Тёмный

LOGIC PRO X - Advanced Beat Programming With Step Sequencer 

Jono Buchanan Music
Подписаться 8 тыс.
Просмотров 2,9 тыс.
50% 1

The step sequencer offers a quick and creative way to create beat patterns. But it's also ready to respond if you prefer patterns with varying parameters. If you want velocity control per step, or to vary the direction of travel for a particular row of a sequence, you can. But you can also introduce glitchy note repeats, skip steps, tie them together or randomise the likelihood that they'll play at all. In this video, Jono takes a deeper look at all of the options available to show how quickly you can make super-sophisticated beat patterns from humble origins.
00:00 Intro
00:29 Loading a kit and creating a Pattern Region
02:06 Velocity Variation
03:13 Extra Claps with Velocity variation
03:54 Gating Individual steps
05:23 Explaining Tie
06:09 Note offsets to vary pitch
07:33 Loop Start/End variations
08:58 Varying sequence direction
10:11 Note Repeat
11:07 Chance
12:25 Start Offset
13:42 Step Rate
17:20 Skip
18:04 Further variation via a second pattern
19:59 Summary

Опубликовано:

 

4 июл 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 22   
@ranife
@ranife 2 дня назад
I didn't realize the step sequencer had so many features. We can create endless patterns with it. Thanks a lot! :)
@davidpharo
@davidpharo 2 года назад
Wow, hadn't appreciated just how much variation was possible until watching this, thanks for another great video!😀
@jonobuchananmusic
@jonobuchananmusic 2 года назад
You're welcome DP. Thanks for watching, as always.
@real-sloth
@real-sloth 5 месяцев назад
I am new to Logic and watch some videos about it and yours are the most helpful for me. Thanks!
@jonobuchananmusic
@jonobuchananmusic 5 месяцев назад
Delighted to hear that. Thanks so much.
@andrewhertzberg6889
@andrewhertzberg6889 2 года назад
Once again, pure gold. I have been doing some of this by clicking on the dropdown arrow on each track. That has the "benefit" that you can see several of these values at once. But for most of what I do, this is a far better approach. Much appreciated.
@jonobuchananmusic
@jonobuchananmusic 2 года назад
Many thanks Andrew.
@velanche
@velanche Год назад
Your videos from awhile back were some of the best Logic tutorials I’ve seen. Just subscribed, so many thanks and keep up the great work you do!
@jonobuchananmusic
@jonobuchananmusic Год назад
Thank you so much and welcome. There should be plenty in the back catalogue of this channel to catch up on (!) and lots more planned too. Really great to have you with us.
@nikitasavcenko3666
@nikitasavcenko3666 2 месяца назад
Thx very helpful
@jonobuchananmusic
@jonobuchananmusic 2 месяца назад
Delighted to hear that - you're welcome.
@victorRodriguez-oy1ri
@victorRodriguez-oy1ri Год назад
JONO esta tutorial brutal. Tu deberias estar haciendo regueaton. gracias.
@jonobuchananmusic
@jonobuchananmusic Год назад
Gracias. ¡De nada!
@estebanlopezlimon1346
@estebanlopezlimon1346 2 года назад
I don't how this feature went off my radar all this time. This is a game changer for me and will save me a ridiculous amount of time. Question: What would I be better off using: Drum machine designer (or Track Stack + Samplers, whatever) or Ultrabeat? Which option offers more flexibility and which one goes less hard on the CPU? I see plenty of EDM guys sticking with Ultrabeat. But Generic Drum Machines just feel more natural to me, more intuitive, less chaotic. And having seen this video, I must say I'm even more partial in this topic now. Can I ask what's your personal preference, Jono? What's your take on this dilemma? I don't even know if Ultrabeat is even worth the risk of doing Automation in. Looks like parameter hell to me, haha. Really intimidating for a beginner. I assume Ultrabeat is more fitting to those who haven't worked their samples yet and want to produce them within the same plugin. Other than that, I don't see the point.
@jonobuchananmusic
@jonobuchananmusic 2 года назад
Hi Esteban. I would say that what matters most is how things sound and what is of next most importance is how intuitive an instrument is and how it facilitates creativity. If any instrument is frustrating to use, it won't encourage a free-flowing approach to music-making. Objectively, great sounding results are possible with both DMD and Ultrabeat, so it's entirely down to personal preference. Ultrabeat in part lives on because it pre-dates DMD and plenty of producers have older sessions which rely on it. But others choose it because it suits the way they program beats. Like you, I find DMD more intuitive and I'd probably reach for it more frequently than Ultrabeat. But sometimes I find that mixing things up and choosing a different approach triggers new, fresh ideas. Great to have both options!
@Cuban_Knight
@Cuban_Knight 2 года назад
Another Gem. I’d imagine you would duplicate the regions to build up an arrangement. Is it possible to use the format to record the audio in a separate track and adjust the beats o the fly?
@jonobuchananmusic
@jonobuchananmusic 2 года назад
Hi Tes. Exactly that - every time you want to develop the arrangement, copy the Pattern Region and alter its contents accordingly. If you set the output routing to an Aux and then create an Audio track with that Aux number as the input, yes, you could manipulate sequences on the fly and record the results.
@paulbarrett4533
@paulbarrett4533 5 месяцев назад
How do split dmd step sequencer between its retrospective tracks in the actual projects
@jonobuchananmusic
@jonobuchananmusic 5 месяцев назад
Hi Paul. I hope I've understood your question correctly. If I have, the thing you'll need to do is to Control-Click the Pattern Sequence and select Convert > Convert To MIDI Region. The resulting, regular MIDI region can then be chopped and copied/moved/assigned to whichever tracks you like. Hope that helps.
@paulbarrett4533
@paulbarrett4533 5 месяцев назад
@@jonobuchananmusic thats exactly what I was asking I thought there might be an option to just auto assign the individual steps onto there retrospective tracks.
@jonobuchananmusic
@jonobuchananmusic 5 месяцев назад
@@paulbarrett4533 Hi Paul. Great, that makes sense. Effectively, the routing of a DMD kit does that assignment for you. By limiting each note to a specific instrument, it gets its own track. So whether you use a Pattern region, or a regular MIDI region, each snare drum you program, for example, will only be assigned to the snare track. That means you can open the DMD Track Stack, assign Insert effects to that track, set up bespoke Auxiliary sends from each one etc. But the convert and copy approach definitely works too, if you want to see a lane of MIDI notes for each instrument.
@paulbarrett4533
@paulbarrett4533 5 месяцев назад
Yeh that’s what I was after so I could move the midi for different instruments within the stack around in the project instead of having to open up the step sequencer re program the steps but I’m sure I’ll find a way of getting efficient with it
Далее
LOGIC PRO X - Pad Bounce and Chop
13:05
Просмотров 855
Logic Pro: Creating Mix Space (Pads Edition)
28:27
Просмотров 1,8 тыс.
Step Sequencer - Best Way to Write Automation?
16:58
Logic Pro X: Adding Patterns To The Loop Library
12:32
Просмотров 1,3 тыс.
Step-by-Step: Setting Up Session Players in Logic Pro
18:47