Losing Control 

Love this comment so much!! I think you are exactly right!!🤣🤣🤣

Exactly

Yes. Yes he would.

Sounds like trespassing to me

Dr Mad Scientist 😨

Spot on!

I got that vibe from him as well. He was definitely a cocky little turd. Lol

I got this too..

def givin off Hunter Biden vibes

"The guy at the end"!!!!!!!!! I can't allow that.

I have seen many cases like this but car accidents. Was the accident done be a car illegally parked or a driver driving negligently. If he parked on the road and there was a sign, plaintiff would of lost. He assumed the risk by parking there. There is a sign for a reason. They take illegal parking on a street different than on a private parking lot. At the same time the Plaintiff picks up and drops off furniture there. He has the right to park there because he is doing business there. This all changed when the store saw the estimate.

@@georgebenevidesyou’re wrong. Even if it were illegally parked on a road with a sign, the plaintiff still would have won. A car parked illegally deserves a ticket and to be towed. That’s the law. It does not deserve to be damaged by other negligent drivers or workers etc. The correct, legal procedure to deal with an illegally parked car is to have it towed, not drive into it 🤦‍♂️

So, what happens if you park next to a fire hydrant and the fire department smashes your windows to get the hose to the hydrant during the fire? Do you sue the fire department? No. You eat the costs because you parked illegally. This case is different because there was negligence on both sides .. it should be 75% fault of plaintiff and 25% fault of company

@@franbacon82 that might be a legal exception. But private citizens cannot just smash into an illegally parked vehicle without having to pay the damages 🤦‍♂️

It's not a parking pass. It is his business information.

@@tmilesffl the Plaintiff stated the business he was picking up his merch from gave him the paper to put in the window to prove he was loading his vehicle

Oh my gawd - yes 😬

Agreed!!

The thumbnail threw me all the way off fr.

defendant is the kind of guy that thinks that if u park illegally then he can do whatever he wants to your vehicle while it is parked there . i have known some homeowners and neighbors who would do things to a vehicle if it was parked in front of their home or parked in a space that they preferred . people like this need to get sued so they learn that they cannot do whatever they please to a parked vehicle .

Defendant must think it's airport rules xD

If you park illegally all bets are off

@@christopherchance4860incorrect, I’m an insurance adjuster and what you said is legally incorrect.

@@christopherchance4860 so if there's a car illegally double parked, you can just drive into it? 😂

​@christopherchance4860 So, just to recap: Park illegally and someone can intentionally kill you and get off. Man, rough call.

well lets get real here, your paid to deny claims, so while you may not like what I said, your win/lose track record speaks volumes@@zacharybohlman4069

I'd say by being stationary in a place or zone, it should have never been

@@brandengrass8340yeah but that’s not the law 🤦‍♂️

I can think of one case but it may not apply everywhere. A friend was coming up to a stop light when the light changed, his front tires were over the line. A lady making a left turn hit his front end. Though she could clearly see him, the court deemed the accident his fault for being stopped over the line.

He must be *actively* loading or unloading to be legal. The other guys are still liable for the mistake but they had every right to call for a tow and let the driver foot the bill.

@@wildcaveman5310 on private property there is no such standard.

@@MatthewSmith-lr8bm the property owner or lease holder has the right to make that judgement. Not the general public.

@@wildcaveman5310 that's the problem both companies have the right to the same dock.

@@MatthewSmith-lr8bm “same dock”. As far as we know it is not specifically marked out as different dock spaces to be used individually of each other (in which case the defendant would have absolutely no claim to the area the guy was parked in). Therefore it is a group dock space and they share the space by whoever needs it at the time. That doesn’t mean one party can park while not using it. Drivers are not supposed to park in loading spaces. They are supposed to park in a normal spot then move to loading when the order is ready. It’s not hard. But way too many people have a “I’m special and that doesn’t apply to me” mentality (especially when they think they will only be there for “2 minutes”). I see this far too often in my area even by people parking in fire lane for the grocery store because “they are special and only going to do one thing”. It doesn’t matter. The entitled attitude needs to end and everyone needs to obey the rules and not make excuses.

😂😂

❤

😊😅😊

I don't think that Rob would've raised a son so stupid.

​@@Quartzquiz333true

He does looks a bit like Archie's son in law.

@@Quartzquiz333 No but meathead would.

Yes!

That would be so frustrating to put up with on a regular basis. People can be so entitled. Or they have a mindset that if they're quick, it doesn't count. Lol

She's hot

Yes. You are responsible for hitting a parked vehicle, even if it is illegally parked 🤦‍♂️ Why is it so hard for people to understand that what they think is fair is totally irrelevant to what the law actually is? 🤦‍♂️

I would think if you see it's there and continue to do something that damages it, yes. You should have the person remove it if they do not, then have it towed out of your way. The defendant should have had the car towed if it was in an illegal spot.

@@michellehawkins1027 so a guy parks on my property without permission, and I have to inconvenience myself by spending my morning calling and waiting for a tow truck to remove him? Doesn't sound right to me, but I guess I'm in the minority on this one.

@@stephenhiggs5224 You would still be in the minority while paying to fix or replace the guy's windshield. Not like mowing your lawn is an emergency that cannot wait later.

@@stephenhiggs5224 I'm not saying it's right but sadly that is the law.

@@stephenhiggs5224regardless of what you think is right or fair, you have to obey the law or you pay the consequences, as already pointed out by others. Have the car towed. If you damage it, you are responsible. That’s the law

I'm confused, I thought he said he was picking something up from the other store that shares the loading dock. I don't think that's "illegal" parking.

Except that’s not the law 🤦‍♂️ Parking illegally does not entitle other people to damage the car. The correct legal procedure would be to have the illegally parked car ticketed and towed 🤦‍♂️

Me too! I think they should’ve split the cost

@teisham4508 this judge I tell ya sometimes she so biased

Totally agree

He wasn't illegally parked. He was in a loading zone, which was shared with the other store he was unloading stuff to.

I'm going to have to be a minority on this verdict, I disagree with it . JM dropped the ball , she could at bare minimum hold each of them 50/50 at fault. Me personally, I would have ruled for the defendant...illegally parked NUFF SAID!!!😕

But that’s not the law 🤦‍♂️

I like your comments more when you DON'T let us know how much you don't care for Judge Milian.

I think she retired from the show already...

I guess you missed the part right after where he immediately capitulated and said "yes ma'am, yes ma'am, yes ma'am" 😂😂 He wasn't answering her question and she immediately put him back on track.

🤡

@@paulct91 The show was cancelled. She now has another show.