Тёмный

Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained 

Quimbee
Подписаться 54 тыс.
Просмотров 27 тыс.
50% 1

Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 16,300 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 223 casebooks ► www.quimbee.co...
Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife | 504 U.S. 555 (1992)
Congress passed the Endangered Species Act in 1973. One provision required federal government agencies to consult with the Secretary of the Interior or Commerce before doing anything that might harm an endangered or threatened species. The Act also contained a citizen-suit provision, authorizing anyone to sue and obtain an injunction against anyone, including government actors, to stop them from violating the Act.
The Secretaries of Commerce and the Interior issued a joint regulation in 1978 saying the Act’s consultation requirement applied to actions taken by the federal government anywhere in the world. However, by 1986, the secretaries had limited the geographic scope of the consultation requirement; thus, federal agencies only needed to consult about potential harm to endangered species posed by projects within U.S. borders or on the high seas.
Want more details on this case? Get the rule of law, issues, holding and reasonings, and more case facts here www.quimbee.co...
The Quimbee App features over 16,300 case briefs keyed to 223 casebooks. Try it free for 7 days! ► www.quimbee.co...
Have Questions about this Case?
Submit your questions and get answers from real attorney here: www.quimbee.co...
Did we just become best friends? Stay connected to Quimbee here:
Subscribe to our RU-vid Channel ► www.youtube.co...
Quimbee Case Brief App ► www.quimbee.co...
Facebook ► / quimbeedotcom
Twitter ► / quimbeedotcom
casebriefs #lawcases #casesummaries

Опубликовано:

 

21 окт 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 6   
@X_explorer
@X_explorer 7 лет назад
Amazing channel! I love observing nature, explore and meditate...
@lakshminathanbalasubramani8404
No they did not win this case. SCOTUS opinion was that the plaintiffs failed to establish a standing to file a suit against the DOI
@USTankslashercoal
@USTankslashercoal 7 лет назад
JUST BUY THE DAMN PLANE TICKETS!
@joelnenadovich8141
@joelnenadovich8141 8 лет назад
Hey I was just wondering, so did the plantiffs win or not? Did they stop the government from causing possible harm to endangered species overseas or not? Thanks :)
@VictoriaFernandez
@VictoriaFernandez 5 лет назад
No
@legallyblind4836
@legallyblind4836 2 года назад
They lacked standing. No generalized grievance
Далее
Bush v. Gore Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained
10:22
Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife - Standing to Sue
13:28
Просмотров 2,2 тыс.
skibidi toilet multiverse 042
20:57
Просмотров 4,9 млн
What’s your height?🩷🙀💚
00:59
Просмотров 3,8 млн
Supreme Court Shenanigans !!!
12:02
Просмотров 10 млн
Richard Lazarus on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife
6:53
Why the US Supreme Court made this map illegal
5:41
Просмотров 2,4 млн
Think Fast, Talk Smart: Communication Techniques
58:20
skibidi toilet multiverse 042
20:57
Просмотров 4,9 млн