Live PD: Just Looking Out for My Neighbors (Season 4) | A&E 

Mo Town I would have responded with *can you?*

Blind doesn't always mean no vision at all. Most people who are legally blind can still see shapes etc. so if he knows there's a sign on the east side of his house, he can easily point at it from a distance

@@eliheidlebaugh3711 I guess he may have overreacted in the heat of the moment. Or maybe they're lying, we'll never know

@Necramonium better threaten someone with a gun you can totally use right?>!?!

@Necramonium Agree, Necramonium, plus he probably put the sign up, so he knows exactly where it is.

Because he is not blind did u see how he pointed to his sign and how he talked straight to the cop as if he can see him.

Aye Null They’re blind, not stupid. They can hear what direction people are, and if he’s lived there a long time he could have put the sign up before he went blind. I can walk and point through my house with my eyes closed

@@josephwinebrinner2296 you have to remember outside has a changing landscape in your house you dont. It's everyday placement. My great uncle was blind when I took care of him outside he had to have his walking stick no matter what. Everyday situations outside are totally different from inside situations. I don't walk outside everyday and it's raining no, changes day to day

😂😂

To be faiiiiiir

evan heidel lmao you got me

is that a danny devito quote?

😂 😂 😂

I got your federal Express right here punk!

I think mailman is a federal employee, right? so FBI will knock that guy's door

Eean Pitcock 😂😂😂😂

Eean Pitcock LMFAO

I can walk through my house in pitch black without tripping. I think they had it placed where he remembers? Maybe he developed an internal compass of some sort lmao

@@SgtJohnRemairez ur dumb lol whats that prove that u can walk alone at nite in ur house..?

Eean Pitcock also said he’s going to shoot the guy next time...a “blind” guy firing shots everywhere, we’ll be seeing this guy again lol

Save it for the summer because it will probably only work once and that is a pretty expensive excuse.

Please don’t. You don’t know how often is medics are called for that.

JG Wentworth comes to mind too

Do people not realize it's called joking. Lol

You gonna be dizzy when that ambulance bill hit too ... 🐱

Alex Black lmaaao

Oh My Mod might have been funny if you put a little more effort into it

PLOT TWIST *He* *shot* *the* *mailman*

Lol....

LOL in his defense it was "my constitution" probably not the same are yours and mine?

Just leave it alone....he's blind so we can cut him some slack.

Let's be frank. Many states have or are trying to pass laws that are unconstitutional such as anti BDS laws.

Second thing I laughed at after his son telling the officer his dad is blind and then his dad saying "I'll just shoot 'em next time!"

You know what dude just forget the paramedic I’m gonna be the bigger man

🤣😂🤣

Oh My Mod omg that’s great. Made me choke on my smoke 🤣

octagonocologist lmao EXACTLY 😂😂😂

Well to be fair the laws are out if control nowadays so I get where he's coming from

Jesse Graziano could be worse, we could be in the UK where you can’t even defend yourself

Aren’t all laws made up? So we just supposed to live without them?

@@Rylan-FN Gods laws aint made up homie xD

Or a Paramedic, or a Firefighter, no wonder the depression rates in these fields are so high, dealing with dumbasses all day.

Don't forget teaching.... that will drive you absolutely crazy

😂

It’s opposite

SEE YAI AYE I know right

LMFAO....just what I was thinking.....that man's very protective of his dust...LOL

Most people with rich soil don't utilize it anyway. You can't eat grass & astroturf.

Yeah and if hes so concerned about precicely where hes dusty property goes , well then it may be an idear to put up a fence. that was not far from side of the road so put up a fence and move the sign there too. People are crazy....... When living in such place it would be good if a neighbour looking out if see something unusual... But again some people are just crazy.

Well... it's Nye County lol... it's basically Trevors place in GTA 5

@@Chthonian121 lol.

Lol but I bet you would have the same reaction.

@@deegst Nope---I would've posted the sign in a place where people could see it

@@justsumguy2u oh ok so you're saying a burglar would actually follow the directions given by the sign?

Soapy Weiner 😂

more like Dirty Sausage

So he didn't say anything he let himself get shot fym.

Soapy Weiner that actually happened recently, dudes son didn’t tell him he was coming to visit and tried to surprise him.

@@John-ti2xr His son is seeing darkness just like him.

He must be daredevil lol

@@edgarordaz4798 underrated comment haha !!

Collecting disability no doubt...and voting for Trump!!!!

@Oh My Mod yup ! you can get $29 per gram if you buy it through me.

@@n_u001 $29 a gram😳

Brandon Milligan it’s the right wing nra gun nuts that think they can just blast away because “muh constitution says so” all over his methed ridden shack

@@johnschofield6263 You're a bigot. He didn't actually shoot anybody, is obviously amped up because there was just a confrontation and he's probably worried his son is going to get busted for trying to protect him. I'm sure if they were a different color you wouldn't be so quick to call it a "methed ridden shack."

Samuel H 😂🤣😂

you can, after due warning

@@Red_Dusk No, you can't. It doesn't work like that. People Misunderstand the right to bare arms law. Only if the person is literally lounging at you with a weapon are you allowed to kill them... You can be charged with manslaughter.

@C they live on a dirt road. I couldn't even tell where they're property started. There's not reason to shoot someone for accidentally roaming into your property. You can be charged.

@@jmfia2391 It has to do with castle laws not the right to bare arms. lol

Jmfia20 talking about misunderstanding laws when you are misunderstanding the law that they are talking about. What they are talking about is the castle law, has nothing to do with the right to bare arms

i mean the paramedic wouldnt stop him from going to jail so idk how that makes any sense

@@fluffyminecraftpigs If you claimed an injury they would first take you to the hospital avoiding an immediate arrest at that time

I have a bird scare banger here in country Australia. That thing makes you think there is someone within range of you with a big caliber weapon. Friend of mine sometimes fires his shotgun in the air just to remind the crazy neighbor he is crazier lol. A lot of people live in these places because they simply can't live in the city so the nutter ratio is often higher. The police take 40 minutes if they hurry so it is a different reality in these backwoods places. Your comment is still valid though for sure.

Yup but instead you got mr maga nra right winger over here wanting to shoot first (even though he’s blind, so he says) and ask questions later cuz it’s “muh constitutional right”

mind your business

@@KmtNubian94 Oxymoron XD

He looking to get paid until he found out dude was blind...so factor that into your evaluation of him...

obviously Agreed.

Stfu no

brussell639 if that doesn’t happen and a fight breaks out there’s only one cop and 3 of them

@@mernky3562 I give that about a 1% chance happening.

@@brussell639 lol where are you getting these probabilities from?

considering the son immediately threatened him to get off the property then proceeded to punch him twice and try and follow him and attack him again, i don’t think that’s a good idea.

they’re american police officers what do you expect

And then he goes "Nah nah im good i didnt know he was blind" after the cop tells him

Sean Haggard “but I can’t see so good” 😂😂

I think around 2000 they took away the 'shooting in the back' law in texas (I think) so basically you could shoot at will and only had to show they were there for no good, and the burglary rate instantly dropped by some huge margin. Was current news when I was there then if I remember.

Mick M There are few laws and principles that come into effect here. But it would be an accurate to say that you could “shoot at will and only had to show they were there for no good.” Under common law there is a “inferred principle” of the right to self-preservation. Being that while an act of great bodily harm is being done to you, you may use deadly force to defend your own life. In Practice even this definition can be too big. A hypothetical situation where two strangers in a train station get into a fight. Jones is ontop of Smith on the ground, Jones was the aggravator, Smith was breaking no law while being in the area where he confronted Jones, neither did Smith agitate Jones. Jones has struck Smiths several times in the head, Smith is bleeding, his skull is fractured. Jones raises his fist up to strike Smith again, a gunshot, Smith has fired a single bullet killing Jones. Seems pretty cut and dry right? It would be a defense to Smith to say that he was in fear for his life, AND was in imminent peril. However by definition Jones did not exert deadly force, as Smith survived. Perhaps Smith has no permanent injuries. I mentioned above that Smith was bleeding and his skull was fractured, are we certain that Jones caused that or is Smith in blood thinners and has prior skull injuries. Further if the injuries were not serious could we not conclude that Jones intended to not leave serious injuries on Smith? That Jones, a benevolent giant of a man misunderstood by the people around him, was sparked to anger, and leapt toward Smith, swinging and connecting with his head. Smith fell backward and Jones fell upon him. Jones now felt the gun in Smiths pocket, fearing for his life he struck Smith again, before the inevitable; a single full metal jacket tore through Jones sternum, ending not only his life but his dream and love for the very people who doubted him. Smith was a heartless man, who had no care for the sanctity of life! He knew full well that Jones had no intention of killing him, but he sprang upon the opportunity like a hyena, cackling as realized he has been able to take another life. Jones, committed assault, and here see the battery upon Smiths face. And still Smith murdered him. Smith never feared for his life, Jones never intended to take it. It was a mutual understanding between two men to fight, and Smith betrayed that trust. Boom conviction, 2nd degree manslaughter. Of course that seems ridiculous, and “that seems ridiculous” is a valid legal argument. The “reasonable person” is a sacred standard with in law, which simply asks “would a reasonable personal think this, or do that, or believe such and such”. I believe a reasonable person would feel their life in danger underneath Jones. Now instead, before the fight happened Smith looked up and saw Jones, he turned and ran. He was much faster than Jones, and yet he turned after gaining a significant distance and shot Jones once killing him. Was Smith the aggressor? Certainly he COULD have run. And if we do not place the duty to flee on Smith could we place it on Usain Bolt, definitely this is a man who can run. And this idea “duty to retreat” is where we find Castle Doctrine. Duty to retreat places the responsibility on the victim of a crime, to if at all possible, retreat from conflict and resolve the issue at a later time. In states that grant a Stand your ground doctrine, the ability to retreat is irrelevant, if you believe you are in harms way you may use force appropriate to defend yourself in like kind. Castle doctrine extends further protection when you are “in your castle” which is commonly your home, vehicle, or place of work but theoretically could extend elsewhere. Castle doctrine can be applied to protect the use “deadly force” regardless of the threat you may or may not believe faces you. Even if prosecution could prove beyond a reasonable doubt, that you were aware the home invader was coming in only to verbally berate you, and you the home owner knew this, deadly force is authorized as the act of entering the castle is by definition great harm. Texas has one of the strongest castle doctrines which theoretically even extends use of deadly force to recapture property which was taken from me. In other words if you return home, from the street see that your door is kicked open, you are not in danger of great harm so duty to retreat is already irrelevant. However you would be authorized to enter your home, initiating a fight with any home invaders, and use deadly force, as the act of breaching your castle was a direct great harm done to you. Not legal advice, consult an attorney.

Proraptor good for the old man, saying he’s going to shoot someone when he’s “100% blind.” What a stand up citizen, those are the kind of patriots we need in our country. Tough justice, vigilante’s everywhere.

Trump does.

Because everybody involved is stupid. ( Not the Officer, Obviously)

@@your_huge_ego_bores_me how are you stupid if someone steps on your property you tell him to leave and he wouldn't?

@@rafon. YOU DON'T LIVE IN THE MIDDLE OF NOWHERE AND NOT KNOW YOUR NEIGHBORS, DIPPY!!!

Rafon how do you know that really happened ? The old mad is blind and the son looked pretty goofy. So honestly I’d believe the one who called because if the blind guy really felt threatened or needed the guy removed he could have called the cops first.

9poundssoft not to mention he’s clearly one of those unhinged nra gun nuts that wanted to shoot (even though he’s blind, so he says) a man that’s 5 feet onto his property because his constitution says he can

You can bud

Godly-_Clipz try it and let me know how it works from jail. We don’t live in the Wild West bud

TEZ wrong. It Varies on state to state but in general you CANNOT use deadly force to protect property. But a trespasser in your house at night that may cause you to fear for your life is another story. But some dude standing on your lawn is not enough of a threat. So just think twice before you go gun-ho on someone

TEZ I agree and those people will land themselves in jail. People who feel the need to shove guns in everyone’s face are the same ones that will get the 2nd amendment destroyed. Ironic

@@unkown7825 Not if they don't pose an imminent threat to your health and safety you can't.

Dude picked out his patch of desert and ready to defend it with his life

Ione is the best part of nye county

You should check out Chicongo, Detoilet, Little Mogadishu, and the like.

yeah,, stay off my piece of the desert !!

Bradmorrison LMAOOO

You ever heard of a name tag?

this situation is all types of fishy

Except for the 2nd amendment. The rest he doesn't care about.

Everybody duck!..lol

What are you confused about? The constitution was formed with the birth of our country and is the literal law of the land created by our founding fathers. How can you possibly compare that with corrupt politicians and judges with life long appointments with inherit biases? Why do you think law enforcement is so out of control? They've been given way too much authority. Why do you think there's so much regulation and red tape for businesses? Why do you think taxes are so high? These are the result of corruption.

!? Way to take a comment about the dude thinking the constitution wasn’t made up by people like every other societal institution/document/law etcetera, and make it about your politics lol.

@@John-ti2xr What about the constitution do you think is fallible? The constitution is a birth right, to all Americans. There is NO comparison.

!? Dude I’m not saying it’s fallible or infallible because that would be ridiculous. It’s a document which yes is the foundation of America, but to say that it’s perfect or infallible doesn’t really make any sense. It’s a legal document describing a system of governance. I’m just saying as other people are saying, that yes it was made up, in fact you, me, and id say pretty much every person who has grown up in this country was taught in detail about how and why it was made up. Being made up doesn’t change what it is or it’s importance. I agree with you, it’s a very significant and important document, it could even be seen as the fabric that holds our nation together. But I disagree with the notion that just because we believe in the legitimacy or the idea of something like the constitution that you have to pretend it doesn’t have a history.

!? bro stfu please 😂

its because the blind party didnt drop charges

The blind old man just had the man trespassed? The blind mans son was the one that assaulted the other citizen. The blind party would be the only party that is subject to charges UNLESS the other citizen were to trespassed again.

@@garrettwelsh7424 because the officer wasnt present at the time of the dispute so its up to the court to go over the statements and stuff. if the cameras werent rolling im sure they would have come to an agreement. Really what should have been done is the officer bring the guy to the blind dudes house so they could talk it out since it was a misunderstanding and they are neighbors and then if the blind dude still wanted him trespassed then they could file that paperwork.

Shh....just let it be.

me too

Ed Gein and Ray Copeland were little old men and they've got about at least a dozen bodies credited to them. Little old can do plenty.

& He Also Knew Their Dogs Name (Sadie) He Said... "Their Dog Sadie Knows Me, She Always Comes Up To Me & Greets Me, Everytime I Walk Past Their House. She's A Really Friendly Dog. "

Chicken Daily thanks

Chicken Daily my dude be making my stomach grumble seeing all that chicken

It's like turning down the radio so you can see your turn better in your car.

tyvek05 I dont feel that way lot of people just hate to see someone win