Ich denke sie ist ziemlich frustriert, denn sie sieht, dass sie zwar eine weltweite Bewegung inspiriert hat, aber die reichen Staaten und großen Verschmutzer trotz aller schönen Worte überhaupt nichts konstruktives tun. Madrid war ein totaler Fehlschlag! Was hilft's, vom US-Kongress, von Obama und von der UN-Generalversammlung empfangen und gefeiert zu werden, wenn sich in der Sache überhaupt nichts bewegt? Ich denke, als Aspie hat sie da eine sehr nüchtern-realistische Einschätzung und lässt sich von all dem persöhnlichen Ruhm nicht blenden. Dazu kommt allerdings der geradezu fanatische Hass den ihr Klimawandelleugner entgegenbringen. Ich denke schon, dass sie deshalb guten Schutz braucht, leider.
She's just there, calmly stating facts. Facts that can easily be checked and verified and I'd love for all nay sayers and haters to just shut their mouths for a moment and validate what she's saying is very, very true. Then maybe we can save our planet before it makes us adjust to the definition of the word survival.
@Lavita Cinderella As Greta has correctly said: The fact that climate change happens is not a matter of opinion. It is a scientific fact. Facts don't care about your opinions. You can have different opinions about what we ought to do about it. That's a different thing.
Some people are content to call her just an "angry girl". Anger is needed. Anger is useful. The only way you can listen to the threat this world faces and not be angry is to flat out reject the evidence that is there for all to see. Greta Thunberg isn't "angry"; she's a hero. Watch her speak and tell me you're not angry.
@@barleyarrish The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath. In layman's terms, there are more important things than going to school every day.
@@barleyarrish For someone who believes in education so fully, you have terrible spelling and grammar. And you seemingly have no respect at all for science, which is what Greta advocates in this speech. So, whether you believe in religion *or* education, you should really be on her side in this, and not the jackass you're being.
@@PaperbackWizard sorry about truant, ignorant. still did not prevent me obtaining a degree in biology. my spelling does leave a little to be desired but that is what a proof reeder is for. greta's borrowed tesla was photographed at cop 25 and oh my all that platic wrapped food, what an inspiration? No, I'm not on her side, I avoid plastics more than she does, i plant trees and have done for the last 40 years on my land. And my journeys are short and of a purpose. I was recycling and repairing cloths before it became virtue signaling for uneducated, spoilt brats.
Support and greetings from Belgrade - Serbia! Save the Planet and help poor countries to bild eko infrastructre and make pression to every goverment!!! 🌴🌳🌲🐋🐬🦁🐯🦍🐘🦏
1. Use magnet-to-magnet motors for everything, no fuels, no CO2 emissions, they decay at 10%/1000yrs, an example: Flip towns-grid, 1-Mw/1300hp magnet-to-magnet motor, "50-year no-inputs warranty", 17yr R&D, sparkless, ships in a container, military-spec: technokontrol.com/en/current-projects/generator.php 2. ALL IC-ENGINES must use N.Tesla's Tailpipes, his 'valvular conduit', a one-way air valve with no moving parts, scales to coal smokestacks, nearly ZEROS emissions. These must be FULLY SUBSIDIZED or it'll never happen. 3. Use ALGAE to purify wastewater home•farm•ranch to cities, the BIODIESEL -CO2 +O2 BEFORE burning & $elling it pay$ the bill$. 4. Critical or we all die, weir dam at St. Lawrence Is., Bering Strait, poldering north the entire Chukchi Sea to establish a SEAICE REFUGIA to stop the jetstream going north there. Or, it's GAME-OVER on ending the "Runaway Methane Greenhousing" GAME-ON in the Arctic. Ymmv.
Incredible speech from Greta. So young and yet so mature, humble, and aware of the problems that will devastate our world in the decades to come. All this, while speaking in a foreign language. Inspiring.
Gretas speeches have been so great at trying to say complicated news in a short time. Just amazing!!! The lecturen needs to be adjustable so we see all of the face of each speaker. Move the flags to the side so they donot clash with the speakers clothes, hair, etc. My thoughts seem silly to some but notice how easy it was to see Greta in all her other speeches. Remember that all of us are used to TV presentations.
@Lavita Cinderella I believe she wrote this, can tell in her young face she's stressed out about the government's not taking enough action. People can boast and imagine like you but what are you actually doing ?!
Thank you all for speaking about our HUGE challenging problem. Please get help each for your ways of speaking so all can hear each point carefully. Number things, go slowly, even if having to do fewer points. Watch Greta...in her braids!
@@frangipang1955 And that again you know how? And when have Hitler Youth members spoken before an audience of leaders? Or did you just mention Hitler because you desparately need to slander her? This was Poe's law par execellence!
@@riadenbreejen8936 If this is supposed to be an analogy, it is probably the worst analogy I ever read. For one, child soldiers by definition participate in armed conflict. I haven't seen Greta holding a gun. Scond, they are recruted by force and manipulation into an armed formation. In my experience, it is near impossible to manipulate an adolescent with Aspergers. They only do what their are genuinely convinced of. Her activism is genuinely born out of her own conviction, and she has got a far too brilliant intellect to be anyone's sheep.
@@jacekmaui7381 for the education it provides concerning the critical nature of the climate situation. Our children deserve to be left a planet that provides life to all, not one that makes it questionable how long life will last.
The leaders need to GET MORE INVOLVED in regards to #ClimateAction measures ⧖ ...this dude sounds all grande when in fact more governments around world need to make changes to the regulations. The people of the world population are not ENOUGH 💭
@@barleyarrish your right but if the movement is co-opted in ambitious self-interested individuals (who essentially emulate the archetype neoliberal that is at the heart of the problem) XR will be its own demise.⧖
Hello China and India..... are you listening??? but don't you worry folks..... we have 12 years left so I will go drive around the country on my V8 SUV and enjoy life..... go manipulate the climate data to shorten it 10 years...... DILLIGAS....
Everyone watching this RU-vid video knows there is great controversy associated with climate change, especially the reasons for it, if anything can be done to reverse it, and if so at what cost. While each of us is entitled to our own opinion on this subject I am convinced that no one is likely to change the mind of another simply by preaching their gospel or by beating that person over the head. So that brings us to what we each can do to talk about climate change in a responsible and respectful manner. IMHO I think that regardless of one's position on the climate controversy it is worthwhile to examine the current impacts of climate change (no matter what the cause, manmade or otherwise). This may be less controversial than the causes of climate change or methods to abate it. These climate changes include rising seas levels due to ice melting at the poles, shifting of coastal landscapes, more frequent and violent storms due to warming of ocean temperatures, extended periods of drought and flooding, and many other measurable impacts. As always, education is the key to understanding and being able to intelligently talk about this subject. Learning through reading about the subject, even reading fiction (some would claim climate change is fiction), can lower the temperature and make people more open to discussion of what is actually factual and measurable and what is just conjecture . Of course there are many articles and books on the environmental impact of climate change, both science and science fiction based, so we should all read. If reading fiction is your escape then may I suggest "Seeds of Our Future" on Amazon and others like it. No matter how we become educated however if we want meaningful discussion of this subject we should start by addressing the effects of climate change even if we cannot agree on the causes or about solutions to stem or reverse the changes.
There is no scientific controversy on the causes of climate change. None. There are three short term climate drivers: The sun, C02 and aerosols. Solar activity has stagnated or fallen since the 1960s while C02 concentration has steadily increased. The reduction of aerosols, which caused "global dimming" also contributed to warming to a minor degree. We know that C02 traps infrared, we know that without the greenhouse effect the earth would be 32°K colder. This is not a matter of opinion. This are simple basic physical facts. We can and must have a respectful discussion regarding what to *do* about it. But the fact that it is taking place is beyond discussion. This is not to say that climate science has all figured out: There is a great deal of uncertainty regarding the various tipping points, also the new figures regarding climate sensitivity used in the CMIP6 family of models is debated. But the *if* of climate change is not. And the projections presented in the IPCC assessment reports tend to underestimate the danger, not overestimate it. For instance, the problems with methane are systematically underestimated because the global warming potential of gases is calculated over 100 years, whereas methane stays in the atmosphere only for 20 years, during which it has the 100fold effect of C02. However, the standard method of calculating it over hundred years dilutes it down to 33 times , even though its short-term effect is much stronger. So we have to expect that it is going to be only worse.
when i first heard that i was in shock. it is about the size of the metro area i live in. to think that it is that many people every 24 hours is absolutely mind boggling.
I am writing this comment today(06.11.2021) after watching this meeting(COP25) and before watching the one of COP26 in a little while! I am sure that there will be nothing new there as ı will comment on that one too! Now I ask all those reading this comment; is biology not a science? İs present day anthropogenic genetics not a science? İs it not a scientific fact that 99+% of our genes are the same as orangutans and chimps(Dawkins). Then how come that behaivour due to our animal composition is not included in methods to curb global warming and climate change! When are we going to admit that everything started with populations increase following the so called first industrial revolution! It is very disturbing when a minister of the environmet has 4 children instead of 2(Thomas Malthus)! Then how can we blame the orthodox jew in UK having 10-15 children! A devout Catholic having 4 or more, a devote Moslim having 6-10+! Science knows vey well that having more than two children per family will only cause coercion! Thats a law of nature! The third+ child will be sharing the vital natural resources(air, water, land) of the two children of all other families existing at that time! Any one interested to learn about Overpopulation listen to Sir David Attenborough.
Revelation reads like a really bad acid trip, but what you can be certain about is that the author wrote for his contemporaries. Scholars agree that 666 is a reference to Emperor Nero. He like most early Christians, expected the end to be imminent. So really, it has nothing to do with our days.
Correct physics allows us to understand why greenhouse gases like water vapor (and a dash of carbon dioxide - about 1/65th as much) can only COOL us, which is why rain forests are COOLER than regions with average water vapor. Learn about the new understanding of atmospheric and subterrestrial physics at climate-change-theory.com and in the linked papers and videos. Watch ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-1BEN3iJzlrI.html
No, it doesn't. Short wave solar radiation passes right through the C02, it is neither reflected nor absorbed. Only the long-wave radiation that the earth's surface sends back into space is trapped by C02. That's very basic physics for you... All you need to verify is a container of C02, and infrared lamp and a thermometer.
@@jochannan7379 Over 100 peer-reviewed scientific papers have presented a more balanced view as to the insignificant role of one molecule of carbon dioxide in 2,500 other air molecules that does most of its radiating in bands that are active at very cold temperatures only found in the mesosphere and, in accord with the laws of physics, cannot cause heat transfer into the already-warmer surface as climatologists assert somehow happens. (notrickszone.com/50-papers-low-sensitivity/) It’s sad that so many people are too dumb or ignorant to comprehend the relevant physics which most undergraduates learn in second year in the Physics Departments of recognised universities, as distinct from being brainwashed in the one year course internally perpetuated among those in the infant science of climatology. We find evidence of this kind of ignorance throughout history. You don't know what entropy is and yet you think you can discuss such matters with someone like myself who first studied and taught such physics, marked university assignment papers and gained a degree in such in the 1960's and has subsequently written papers and a book on thermodynamics following extensive post-graduate study in this very specialised field in which I have made an important discovery and have been the first in the world to explain it from the laws of physics which you don't even know, let alone understand. It is apparent that some people think outside the square and make discoveries that, when eventually accepted, improve the science community while others slow down progression. Good job that you have an unfounded opinion based upon the fictitious, fiddled physics of climatology - as such “scientists” pal-review their greenhouse garbage for the gullible and promote, to the delight of the Club of Rome, the biggest scientific deception, hoax and fraud in the history of the world. So we'll leave it at that as you will be way out of your depth since I doubt that you would even understand the seven reasons why experiments and studies of real world data make it just so easy for any graduate in physics to see the errors in their “gold standard” textbook of climatology by Pierrehumbert that I rather doubt you have studied, unless of course you have a vested interest in maintaining the status quo with your calls to authority and belief that it is all about being a PhD. www.researchgate.net/publication/337915619_Cogent_and_irrefutable_reasons_why_carbon_dioxide_cannot_warm_Earth
@@jochannan7379 Try clicking the link. You prove you are not interested in learning. I’m here to assist those who have started studying my peer-reviewed paper on radiation (first acclaimed and published on several sites in 2012) and my two subsequent papers and nearly 30 articles that I have posted on SSRN, LinkedIn and Researchgate where only qualified scientists can post. All my papers, videos, websites and book are linked at climate-change-theory.com where you can learn about the whole new paradigm in climate science that proves from the laws of physics how greenhouse gases (like water vapor and carbon dioxide) can do nothing but cool us. At present I see no evidence of your having understood my material (if read) and no indication that you have a valid understanding of the physics of the atmosphere, or knowledge of the claims made, so please answer these brief questions before I decide whether or not to continue helping you so that you are no longer fooled by the false AGW physics being promulgated for political reasons. Q.1 Approximately what percentage of Earth’s atmosphere is carbon dioxide? Q.2 What is the most prolific so-called “greenhouse” gas and what percentage is it? Q.3 What is the coldest layer of the Earth’s atmosphere called? Q.4 What layer of the atmosphere has temperatures corresponding with the main band for CO2? Q.5 What is the approximate global average flux of direct solar radiation reaching Earth’s surface? Q.6 By what law in physics can we determine temperature achieved at equilibrium by such flux? Q.7 Approximately what temperature can be achieved by the flux in Q.5 using the law in Q.6? Q.8 Referring to NASA energy diagrams, what fluxes are added to determine surface temperature? Q.9 How much more energy is coming out of the base of the atmosphere than is entering at the top? Q.10 State the Second Law of Thermodynamics from Wikipedia “Laws of Thermodynamics.” climate-change-theory.com/energy-budget-back-radiation.jpg www.researchgate.net/profile/Douglas_Cotton www.linkedin.com/in/douglas-cotton-b794a871/detail/recent-activity/posts/
When she spoke without notes, she only repeated what the adults around her were saying and sounded unsure what she was saying. She has no business representing the world
Did she? I don't know of that. She made some unscripted comments in the end and she chose to say something about a mix of anger and optimism that is needed, and I don't think that this is something any adult had said before in the discussion round.
She herself said that scientists check her speaches. And, most polititions have their speaches written by ghostwriters. Whats important is the facts and the truth! Greta speaks the truth!
@Lavita Cinderella So you say she is lying? Why should she? How do you know? I saw videos where she and relevant highclass scientists made clear that they cooperate to proove the facts of her own speaches. They say she and other activists are well informed and speak the truth only, based on the overwhelming datas. So, shut up!
@@gailjohnston9253 That's all you have to say? Since she is basically just restating the facts established by the global scientific community, I am not aware of any lie she ever told. I would say, she is as fact-based as you can possibly be.
Gonzalez 3:40 Johan Rockström underestimated the risks we are faceing 4:09 tipping point allready reached melting ice will raise 2m water level. 4:34 we are on the path to 4 degree warming 4:44 3Ma has never been above 2 K. 5:02 go beyond 1.5K is danger zone 5:19 exceed 2K is a planetary tipping point to hothouse earth. 5:25 selfamplifyieng warming 5:40 landuse change 6:00 495 thousand people died by extreme weather 6:15 3.5 trillion $ 7:05 9 out of 15 tipping emements are on the move. 7:20 domino effekt 7:55 340 GtCO2 is the remainig budget. 9:16 planetary emergency 9:50 cut CO2 by half in 2030. 10:05 its time to act. 16:40 goal 1,5 degree Celsius COP21 aim. 17:46 Jennifer Morgan Greenpeace. 18:44 impacts come harder 19:14 where are the leaders/adults in the room. 20:16 deforestration carbon majors shall pay for demage 23:14 the heart of the paris agreement is still beating. 23:40 Greta Thunberg 24:40 we dont have time to leave out the science 25:10 below 1.5
Haha, all these reports she is mentioning she has never read one of them, you know why? Because everything she is reading and saying were given to her written by a coward adult. If you had her in front of you one on one without notes in front of her, she would have deer in the headlights look.
You seem to have no idea what an Asperger intellect is capable of. Intellectually, they are often head and shoulders above the rest of us. She has been into the issue since she was 7 or 9. I am certain that she has read more about the issue than most of us.
@@jochannan7379 which age is it? 7 or 9? And I can care less about her so called "mental issues" shes a pawn and you are supporting child abuse by buying into her "handlers" crap.
@@raginggamer2109 That's the age range she gives when she is asked at which age she came into contact with the issue. I don't see any evidence that "she's a pawn". I've got some experience with Asperger personally (one of my sons), and my experience with him is that you just cannot manipulate him. When he does something, he does it out of conviction, not to please others, but only because he sees good reason to do so. Greta Thunberg's whole attitude is extremely sober and fact-based. It doesn't look like she cares very much about her fame (which any neurotypical person would). So I don't think at all that she is being seduced into something that wasn't her choice to begin with.
@@jochannan7379 OMG, her "condition" you speak of has nothing to do with this. Her parents and the adults around her are using her. And of course you do not see any evidence of her being used as a pawn
A brief mention of the most worrying contributor to the climatic emergency, the livestock industry, which makes up 96% of all mammalian life on Earth, together with humanity. If people continue to eat animal products then there is no possibility of urgent change.
@AsconaA The FAO and Worldwatch studies, along with the recent study from Oxford University are worth looking at. I'm suggesting we end livestock altogether.
@AsconaA Methane emission through burping, waste pollution of the environment including the oceans and natural rivers, something that causes dead zones that are now free of oxygen, mass deforestation, dangerously excessive uses of our natural water supply, the list goes on.
Is it just me or does she seem a bit entitled. Think about it, she is refusing to go to school till people change the temperature for her, and her claiming that her childhood was stolen is not true. She had a choice, unlike Chile soldiers, slaves or sweatshop workers that actually had their childhood stolen.
Before I'm slammed for insulting a 16 year old girl, I am at a similar age. She's entitled, hasn't done much, offers no solution, lives a good life and claims her childhood was stolen. She is a highschool dropout that inspires others to skip Fridays to do effectively nothing. Someone like Elon Musk or various scientists have done more, but of course they get less coverage then a 16 year old girl with Asperger's.
Nominated for peace prize and is time person of year - why? Firstly she hasn't changed shit, and secondly what in the fuck has she done for peace. People love her though and I guess inspiration is cool, but anyone who can actually do anything about it either is educated or has made their mind up
Shes stating facts and helping all those people, she influences protests for climate and human rights, those sweatshop kids you talk about are lucky there arepeople like greta in the world
