Link to buy this Book: amzn.eu/d/3Tm7JVR * Support us on Social Media * Like👍 | Comment👇 | Share👫 | Subscribe👈 Latest WhatsApp and Instagram group links: yogaoflove108.blogspot.com/2023/06/SocialMedia.html RU-vid: www.youtube.com/@Yoga-of-Love?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram: instagram.com/yoga_of_love_108 Facebook: facebook.com/Yogaoflove.us RU-vid Shorts Playlist: ru-vid.com/group/PLDqWQzEha94aAVp06FQDe1W0UEZS_Ix0b
Hare krishan prabhu, Plz can u make a video on gaudiya matha? And the quarals(or confusion s) happend between iskcon and gaudiya matha. Plz accept my request prabhu Hare krishan.
I fortunately spend my 25 years in Kurukshetra as I born in Kurukshetra and visited so many ancient places of Mahabharat and I can tell you by my heart you can feel the presence of each and every person in Mahabharat by just being at those places. Great effort Prabhuji You are working so hard. May Radharani bless your family always.🙏❤️🙌 Best wishes 🙏
Many chronological order also makes it evident that Devakīputra Vāsudeva Krishna lived in the Rigvedic era around 11150-11050 BCE and was the pupil of Ghora Āṅgirasa, whereas Sri Krishna, a descendant of Vāsudeva Krishna, lived in the Mahābhārata era around 3223-3126 BCE.
The Kurukshetra War narrative, designated as an Itihāsa (it happened thus). This work was named as Jaya. Vyāsa’s knowledge of history, astronomy and the geography of Bhāratavarsha got embedded into Jaya. Vyāsa thus seeded a growing knowledge repository in the form of Jaya. This war-narrative called Jaya had 8800 verses, structured as a dialog between Dhritarāshtra, the Kuru king and his minister and aide Sanjaya. Dhritarāstra’s sons participated in the war opposing the Pāndavas and Sanjaya witnessed it. Vyāsa, who fathered Dhritarāshtra turned this war-narrative dialog into an Itihāsa called Jaya. This Jaya became Bhārata of 24,000 verses - structured as a dialog between Vyāsa’s disciple Vaiśampāyana and Janamejaya, the great grandson of the Pāndava Arjuna. Bhārata then becames Mahābhārata of 100,000 verses, structured as a dialog between Ugrasrava Sauti and sage Śhaunaka. Mahābhārata is of 100,000 verses as revealed in this verse (MBH.01.56.13):- This consists of a hundred thousand shlokas composed by the son of Satyavati of pious deeds and of great mental power. idaṃ śatasahasraṃ hi ślokānāṃ puṇyakarmaṇām satyavaty ātmajeneha vyākhyātam amitaujasā This is found to be true if we count the number of verses in currently available versions of Mahābhārata and Harivaṃśa together. Mahābhārata is having 84,879 verses and Harivaṃśa is having 16,374 verses, totaling to 101,253 verses. I am using the Bengal edition of Mahābhārata for this verse count. Other editions too arrive at counts close to 100,000 verses. The inner core viz. Jaya, the Itihāsa, is a dialog between Dhritarashtra and Sanjaya, containing the eye witness account of the Kurukshetra War. This is the original contribution of Vyāsa. It is approximately located between Bhishma Parva (6th book) and Sauptika Parva (10th book). It will not contain Vyāsa himself as a figure, unlike in the rest of Mahābhārata. The next layer is Bhārata, which is a dialog between Janamejaya and Vaiśampāyana who narrates the Kurukshetra War and also the accounts of the births and lives of the Kauravas and the Pandavas and various other events in their lives leading to the war. Janamejaya is the great grandson of Arjuna who participated in the war and hence this narrative occurs 70 or more years after the war. Thus it is not a report of events as it happened before the eyes (Itihāsa) but an account of what is known from olden times (Purāna). Vaisampāyana learned Jaya composed by his guru Vyāsa and retold it to Janamejaya with what else he knew about Kauravas, Pāndavas and Vyāsa resulting into the 24,000 verses of Bhārata. Vyāsa’s Jaya is retold by Vaisampāyana and hence it is no longer available in its original form but as embedded and dissolved in Bhārata. Apart from Vaisampāyana, Vyāsa’s other disciples like Jaimini and Lōmaharshana and Vyāsa’s son Suka too is likely to have contributed to Bhārata. This Bhārata is finally retold by Ugrasrava Sauti (who is the son of Vyāsa’s another disciple Lōmaharshana), probably after a few more years to an assemblage of sages at Naimisharanya headed by sage Saunaka. Hence Bhārata too is no longer available in its original form but as embedded and dissolved in Mahābhārata. Since the Sauti too is mentioned in third person in the Mahābhārata available to us, we must know that numerous other unknown contributors have added content to Mahābhārata. It contains materials identifiable with Saiva, Vaishnava and Skanda Purānas. It contains information about various orthodox Brahmanical practices. It contains the history of the Nāgas. It contains materials identifiable with the Vedas and Upanishads.
Awesome great so beautiful mind boggling clarification of MAHABHARATA with 300+ Evidences .. so amazing literally very proud and emotional feeling experiences .. most informative and transformative awareness PODCAST .. Bahot bahot dhanyawad PrabhuJi and specially Ramesh Chandru PrabhuJi ko 🙏 HareKrishna
At 32:44 Ishvara Gauranga prabhuji you understood that. But this is how manipulating and dogmatic assertions of iskcon and prabhupada has regarding it, When an Indian person calls on Krishna, he often says, Krsta. Krsta is a Sanskrit word meaning attraction. So when we address God as Christ, Krsta, or Krishna we indicate the same all-attractive Supreme Personality of Godhead. When Jesus said, Our Father who art in heaven hallowed be Thy name, the name of God was Krsta or Krishna. Srila Prabhupada: What is the meaning of the word Christ? Father Emmanuel: Christ comes from the Greek word Christos, meaning “the anointed one”. Srila Prabhupada: Christos is the Greek version of the word Krishna. Father Emmanuel: This is very interesting. Srila Prabhupada: When an Indian person calls on Krishna, he often says, “Krsta”. Krsta is a Sanskrit word meaning “attraction”. So when we address God as “Christ”, “Krsta”, or “Krishna” we indicate the same all-attractive Supreme Personality of Godhead. When Jesus said, ” Our Father who art in heaven hallowed be Thy name,” the name of God was Krsta or Krishna. Do you agree? Father Emmanuel: I think Jesus, as the son of God, has revealed to us the actual name of God: Christ. We can call God “Father”, but if we want to address Him by His actual name, we have to say “Christ”. Srila Prabhupada: Yes. “Christ” is another way of saying Krsta and Krsta is another way of pronouncing Krishna, the name of God. Jesus said that one should glorify the name of God, but yesterday I heard one theologian say that God has no name - that we can call Him only “Father”. A son may call his father “Father”, but the father also has a specific name. Similarly, God is the general name of the Supreme Personality of Godhead, whose specific name is Krishna. Therefore whether you call God “Christ”, “Krsta”, or “Krishna”, ultimately you are addressing the same Supreme Personality of Godhead. Father Emmanuel: Yes, if we speak of God’s actual name, then we must say, “Christos”. In our religion we have the Trinity: the Father, Son and Holy Spirit. We believe we can know the name of God only by revelation from the son of God. Jesus Christ revealed the name of the Father, and therefore we take the name “Christ” as the revealed name of God.
I am from kaithal... District near Kurukshetra....Arjun came at gyrahrudriandir ....and shiva...ki pooja ki ... 40 kos...bhumi me aata hai.. Hmaari dharam bhumi hai....
Hare krishna prabhu ji mera ek sabal h, mere dost kahte h ki jo mahabhart ved vyas ji ne rchi thi bo original granth kaha h Or ager bo ab nhi h to jo mahabhart aj ke time me h bo logo ne apni mrji se change kiye hui h to aj ki mahabharat granth shi nhi h isi liye bo mans Or daru bi pite h bolte h ye pap nhi h kripya is topik per ek video bnaiye
भाई पहले मैं भगवान राम को मानता था उनसे प्रेम करता था लेकिन जब से मैंने कृष्ण कथा सुना है by amogh लीला प्रभु तब से मेरा चित्त मन दिल सब चोरी हो गया है अब मेरा मन kriahna में लगा रहता है आप बताओ की मैं कृष्ण भक्ति krun या राम भक्ति ।
Shri krishna aur shri ram bhagwan ek he hai lekin shri krishna aadi rup hai........ aap confuse mat hoiye Bhagwan gita mein kehte hai ki unse upar kuchh bhi nhi hai unse he saare avtar aate hai Srimad bhagwatam mein kaha gya hai ki krishna avtari hai..... avtar nhi hai Aap brhama samhita padhenge toh usmein bhi brhamaji ne yahi btaya hai Dekhiye agar aap uss personality ke baare mein janna chahte hai jo ki sabse pehele hai.... toh woh shri Krishna........ wahi krishna ram banke aate hai....... aap yeh mat sochiye ki krishna toh 5000 saal pehele he aaye they....... bhagwan kehte hai geeta mein ki woh shuru se hai...... 5000 saal pehele woh khud he aaye they...... shuru se matlab ki unse pehele kuchh nhi tha aur unke baad kuchh nhi hai..... Yeh srimad bhagwatam ka ek shlok ka link hai aap padh sakte hai vedabase.io/en/library/sb/1/3/28/ Dekhiye sabse simple baat btau...... bhakto ki sangati mein rahiye sab kuchh clear ho jayega sab samjh mein aa jayega..... iskcon se jo jude huye bhakt hai woh iss baat ko bahut acchi tarah se samjhate hai Aap RU-vid channel par bhi dekh sakte hai jaise ki ISKCON DWARKA, ISKCON DELHI, YOGA OF LOVE, MY ASHRAYA, VANIMEDIA MAYAPUR, AMARENDRA DASA OFFICIAL, SIKSHARTHAKAM yeh sab RU-vid channel hai yaha se aapki sabhi confusion durr ho jayegi. Hare Krishna🙏
@@atuldubey129 ye doubt clear karna thodi hua... Ye to ye hua ki aur zyada usi baat Ko suno taki use sach Manne lago. Thoda Lagic se socho... Avtar Vagerah jaisi koi cheez ni hoti . Krishna Manushya the, Pure insan, Hamare aur tumhare jaisi body ke. But Wo ek great, Intelligent aur High value man the, Maha Purush kehlate the... Isliye Unhe Avtar Bata kr Rishiyo ne Bhagwan ka darja de diya.. !!!!! Aur same Kahani Ram Ji ki hai. Wo bhi itne acche the ki Unko Bhagwan Ka avtar bata diya . Bhagwan to Niraakaar hai, but Logo Ko Bina shape and Size, Face, looks, Bina Insab ke Bhagwan Ko imagine karne me, Yad rakhne me dikkat hoti thi.. ab bhi hoti hain... Insan kisse kahani me bada interest leta hai, ye baat Rishiyo ko pata thi, isliye unhone Bhagwan ko Hamare Paas laane ke liye Unhe hamare jaisa hi bana diya.. kabhi Kisi Ko avtar keh diya... Kabhi kisi ko Devta... Kabhi Kuch kabhi kuch.. bahut Diverse Karke chize Batayi gayi hain, badi mehnat se Likha gaya hai sabkuch.. taki log Bhagwan tak Pahuch sake... Murti Pooja, Mandir, Avtaar, saakar roop, Methods of Bhakti, Etc etc, ye sab Bridge Hain Asal Niraakaar Bhagwan tak jaane ka. Kyu ki Asli bhagwan Niraakaar hain, Jo na dikhte hainn, nna unka koi Roop hame pata ho sakta hai.... Naa hi ham Ya koi bhi manav dharti pr janma hua Kabhi Kisi Granth me, Ya purano ki katha me bhagwan ke bare me Likh sakta hai. Ham itne bade nahi huye hain Jo Is Universe ke creator Tak pahch sake. Isliye Wo Hamari Imagination se pare hai.... But ye baat logo ke liye manni difficult hai, pooja karna , aise Bina Roop ke bhagwan ko yad rakhna Difficult hai isliye Rishiyo ne badi mehnat se, shraddha bhaav se Hame kisse kahani, apni Intelligence aur creativity use karke, Imagination use karke itne sare Katha kahani likhe, for ex. Bhagvat puran Me jo kuch hai, sabkuch sach nhi ho sakta practically, waha pe chize exaggerated hain. Badha chadhakr batayi gayi hain. Jinko fact naa maanker Uske piche ka symbol samajhna zaruri hai.... sanatan dharm me, Hindu dharm me Mostly chize Symbolic hain, Sanketic hain unhe As it is nahi lena chahiye, unke hone ke piche ka Purpose samajhna chahiye. Jaise ki Brahma Vishnu Mahesh ekdam imaginary Naam hain, Imaginary hai Sab ke sab, But koi cheez Fact nahi hai iska matlab ye nahi ki wo jhooth h. Ye sab Fact bhale hi na wo par Saty hai , sach hai . Bas thoda indirect hai.
@@AbeKyakarogejaankar aap toh hamare rishi muniyo aur bhagwaan ke bhakto se bhi jyada jante hai aur yeh bhi samjh jaate hai ki woh log kya sochte hai....... aapki sochne ki taakat toh rishi muni aur bhakto se bhi jyada tej hai bhagwaan ke baare mein......🤣
Hamara kitna bada durbhagya hai ki bhagwan ke hi prakat hone ki bhumi me rehkar aur bhagwan ko hi nhi maan rhe ...... western culture destroying today's youth
it doesn't matter if it's mythology or history the only thing that matters is whether it give us a good message or teaching or not it might be any thing
Thoda Lagic se socho... Avtar Vagerah jaisi koi cheez ni hoti . Krishna Manushya the, Pure insan, Hamare aur tumhare jaisi body ke. But Wo ek great, Intelligent aur High value man the, Maha Purush kehlate the... Isliye Unhe Avtar Bata kr Rishiyo ne Bhagwan ka darja de diya.. !!!!! Aur same Kahani Ram Ji ki hai. Wo bhi itne acche the ki Unko Bhagwan Ka avtar bata diya . Bhagwan to Niraakaar hai, but Logo Ko Bina shape and Size, Face, looks, Bina Insab ke Bhagwan Ko imagine karne me, Yad rakhne me dikkat hoti thi.. ab bhi hoti hain... Insan kisse kahani me bada interest leta hai, ye baat Rishiyo ko pata thi, isliye unhone Bhagwan ko Hamare Paas laane ke liye Unhe hamare jaisa hi bana diya.. kabhi Kisi Ko avtar keh diya... Kabhi kisi ko Devta... Kabhi Kuch kabhi kuch.. bahut Diverse Karke chize Batayi gayi hain, badi mehnat se Likha gaya hai sabkuch.. taki log Bhagwan tak Pahuch sake... Murti Pooja, Mandir, Avtaar, saakar roop, Methods of Bhakti, Etc etc, ye sab Bridge Hain Asal Niraakaar Bhagwan tak jaane ka. Kyu ki Asli bhagwan Niraakaar hain, Jo na dikhte hainn, nna unka koi Roop hame pata ho sakta hai.... Naa hi ham Ya koi bhi manav dharti pr janma hua Kabhi Kisi Granth me, Ya purano ki katha me bhagwan ke bare me Likh sakta hai. Ham itne bade nahi huye hain Jo Is Universe ke creator Tak pahch sake. Isliye Wo Hamari Imagination se pare hai.... But ye baat logo ke liye manni difficult hai, pooja karna , aise Bina Roop ke bhagwan ko yad rakhna Difficult hai isliye Rishiyo ne badi mehnat se, shraddha bhaav se Hame kisse kahani, apni Intelligence aur creativity use karke, Imagination use karke itne sare Katha kahani likhe, for ex. Bhagvat puran Me jo kuch hai, sabkuch sach nhi ho sakta practically, waha pe chize exaggerated hain. Badha chadhakr batayi gayi hain. Jinko fact naa maanker Uske piche ka symbol samajhna zaruri hai.... sanatan dharm me, Hindu dharm me Mostly chize Symbolic hain, Sanketic hain unhe As it is nahi lena chahiye, unke hone ke piche ka Purpose samajhna chahiye. Jaise ki Brahma Vishnu Mahesh ekdam imaginary Naam hain, Imaginary hai Sab ke sab, But koi cheez Fact nahi hai iska matlab ye nahi ki wo jhooth h. Ye sab Fact bhale hi na wo par Saty hai , sach hai . Bas thoda indirect hai.
Maine aise bahut engineers dekhe hai ya unke bare me suna hai jinhone engineering ki padhai to ki hai lekin ve engineer nahi balki kuchh aur hai jaise Arvind kejriwal Sudhanshu Trivedi Bahut sare IAS,IPS,IFS,..., Famous politicians MBA students Aur bahut sare 😅😅 Aaj ek itihaaskar vi dekha Just kidding Hare Krishna
