Ben Kenobi (ANH, Rebels) Vs Pre Exile Luke (TLJ) Strength-Luke Durability-Luke Speed-Luke Agility-Luke Endurance-Luke Stamina-Ben (with his defensive lightsaber form he can fight for longer) Iq-Ben Intelligence-Ben Biq-Ben (fought in CW) Experiance-Ben Skills-Ben Tactics-Ben Training-Both (both tought by 2 wise Jedi) Offence-Luke Defense-Ben Dueling-Ben (stated above ANH Vader and Prime Yoda, Luke's dueling was great and he also states above Prime Yoda, but Vader>Luke (Said by Lucas himself. Kenobi's dueling was always on extreme level) Combat-Luke Combat speed-Luke Reaction speed-Ben Gadgets-Ben Weapon-both (both didn't modify their lightsabers) Abilities-Luke Power-Luke AP-Luke DC-Luke Hax-Ben (his lightsaber form exposes his enemy's weaknesses) Versatility-Ben Feats-Ben Potential-both (both had potential of Force Ghost) Ben Kenobi points-17 Pre Exile Luke points-14 Ben Kenobi wins high-extreme difficulty
Lemme correct that for you with actual reasons Stamina-Luke(Pre Exile Luke mainly uses Soresu and Djem So so he has more stamina, also considering that ANH Ben's stamina was so low that Vader beat him in second) IQ- Equal(nothing states that any of them has a higher IQ and if you check it online, Luke prolly gets IQ but I'll leave it at equal) Intelligence- Luke(Luke has knowledge from Yoda and Obi Wan, even as force ghosts, so he knows more and knowledge is part of intelligence) BIQ- Luke(Luke fought in the Galactic Civil War which is 2 years longer than the CW) Skills-Luke(Luke is stated in the Shadows of the Sith novel that Luke had reached lightsaber perfection, something we never see for Obi Wan) Training- Luke(Obi Wan got trained by Qui Gon who is fodder as a duelist while Luke got taught by Prime Obi Wan and Yoda. So he has Obi Wan training and Yoda's training. Its clear it's not equal) Defense-Luke(yes, Luke gets defense because not only did a Pre Prime Luke defend better against Vader than Prime Obi Wan did, but Pre Exile Luke managed to easily and perfectly parry 9 Sith wraiths who were amped by the force using Soresu, far surpassing what Obi Wan has ever done with Soresu) Dueling-Luke(Pre Exile Luke is a far better duelist than both Prime Vader and Prime Obi Wan. Also, ANH Obi Wan lost to ANH Vader in the movie and in the novels. George Lucas doesn't state that Luke is below Vader in dueling either. Also, Prime Obi Wan isn't a better duelist than Yoda or ANH Vader considering he lost to Vader who didn't surprass Yoda in dueling until the OT, and Obi Wan got destroyed) Reaction Speed- Luke(Vader has the fastest reaction speed, and Pre Prime Luke matched Vader in reaction speed in ROTJ) Hax-Luke(Luke literally has a rage amp that put him far above Prime Vader and on Sidious level in the ROTJ novel. Obi Wan's lightsaber form isn't a hax. Also Soresu on Obi Wan is overrated) Versatility-Luke(Luke mastered Soresu[because of Obi Wan], Ataru[thanks to Yoda] and Djem So[thanks to mirroring Vader while Obi Wan only mastered Soresu] Feats-Luke(destroyed army of TIE Fighters with the force, defeated Vader and Exim Panshard who are both Sith lords, tore down a Star Destroyer from the sky with the force, defeated Prime Vader(ROTJ), Potential-Luke(because he's simply a Skywalker who has more force potential than Obi Wan who was a below average jedi in the force) Winner: Luke Skywalker no diff
@@willisstillhere8846Obi wan didnt just master Soresu in canon he has 1,3,4,5,6 mastered with his emphasis is on 3 Luke had the same with more emphasis on 5,3,4
@@willisstillhere8846 kkkkkkkkk Tu é tão fanboy do luke ao ponto de comparar um cara que meramente lutou como soldado em uma guerra que nem vimos ele elaborando grandes estratégias como comandante e vc ainda da qi de batalha pro luke Vc também disse que luke é melhor na defesa contra o cara que dominou perfeitamente a MELHOR técnica de defesa com sabre de luz 😂 Fora o resto q tmb n tem sentido
Luke would never bear Obi Wan in terms of IQ or Battle IQ. Kenobi was a general who helped oversee, and strategize military plans for countless campaigns during the Clone Wars while also serving in battle right along side his clone troopers. Obi Wan can do everything Luke can do, but Luke simply doesnt not have the experience to accomplish the things Obi Wan did, at leatlst within the time frame of this comparison goes. Strictly speaking on battle IQ, battle tactics & strategy. Luke does become much stronger and more capable as he has youth on his side, but what Obi Wan lacked in physicality and strength in his latter years, he more than made up for with his wisdom, patience and applicable knowledge. Thats my opinion though so Just saying. Great video otherwise! Enjoyed it!
@@rtixboi4193 i would have to refresh myself on how many campaigns Luke lead against the Yuzan Vong and where in the timeline those occured exactly.. lemme refresh and get back to you?
amazing edit, although one thing people get wrong about starwars is that kenobi has incredible stamina endurance and skill, his from (serosu) which is a defensive style that is a direct counter to from 5 which is the most common used by luke and anakin. also as shown in the last jedi yodas force ghost showed luke that he still has much to learn. id say rebels obi wan would beat exiled luke. Obi wan knew more abilities, had more skill, endurance, and stamina. I mean kenobi litteraly killed maul in 3 seconds. Old luke is honestly so arrogant and stupid. while kenobi is much more smart and calm.
Ep 5 Luke takes strength over ep two Obi, and (Excluding the final round) Obi wan get endurance and durability, he taken more shit than luke and gotten back up. Other than that great edit, you deserve more subs
Luke used parts of form 4 which literally was based around agility and speed like yoda. You can’t just look at fighting choreography cuz George Lucas didn’t have much to work with in the 80s
I think Luke’s potential is higher obviously since George stated he has the same potential as his father. Tho with a saber even episode 1 obi wan was amazing. Luke didn’t have much training with a saber in comparison. But at his peak was probably obi wan ep 1 or maybe 2
From a certain point of view………….. Both were powerful enough to defeat Darth Vader. After first losing to him. Mando-era Luke appears to be A UNIT based on what we saw at the end of S2. He’d have been far more if Disney didn’t completely screw the pooch with the Sequels.
@@danieledits102 Frak! I mis-read the post. I LOATHE the Disney Sequels. To me,THEY should be “SW Legends”. 100% what they “now” call Legends should have been the Sequels. Sorry!!!!!!!! I’ll delete the comment. Frak!!!!!!
If obi wan saw What luke turned into in the last Jedi Obi wan - Luke What happened to you look what you turned into Luke- there is nothing wrong with me obi wan I just want to stop being a Jedi Obi wan - did you learn anything from what I taught you in Episode 4 Luke -oh Just go away ben Obi wan - Geez you sure have the attitude of your Uncle Owen
no? in both movies Luke kept pace with Vader who way outscales kenobi in speed, and ROTJ gets strength no questions, he has far better force aug, and was able to physically overpower Vader
You can argue about the speed, but luke in rotj had a prosthetic arm and you could tell by his lightsaber fighting that he was using his strength to his advantage
@@commiecoon6043 Kept the pace with Vader ? Bruh, in Empire Strikes back Vader was toying with Luke and in Return of the Jedi Luke swung his lightsaber left and right like an angry kid would his broom in a fit of rage, there was nothing fast or even remotely professional there. Vader didn't want to kill his son. If he wanted he would have crushed him. Has any of you even watched Revenge of the Sith and saw the insane speed at which Obi-Wan and Vader were going at each other ?
@@Nevad25 you are not one of those people who thinks anakin and obi wan are above Luke because they had better choreography. ROTJ was made in 1983, ROTS in 2005, of course Luke was gonna look unprofessional, and the fight choreography is totally irrelevant to who wins in a fight. say Luke was in ROTS, he would be fighting twice as fast as kenobi. medium distortion isn't a valid argument for why one character beats another. oh and also Vader was not conflicted, Luke was the one holding back: "If it came, at last, to blows, yes, he would destroy Luke. He could no longer afford to hold back as he once had." "But if meant killing a boy who wouldn't fight... then he could do that, too." "On the death star... father and son grimly clash! brutally, aggressively, Darth Vader brings his full strength and power against the younger man." "But if the son holds any reluctance at the clash... the father seemingly does not." in reference to Vader in ROTJ "So he doubles down on the dark side almost as a coping mechanism." "He must teach this boy a lesson he would never forget, or die learning." All canon statements showing how Vader was very much okay with killing Luke, had no confliction, and wasn't holding. They also show that Luke was actually the one holding back because he wanted to save his father rather than kill him. ROTJ Luke scales > ROTJ Vader high diff. before you say ROTJ is sub anakin or obi wan, KS Vader was already ~ Post IH Anakin, and Vader grows significantly each consecutive time we see him. ROTJ Vader no diffs obi-wan and anakin.
@@commiecoon6043 Yes, I am one of those people that say Obi-Wan and Anakin were better and faster than Luke because of what was portrayed in the movies. I don't care if George Lucas himself says otherwise, he showed something different in his movies, that's it. For example if George shows Luke eating a strawberry in Episode IV, I don't care if he says it was an apple, because what he showed on screen was a strawberry, despite what he said, so yes I'll still argue that he ate a strawberry, not a apple, that's it. Besides, I don't care about the novel (I assume) you quoted, I'm using the movies for reference solely. And it doesn't make sense to have a man who spent 13 Years training, fighting and living his life as a Jedi everyday of his life with the best Jedis around to teach him and help him hone his skills in various ways, then become one of the most ruthless and savage Sith Lord the galaxy has ever known, growing stronger each day and honing his skills for the next 23 years of his life, only to be beaten by a farm boy that first picked up a lightsaber and discovered the Force 4 years prior, without proper training at that. It's poor storytelling. I don't even care if it's Luke Skywalker, the son of Anakin who therefor has insane potential. Without proper training and mastery potential just stays that, potential. It's not one month on Dagobah lifting a few rocks and a few advice from Ben Kenobi and Yoda that will change that. So, we're left with the only logical conclusion: Vader held back. That's it.
@@rtixboi4193 How can u say a guy that canonically speaking had the most potential out of everyone that ever existed in Star Wars universe is overrated?. Anakin was on the same level of RAW power as Yoda and Sidious on ROTS. He was bested by knowledge, experience and Battle IQ. Luke on ROTJ is on par with Anakin ROTS (and that is really debatable cause for me Anakin is still a lot stronger). Luke didn’t kill anyone, 0 JEDI and 0 Sith by the end of ROTJ. It is impossible to compare levels with any other person. Obi-Wan on the other hand, by ROTS bested prime Anakin, DEFEATED Maul twice and best Griveous 1v1. Don’t forget Anakin killed Dooku that hold is own against Yoda and on ROTS he killed a lot of Jedi during order 66. Griveous too killed a lot of Jedi along the way. Those guys CAN be compared. Now, saying that Luke beats Obi-Wan, Yoda, Anakin or any other character for me is just stupid. I don’t get. In “A New hope” Obi-Wan says that he in termos of power is a 7 and Vader is 4 (I think). Even if u say Vader was beaten by Luke he still couldn’t beat Old Ben Kenobi cause that guy is just A LOT STRONGER. Luke maybe fast and maybe stronger but IQ matters sooooo much, like experience and knowledge. Anakin was the strongest character on par with Luke (on paper) and Obi-wan bested him. Ah, and don’t forget Ashoka bested Vader 1v1. If someone says Luke is stronger than Vader because of that than we can say Ashoka is as strong as ROTJ Luke.
@@guilhermepeixoto3218it's ironic how you say Luke is the most overrated jedi on a video where he clearly wins against mf Obi Wan Kenobi Then proceed to defend Anakin because he's has the most potential, as if Luke didn't have the second highest potential. You prequels fanboys are stuck in your nostalgia rage bait garbage