this close, linux is going to end up outperfoming windows more and more.
The data that has been released is misleading, as it compares NTSync with Wine's built-in sync. Proton uses Fsync. NTSync has practically no performance improvement compared to Fsync.
@@PixelBrushArt especially for dx12 games, which is unfortunate because going forward games are exclusively using that. I wish more games used vulkan. Idk why they don't... it would be better for everyone.
