I can't believe that after Liverpool's 2005 historic victory over Milan in Istanbul, the club are slowly become the real contenders to win the Premier League. In 2007 and 2008, Liverpool are so close to face Manchester United in the Champions League Final, even though they had relatively average Premier League campaign for those occasions than Alex Ferguson's side. After the historic Double in 2008, both teams are looking for the Premier League title, at which Liverpool managed to beat Manchester United twice before they dropped a vital points (albeit not with a single defeat in the last 8 league games) and allowing Ferguson's side to retain the league title (and matching the Liverpool's number of league titles at that time). Now, Manchester United are still had 21 league titles, but the last one came in 2013, the last Ferguson's year as a manager. In 2020, Liverpool made it 19th with Jurgen Klopp after so many closes to win, including the infamous Steven Gerrard's mishap in 2014 against Chelsea.
Man Utd 13 PL Titles and 7 Div1 Titles so on paper an technical 13 times not 20 it is two different competitions Still a great Honours and achievements Founded in 1888 as the Football League, it is the oldest football league in the world. It was the top-level football league in England from its foundation until 1992, when the top 20 clubs split from it to form the Premier League.So Liverpool hold the most from Div 1 with 18 Titles only 1 PL Man Utd hold 7 Div 1 but 13 PL My team they hold the distinction of being reigning League champions for the longest time (20 years, alongside Manchester United), They have scored and conceded more top flight goals than any other club have played in more top flight seasons than any other club. were the first English club to appear in European competitions five seasons running And they won the FA cup 1995 And it's Everton, Everton F.C. We're by far the greatest team, The world has ever seen
There are so many eerie similarities between Liverpool back then and United now, you would almost think they script this. The same stuff they are saying how United right now, they were saying about Liverpool back then in this video. "Don't have match winners, lack quality players, they've spent nearly 200m, bottle the big games" etc etc. They even compared big game records, they called it the 'grand slam' back then but now it's called the 'top 6'. Looks like United in for a similar drought like Liverpool. Already been 10 years, gonna be at least another 10 with the way the club is run.
@@oldschool8330I think what they meant is that it's similar, relative to the period in time. Of course transfer amounts are higher, look how much more expensive transfers are nowadays! We've got City and PSG to thank for that. Unfortunately United just seem to panic buy and spend way more than players are worth. Fucking Glazers. Sorry, but there are similarities between United now and Liverpool throughout the 90s/00s. Football domination runs in phases. City's will come to an end sooner or later. Sooner hopefully. At least United and Liverpool have a real history of success.
Liverpool struggle financially..they need to sell before buy..example they wanted Gareth Barry but need to sell alonso..and for a couple of season no back up player for gerrard and Torres,unlike United who can spend large sum of money and have huge squad
Liverpool almost won the league that season including a 4-1 win at OT. I honestly fail to how this Liverpool team is in any way similar to todays Utd team
Manchester United are living through the 2000s era of Liverpool, 10 years since dominating the English game and in those 10 years no trophies of any significance and seemingly no end in sight.
United wish they were living through Liverpool's 2000's era. Liverpool's 2000s trophy-haul: 1x Champions League (Plus one other Champions League final) 1x UEFA Cup 2x FA Cup 2x League Cup 2x UEFA Super Cup Also Liverpool got within 4 points of winning the league in 2009. Man Utd's post-Ferugson trophy-haul: 1x UEFA Cup/Europa League 1x FA Cup 2x League Cup Man Utd have been runners-up twice in the last ten years, - once by 20 points and once by 12 points. United are more akin to Liverpool's 90s era.
@@Azog150in our worst time we are nowhere near as bad as liverpools bad era and our successful era is so much better than apparently golden era of klopp
@@sachinpatodia4593 Man Utd were relegated in the 1970s. Your bad eras have been much worse. Manchester United have been relegated 5 times in their history, compared to 3 for Liverpool. Liverpools Golden Era was the 60s, 70s, and 80s - especially the 9 years under Paisley (6 League titles and 3 European Cups - Alex Ferguson could only manage 2 European Cups in 27 years...). If you take the 27 years from Shanklys first title as manager at Liverpool in 1964, up until 1991 when Liverpool declined, LFC won: 13 League titles 4 European Cups 4 UEFA Cups 5 FA Cups 4 League Cups. That compares to Alex Fergusons 27 years as manager (i.e. Man Utd's Golden Age) when United won: 13 League titles 2 European Cups 4 FA Cups 4 League Cups Manchester Utd have only had 3 title winning managers in their entire history. If you remove those 3 title winning managers, Manchester United have been average at best. Liverpool have had 9 different title winning managers. Quite simply, Liverpool have been more consistently successful throughout their history than Manchester United. Your main problem is you think football was invented in 1990 by Premier League.
lol this United team had van de sar, Evra, Ferdinand, vidic, scholes, carrick, Keane, giggs, tevez, berbatov and Rooney…. What a team, look how far things have gone downhill since then
I'm a Utd fan I'd take young Nani and young Anderson in a heartbeat too. Even Hargreaves, Giggs on the bench too. Of course Man U have Varane, VDB, Casemiro but Glazenomics 💵 🤣🤣 they wanna sell 'em. I know this a Liverpool channel but Torres, Mascherano, Alonso, Hypia as a spine scared me. I think if Fergie wasn't scaring/bribing refs and they got rid off Reina who flapped a lot, Liverpool would have won the league then.
Keane wasn't in this era and he was a dirty thuggish violent player like Cantona destroying people's careers with ill-intentioned injuries. He was in 2005 and prior to that like Neville for example although Neville had a longer career and much more respectable honest soccer player. But other than that I agree the force was tenacious with old Man Utd 16 years ago. Now it's a circus show with bad managers and inconsistent players. Erik Ten Hag is a clown and most of the so called talent is just pure rubbish. We haven't been good for the last 10 years. And I wouldn't be too quick to give compliments to players like Tevez I knew he was a rat and a snake willing to sellout and sacrifice his integrity to our fierce rivals City. But still scored a good goal thanks to Berbatov. So props for that.
What a great upload. Love your football content. Please keep them coming. I’m a collector myself and have been looking for certain games from the early 90’s just wondering who your supplier might be id be very interested in seeing if they have the few I need.
Even I was at an Anfield game back in 2004 when Liverpool played against Crystal Palace. The stadium back then was too loud but then within the next decade or so, the noise did reduce. But then again as an autistic person, I might be wrong.
@@csenterprises9632 Absolutely, I agree with you. The success of Klopp's Liverpool might have shifted the crowd's expectations or reactions during games. Also, the rise of distractions like smartphones could be another factor on how people engage with the game. It's a mix of factors.
I’m on holiday at the moment so I can’t do anything to put it back on here or move it over on archive.org until I return on January 8th. That got taken down because of the Premier League claiming copyright.
Berbatov shot at Skrtel hands at the exact first minute should of been an obvious penalty he basically blocked his attempt. Van Der Sar with a horrendous mistake. It was an even match I didn't feel like one team was better than the other. But I'm disappointed as a Man Utd fan seeing us lose an important match. 4-3-3 usually doesn't work no wingers or anything. Poor tactics by Alex Ferguson. First goal was beautiful but almost no threat after that. Rooney had an extremely bad match usually just complicating things way too much in the forward line. Defending was not good. It was funny how Berbatov & Keane had just left Tottenham for their favorite clubs. They were an incredibly effective duo at Tottenham. Two of the best strikers ever.
If it was VAR days, they would've given it, (probably), but the commentator still said Howard Webb is right, so it depends who is sitting in the VAR booth. If you support Liverpool, its not a pen for sure.
Even back then you can see how biased sky is towards liverpool, going on about their history and 18 titles lol. You never see them talk about uniteds 20 titles now
I think MOTD and Sky were very biased to the Scousers Now Lawro, Hansen, Jamie Redknapp, Souness. I don't know who was on ESPN/Setanta but maybe couple scousers on there lol. But now if you look at it Hargreaves, Ferdinand, Scholes on BT/TNT. Neville on Sky since 2013 when Fergie left there's been no criticism of Utd . A bit of bias towards Fergie's Utd even, like if LVG and J.Mou two managers who put the foundations and spine in at Bayern for Heyneckes in 2013 and Real Madrid Ancelotti, in 2014 to get the credit and win big in Europe. Even with Zidane after too.
Liverpool were on 18 when Utd were on 8, and here they were on 17 and about to catch and then overtake their greatest rivals. Liverpool had set the standard in dominating league wins before this and Utd did the same in this era.
Some late winners for Man U too - Macheda’s comes to mind. Liverpool clicked into gear and played some great stuff including winning 4v1 at Old Trafford in the run-in.
We got good again just as the game went from globalised to hyper-globalised and the tourists flooded in. Bigger stadium, worse atmosphere. Realistically it will only get worse. But it would be unfair to just blame the tourists. We have the same season-ticket holders in the same seats today as in 2007/2008 - just they're now 15 years older. Meanwhile, the youth are shut out due to extortionate prices and the difficulty of competing with a global fan base willing to pay ridiculous money for their once-in-a-lifetime trip to Anfield. We have lost out on a whole generation of regular match-going fans.
