Magnus Carlsen is Jolly on Titled Tuesday 

Agreed! Jerry's commentary is excellent.

Living

It’s a Jerry on the top not a cherry

😂

Yes! +1

😴 👍

I'm saying it's one of the better commentaries because it's not like the ones trying to flaunt their understanding, but instead explaining it like the audience are students that aren't incredibly advanced.

😴😎

Same!! Cant sleep before I put on one of these videos, love Jerry

Wasn't that great? Carlsen showed his superior endgame skill with all the right moves, turning an equal position into a victory.

😴

@@ChessNetwork Jerry your voice is incredibly soothing and I used your videos a few times to fell asleep. Marry christmas to you

Im using jerry to pass out for many years. Never lets me down. While asleep i watch all them adds xD Thanks jerry.

I catch him ever now and then. 😎

Thanks cpt 😎

Hi Vijay, it’s Jerry. 👋

Thank you and Happy Holidays to you too. 👍

Thank you 😎

Thank you

Thank you for your long-time support of the channel. I realized this atypical move was on purpose after more games had atypical moves. 😎

@@ChessNetwork Hi Jerry. I support you since you celebrated your 30th birthday back on chesscube. I wish you good health and a happy new year.

lol….

i dont

Or drawing against Hikaru and losing 3 points...

It didn't even look like such an unusual move to play. It gained a tempo on the knight and gained space. Maybe it wasn't one of the main lines, but I think that will be the last time he premoves like that again 😅

At 49:48 after Magnus played Kh7, Hikaru had Qa3 with the threat of capturing the bishop. Bd2 is the only square for the bishop but then white has Qd3+ and wins the bishop. Hikaru mentioned it on his stream immediately after he played Qd5.

He was winning anyway.

When I understand it correctly, when the tournament clock is ticking down, the results of the ongoing games do not count, so this was a way to secure at least half a point for both instead of getting nothing.

@@kingberzerk While this is true for Lichess Arenas, I don't believe it is the case here

By no means I am an expert on this, but in this case I think I'm right @@hamba1998

There was no way to win the game before the tournament was over, so playing the game out only impacts his rating, which apparently he doesn't care about.

​@@Alskaskandidn't get you. The tournament gets over only when all games finish right?

Oh maybe you are right, I thought that was not the case@@rajathjain6672

@@AlskaskanNo all games gets to be played out fully. There is no such timer in TT

Yeah if you just inverted it in post, or made it smaller and applied a zoom box over the names. Idk Jerry's editing skills.

For most of the video it's actually a Standings box. (He had it set to notation in the beginning, but then he changed it after the first game and never changed it back.) Personally I prefer a notation box: I like to be able to refer to the game score to remind myself how the position arose. The Standings, to me, are of less interest during the game itself.

​@@SaintD382 Thank you both for the replies, thanks for the likes as well. I covered the bar so fast that I didn’t notice the change he made until I came back the next day for watching more. Anyway, it’s a recurring annoyance, it’s not just this video. But I will agree with you that some viewers might like the “whatever” bar for their own reasons, different watching experiences, of course. As long as they are relevant, like the standings one, I wouldn’t rip them off, just turn them dark. You could even have multiple bars, I wouldn’t mind it. And I could improve my argument actually, forget the selfish silly one from previously. Think about the energy being wasted to turn those pixels on in 22000 devices for an entire hour, 22000 notebook-hours of bright white pixels for nothing. Doesn’t it sounds wasteful? I’m pretty sure if someone bothered to do the math it would amount to some significant figure. I mean, in a world thirsty for energy, it could contribute a bit. I suspect Jerry could actually set the equivalent of his whole household carbon-footprint off by just tuning his streams settings properly, optimally, it’s a privileged position, he would be saving through other peoples bills world-wide, which is arguably the best way to save because (1) it requires no lifestyle changes at all, (2) it has an immediate effect everywhere, (3) he doesn’t have to ask for anyone’s permission. Am I going to far here? Anyone following? What you guys think, please let me know, and sorry for the big text, it kept getting interesting and interesting, I couldn’t stop the flow, sorry.

@@zebreuuugames Bad news: I don't know if you're joking. Good news: you could be Akiba Rubinstein reincarnated.

​@@jackmason9144 Akiba Rubinstein the chess legend? Thank you! I won’t deny I had a good time writing that text but I definitively wasn’t joking. I totally stand with what I’ve said, there’s some worth pondering material there.

No way dude, thats what i love about Jerry. He shows the ideas behind what Magnus is doing. Keep doing it Jerry!

watch your language

what? he draws the arrows, explains everything 20x better that way

This commenter appears to be referring to the mouse cursor, not the explanation arrows.

@@SaintD382 I know, I mean he shows everything with his mouse, whatever he says, also drawing arrows, highlighting squares etc, it's 20x better that way. If he didn't do so and instead say "if he played queen to d4, than pawn to e5 attacks the queen, she has to draw back to d1 or move to a4" most people wouldn't follow, probably Jerry would also have to slow down with his commentary significantly.