Luminar uses this very dramatic presentation to highlight their "always on" integrated lidar protection system vs other cars "basic" systems. The Tesla is being driven by a human with no FSD functions on at all.
Wonderful technology, make it mandatory in all vehicles. Drivers are becoming more and more irresponsible and distracted, it's disgusting. Force society to be better with this technology. 🙏🏻📖🙏🏾
Every tesla has ability to FSD as per Elon and we talking safety so why Elon don't provide same feature as FSD. I am quite sure FSD will have same problem.
@@vgsalvi2007 why Luminar needs to manipulate, to proof his own system? Tesla managed to get the best rating from NCAP as you can see here -> ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-dKaN3f2zmCQ.html. Luminar should do the same test with his Lidar car to proof, if they are better. Not a random PR show.
@@TI-ct6fx much complicated? When Nissan is that great, why they are not at first place in NCap Test like Tesla? And the fact that even Lucid with its air and Luminar Lidar is not able to catch up in that Test, shows that Luminar is not that good as they want to show us.
It's funny how the Tesla already has been using that technology for a long time yet they've disabled it and used it to be the scape goat in a good ole boys vs new fangled technology man war. Interestingly this technology has been available in a similar form in trucking with adaptive cruise control, Lane departure warning and emergency braking. All of which migrated into passenger cars
Obviously this test should be done by a third party who is not biased. For all I know the driver in the Tesla could be doing exactly what Luminar paid him to do to make them look good.
This is clear demo on how Lidar will soon consider essential in every car. There is no other technology that can do same level. Cost of lidar is reason for delay integration but with solid state it's changing.
If one car is driverless and the other has ai, surely it would be better to have the same model of car for this demo... same breaking distance, same everytbing else.
Seems like a bullshit test, they state that all safety features are turned off on the Tesla, then why use it for comparison? To try and discredit Tesla for those that didn't Read that small detail, good thing these ass clowns don't test airplanes
Personally, I own a vehicle that has safety autonomous features... WHICH CAUSED A CAR ACCIDENT AND REGULARLY ACTS INCORRECTLY. I would NEVER trust my life in one to operate on its own.
I think the number of times these features act wonky and cause accidents is considerably less than human caused accidents. I hear your frustration though.
Wow... this is a task pretty much even the most simple of automotive lidars can fulfill... actually, which can even be fulfilled by a radar... no need for that expensive luminar stuff...
You've got to be joking. The error rates already on self driving cars are ridiculously better than human drivers. The only reason it hasn't happened is because everyone erroneously believes that they are in the top 10% of drivers.
I agree, let's make it plow through pedestrians like that tesla every time, just because there's a slim possibility that it fails. Forget saving hundreds of lives, if we might not be able to save one it's not worth it to save any.
They are not confident enough to have their own advocates for their 'safety system' play the role of the pedestrians that walk into the path of their moving car... Several manufacturers of ballistic protected vehicles and clothing have sat in their armoured vehicles or worn their armoured clothes whilst being shot at, to display their absolute confidence in their products! Yet this test used dummy pedestrians throughout, rather than show their systems being used with actual human beings! Extremely unimpressed!
@@9ZERO6 comment is a little bit trolly, but no really, there are videos from bulletproof vest manufacturers of their owners taking a shot and then showing the bruise underneath to demonstrate their confidence in their products.
Truth of the matter is we live in a litigious society. Auto manufacturers, technology companies nor the drivers themselves want to take responsibility should the product fail. 🤷
