Made to replicate 90s Citadel paints: NOSTALGIA 94 reviewed, still good? 

Sounds like a great idea :)

Any news on when Dark Angels green is released?

Was the conversion chart released?

The screw top hex containers right?? I have those. I found the entire set new in box on ebay for $26 5 years ago. Some of them have dried to the point i couldnt reactivate them but i still have them up on my rack in order. Its very nostalgic. I still use them today. I use them for my axis and allies pieces for a my giant global 1940 but if this company makes the full set of original 90s colors i will buy it instantly

Apologies :D

Haven't encountered that yet, but I'l keep an eye on it. I guess it might have been an issue with a non-acrylic based primer that hasn't fully cured yet.

Schau mal hier rein, da habe ich alles beschrieben: taleofpainters.com/2021/07/top-tip-make-your-own-paint-swatch-to-organise-your-paint-collection/

I think Warpaints are a bit less satin and have better opacity overall. While they have a lot of vibrant colours as well, Nostalgia might be a bit more vibrant in direct comparison. And their consistency is smoother and slightly thinner than most Warpaints. Hope this helps :)

Thank you, that's just what I wanted to know!

I've read the Fauxhammer review: www.fauxhammer.com/reviews/coat-darms-paint-review-for-miniatures-wargames-models/ Since the colour match isn't that close and they are apparently more of a match to the 80s range, they weren't too interesting for me. Honestly, I prefer modern paint ranges.

Look at the video, stahly needs 5 coats of red over a white primed surface to get an even finish. In short, no.

No, these are meant to replicate much older paints. Strong Tone Wash from The Army Painter is the closest replacement I found for Devlan Mud.

Yeah I understand, but wasn't the 88 range out for quite a few years? I think they're being retired to make space for the 94 range.

In also like, 95% sure it's a one man show at warcolors.

@@christopherheintz2634 I’m aware of that, but if you’re not planning on making a product permanent, it should be openly and explicitly labeled as such. That’s my complaint. If 88 had been upfront labeled as a limited release to be replaced once the anniversary for the 94 range came up, I could have chosen not to invest in it. There was just no indication of this. I can’t afford to keep gambling on a paint range sticking around when the manufacturer has established they won’t be honest about its long-term plans. Put another way - what’s good for the goose is good for the gander. GW would have been crucified if they’d pulled a similar stunt. Being small or independent isn’t an excuse.

​@MasterShake9000 honestly though whats your expectation for when someone says it's permanent or limited ? I'd say multiple years is far from limited. Gw paints changed multiple times across 2 decades

@@Bog_Dog I'll just be blunt: It appears that Warcolours dropped 88 to make room for a chance to capitalize on the anniversary of the 94 range by "reformulating" the paints and launching the 94 range. If 88 had been selling poorly, they almost certainly wouldn't have wasted further effort with a 94 version - which in turn means the only reason to kill off the 88 range is solely to capitalize on a gimmick anniversary cash-in. If GW did a range change for that reason, they'd (rightly) be crucified. AFAIK, most of GW's paint changes over the years have been due to them changing distributors. IE - not an arbitrary decision to can a line. Otherwise their range changes have kept the existing range but added to it and/or removed less successful items. IE - not every GW change has been a cancelation of all existing paints. And again, there was no real announcement of this either. People (rightly) bag on GW for repeatedly out of the blue discontinuing models with no real warning. At least with paint changes they give alerts that certain items will be discontinued on a given date. There was not only never any indication that this was a limited release range, but the "announcement" is literally just going to their website of your own accord and realizing their entire 88 range is on clearance with a significant number of items already out of stock. Serpentbite Leather was already gone by the time I realized what was happening. So again, I'm not being unrealistic or too demanding here. If a paint range isn't intended to be a permanent part of the range, be up front about it. Once you terminate it, give forewarning about it. Warcolours did neither, clearly because they want to push a brand new range without anyone wondering how long this one will last. Which, again, GW would have been crucified for if they'd pulled such a tactic."Not being GW" isn't a blank check to act like or worse than GW.